Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Hatchbacks Could Be Bucking the Downward Trend In Passenger Car Sales

      The bright spot in the passenger car market could be the hatchback

    Hatchbacks have never sold well in the U.S., but that could be changing thanks to new entrants and hotted-up models. According to a forecast done by IHS Markit, sales of hatchbacks are projected climb 19 percent this year. By 2020, the firm projects sales of 567,000 hatchbacks. What has changed?

    Some of this comes down to hatchbacks finding a niche market. Michelle Malcho, spokeswoman for Chevy cars and crossovers tells The Detroit News that active, urban buyers who are wanting a bit more functionality with their vehicle are turning to hatchbacks.

    “I think the U.S. likes the functional thought. The hatch for some people offers that without stepping up to that next level ... It really does fit what you need to do on a daily basis,” said Malcho.

    Helping out are new models and hotted-up versions. The Chevrolet Cruze hatchback made up 10 percent of the model's total sales in January. Over at Ford, the sales of hotted-up versions of the Fiesta and Focus grew 21 percent last year.

    But Stephanie Brinley, senior analyst with IHS Automotive cautions this will only cause a slight spur some growth in the compact class.

    “Hatchback sales have not traditionally been good in the U.S. It’s a relatively small opportunity ... they should help stem the losses in the (small car) segment,” said Brinley.

    “The cars are just so much better than they were, and it’s no longer a penalty (to drive a hatchback). It’s taking a while, but people are starting to understand.”

    Source: The Detroit News

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    This totally makes sense, those that want the flexibility of a CUV interior but not the tall riding position will move to the Hatchback. Makes one wonder if we could see the ugly mid size Coupe 4 door sedan become a midsize 4 door hatchback?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Stew said:

    Love hatches.  Would love to se Chevy come out with higher power, maybe 2.0 Turbo 4 Cruze Hatch preferably with AWD.  i would be right there. 

    I'd like to see a Malibu hatch...it already has a fastback roofline, a hatch could make it more practical w/ the same styling..

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The hatch will still have a hard row to hoe. 

    Americans are just becoming anti car in general be it coupe, sedan and hatch. 

    They do love the versatility of a CUV but most also like the higher ride height and the option of a AWD at not a large cost. Many hatches either do not add it or it takes the price beyond what it should be for a car like a Cruze. 

    Lets face it the small Buick CUV is doing better than a if it were a hatch sedan. 

    Just look at the HHR as it was nothing but a Cobal wagon but it sold generally 5 times what a Cruze wagon would have sold. 

    I love a hatch but in America make it look like a truck or SUV and it sells. This is a truck/SUV driven market as people just like them and feel they are getting more for their money. It is going to be difficult to change this with more CUV models coming sucking all the oxygen out of the market for the hatch. 

    At least with the global market now you will get small volumes of hatches here that you never would have gotten other wise so all is not lost. 

    Same applies to the wagon if not for global sales and Opel we would not be seeing the Regal wagon. Sad how good it looks and it will still sell in small volumes. It looks better than the sedan. 

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Diesel baby... 52 MPG!  :smilewide:  < what is going on with this site?  I hit the "new comment" button and it dredges this up.

    Anyhoo, are you saying hatches in America need to be outfitted like this little bugger to be appealing?

     

    chevrolet-spark-active-2016-desempeno-respuesta-auto-compacto-rendimiento-980x316.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

    Diesel baby... 52 MPG!  :smilewide:  < what is going on with this site?  I hit the "new comment" button and it dredges this up.

    Anyhoo, are you saying hatches in America need to be outfitted like this little bugger to be appealing?

     

    chevrolet-spark-active-2016-desempeno-respuesta-auto-compacto-rendimiento-980x316.jpg

    Yup, they do. :)

    Welcome to the new Revolution! :metal: 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now use care when reporting hatch sales as you will see an increase in sales but they will report percentages. The true number of increases will be limited.

    Lets face we will have more models that never existed.

    Kind of like them saying Alfa sales doubled in December. While true the real numbers went from 23 to 52 models sold. This is why I hate them reporting percentages with lower volume models as it can be very misleading. We see it at Cadillac when they report a 15% drop but in sales but if you look it is 75 units of one model.

    The worst thing for Cruze hatch sales are all the new CUV models GM is introducing. Their worst competition will be from within.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I'd like to see a Malibu hatch...it already has a fastback roofline, a hatch could make it more practical w/ the same styling..

    That wiould look good.  The way 6o get people into hatches, sadly, is to make them look like CUVs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I'd like to see a Malibu hatch...it already has a fastback roofline, a hatch could make it more practical w/ the same styling..

    Has there ever been a hatch that large that wasn't a wagon or CUV?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    Has there ever been a hatch that large that wasn't a wagon or CUV?

    Several.  Not US GM, but midsize hatches are common in Europe..such as the current Mondeo, Insignia, etc..Audi A7 and Panamera are two big ones in the US, for example.  

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, FordCosworth said:

    There was that awful Malibu Maxx thing from a few back. 

    Disagree with you as the Malibu Maxx had awesome rear space. You could be comfy or fit a ton of stuff in it. Style sucked, but the over all space was right on for big people.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Disagree with you as the Malibu Maxx had awesome rear space. You could be comfy or fit a ton of stuff in it. Style sucked, but the over all space was right on for big people.

    It may have had good space. But that generation of Malibu was horrible. 

    Squeaks, creaks, and groans ( interior and exterior ), shoddy front ends ( steering and suspension ), numerous electrical issues...

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, FordCosworth said:

    It may have had good space. But that generation of Malibu was horrible. 

    Squeaks, creaks, and groans ( interior and exterior ), shoddy front ends ( steering and suspension ), numerous electrical issues...

    That I would totally agree with you on.

    The Malibu Maxx was a great idea with poor execution.

    Take that size and space with today's quality of built auto's and make a hatch out of it and there will be plenty of people who would love it.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Several.  Not US GM, but midsize hatches are common in Europe..such as the current Mondeo, Insignia, etc..Audi A7 and Panamera are two big ones in the US, for example.  

    The A7 and Panamera are technically hatchbacks but they don't reward the owner with the space of a "conventional" hatchback like a Focus, Mazda3, or Golf.  They are "coupes" because that's about all the space behind the driver there is(exaggeration but the sloped roof line leaves the back tighter than the cars footprint would suggest).

    20 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    The Malibu Maxx was a great idea with poor execution.

    That sounds like it summed it up perfectly.

    Heck, I'm just curious what a mid size sedan would look like morphed into a real hatchback(not that A7/Panamera crap).

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    See those hatchbacks like the Mondeo don't really add much utility to the car outside of a truck. Yes, there is a little more space and versatility but not a whole lot.

    Why don't companies do a "short wagon" version of wagons and they would then look like a "normal" hatchback? Eliminate the rear overhang and it is no longer a wagon that people seem to be afraid of and is now a hatchback that less are afraid of and like.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    51 minutes ago, FordCosworth said:

    ford-mondeo-hatchback-wallpaper-hd-15335

    FordMondeo20TDCi1501214Int(4).jpg

    Above is the Euo Ford Mondeo hatchback...Below is the Wagon

    Ford-Mondeo_Wagon-2015-ig.jpg

    ford_mondeo_titanium_wagon_9.jpeg

    Do they come in AWD? :D

    29 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    That's about the only different between a wagon and a hatch is the rear overhang.

    Focus Hatch.jpg

    FordMondeoWagon.jpg

    Not that much difference in overhang. What 6-8 inches maybe 10?

    I would and feel all Hatches need to change one thing, the C pillar, that angle forward kills entry  and exit. I would rather have it go straight up and give maximum entry into the back seat.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Do they come in AWD? :D

    Focus Hatch.jpg

    FordMondeoWagon.jpg

    Not that much difference in overhang. What 6-8 inches maybe 10?

    I would and feel all Hatches need to change one thing, the C pillar, that angle forward kills entry  and exit. I would rather have it go straight up and give maximum entry into the back seat.

    No there really isn't a whole lot of difference in a wagon vs hatch and that's why I was thinking a mid size hatch would sell because wagons just don't over here but hatches seem to do well enough. Yeah I can see what you're talking about on the C pillar. It's never bothered me but I'm also only 5'8" and not 6'6" and if they're going to make a mid sizer they would have to cater more to larger folk.

    Does anybody here photoshop? I'd love for somebody to chop 8-10 inched off of the Mondeo Wagon just to see what it would look like.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Sure there were :
     

    I wasn't thinking of old cars..thinking modern era.  GM hasn't had any US market midsize hatchbacks that I can think of in recent decades except the goofy looking Malibu Maxx..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    Corsica was borderline, or "large compact".  Gorgeous hatchback bodystyle available.

     

    Don't think I've ever seen a Corsica described as 'gorgeous'..thought of them, but decided that was too long ago..vehicles GM did 20-45 years ago aren't relevant to the thread.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    HHR was a tall Cobalt wagon Hatch.
     

    So in essence the Cruze hatch and the HHR hatch both were in the same class and similar sized platform. In fact the Cruze is the HHR equal in size and platform.

    The problem is the Cruze will never sell in the numbers the HHR did due to the fact is does not look like a SUV. Also the lack of hatch room in the back with the seat up renders the Cruze hatch less usable with 4 people in it.

    Edited by hyperv6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Lets Just admit it, that society has moved on from their love affair with cars to a love affair with CUVs.

    True. I've long liked SUVs, am warming to CUVs.  Practicality is winning.  So many cars are just too impractical with their tiny trunks and lack of space. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    HAHAHA look at this adorable little dude!  He's like Alvin the Chipmunk!  2017 Spark Activ Manual in Toasted Marshmallow!

    image.gen.png

    That color kicks so much ass! Maybe it's just a great picture of it or maybe it's actually cool but it looks awesome in this picture.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    HAHAHA look at this adorable little dude!  He's like Alvin the Chipmunk!  2017 Spark Activ Manual in Toasted Marshmallow!

    image.gen.png

    Nice Ocnblu, the photographer did an outstanding job of using bounce lighting to highlight the side profile, the body lines, plus the warm color just makes it over all an outstanding looking Spark! :metal: 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Having had a Jeep Liberty in the driveway for a year now, I have no problem with CUVs (tho being BOF, perhaps the Liberty is an SUV). But it has a passable amount of room in it, esp with the rear seat folded (flat).
    SO many of these uber-teensy CUVs have room for 2 grocery bags, but I agree; it's not that they are appealing, it's that cars have gotten so cramped.

    IMO; OEMs F-ed up when they strove to make cars smaller & smaller; first it forced truck sales to explode, then SUVs, now CUVs. Meanwhile convert & coupes are like woolly mammoths anymore. I know it's not going to happen (and I don't believe it will, either), but in the day when a mid-size car was 200-in and a full size was around 212 and larger, the insides, the rear seat and the trunks were immense. There were only a few SUVs and trucks were for farmers.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Argh.  This is a question I almost want to avoid. The A380 is incredible.  Yes, I had a roundtrip through AA on British.  They have a small economy section at the back, upstairs.  Then I flew a one way from Italy to New York-JFK on an Emirates "fifth freedom" flight segment.  They have economy taking the entire main level, with none upstairs. Economy seats are a little wider on the A380 ... definitely on Emirates, at least.  It was an outstanding flight because of that.  On British, I paid for an economy seat upstairs and the curvature of the exterior translates into windows that are too sloped and with an odd and bigger void in between the cabin and the exterior.  I will be sitting downstairs if there is a future flight on one. The 747-8 isn't as comfortable in economy because the seats are traditional economy width.  I feel more comfortable in one because I know it.  It's also much more photogenic all the way around.  You feel good when it pulls up to the gate and you see that beautiful and proportioned machine through the big glass windows. The humidification is good on both planes. It's really sad that no more passenger quadjets are being produced.  It's easier to get onto an A380 if Europe bound (British, Lufthansa, Emirates, and others via connections, with Air France holding back).  For a 747-8, Lufthansa is the only choice and I am grateful to them for that.
    • My car has a supposed 525 mile highway crusing range on a full tank (19.5 gallons).   I haven't fully tested that since I tend to fill up at 1/2 tank when on road trips..but I have recorded averages of 29.5 and 30 mpg on road trips, which is pretty good for a comfortable 4200lb AWD sedan..
    • @trinacriabob in your flying in recent years, have you had a trip on an A380?    If so, how does it compare to the larger Boeings? 
    • Right.  It's not the aircraft themselves, but the haste and sloppiness.  ("Haste makes waste.")  This 777 X is ambitious and the folding wingtips are novel.  They will be very late with delivering this plane.  I now like some Boeing and some Airbus.  It's a mix.  In the recent past, I took a ride on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner and I definitely like it more than the Airbus 350 (even though the Airbus 350 has that photogenic curved winglets).  The cabin fatigue from flying is much reduced on the Dreamliner. Yesterday, I was on two domestic Boeing 737 Max 8 segments back to back on Southwest.  I like its newer features - ambient lighting, larger bins, a little quieter.  So, if it's working, it's a very nice rendition of the 737.  It's too bad that their newest version of this storied workhorse had to be tainted.  I get on and sigh.  If it keeps a clean track record going forward, people may be less weirded out as the statistics may become better. It is.  However, I'm not a fan of the leg design, which is also now popular on sofas.  The biggest turnoff for me in sofas - when I bought a sleeper for another room with the last stimulus money - was the amount of product that had nailheads all over the place.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search