Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    SUVs and Crossovers Pass Sedans In Sales

      Not Surprising, SUVs and Crossovers Pass Sedans In Sales

    Congratulations America. It seems we now buy more SUVs and crossovers than sedans according to a new study from IHS Automotive. Through May of 2014, IHS says that SUVs and CUVs account for 36.5 percent of new car registrations, compared to the 35.4 percent of registrations for sedans. This is a reversal from five years ago where sedans stood at 36.3 percent of registrations, compared to the 31.4 percent for SUVs and crossovers.

    “It’s not that sedans have become unpopular. It’s just that CUVs have really grown. They drive like cars, but they have higher positioning, the option for four-wheel drive and better fuel economy. There’s more space for seating. It’s easy to see why they’ve taken off in popularity,” said Tom Libby, analyst for IHS Automotive.

    The one thing we wished the study showed is the breakdown in registration percentages if SUVs and crossovers were separated. Otherwise, the results don't come as surprise.

    Source: Bloomberg

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at [email protected] or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    The issue boils down to useability.

    The SUVs and CUVs, we used to call them station wagons, have greater capabilities and

    flexibility of usage than the current crop of sedans, I believe due to downsizing.

    People have not gotten smaller! They need the space these types of vehicles provide.

    Then too, in the event of an accident there is the issue of mass --- more metal to crunch instead

    of bones --- that is the perception, regardless of the level of crush sophistication in the cars design.

    Buyers today are not as technically astute as they were years ago, before cars became another

    appliance commodity. Ignorance plays a role in allowing the manufacturers to sway opinion, over reality and facts!

    The other major factor is politics. In their ignorance of the machine, the buyers have allowed the

    politician to interfere in the design criteria and a belief that protection is better than avoidance.

     

    As cars have become more common as a necessity, driver skills have gone down. This is why there has been the cry for "more protection" from some. Ralph Nader led this charge years ago.

    Many drivers today are more interested in the entertainment attachments than the internal mechanicals of their car. Some don't even know how to do checking of fluids or minor maintainence.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love my Full Size SUV's and will never be a full time real car user.

     

    Sadly I exect Sierra club and the rest of all the tree hugging nazi's to attack the CUV's / SUV's saying people do not need them. I just hope the public does not give into these home grown terrorist.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually, I love nature and I love machines. My real goal would be for us to have alternative fuels so that our great grand children can enjoy an escalade if they wish to.

    That being said, people love the room and seating position of cuv type vehicles. Americans have not gotten any smaller!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SUV's and CUV's aren't rally the same thing. A lot of CUV buyers would NEVER purchase an SUV. They shouldn't lump the numbers together.

    I would love to see the break out plus the break out of HD versions of trucks versus non HD versions as with 2wd versus 4x4. It would really be interesting to see the real numbers of what is selling.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    See ! ----

    Not one blog yet about the technical aspects of these two types of vehicles.

    Nobody has even mentioned towing!

    How do all those boats and ATVs get around?

    Maybe those folks don't look at this website ???

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    my parents live a town that is a decent easy part drive from Canada and its a large enough town where the Canucks come down and shop the malls etc. very often.

     

    When i went to visit them recently, i went to the mall and i saw two Manitoba Trax within a few minutes.  Cute lil thing!  I can bet you the Trax will do well.  I saw an Orlando too that day and be glad that Chevy did not bring that turd down to the US.......

     

    I think sedans would do better if they made them more spacious!  For example two cars I tested out this weekend, A passat and Legacy, both have good passenger space but not real good trunk space.  I could see bypassing them for a CUV for family use.

     

    One car that gets ripped is the Taurus, but to me it's a great family car.  Spacious inside even if they say the leg room isn't the best, an adult can still sit back there.  Big thing is the 20 cubic foot trunk is in fact a genuine legitimate competitor for a CUV trunk as it is tall deep and wide.  You can pack a second level of bags and such and you could probably even get a bike back there.  trunk sizes are still pretty small even on many of the larger sedans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All of the lower MPG vehicles until the next fuel price shock....which may be severe.

    Agreed.  If we had gas at $6 a gallon, let alone the $8-9 per gallon they have in Europe, sedans and station wagons with 4 cylinder diesels would take over.  $3.80 a gallon is relatively cheap and the car companies market the crossovers.

     

    I'll take a sedan any day and take the better handling, I could drive a coupe every day if I wanted, but there wasn't a coupe I liked that I could afford.   I did see a Jaguar F-type on the road today, looked absolutely epic and sounded even better.  I wouldn't mind driving that every day.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Buckle up dear American friends. These tariffs are going to cost the avg US household a whole lotta money.  New car prices. Gasoline.  Transportation on goods. Keep in mind that the US uses a LOT of Canadian oil.  That is why the fat moron only wants to tariff oil at 10% rather than the 25% he keeps on heckling about.  Housing.   Plus, we Canadians are going to tariff US goods as well. Which wont be good but it will be necessary.  A tariff war will not benefit either of us, but believe it or not, it will be a lot worse for you guys...  Ontario and Quebec provide electricty to MILLIONS of Americans in the North East.  THAT wont be good.  It will be disatrous to the price of eggs if you will, to those shytheads that voted in Trump.   And, this beautiful blonde lady that  represents Donald's mouth, in this clip, she mentions fentanyl.  But does she know that underground CIA operations have fostered fentanyl production in South American countries?  Probably not, but I diont see her lasting too long at her job because she not only is dumber than Donald's previous mouth pieces such as Kayleigh McEnany and Sarah Huckabucks, she looks to be timid as well.  At least the other two could lie with a straight face and believe the bullshyte, this one looks like she is going to break down. She seems to have moral standards...  Which I kinda feel bad for her, because I have a feeling reporters this time around wont let the bullshyte fly like they did 2016-2020.  And Fox news had to pay millions of dollars for bullshytting.  The threat for punishment for false info still looms.  I cant believe though, that  Donald the duck administration had the balls to tell her to say that Justin Trudeau shoudnlt be threatening Donald with retalitory tariffs before talking to the duck first.   Too bad this aint hockey, because Donald would have had his hockey jersey over his head and Justin be pounding on him.      PS Justin is an amateur boxer.  Donald is just a fat phoque.   
    • Eye Spy the Avalanche to the left in outside.
    • After weeks of weather in the teens or below, decided to give these two a mid-winter warmup.
    • I'm pulling back hard on spending. My vehicles are weeks (300c) or months (Avalanche) from being paid off. The LLC that owns C&G got some new contracts recently and I'm going to be writing off every last thing I can. Both of us may be putting a lot of expensable miles on soon and we might find a cheap EV lease to take advantage of the situation and keep the miles off the ICE vehicles.
    • All of that waste is reprocessable back into fuel again, but due to outdated regulations and fear mongering dating back to the 1970s, it is only waste because we say it is waste.  Breeder reactors can extract additional energy out of those nuclear byproducts and turn it back into useable fuel in another type of reactor.  The only reason we don't do that is because it could be used to make bomb quality isotopes.  But if WE are the ones doing it, why are we afraid we might accidentally make the bomb isotopes? The remaining radioactive material left over from those next two steps in the process, if we got out of our own way and did them, would condense the entire container seen above down to a relatively benign thimble size. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search