Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Small Fiat-Based Jeep Delayed

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    February 5, 2012

    A new small Jeep has been delayed. According to Automotive News, the new Jeep has been pushed back due to a review of future investments by Fiat.

    The new Jeep, codenamed B-SUV would use Fiat’s new Small Wide platform, which also underpins the new 500L. The model would be placed underneath the Compass and Patriot in Jeep’s lineup.

    Fiat’s plan called on a $1.3 billion expansion of Fiat's Mirafiori plant in Italy to build Jeep and a Fiat version of the B-SUV.. Now, Fiat will begin building their version to replace the Sedici, which is currently based on the Suzuki SX4. Production of the Fiat model will begin sometime in 2013, while the Jeep will begin a year later.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I'm wondering where the next Liberty is going to go...they should bring back the Cherokee name (as the Liberty is called outside NA), IMO.

    It's going to be much more of a soft roader than the current KK model. For starters, two-wheel drive models will be front-wheel drive instead of rear-drive. That's understandable since it'll be based on the CUSW Plus platform. Four-wheel drive models will have a setup similar to the Freedom Drive II system on the MK Jeeps, so that means no two-speed transfer case ... or a transfer case at all, for that matter.

    There are rumors that the next-gen Liberty will carry the Cherokee moniker, but I'm personally not betting money on it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm wondering where the next Liberty is going to go...they should bring back the Cherokee name (as the Liberty is called outside NA), IMO.

    It's going to be much more of a soft roader than the current KK model. For starters, two-wheel drive models will be front-wheel drive instead of rear-drive. That's understandable since it'll be based on the CUSW Plus platform. Four-wheel drive models will have a setup similar to the Freedom Drive II system on the MK Jeeps, so that means no two-speed transfer case ... or a transfer case at all, for that matter.

    Ick...I was thinking maybe they would do something like a cut down Grand Cherokee platform...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not a fan of the current compass / patriot. Both are ugly and cheap feeling and looking inside. They need to be replaced with much better vehicles.

    I have to disagree with you. I came within inches of buying a 2007 Freedom Drive I Patriot Sport and while I did think the interior plastics were a little flimsy and lined with razor blades, the design was nice and functional with okay panel tolerances. Newer models have much better interior materials, so any complaints about the plastics are now moot. While I have never been a fan of the Compass' design, I don't see what's wrong with the Patriot. If you liked the old XJ Cherokee then there's a lot to like about the Patriot's styling.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If anyone needs a good indicator of what this upcoming Jeep will amount to, read up on the old JJ program. Call it a hunch, but I don't think this new "small" Jeep will have a Trail Rated offering.

    jj.jpg

    Ick...I was thinking maybe they would do something like a cut down Grand Cherokee platform...

    While that would prove to make a more capable and much better Liberty, the old SJ (Wagoneer), XJ (Cherokee), ZJ (Grand Cherokee), and WJ (GC 2nd-gen) Jeeps would still leave it in the dust off-road. It certainly wouldn't touch a CJ, TJ, and YJ Wrangler or even the JK Wrangler off-road, either.

    There's no denying it, Jeep has slowly been going soft over the years after the Daimler buyout. It started with the KJ Liberty then the WK Grand Cherokee. Solid front axles were thrown out the window along with the simple, durable, and lightweight QuadraLink suspension in favor of independent front-suspensions. They had absolutely no good reason for the switch either. Sure, some ignorant reviewers in the automotive media bitched about how "old tech" they both seemed on paper, but then again at the same time no one -- auto journalist, consumer, or otherwise -- was really complaining about how a XJ Cherokee or WJ Grand Cherokee handled on-road. No one also denied the fact they handled far better than other SUVs in their class.

    That all also begs the question: who in the hell buys a Jeep for its on-road behavior anyway? A traditional Jeep's on-road behavior didn't stop hundreds of thousands of owners of mega-dollar luxury cars from parking a Grand Wagoneer in their garage in the 1980s. If it was good enough for someone who drove an 300SEL, then I fail to see the problem.

    There's also no denying that there was nothing wrong with the old 4 liter inline-six. Instead of replacing it with the questionable Power Tech 3.7 V6 and that old boat-anchor they took out of the minivans, they should have just engineered a new motor with the 4.0's block as a starting point.

    I'll also say this right here and right now, the JK Wrangler is a slightly overweight caracature of the old YJ and TJ Wrangler. I know I've said before that it's the only industrial-strength Jeep left and I stand by that statement (it's for sure the only Jeep left that's capable of taking any terrain you can throw at it), but I can't deny the old YJ and TJ were much, much more involving to drive and far less forgiving.

    I remember driving a 2003 TJ Wrangler with the 4.0L I-6 and a five-speed row-your-own once and it was and still is the most involving four-by-four I've ever driven by far. It's always communicating to you, always demanding your attention. You can feel the engine working in front of the transmission in a TJ, all of the cogs meshing into one another when you change gear, the clutch engaging and disengaging with every up and down shift. When you don't disengage the clutch perfectly in a TJ, it'll tell you so. A TJ's firm suspension isn't punishing, but it's always letting you know through the seat of your pants what road surface you're driving on. A brand-new JK is so civilized in comparison it's almost apathetic. You don't have the same man-and-machine relationship in the JK like you do in the TJ.

    Don't get me wrong, though. I think an all-season, fuel-efficient, four-cylinder Jeep runabout like the MK Patriot is a fine and perfectly needed addition to the Jeep line-up. But that doesn't mean Jeep should offer medium, large, and extra large sizes in it.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ..

    . Sure, some ignorant reviewers in the automotive media bitched about how "old tech" they seemed on paper, but then again no one -- auto journalist, consumer, or otherwise -- was really complaining about how a XJ Cherokee or WJ Grand Cherokee handled on-road. No one also denied the fact they handled far better than other SUVs in their class.

    True enough...I've always thought my WJ drives quite nicely on-road for a 4x4, much better than the '96 Explorer Sport my Mom had or the '99 Explorer Eddie Bauer my sister had back in '00 when I bought my GC, and infinitely better than my old Bronco II did.. I never cared for the WK generation w/ it's blocky shape and violently cheap interior trim. The WK2, on the other hand, :wub:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will say that for the 4 years I owned my Sahara edition wrangler from 94 to 98, the on road manners were more than fine, it was easy to drive with excellent feedback of the road to the driver and I never felt the inline 6 engine or 5 speed tranny was lacking. Off road that baby went everywhere.

    Jeep needs a Patriot and Compass, but I doubt like others have stated here that they need to soften up the rest of the auto's.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • This looks so freakin great.  
    • Well kids, today's lesson is: Just buy the effing tool you need. Last weekend I took the R1100RS out on the longest ride I've been on with it. A total of 5 hours of wandering. Even with 109k miles on it, this bike just loves to chew up highway. The engine runs superbly.  I was really trying to burn off gas that's been in the tank a little long for comfort, but even with 5 hours of riding, I have more than half a tank left! No issues on the trip except I noticed that the right fork was leaking oil.  These are telelever forks that don't actually have any suspension components in them. The shock and spring are mounted on a cantilever platform between the forks.  Essentially, all the forks do is slide up and down and keep the wheel aligned. When I got back from the trip, I ordered a set of fork seals and picked up fork oil. Watched a few videos on the process and decided I was set. ALL of the videos suggested that I could get the oil seal out with a flat head screwdriver. Both my Haynes manual and the BMW service manual I have said to use an oil seal remover tool. You can see where this is going. I effed with that oil seal for a good hour with a flat head, some long needle nose pliers, even some plastic bodywork tools I have before I gave up and drove to Harbor Freight.  Harbor Freight has an Oil Seal Removal tool for $7.99.  I got that and a few other things that I decided I might need to try also. Got home and with the tool I had the oil seal out in 15 seconds. . I replaced the seals, topped it off with some fresh fork oil, and had it back together faster than the time I spent just trying to get the damn seal out. So, moral of the story is: Just buy the damn tool.
    • Based on the pictures, it would appear what went into the EV9 has been pushed out to the other EVs in Hyundai and Genesis based on the pictures. If so, then a decent set of physical switches for the most common features and a very user-friendly thought-out interface imho. I like this new updated design much better than generation 1. I am very excited to see what comes of the next 18 months. Seems to be a weird assortment of some companies are investing in the U.S. to ensure market share gain and production with minimal tariff affect like the 21 billion Kia/Hyundai/Genesis are investing and then others are cancelling plants like Ford and GM. Then you have the Europeans that have come out and stated they will have a Tariff line cost on each auto now with no changes in production as I think they are figuring 47 could be gone soon based on recent video of him and his leg dragging, slurring of speech and freezing in talking and someone else will have common sense to set fair trade negotiations and balance the craziness out.
    • My main question is if they improved the center console.  I really like the Ioniq 6, but the center console of the interior was such a huge miss in terms of material quality and construction that it killed the car for me. It was odd that given the level of quality in the rest of the interior that one of the most touched items in the car outside of the steering wheel was an obvious afterthought to the design team.
    • Interesting read, I have to agree that the writer hits a number of solid points as to why the whole Tariff mess actually will help EVs as ICE dies. Why EV-hating Trump has accidentally driven the final nail in the coffin of gas cars Interesting read and I can see dealerships ripping up current unsigned contracts to reap bigger profits on autos on the lot now before the more expensive ones show up. US consumers rush to buy big-ticket items before Trump's tariffs kick in
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search