Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    How the New Emission Standard May Actually Make It Harder For Automakers To Achieve

      And now for something completely contradictory 

    Under the current standards for vehicle emissions, automakers have a variety of ways to achieve compliance. These are known as "compliance flexibilities" which allows an automaker to sell electric vehicles to off-set gad-guzzlers like SUVs as an example. But the recent proposal by the Trump administration to ease emission standards, will remove these flexibilities.

    The proposal unveiled last week would freeze fuel-economy and emissions standards at their 2020 levels for several years beyond that. This would seem like a positive for automakers as trucks and SUVs/crossovers are selling like hotcakes. But the removal of this provision has automakers crying fowl, saying these help with global vehicle development. The heads of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Association of Global Automakers wrote a letter to Trump stating that the “flexible compliance pathways that pave the way for research and deployment in advanced fuel-saving technologies”.

    “We are global manufacturers; to compete around the world, we must continue to invest in both more efficient internal combustion engine technologies, electric-drive technologies and fuel cells,” said Mitch Bainwol of the Alliance, and John Bozzella of the Global Automakers.

    But there is a reason the government is removing those compliance flexibilities as it "existing fuel-economy program easier to administer and more transparent". This makes it easier for regulators and consumers to verify an automaker's claim. The current system is somewhat confusing, as thirstier automakers can buy into compliance by trading emission credits from more efficient ones. The trades and prices can be shielded from public viewing.

    Source: Bloomberg

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    I get both sides of this coin, simplistic for politicians and the current administration that is confused by the way American as well as European and Asian auto companies are building and balancing the system. Then the OEM which wants the MPG to be put into static mode but keep everything else the same.

    OEM's will have to adjust if the current system is rolled back to be this simplistic system and that will really affect everyone to meet the MPG when they cannot use EV, Hybrid or any other alternative fuel such as the CNG/LNG trucks the OEMs make and use to offset the gas guzzling pickups.

    One does have to wonder why it would not be simplest to just freeze the MPG as the auto industry has asked till 2035 letting them get their alternative powertrain auto's out and get caught up. A pause would be good for all, but one has to wonder if this is also a way to reduce the headcount in government jobs?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74
    7 hours ago, dfelt said:

    I get both sides of this coin, simplistic for politicians and the current administration that is confused by the way American as well as European and Asian auto companies are building and balancing the system. Then the OEM which wants the MPG to be put into static mode but keep everything else the same.

    OEM's will have to adjust if the current system is rolled back to be this simplistic system and that will really affect everyone to meet the MPG when they cannot use EV, Hybrid or any other alternative fuel such as the CNG/LNG trucks the OEMs make and use to offset the gas guzzling pickups.

    One does have to wonder why it would not be simplest to just freeze the MPG as the auto industry has asked till 2035 letting them get their alternative powertrain auto's out and get caught up. A pause would be good for all, but one has to wonder if this is also a way to reduce the headcount in government jobs?

    Freezing the standards is a good start. 

    If this administration truly wanted to reduce EPA headcount, they can get Congress to legislate the EPA out of existence.  For a party that has advocated smaller federal government since 1980, they sure are doing a surprisingly poor job doing just that.  Only defunding and legislation will actually reduce headcount in an appreciable manner, unless you want to repeal the merit-based civil service and revert to a 19th Century Spoils System.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    daves87rs

    Meh.

    You are going to win some and lose some.

    Step or get out-change with times.....

    That said- my low tech Cobalt and Cavalier have no issues with getting good MPGs...

    Maybe less airbags and junk might help first......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Robert Hall
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By Robert Hall · Posted

      Re: Angeles Crest..I've driven it a couple times when I was playing tourist in LA (both times in rentals--once in an early 00s Nissan 350Z, once in an early 00s Lincoln Town Car)...it's a beautiful road, but with a lot of hairpin turns and blind corners, some drivers and motorcyclists take unnecessary chances and drive recklessly.  I've seen seen it in a lot of car review videos and movies also over the years. 
    • oldshurst442
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

      This is Angeles Crest Highway, right after a tunnel...    Ive never been to California but Ive seen many videos on youtube of this exact location that I googled and posted here.  It seems to me that this is a death stretch of road.  Many videos of all kinds of cars going really really fast in the tunnel and they come out and go boom!!! Near death accidents but some actual gruesome deaths too. The latest death...Vince Zampella, co-creator of Call of Duty video game.   I got a video, but I will not post it as it shows the accident in full detail and his passenger being ejected and dragged by bystanders clear of the fiery wrecked Ferrari.  And its as clear as it could be. Nothing blurred.    I was wonderin' Why do people INSIST on speeding like with crazy amounts of speed on public roads and especially on stretches of roads where deaths do happen? 55 years old and his passenger unknown to the public. Just before Christmas where even atheists acknowledge the importance of the 25th of December which is about family and friends and love.  And these two guys are now dead and leave behind friends and family morning for them instead of celebrating their lives full of love with them.   *sigh*       
    • Robert Hall
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By Robert Hall · Posted

      Yeah, the stupid f*ckers that are in the KY bourbon industry all voted for Trump, and now they are whining about the tariffs destroying their business.  F them, they got what they voted for.  Same with the whiny-ass Midwestern farmers that voted for Trump.  You reap what you sow..
    • trinacriabob
      Permanent Car Spotters

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I once read that really, really rich people whose lives and occupations aren't really in the public eye can be understated and drive simpler cars and/or keep them for a long time.  Rich people like that also tend to be a lot nicer.
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Point on, but it does miss one very important point, this is OLD OUTDATED Thinking by Idiot47 and his administration. Living in the past of Empire building is something the old 1% that are already 1 foot in the grave are trying to hold onto. They think that they can move into a synthetic body based on Moron Musk and his experiments with chips in the brain. The 1% want to live forever and rule for ever and that will not happen. Just as many rich families became broken up and the wealth eventually redistributed, the U.S. is looking at great wealth redistribution over the next decade as these idiots die and their idiot kids who have never learned how to work hard take over the family wealth and believe they were born to rule. Eventually this will pass and smarter people will work to patch things up, but it will never be the way it was before Idiot47 took office as his administration, now the most corrupt in history next to Putin and North Korea and China will attempt to hold on. While I am a wine guy and support PNW wines, I am fine with the south bourbon / whiskey companies failing. They wanted this and deserved to lose it all. Let these companies die and the people who support this criminal approach to humanity die with them.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search