Bob Lutz: Plug-In Tech Is Better Suited For Larger Vehicles

He is so correct, I love the Volt and ELR, but have wondered why not use the technology in large fuel thirsty auto's first.

Hmmm...

I'm usually with Lutz on things, but on this one I'm a skeptic.

Well Lutz may be on to something afterall, how about a Silverado with 800 HP and 100MPG...

http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/via-motors-x-truck-concept-2013-01-16

Well now that's interesting.

Still need more detail.

More here:

http://www.viamotors.com/

There's a nice episode of Jay Leno's garage on the Via site with Lutz and Leno going over the trucks, pretty interesting stuff.

Hmmm...

I'm usually with Lutz on things, but on this one I'm a skeptic.

Except GM did do it this way already. Their first big foray into hybrids was on Buses.

At $79k, this is interesting, but not "must have".

At $79k, this is interesting, but not "must have".

Economy of scales and adoption of new technology. Too bad its booth was empty every time I was there - I wanted to talk with representatives.

Bob Lutz spent most of his time in the GM booths.

I'm only interested in Lutz projects like his Fisker with Corvette ZR-1 engine... now THAT is a project worth doing! (even though I still think the car itself is not well made, an LS9 can transform ANYTHING into hotness!)

I think Via is wise to aim this at large fleets, they have lots of number crunching to do before the public will pick up more than a handful of these.

He is correct! Its the large and less efficient models that need this tech more then the smaller and more efficient ones! I would have liked to have seen a larger RWD sedan model like say a true fullsize Buick Electra using the Voltech system were the cost of said system would be less important and impactful to the model! GM should have thought this out better I think!

Considering how many trains and container ships use electric motors with diesel generators, I totally see the sense of getting the full size trucks and SUV's to use the Volt style system. This would truly make a difference in the market for petrol. If semi trucks did this it would probably stop the need to import any oil period.

Course better yet would be CNG and just leave all those dictators with having to find alternative markets for their oil.

Exactly what I was thinking, dfelt.

Considering how many trains and container ships use electric motors with diesel generators, I totally see the sense of getting the full size trucks and SUV's to use the Volt style system. This would truly make a difference in the market for petrol. If semi trucks did this it would probably stop the need to import any oil period.

Course better yet would be CNG and just leave all those dictators with having to find alternative markets for their oil.

Yes, Stephan Harper may be a bit too conservative for my tastes... but I wouldn't call him a dictator..

Considering how many trains and container ships use electric motors with diesel generators, I totally see the sense of getting the full size trucks and SUV's to use the Volt style system. This would truly make a difference in the market for petrol. If semi trucks did this it would probably stop the need to import any oil period.

Course better yet would be CNG and just leave all those dictators with having to find alternative markets for their oil.

Yes, Stephan Harper may be a bit too conservative for my tastes... but I wouldn't call him a dictator..

Yea I always do forget about Canada as I consider it the Black Sheep of the NA Market. Was thinking more inline with the Arab countries and primarily Venezuela and their dictator for life.

Considering how many trains and container ships use electric motors with diesel generators, I totally see the sense of getting the full size trucks and SUV's to use the Volt style system. This would truly make a difference in the market for petrol. If semi trucks did this it would probably stop the need to import any oil period.

Course better yet would be CNG and just leave all those dictators with having to find alternative markets for their oil.

Yes, Stephan Harper may be a bit too conservative for my tastes... but I wouldn't call him a dictator..

Yea I always do forget about Canada as I consider it the Black Sheep of the NA Market. Was thinking more inline with the Arab countries and primarily Venezuela and their dictator for life.

Most of our imported oil comes from Canada and Mexico. Venezuela's dictator for life doesn't have much life left anyway (bad cancer prognosis).

Plus we are producing so much oil in the United States right now.

Yet with Canada, Mexico and Us producing more oil, the refined Gas stocks are going up and the oil companies are shipping the gas overseas due to higher prices they can get there and so our prices are not going down and even worse, lately they are going back up again.

The Gov has done nothing to deal with the pricing fixing that is clearly going on with oil and gas prices.

I'm also skeptical. Lutz is saying this because he has a stake in VIA. Either that, or he's completely delusional.

Starting off with an E-REV Escalade? An Escalade is $70K. Adding plug-in tech would push it past $100K, since the size and weight of that thing would necessitate beefier components than what's on the Volt. The market for $100K trucks is already slim, and for a major manufacturer to electrify a vehicle with such low sales potential for their very first PHEV would be an absolute joke. (Volt outsold Escalade, Escalade EXT, Escalade ESV, and Escalade Hybrid combined in 2012). People with that much money to spend don't care much about fuel costs, and if they are rich but care about the environment, they wouldn't drive around in something as conspicuously wasteful as an Escalade. As a GM stockholder, I'd seriously question their commitment to the technology, let alone their ability to plan products.

Lutz is right in that going after high-volume gas guzzlers has the greatest impact on fuel use. But there are multiple ways of doing so. An automaker could spend millions hybridizing an existing oversized truck to be less of a guzzler, or a consumer could altogether buy something else. GM assumed that the demand for body-on-frame full-size SUVs is elastic, that people really needed Tahoes no matter what, when in truth, consumers were flexible and open to substitutes like a conventionally-powered Lambda crossover, which has the same fuel economy and space as a hybrid GMT-900 but costs $30K less and sells in much higher quantities. The E-REV Volt makes sense because it's built on an efficient platform to begin with, whereas with large SUVs, there was low-hanging fruit with a greater return on investment that should have been picked first.

As for VIA Motors, it's the same hyperbolic crap that Lutz is known for spewing but not delivering. A Nissan LEAF gets 99 MPGe; the only way a VIA E-REV to get 100 MPG is if you don't count the electricity consumed and drive a few miles in range-extended mode. It's a pretty meaningless metric that's just a matter of how far one travels with the gasoline engine on. Judging by the specs, in all likelihood an E-REV Silverado will get 45 MPGe (EPA) on electricity, have a 30 mile EV range, and get 18 MPG in range-extended mode. Depending on whether or not you count electricity consumption, here's the likely range of MPGs:

DOES NOT INCLUDE ELECTRICITY

30 miles EV, 0 miles gas = infinite MPG

30 miles EV, 5 miles gas = 126 MPG

30 miles EV, 10 miles gas = 63 MPG

30 miles EV, 20 miles gas = 45 MPG

30 miles EV, 30 miles gas = 36 MPG

INCLUDING ELECTRICITY

30 miles EV, 0 miles gas = 45 MPGe

30 miles EV, 5 miles gas = 37 MPGe

30 miles EV, 10 miles gas = 33 MPGe

30 miles EV, 20 miles gas = 28 MPGe

30 miles EV, 30 miles gas = 26 MPGe

These estimates are reasonable given a 6,000 lb truck and 24-kWh battery. A more aerodynamic 5,300 lb Fisker Karma with a 20-kWh battery gets 56 MPGe on electricity, has a 32 mile EV range, and gets 20 MPG in range-extended mode.

The problem here is that truck owners are already a closed-minded bunch. Brand loyalty is huge and it'll be hard to dissuade them from sticking with a tried-and-true diesel or gas V8 drivetrain, as evidenced by the low adoption of GM's hybrid system. Factor in reliability concerns that truck owners will undoubtedly have about plug-in's and it pretty much equals a 'no sale.'

If GM put a Volt-Tec drivetrain into a truck, I'd doubt it'd have gotten the traction the Volt has.

Methinks Maximum Lutz is trying to minimize the Volt for his own gain.

The problem here is that truck owners are already a closed-minded bunch. Brand loyalty is huge and it'll be hard to dissuade them from sticking with a tried-and-true diesel or gas V8 drivetrain, as evidenced by the low adoption of GM's hybrid system. Factor in reliability concerns that truck owners will undoubtedly have about plug-in's and it pretty much equals a 'no sale.'

If GM put a Volt-Tec drivetrain into a truck, I'd doubt it'd have gotten the traction the Volt has.

Methinks Maximum Lutz is trying to minimize the Volt for his own gain.

Agreed. I don't know why the Big 3 won't offer a ~3 liter diesel for full-sized trucks and SUVs.

I've driven a GL350 BlueTEC, and it seems to have all the motor one would ever need: 3.0L V6, 240-hp, 455 lb-ft. The curb weight is 5,800 lb, it does 0-60 in 7.5 seconds, and it gets 19/26 MPG.

The problem with the Volt is that it is neither as philosophically interesting as the Teslas or as economically approachable as the Prius. The folks who drink the Carbon Footprint Coolaid and have the money to spare will buy a Tesla. Those who do but don't have the dough buys a Prius. People who really want to save money buys a Corolla or a Civic. None of the above are particularly attracted to a $40K "economy" car which can go 40 miles on a charge then post worse mileage than Cruze afterwards.

Driven the same way, the Volt will post better numbers than the Cruze on the highway.... I know you know better than to just go by EPA rating.

Well, I read through Via's entire site and watched all of the videos. Lutz and the company are onto something with this, but mostly as a fleet vehicle. The cash outlay is just too much for the public to stomach at this point. If the price can be ratcheted downward from the $79k they now charge, it might be another story.

Until then, CNG makes so much more sense to me.