Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Trump's Tariff Threat Turned Out To Be A Farce

      ...the "deal" was made months ago...

    The tariffs that Trump had threatened to impose on Mexico starting June 10th will not be going on to effect.  Trump tweeted out that Mexico had made concessions to deploy their newly formed Nation Guard to their own southern border and that it only took two days for Mexico to bend to Trump's demands.   This is false.

    The truth, according to a report in the New York Times is that Mexico had already agreed to do that back in March 2019 during secret talks between the (at the time) Director of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and the Mexican Secretary of Interior Olga Sanchez. Further, Trump claimed a victory via his tariff efforts saying that he had reached an agreement that Mexico would hold more asylum-seekers on the Mexican side of the border while the U.S. processes their cases.  The timing of this is also false.  The agreement was already reached at the same meeting in March.   Where Trump failed was in getting Mexico to accept a "Safe Third Country" treaty that would have given the U.S. the ability to reject asylum seekers if they had not first sought asylum in Mexico. 

    In opposition to the tariffs was many Senators from Trump's own party, including the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who said, "There is not much support in my conference for tariffs, that's for sure". Many in the GOP were whispering that the Senate was going to pass a resolution disapproving of the tariffs, causing embarrassment for Trump and making him look weak.  Most likely that whispering got to Trump himself and so then he laid claim to the previously agreed "concessions" from Mexico in order to save face and drop the tariff while claiming victory. 

    Many business leaders too were calling for relief from the tariffs, the auto industry would have been hit especially hard with a significant number of components passing over the border multiple times.  

    Below is a list of vehicles that are currently assembled in Mexico for U.S. consumption:

    Audi Q5
    BMW 3-series
    Chevrolet Blazer
    Chevrolet Cruze
    Chevrolet Equinox
    Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab
    Chevrolet Trax
    Dodge Journey
    Fiat 500
    Ford Fusion
    Ford Transit Connect
    GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab
    GMC Terrain (certain models)
    Honda Fit
    Honda HR-V
    Hyundai Accent
    Infiniti QX50
    Jeep Compass
    Kia Forte
    Kia Rio
    Lincoln MKZ
    Mazda 3
    Mercedes-Benz A-class
    Nissan Frontier (certain models)
    Nissan Kicks
    Nissan Sentra
    Nissan Versa
    Nissan Versa Note
    Nissan NV200 Cargo
    Ram 1500 Regular Cab
    Ram 2500/3500/4500/5500
    Ram ProMaster
    Toyota Tacoma
    Toyota Yaris
    Volkswagen Beetle
    Volkswagen Golf
    Volkswagen Golf SportWagen
    Volkswagen Jetta
    Volkswagen Tiguan

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

     

    Yes, when you read the story I at least took it to be the Percent of the Tariff applied to the cost of the product. Yet with that said, I can totally understand that without a clear statement of what that number means it would be confusing for people. I have actually reached out to the writer of the story to ask him for clarification of those numbers. Will post the reply once I hear back.

    Thank you both ?

    What kind of rookie doesn't label their graphs?!? 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    What kind of rookie doesn't label their graphs?!? 

    well, 100 units is bigger than 50 units, or 30 units.  That much is clear.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    well, 100 units is bigger than 50 units, or 30 units.  That much is clear.

    It doesn't even state units. There's zero label. It could be deaths. It could be births. It could be any variety of things and it should be pretty basic reporting to include labels. Having accurate graphs that aren't misleading in anyway can only builds their reputation.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    It doesn't even state units. There's zero label. It could be deaths. It could be births. It could be any variety of things and it should be pretty basic reporting to include labels. Having accurate graphs that aren't misleading in anyway can only builds their reputation.

    It's units of something, and 100 > 50. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    We should dynamite mount Rushmore, it is a moral and visual desecration to a sacred Indian mountain.  Making it in the first place was wrong, keeping it there is wrong also. Dynamite for the win. The sooner the better.

    This...I did NOT know.

    I was always in awe of Mount Rushmore, but learning this about it being sculpted on sacred Indigenous Native American land...I all of a sudden view it in a different light. 

     

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, oldshurst442 said:

    This...I did NOT know.

    I was always in awe of Mount Rushmore, but learning this about it being sculpted on sacred Indigenous Native American land...I all of a sudden view it in a different light. 

     

    They say it was done to hide sacred Indian locations, so who knows maybe National Treasure is right, hidden city of gold? ?‍♂️

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @ocnblu   @Drew Dowdell

    Why you laughing Blu?   (plus all the downvoting you do when somebody mentions THEIR opinion on politics that is different from yours yet you dont offer anything of value...just dumb rhetoric...as if you are knowledgeable on the subjects...) 

    The massacre of Natives is funny to you?

    Why?

    You think its because it happened in the past that we should all just ignore history?

    Because you think it wasnt you personally that harmed Natives that somehow its all good now?

    Greeks were slaves to the Turks for 400 years during that horrid Ottoman Empire.  Every March 21, Greeks celebrate their FREEDOM (Its called their Independence Day...but THAT is false...Greece was ALWAYS independent...we FREED ourselves)

    Greeks dont EVER want to forget that...and for you...that would be stupid, right?

    In THIS situation....we want the Natives to just go away?  Because your laughy thingy says exactly THAT to me...

    How does that work?  How does that work in the eyes and skin of a Native? 

    Its easy for Greece and Greeks to start moving on from that past as the Ottoman Empire is no longer around....yet it still is...Constantinople and Cyprus is a very harsh reminder, but at least the main mainland Greece...Greece gets to be HELLENIC.

    In North America...the Natives see their land STILL being occupied bu NON Natives...and YOU have the AUDACITY to laugh?

    You know...politics is a strange animal...

    Politics involves EVERYTHING we do in our CIVIC lives.  

    But, some aspects of politics is very human related. And when we are so IGNORANT on the plight of peoples because of our PAST politics and just want it to go away...well...

    You know Blu...I COULD discuss cars with you...its fun...but you are one very IGNORANT individual with everything else...

    I for one...will vote NOT to have a political forum open for us to discuss....

    Not for me...for YOU...

    Im embarrassed for you and your ignorance... 

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Sad 1
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, Trump could change his mind tomorrow about that.....

    But let me be real (and respectful) for a moment. Most of the people in this thread (and forum) and definitely not Trump suppporters. So no matter what, it does make it hard to have a civil conversation at times. Ocn is in that minority, and I can see at times why he does lash out. Whether we agree with Trump or not, I try to respect the fact that people support him, even if I might not agree with the reasons. It’s simply how I keep my friends in real life, facebook, or even here. You guys are my friends, not always for your opinions, but our love of the same things. ?  While he might not agree on politics, pretty sure most of us would not say no to a nice 55 Chevy (or maybe a new Corvette). I think a politics section would work fine is long as we can ask the question: why? Otherwise, it simply turns into petty issues.....

     

    Adding to the topic quickly, I can say he (Trump)is quite good at the dog and pony show..... ? One of the best showboaters.......

    Edited by daves87rs
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    tear-indian-ad-pollution.png

    And continuing to offer nothing of substance and supporting the narrative that some folks kind handle political discussion. 

     

    Honestly blu, it’s pretty pathetic at this point yet also a pretty typical response since you have offered nothing here but snarky remarks and down votes because there are thoughts and words here that don’t line up with yours. 

     

    Cry me a river indeed. 

     

    And they call liberals “snowflakes”. 

    57 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    Well, Trump could change his mind tomorrow about that.....

    But let me be real (and respectful) for a moment. Most of the people in this thread (and forum) and definitely not Trump suppporters. So no matter what, it does make it hard to have a civil conversation at times. Ocn is in that minority, and I can see at times why he does lash out. Whether we agree with Trump or not, I try to respect the fact that people support him, even if I might not agree with the reasons. It’s simply how I keep my friends in real life, facebook, or even here. You guys are my friends, not always for your opinions, but our love of the same things. ?  While he might not agree on politics, pretty sure most of us would not say no to a nice 55 Chevy (or maybe a new Corvette). I think a politics section would work fine is long as we can ask the question: why? Otherwise, it simply turns into petty issues.....

     

    Adding to the topic quickly, I can say he (Trump)is quite good at the dog and pony show..... ? One of the best showboaters.......

    I have no problem if someone is a Trump supporter. The problem is when they offer no real argument to defend their position or anything else that would reasonably explain his policies and actions. They come off as echo chambers or deflect to things like Hillary or Obama (a tactic already used by one Trump supporter here). Deflection is not debating or discussing and that is pretty much all Blu has offered on this thread. Might as well be talking about EVs at this point because it’s pretty much the same behavior. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Up votes & down votes aren’t actually a real thing. IMO a downvote is simply pause to reflect on what I said as opposed to what I think the voter felt. I’m probably not going to change their opinion, but I might change mine if I came to a different conclusion/ had different information.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am not one to harp and harp and harp.  My opinions should be clear.  I vote no on a re-opening of the politics section... simply because the two opposing camps are not treated equally by the site owner... when you have an uphill battle to remain balanced and fair, of course those who think like me would vote NO.

     

    As far as the Italian-American who posed as an oppressed Native, and whose famous commercial was sponsored by entities who advocated for single-use beverage containers, I shed no tears for him.  The commercial duped millions of Americans.  He was like the Elizabeth Warren of environmental causes.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @ocnblu So then this is fake news to you.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/trump-campaign-cutting-ties-pollsters-after-internal-numbers-leaked-n1017991

    Yet incompetence in leading our country and trade has led other countries to now impose tariffs on us.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/06/16/trade-war-india-hits-u-s-more-tariffs/1471140001/

    Apple Exports hit with 70% Tariff and now exports will die off on top of many other things we export out of the country.

    Get ready for Depression 2 coming and this is truly all Trump.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    “Can’t handle” not “kind handle”. 

     

    Thanks a lot autocorrect. 

    1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

    I am not one to harp and harp and harp.  My opinions should be clear.  I vote no on a re-opening of the politics section... simply because the two opposing camps are not treated equally by the site owner... when you have an uphill battle to remain balanced and fair, of course those who think like me would vote NO.

     

    As far as the Italian-American who posed as an oppressed Native, and whose famous commercial was sponsored by entities who advocated for single-use beverage containers, I shed no tears for him.  The commercial duped millions of Americans.  He was like the Elizabeth Warren of environmental causes.

    Like you said, cry me a river. If the site owner were a Trump supporter, you’d be singing a vastly different tune. It’s also funny that you assume that those who “think” like you would share the same opinion as you regarding political discussion. I personally know plenty of Trump supporters who have no problem with it so maybe the problem is just you and your personal hang ups.

     

    And while you berate Warren (who I don’t care for at all) you would openly ignore all of Trump false representations of himself. 

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Up votes & down votes aren’t actually a real thing. IMO a downvote is simply pause to reflect on what I said as opposed to what I think the voter felt. I’m probably not going to change their opinion, but I might change mine if I came to a different conclusion/ had different information.

    Oh I agree but in the context of what I’m saying, it perfectly reflects the inability to have a open dialogue with said person who just bitches about not getting his fair shake on this site, politically speaking which quite frankly is a cop out. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Whatever do you mean by "now"??

    Correct, we have always had countries that have added Tariffs to protect their local competitors. Yet a country has dropped Tariffs like India did once we had a signed trade agreement. 

    Then Idiot in Office for no reason other than to complain about H1 visa's as too many workers coming here for jobs and with throwing away a signed agreement opens up a trade war with another country.

    The bully on the playground has never been a win long term for anyone.

    Unhappy with certain trade aspects, sit down like adults and discuss it rather than throw a tantrum. This tantrum administration has already destroyed America in the eyes of Billions around the world and not gained us anything.

    • Agree 2
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    when you have an uphill battle to remain balanced and fair,

    You...have NEVER remained balanced and fair...

    But...Its OK...we have common ground as I too, dont want a political forum opened up...

    Why?

    Because YOU have proven even with EVs....that YOU REFUSE to have ANY discussion.

    One small example.

    I once mentioned that I see  5 different Tesla Model 3s daily...

    YOU immediately scoffed at that.  

    I proceeded to explain to you why in Quebec Tesla has no problem in selling cars and I proceeded to explain to you why EVs, not just Tesla cars, will be a major force in Quebec in the very near future.

    YOU...then...just short of calling me a liar...dont believe me. YOU will NOT listen to me whatever I say....

    I not here to change your mind...

    But at the same time...YOU ONLY have YOUR ways off thinking and WILL NEVER budge on ANYTHING...

    While YOU EXPECT EVERYBODY ELSE to cater to YOUR whims...

    4 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    simply because the two opposing camps are not treated equally by the site owner... when you have an uphill battle to remain balanced and fair, of course those who think like me would vote NO.

     

    THIS post is PROOF positive of what Im talking about...

    YOU dont treat ANYBODY equally that opposes YOUR view...

    What uphill battle?

    A discussion?

    A discussion that PROVES your logic is flawed?

    YOU dont believe me that Quebec is a strong EV market...

    I even TELL you why...

    I, on the other hand...UNDERSTAND why in YOUR area EVs may NEVER take-off...

    But YOU will NEVER be able to SEE what is in MY NECK OF THE WOODS and YOU REFUSE to ACCEPT what I tell you...

    YOU FLAT OUT TREAT ME LIKE A BULLSHYTER!!! 

    SO... STOP THE CRYING!!!

     

     

     

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Correct, we have always had countries that have added Tariffs to protect their local competitors.

    Did they sit down with us & discuss the matter like adults?
    Has the "long term" run out for China and are they 'losing' now?

    Or still 'winning'??

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You want more proof @ocnblu?

    On 6/11/2019 at 5:48 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    This...I did NOT know.

    I was always in awe of Mount Rushmore, but learning this about it being sculpted on sacred Indigenous Native American land...I all of a sudden view it in a different light. 

    This post here...that I wrote is neither positive nor negative.

    That post that I wrote shows NO leanings of how I feel about Mount Rushmore, Natives, and Americans past and/or present...

    YOU took it personal and laughed at it...(then I took it personal because I SAW RIGHT THROUGH YOU!!!)

    THIS is the equality YOU are talking about???!!!

    I am STILL in awe with Mount Rushmore...

    I did NOT know it was built on sacred Native land...

    I respect history...all MY post said...all I wanted to state, is that NOW, I will be a even more sensitive to Native American history...hence I will be viewing it in a different light...

    NOW...I am MORE knowledgeable about what is what...

    hence why I ranted....this post...

    On 6/15/2019 at 7:47 AM, oldshurst442 said:

    Its easy for Greece and Greeks to start moving on from that past as the Ottoman Empire is no longer around....yet it still is...Constantinople and Cyprus is a very harsh reminder, but at least the main mainland Greece...Greece gets to be HELLENIC.

    In North America...the Natives see their land STILL being occupied bu NON Natives...and YOU have the AUDACITY to laugh?

    And why I called YOU up on it...

    On 6/15/2019 at 7:47 AM, oldshurst442 said:

    The massacre of Natives is funny to you?

    Why?

    You think its because it happened in the past that we should all just ignore history?

    Because you think it wasnt you personally that harmed Natives that somehow its all good now?

    Greeks were slaves to the Turks for 400 years during that horrid Ottoman Empire.  Every March 21, Greeks celebrate their FREEDOM (Its called their Independence Day...but THAT is false...Greece was ALWAYS independent...we FREED ourselves)

    Greeks dont EVER want to forget that...and for you...that would be stupid, right?

    In THIS situation....we want the Natives to just go away?  Because your laughy thingy says exactly THAT to me...

    How does that work?  How does that work in the eyes and skin of a Native? 

    Especially the bolded part...

     You dont see a pattern here?

    You think Im lying to you about how I feel?

    The pattern is this:

    History was NOT kind to the Natives...

    I am SENSITIVE to that fact...I COULD relate because the Ottoman Empire was not kind to Greece and Greece lost a lot of land to Turkey...yeah...like the Natives...

    I do NOT EVER want forget and ignore history...seems like YOU want to brush  this under the rug...

    and then what do you do?

    You put the blame on others...

    Did YOU treat me as an equal?

    Did YOU actually understand what I wrote?

    OF COURSE NOT!!!

    CRY ME A RIVER IS WHAT YOU WROTE!!!!

    Which I already KNEW your response...

    I wrote this before YOU wrote cry me a river...because I KNOW you dont care...I KNOW YOU WILL NOT LISTEN NOR CHANGE YOUR IGNORANT WAYS!!!

    On 6/15/2019 at 7:47 AM, oldshurst442 said:

    Why?

    You think its because it happened in the past that we should all just ignore history?

    Because you think it wasnt you personally that harmed Natives that somehow its all good now?

    Greeks were slaves to the Turks for 400 years during that horrid Ottoman Empire.  Every March 21, Greeks celebrate their FREEDOM (Its called their Independence Day...but THAT is false...Greece was ALWAYS independent...we FREED ourselves)

    Greeks dont EVER want to forget that...and for you...that would be stupid, right?

    In THIS situation....we want the Natives to just go away?  Because your laughy thingy says exactly THAT to me...

    How does that work?  How does that work in the eyes and skin of a Native? 

    Its easy for Greece and Greeks to start moving on from that past as the Ottoman Empire is no longer around....yet it still is...Constantinople and Cyprus is a very harsh reminder, but at least the main mainland Greece...Greece gets to be HELLENIC.

    In North America...the Natives see their land STILL being occupied bu NON Natives...and YOU have the AUDACITY to laugh?

     

    So yeah...I am embarrassed for YOU, my friend... 

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    I never said you willfully lied about anything, dear boy.

     

    Quote

     

    willfully lied...

     

    Even in THAT response... you are condescending...if it aint laughy things, its downvotes...whatever the case may be...you try to put doubt towards what the other guy is saying to you...instead of back and forth banter...instead of exchanging ideas...

    WILLFULLY...

    Meaning...my posts are not accurate no matter what.   I aint lying...its just that I think Im saying the truth.   Is what you want to imply, right?    Instead of actually pondering what the other guy is saying to you, you IMMEDIATELY dismiss and CLOSE yourself to your own world!!!

    THAT is why YOU can and NEVER be able to discuss ANYTHING political......  YOU choose to NOT accept ANY ideas that are presented to you...

    Not me, not everyone else.  YOU.

    THIS,  is on you!!! 

     

     

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think if you guys haven’t seen Ocn is just rattling your cages, I’m not honestly sure what to tell you. On my other car sites, when someone says something not well liked, they just get ignored....and either it stops or they get blocked.

    Oh, I remember those old internet days, epic car battles and trolling-I could always imagine folks darn near typing their keyboards in anger..(kinda like facebook now. ? )

    Myself I am a pretty calm and open minded guy- but their are times when an epic troll is needed.... ? 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Did they sit down with us & discuss the matter like adults?
    Has the "long term" run out for China and are they 'losing' now?

    Or still 'winning'??

    We need to be the adults in the room. Open to discuss what that would actually look like.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    At times it feels like the US is chained to China’s radiator & getting beaten regularly & for years. We’ve had numerous ‘adult’ negotiations, but we’re still in economic shackles. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    At times it feels like the US is chained to China’s radiator & getting beaten regularly & for years. We’ve had numerous ‘adult’ negotiations, but we’re still in economic shackles. 

    We'll Posted, I would agree that while we need adult cool level head discussions, we seem to give more than we get in return.

    As one who is college educated in Japan, I can tell you they never say no to your face, but are very business hard negotiators. We need to take the same attitude with Japan, Korea, China, and India. But rather than throw away current trade agreements and this tariff war, we need to take an educated brain approach in pointing out the areas that are unfair and way we view it as unfair and what we feel needs to be done to BALANCE that unfair trade aspect.

    Communication using our educated knowledge is the great tool to balance our Multicultural society I believe.

    1 minute ago, ocnblu said:

    It is about time we have someone in there that actually sees this and has the gumption to do something.  We've been the world's piggy bank for WAY too long.

    +1 Zillion! Well said, we need an educated adult with a proper balance of real business knowledge to take our trade agreements and negotiate those aspects that are out of balance with fair proper notification and set dates of when needed tariffs that make products from that place and here equal to each other.

    Perfect example of wasted billions is our defense spending on guarding the oil tankers from the arab countries that go to other countries with no benefit to us. Our cost of giving protection from pirates and hostile countries but nothing that actually covers that cost. Have them pay us to offer protection or supply it themselves.

    Thank you,

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For those that like to read well documented information from our own academia, then this is a great read with excellent sources:

    https://taxfoundation.org/impact-of-tariffs-free-trade/

    Impact of Trade and Tariffs on the United States Graph

    I really like this report and the hard facts they have of going back so far.

    Quote:

    Academic studies have quantified the costs of tariffs and shown that tariffs often fail to achieve their objectives.[19] A comprehensive study of tariffs in place in 1990 found that the annual consumer costs per American job “saved” range from $100,000 to over $1 million, with an average of $170,000.[20] More recently, a study analyzing the 2002 steel tariffs imposed by the George W. Bush administration found that the first year the tariffs were in effect, more American workers lost their jobs due to higher steel prices (200,000) than the total number employed by the steel industry itself at the time (187,500).[21]

    These results aren’t unique to the 2002 steel tariffs. A Congressional Budget Office report from 1986 reviewed the effects of protectionist policies covering textiles and apparel, steel, footwear, and automobiles. The policies did effectively increase costs, which resulted in slightly higher profits for the firms. However, the report finds, “In none of the cases studied was protection sufficient to revitalize the affected industry.”[22]

    The outcomes of past protectionist policies indicate that protectionism simply does not work. Any potential short-term benefits of using protectionist policies to shield domestic industries from foreign competition come at the expense of others in the economy; the consequences are higher prices, less efficient resource allocation, and job losses throughout other sectors, and in the long run, failure to help the intended beneficiaries.

    Another Quote:

    For example, according to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth model, President Trump’s proposal to raise taxes by approximately $37.5 billion annually (by levying a 25 percent tariff on $150 billion worth of Chinese imports) would reduce the long-run level of GDP by 0.1 percent, or about $20 billion.[34] The smaller economy would result in 0.1 percent lower wages and 79,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The tariffs will also make the U.S. tax code less progressive because the increased tax burden would fall hardest on lower- and middle-income households.[35]

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    We'll Posted, I would agree that while we need adult cool level head discussions, we seem to give more than we get in return.

    As one who is college educated in Japan, I can tell you they never say no to your face, but are very business hard negotiators. We need to take the same attitude with Japan, Korea, China, and India. But rather than throw away current trade agreements and this tariff war, we need to take an educated brain approach in pointing out the areas that are unfair and way we view it as unfair and what we feel needs to be done to BALANCE that unfair trade aspect.

    Communication using our educated knowledge is the great tool to balance our Multicultural society I believe.

    +1 Zillion! Well said, we need an educated adult with a proper balance of real business knowledge to take our trade agreements and negotiate those aspects that are out of balance with fair proper notification and set dates of when needed tariffs that make products from that place and here equal to each other.

    Perfect example of wasted billions is our defense spending on guarding the oil tankers from the arab countries that go to other countries with no benefit to us. Our cost of giving protection from pirates and hostile countries but nothing that actually covers that cost. Have them pay us to offer protection or supply it themselves.

    Thank you,

    I’d like to add the sale of over $100,000,000 worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia, a “deal” orchestrated by the master negotiator and the same country committing atrocities in Yemen who pretends to be our “ally” but really isn’t (reference 9/11 and the recent murder of a Wash Po journalist as examples of this allied farce). Guess we will always have North Korea though right? Oh wait. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Narrator: This is false. 

    LOL after all the anti-Trump posts in random (not even a whiff of "political" anywhere else) threads are left up on the boards after being reported?  Riiiiight...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    LOL after all the anti-Trump posts in random (not even a whiff of "political" anywhere else) threads are left up on the boards after being reported?  Riiiiight...

    I left your anti-Warren stuff up too.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Quote

    A comprehensive study of tariffs in place in 1990 found that the annual consumer costs per American job “saved” range from $100,000 to over $1 million, with an average of $170,000.

    If taxes (which a tariff is on imported, non-jurisdictional commerce) "cost" American jobs, why not reduce ALL U.S .taxes across the board by a tangible amount? Make unemployment 0% and pull more workers in from those who dropped out of looking for work (some 60 million).

     

    Quote

    The outcomes of past protectionist policies indicate that protectionism simply does not work.

    So protectionism simply does not work for China? How the hell else has that country risen so far so fast?

    These 'blinders-on' "comprehensive analysis's" seemingly always fail to look at the broader picture, and commonly invoke singular examples especially suited to support a POV (the steel industry- one whose health began to be chipped away at by China (chiefly) DECADES before 2002. 'Didn't save the industry' = too little too late). 

     

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, balthazar said:

     

    If taxes (which a tariff is on imported, non-jurisdictional commerce) "cost" American jobs, why not reduce ALL U.S .taxes across the board by a tangible amount? Make unemployment 0% and pull more workers in from those who dropped out of looking for work (some 60 million).

     

    So protectionism simply does not work for China? How the hell else has that country risen so far so fast?

    These 'blinders-on' "comprehensive analysis's" seemingly always fail to look at the broader picture, and commonly invoke singular examples especially suited to support a POV (the steel industry- one whose health began to be chipped away at by China (chiefly) DECADES before 2002. 'Didn't save the industry' = too little too late). 

     

    Valid points, one thing that is also missed here is that as a country becomes more educated the manual labor of jobs is less desired, less wanted. Those jobs tend to move to places with a much less educated workforce also.

    It would be interesting to compare the % of labors in China to their college educated workforce and compare that to America.

    Jobs and type of work desired changes over time, this leads to people not wanting to do work in those fields and if you cannot find workers locally, you move the work elsewhere that has a labor pool.

    The ability to have 0% unemployment will never happen even in a perfect society, there are always lazy people who do not want to work, but are happy to lay around and barely survive off a government hand out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    LOL after all the anti-Trump posts in random (not even a whiff of "political" anywhere else) threads are left up on the boards after being reported?  Riiiiight...

    What you called “anti-Trump” posts, sensible folks call “pointing out facts”. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 3
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, balthazar said:

    At times it feels like the US is chained to China’s radiator & getting beaten regularly & for years. We’ve had numerous ‘adult’ negotiations, but we’re still in economic shackles. 

    And its getting worse all of the time. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, balthazar said:

     

    If taxes (which a tariff is on imported, non-jurisdictional commerce) "cost" American jobs, why not reduce ALL U.S .taxes across the board by a tangible amount? Make unemployment 0% and pull more workers in from those who dropped out of looking for work (some 60 million).

     

    So protectionism simply does not work for China? How the hell else has that country risen so far so fast?

    These 'blinders-on' "comprehensive analysis's" seemingly always fail to look at the broader picture, and commonly invoke singular examples especially suited to support a POV (the steel industry- one whose health began to be chipped away at by China (chiefly) DECADES before 2002. 'Didn't save the industry' = too little too late). 

     

    China’s protectionism is not the only reason why China has been successful of the trade front. Having the largest labor force in the world is a much bigger factor. Protectionism has proven to be a failure in this country is all I know and the 1930s prove that. China manages to get away with the policy because of many other factors. Remove even half of that labor force and it’s protectionism practices would simply self destruct, just like ours did in the 30s. There are other factors to this but the labor force size was the first to come to my mind. 

    One positive thing we should take from China is reinvesting in ourselves, like fixing and upgrading our infrastructure. I fear, however, that infrastructure week has passed us by for now. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    It is about time we have someone in there that actually sees this and has the gumption to do something.  We've been the world's piggy bank for WAY too long.

    I actually agree with this sentiment entirely. 

    22 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    China’s protectionism is not the only reason why China has been successful of the trade front. Having the largest labor force in the world is a much bigger factor. Protectionism has proven to be a failure in this country is all I know and the 1930s prove that. China manages to get away with the policy because of many other factors. Remove even half of that labor force and it’s protectionism practices would simply self destruct, just like ours did in the 30s. There are other factors to this but the labor force size was the first to come to my mind. 

    One positive thing we should take from China is reinvesting in ourselves, like fixing and upgrading our infrastructure. I fear, however, that infrastructure week has passed us by for now. 

    China is also not spending crap tons of money on war, like we have in Iraq and Afghanistan, and soon to be Iran. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    I actually agree with this sentiment entirely. 

    China is also not spending crap tons of money on war, like we have in Iraq and Afghanistan, and soon to be Iran. 

    Kind of my point. Military spending is over half our yearly budget while our roads, bridges, transportation, schools, and healthcare needs go to pot. Sadly I don’t see it changing anytime soon. Too many big players in the war business.

     

    Oh and while we do need to address the piggy bank situation, we should also address so much of our money being in our peoples piggy banks (like China and Japan, two of our biggest debt holders). It certainly goes both ways.

     

    @ocnblu-Debate the facts you seem in such a rush to down vote. It’s not that hard really. Or maybe it’s because you can’t really debate the facts. Who knows because you’ve never said. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Kind of my point. Military spending is over half our yearly budget while our roads, bridges, transportation, schools, and healthcare needs go to pot. Sadly I don’t see it changing anytime soon. Too many big players in the war business.

    So True, the 1% of War machine could care less about the rest of the country. We are spending Billions protecting Arab Oil going to countries we see as Enemies, aka China, North Korea, and Russia. Why are we paying for this oil protection and not the Arabs?

    If we took a balanced budget and lived within that budget like we did under Clinton in the 90's and reduced Defense around the world and spent that money from Foreign bases we really do not need to US Infrastructure we would be stronger and better off for it.

    101 of basic investing is to pay yourself first, then your bills. Invest in oneself makes one stronger and not open to manipulation. Currently the US is on track to be a Debtor nation not a 1st world super power.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Very cool read and video on how Tires are made. Where Are Michelin Tires Made And Who Owns The Brand?
    • This is an interesting read. Korea is the only country with EVs that are head-to-head with China and in some ways better. This nanotube technology will allow Korea to move way farther forward than the U.S. in automotive options. Advances in carbon nanotube applications enhance battery dry process
    • I got a better idea for Trump: Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state, Id prefer for the US to become Canada's 4rth Territory.  Not even province status. In order for the United Stated Territories of America to become a full blown province, Americans would have to prove their allegiance and loyalty to the Royalty of King Charles the Third since Canada is a Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy of the British Commonwealth realm.  Trump's job and title would be a perfect revival for an old tradition.  King Charles the Third's court jester. And we could throw him a bone...and have a playing card named after him since he likes those kinds of things    
    • Im glad to get that off my chest  
    • This is what Andy Palmer said, the dude of what the article in the link is about.     "Hybrids are a road to hell. They are a transition strategy, and the longer you stay on that transition, the less quickly you ramp up into the new world," Palmer said. "If you just delay transitioning to EVs by diluting it with hybrids then you are more uncompetitive for longer, and you allow the Chinese to continue to develop their market and their leadership. I honestly think it's a fool's errand," he added.   And him being the dude that helped engineer the Nissan Leaf and was later the dude in charge of Nissan's EV department, I am 100% in agreement with him.  And I would also like to add: The Chinese government pushed and pushed hard for EVs.  Pushed hard not only on the global stage but MOSTLY got ALL Chinese people ON BOARD with EVs.  They had several reasons to do so.  China has lots and lots of minerals and important ingredients to make said batteries. An essential part of EV transition.  But most IMPORTANTLY, China WANTS to REPLACE the USA for being the defacto country  in political, social, economical influence in the world that the USA enjoyed since the end of WW2 in 1945.  And since they knew they lacked behind in ebery metric that would push them to that status, they had only one move to make. It was a Hail Mary pass, but kit was to dominate in the the tech world and it happened to be in the automobile realm. EVs. And while China was seeking to dominate in this arena, and CAREFULLY nurtured it, the USA phoqued themselves over.  Idiot Americans were fooled to believe ALL the negative commentary on EVs. Uneducated morons liked the drill baby drill commentary. Smart but greedy fools failed to see what was coming next and failed even further to see the threat that is China and ITS technological breakthroughs.  ALL from morons that had biased reasons to be anti-EV. From the Joe Rogans and Alex Jones of the world that thrive from clicks for the podcast youtube and other shytty platforms to anti-EV biases from Big Oil.  And lastly, stupid politicians that failed American citizens in different decades from keeping Americans poor and stupid by not giving them educations. By PURPOSELY DEFUNDING the American school system, by PURPOSELY lying to them on DIFFERENT subjects and while these American politicians were greedily looking to make America into a fascist, oligarch world, they failed to see and acknowledge the OTHER threats the world was giving to the US OTHER than the war threats.  The technological warfare.   Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the Chinese regimes were on about EVs.  And if Trump decides to cut EV subsidies, even of only to allow Tesla to sell, the Chinese are building European factories to build EVs there. Slowly.  They are FLOODING the market with Chinese EVs as we speak in Europe.  The next step is to flood North America with Chinese EVs. The starting point IS Mexico.  If one is educated, one could see the disaster that is to come for GM, Ford.  Stellantis is going to get the disaster first in Europe.  Chinese EVs are going to flood Mexico.  INEXPENSIVE Chinese EVs.  Then WILL come the factories in Mexico.  So much for the "NOBODY WANTS EVs" rhetoric that the uneducated, wrongfully informed Americans (and Canadians to some degree) keep on spewing...   Its really IS a big deal. I SEE that rhetoric play about the failure of VW and Stellantis and even GM when these fools squeal about how they are failing because they have put all their monies on EVs.  The thing is, they didnt put their monies FAST enough on EVs and also concetrated on producing ICEVs when they should have just NIXED them waaaay before.  Of course that is Monday morning quarterbacking from me as I say that, but I ALSO saw the writing on the wall about EVs being THE future.  Had Americans NOT been LIED to about this whole thing about scare tactics about EVs, GM and Ford would have ALL the working EVs RIGHT NOW not ONLY to shut down Tesla, but to even shut down Chinese EVs. Elon Musk could have TAKEN China ALL to himself if he was 5% the visionary he thinks he is.   But he was too busy STILL selling us on colonizing Mars...  Whatever happened to that super loop thing anyway?  Yeah...a billion dollar boondoggle that had everybody fooled.  Chinese politicians, engineers and all around smart folk must be STILL laughing at all the gullible Americans and greedy fools that the US has churned out the last 15 years...    But hey...   Now lets keep on shopping because its the Christmas season and we should all consume because its good for the economy while we wait for tariffs to hit us because Canada and Mexico reasons, because our eggs are expensive while we get fleeced by insurance companies but we dont want healthcare because communism and education education education but Ivy Leaguers  they too smart so they elitist but Democrats wanting to forgive student debt no good but keep on having insanely expensive school tuitions while other areas in the country and young folk not having ACCESS to an education while calling some countries of the world as shytehole countries while ALSO keep on having school shootings because teachers arent packing but also those shytehole country folk  are eating the dogs and they are eating the cats.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search