Jump to content
Create New...
  • Cmicasa the Great
    Cmicasa the Great

    BMW Takes the Luxury Crown For 2015 in the U.S.

      BMW is King of the U.S. Luxury Segment for the 4th year in a row.

    Helped by a plethora of CUVs, the hottest selling segment, and the on fire 4-series, BMW managed to stave off Lexus, its German rivals, and Cadillac for the fourth year in a row. BMW(+1.4%) finished 2015 with 346,023 sales. Lexus (+10.7), not far behind with 344,601 sales came in at number two, just 1,422 fewer.

     

    The 4-series, which despite BMW being propelled in terms of growth mostly by CUVs, was the lone stalwart car nameplate to actually show gains. Although the 1/2-series were up 77%, it must be noted that they are, for all intents new entries after the 1-series was discontinued in 2014 and re-pinned the 2-series for 2015. The 3,5,6, and 7-Series, in addition to the Z4, were all down

     

    Buick Motor Co. (-2.6%) came in at 223,055, while the top 5 was rounded off by Audi(11.1%+) , in lieu of VW's diesel debacle managed to pull off a spot as number four with 202,202 sales. Honda's Acura (5.6%+) posted a respectable bump in sales with 177,165.

     

    Special notice goes to American make Cadillac (2.6%+). In a strong effort, and touting six nameplates, two less than it's nearest competitor Acura, and a whopping ten less than the perceived luxury leader Mercedes Benz, came from a dismal 2014, to a rise in sales with 175,267 sales. Cadillac expects growth in 2016 as it introduces the all new XT5 crossover and first ever CT6 large executive class Saloon.

     

    Luxury car sales in the United States in 2015

     

    1) BMW - 346,023 - up 1.8 percent
    2) Lexus - 344,601 - up 10.7 percent
    3) Mercedes-Benz - 343,088 - up 3.8 percent
    4) Buick Motor Co. 223,055- down 2.6 percent
    5) Audi - 202,202 - up 11.1 percent
    6) Acura - 177,165 - up 5.6 percent
    7) Cadillac - 175,267 - up 2.6 percent
    8 )Infiniti - 133,498 - up 13.8 percent
    9) Lincoln - 101,227 - up 7.1 percent
    10) Land Rover - 70,582 - up 37 percent
    11) Volvo - 70,047 - up 24.3 percent
    12) Porsche - 51,756 - up 10.1 percent
    13) Jaguar - 14,466 - down 8 percent
    14) Maserati - 11,697 - down 9.6 percent
    15) Bentley - 2,686 - down 10.6 percent
    16) Rolls-Royce - 1,140 - up 2.6 percent

     

    You can view the complete set of 2015 year end sales figures at our Auto Sales Figure Ticker, or view our archives going back to 2005 in our Auto Sales Figure Archives.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



     

     

     

     

    Not one with the 8AT, but a 6AT'er. It was a boring dog. Take away the guts of the higher trim levels, and you're left with is that cramped interior and maddening CUE. Hard pass. At least you can get a Track Pkg and 6MT with the 320i. And with a tune, it makes near 328i power levels. It does have smaller brakes and a more restrictive exhaust though. There are also a few other components that prevent it from being able to pick up power as well as the 328.

     

     

     

     

    First U come at me in a way that was unnecessary... especially since I was talking about the car.. not U.

     

    Second.. and here is the most important part if U can ever get past the BS.. WE AGREE ON A BUNCH ON STUFF 90% of the time. 

     

    A Tune??? If U are gonna get a tune on the 320i U might as well get the 328i. The difference in price is about $5K.. and that is a very small amount in terms of Financing or Leasing. Furthermore HOW MUCH IS THAT TUNE??? Because it would have to be a bargain basement price in order to justify all the other things one has to upgrade to get to the 328i they could have just bought for $5K more.

     

    As to the 2.5L. Boring dog... I would characteristic any car in this class as that after hopping out of the VSeries model.. or in my case, the day I drive the new 2.5L 8Speed.. my Vette. Its all about perspective, in both brands. No one such as U or me are gonna normally walk into a BMW or Cadillac dealer and buy a 2.5L as a DD expecting it to pull off daredevil tricks like Evel Knievil, but I'll be the first to tell U that the 8speed tends to wake that lil bitch up.. just enough to be noticed. And despite the humble engine, the tuning of the chassis is quite up to snuff to make most feel satisfied. AGAIN.. I personally would opt for the 3.6L or 3.6LTT, no different than I would opt for the 335i or M3. 

     

    Lastly.. if CUE is maddening to anyone then that person must be ready or a strait-jacket just dealing with their daily use of the IPhone or Android. The biggest gripe I've ever heard about CUE was that it lacks buttons. That's it. That's all. Nothing else. My solution.. use the effin Voice Control or BUTTONS on the steering wheel

     

     

    Idk about 90%, but I DO agree with you on a lot of things. My biggest problem is in your delivery. The 320i may not be anything to write home about, but it's a much better car than it's similarly priced competition- 2.5 ATS, CLA, Acura ILX, Buick Regal. Certainly no justification for saying "F^&* BMW." The ATS is laughable in 2.5 spec, but I still wouldn't use that to dismiss the brand as a whole.

     

    I am personally unimpressed with the 8AT in any sporting application thus far. I haven't driven an ATS-V or new Camaro, but in the C7, I just don't feel it is sharp enough and responsive to inputs using the shift paddles. It's great hooked up to trucks and other vehicles, but the best DCT units out there still shame it in sport options. Just my .02. Its a moot point for me anyway, because anything I'd buy that offers the 8AT I would take in manual. And GM's manuals are, by and large, very good. Sometimes they're a little on the notchy, laborous side, but I like that.

     

    CUE has improved over the last few years, I'll give it that. The setup I used in an Escalade was decent. Definitely no longer a deal breaker like it would have been in the past. I still don't like it a great deal, and I think it needs to utilize at least a few more buttons than it does. Even as a BMW fan, I have no issue admitting Cadillac is just a few steps away from having a fully cohesive product that surpasses, or at least matches, BMW in every facet. And I hope they do. Competition improves the breed, after all. The question is whether Cadillac will commit to it. These on-paper winners and niche tweeners like the CT6 aren't going to carry the brand. At some point, they HAVE to build the El Miraj's, Ciels, Sixteens, etc they show off every now and again.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

    A BMW 320i is a far, far better car than a 2.5 ATS. It's the same old vitriol from you as always.

     

    No offense Frisky but how is his support of Cadillac any different from your support of BMW? That last remark was simply uncalled for.

     

     

     

    While I may support BMW, I have no problem openly criticizing them where it is due. I also have no problem with Cadillac or someone liking Cadillac. But mocking products from a competitor when Cadillac's own is even worse strikes me as rather hypocritical. I do not blindly proclaim BMW to be superior to other vehicles just because of my preference.

    Edited by Frisky Dingo
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

     

    A BMW 320i is a far, far better car than a 2.5 ATS. It's the same old vitriol from you as always.

     

    No offense Frisky but how is his support of Cadillac any different from your support of BMW? That last remark was simply uncalled for.

     

     

     

    While I may support BMW, I have no problem openly criticizing them where it is due. I also have no problem with Cadillac or someone liking Cadillac. But mocking products from a competitor when Cadillac's own is even worse strikes me as rather hypocritical. I do not blindly proclaim BMW to be superior to other vehicles just because of my preference.

     

    Again, you do the EXACT same thing where BMW is concerned that Casa does where Cadillac is concerned. That is all I'm saying. BTW, saying Cadillacs is worse is pure opinion on your part and partially proves what I am saying here. 

     

    Carry on folks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

     

     

    A BMW 320i is a far, far better car than a 2.5 ATS. It's the same old vitriol from you as always.

     

    No offense Frisky but how is his support of Cadillac any different from your support of BMW? That last remark was simply uncalled for.

     

     

     

    While I may support BMW, I have no problem openly criticizing them where it is due. I also have no problem with Cadillac or someone liking Cadillac. But mocking products from a competitor when Cadillac's own is even worse strikes me as rather hypocritical. I do not blindly proclaim BMW to be superior to other vehicles just because of my preference.

     

    Again, you do the EXACT same thing where BMW is concerned that Casa does where Cadillac is concerned. That is all I'm saying. BTW, saying Cadillacs is worse is pure opinion on your part and partially proves what I am saying here. 

     

    Carry on folks.

     

     

    No, I don't. Provide me one instance where I have said that a brand- in particular, Cadillac- sucked, or remarked "F%*# them." in reference to them. You won't. You can't. Him and I are noth the same.

     

    And there is absolutely NO third party source that would dispute the 320i as being better than the ATS 2.5. It's like saying Scarlett Johansson is hotter than Roseann. It may be opinion, but it's unanimously agreed upon by any reasonable person.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    A BMW 320i is a far, far better car than a 2.5 ATS. It's the same old vitriol from you as always.

     

    No offense Frisky but how is his support of Cadillac any different from your support of BMW? That last remark was simply uncalled for.

     

     

     

    While I may support BMW, I have no problem openly criticizing them where it is due. I also have no problem with Cadillac or someone liking Cadillac. But mocking products from a competitor when Cadillac's own is even worse strikes me as rather hypocritical. I do not blindly proclaim BMW to be superior to other vehicles just because of my preference.

     

    Again, you do the EXACT same thing where BMW is concerned that Casa does where Cadillac is concerned. That is all I'm saying. BTW, saying Cadillacs is worse is pure opinion on your part and partially proves what I am saying here. 

     

    Carry on folks.

     

     

    No, I don't. Provide me one instance where I have said that a brand- in particular, Cadillac- sucked, or remarked "F%*# them." in reference to them. You won't. You can't. Him and I are noth the same.

     

    And there is absolutely NO third party source that would dispute the 320i as being better than the ATS 2.5. It's like saying Scarlett Johansson is hotter than Roseann. It may be opinion, but it's unanimously agreed upon by any reasonable person.

     

    I have seen you demean others over their criticisms of BMW (myself included) more than once here and on other sites so I really don't have to rehash it to prove anything to you. No offense. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

     

    Not one with the 8AT, but a 6AT'er. It was a boring dog. Take away the guts of the higher trim levels, and you're left with is that cramped interior and maddening CUE. Hard pass. At least you can get a Track Pkg and 6MT with the 320i. And with a tune, it makes near 328i power levels. It does have smaller brakes and a more restrictive exhaust though. There are also a few other components that prevent it from being able to pick up power as well as the 328.

     

     

     

     

    First U come at me in a way that was unnecessary... especially since I was talking about the car.. not U.

     

    Second.. and here is the most important part if U can ever get past the BS.. WE AGREE ON A BUNCH ON STUFF 90% of the time. 

     

    A Tune??? If U are gonna get a tune on the 320i U might as well get the 328i. The difference in price is about $5K.. and that is a very small amount in terms of Financing or Leasing. Furthermore HOW MUCH IS THAT TUNE??? Because it would have to be a bargain basement price in order to justify all the other things one has to upgrade to get to the 328i they could have just bought for $5K more.

     

    As to the 2.5L. Boring dog... I would characteristic any car in this class as that after hopping out of the VSeries model.. or in my case, the day I drive the new 2.5L 8Speed.. my Vette. Its all about perspective, in both brands. No one such as U or me are gonna normally walk into a BMW or Cadillac dealer and buy a 2.5L as a DD expecting it to pull off daredevil tricks like Evel Knievil, but I'll be the first to tell U that the 8speed tends to wake that lil bitch up.. just enough to be noticed. And despite the humble engine, the tuning of the chassis is quite up to snuff to make most feel satisfied. AGAIN.. I personally would opt for the 3.6L or 3.6LTT, no different than I would opt for the 335i or M3. 

     

    Lastly.. if CUE is maddening to anyone then that person must be ready or a strait-jacket just dealing with their daily use of the IPhone or Android. The biggest gripe I've ever heard about CUE was that it lacks buttons. That's it. That's all. Nothing else. My solution.. use the effin Voice Control or BUTTONS on the steering wheel

     

     

    Idk about 90%, but I DO agree with you on a lot of things. My biggest problem is in your delivery. The 320i may not be anything to write home about, but it's a much better car than it's similarly priced competition- 2.5 ATS, CLA, Acura ILX, Buick Regal. Certainly no justification for saying "F^&* BMW." The ATS is laughable in 2.5 spec, but I still wouldn't use that to dismiss the brand as a whole.

     

     

     

     

    I still don't agree. But then again.. as I've said neither are my first of second choices considering there are OTHER choices for really not much more within the nameplate. 

     

     

     

     

    I am personally unimpressed with the 8AT in any sporting application thus far. I haven't driven an ATS-V or new Camaro, but in the C7, I just don't feel it is sharp enough and responsive to inputs using the shift paddles. It's great hooked up to trucks and other vehicles, but the best DCT units out there still shame it in sport options. Just my .02. Its a moot point for me anyway, because anything I'd buy that offers the 8AT I would take in manual. And GM's manuals are, by and large, very good. Sometimes they're a little on the notchy, laborous side, but I like that.

     

     

     

    If I were to buy the Stingray again.. I'd go 8L90 Automatic every time. Quite frankly.. its just too good for me not to have gotten it had it been available at the time of my purchase.. That being said.. the 8Speed in the Vette, the 8L90 is not the same as the one in the Cadillacs, the 8L45 is the Cadillac version (someone correct me on the name code) and is different due to the gearing and transaxle going back to the C7 transmission in the rear instead of the front. Upgainst the last 911 I drove, both the Vette and the Alphas meet the capabilities of the best German tranny I can think of.

     

     

     

     

    CUE has improved over the last few years, I'll give it that. The setup I used in an Escalade was decent. Definitely no longer a deal breaker like it would have been in the past. I still don't like it a great deal, and I think it needs to utilize at least a few more buttons than it does. Even as a BMW fan, I have no issue admitting Cadillac is just a few steps away from having a fully cohesive product that surpasses, or at least matches, BMW in every facet. And I hope they do. Competition improves the breed, after all. The question is whether Cadillac will commit to it. These on-paper winners and niche tweeners like the CT6 aren't going to carry the brand. At some point, they HAVE to build the El Miraj's, Ciels, Sixteens, etc they show off every now and again.

     

     

    And that's my issue. U came in with a sensationalized rant about how "maddening CUE" was... when in reality its force fed crap that people like regurgitate from sources like "John Lieberman" types

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Going back to the 320i, a tune runs less than $600. That puts it on par with the power level (just a bit more, actually) of the 328i. For a cheap leased DD, it'd be a fun little car with a 6MT and Sport Pkg. And out the door for low-mid 30's. I can think of no other car in the segment or a similar segment that would make a more compelling buy for an enthusiast.

     

     

    We'll just have to agree to disagree on the 8AT in the Vette. Aside from being smooth and well-behaved in auto mode, I noticed nothing to write home about. In manual mode, response time didn't feel quick enough, downshifts were a bit jerky, it just didn't feel like a good dual-clutch does.

     

    As for CUE, I didn't go on a rant at all. I briefly mentioned it. It is still a frustrating system to use, imo.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Not sure...I'm not using it, so apparently it wasn't that useful to me...wherever I've gone, I've been there.    Having on the phone only makes sense because you have to have location services turned on for it to gather data, and your phone is always with you, so...
    • Ok, thanks, but what would be the gain or loss related to the Timeline as a specific feature?  Why they made a bifurcated yes/no decision on desktop versus phone is weird. I will continue to use Google Maps.  Remember Mapquest?  Yikes.   Not to digress, but I use the Moovit app with great success when it comes to planning rides on transit.  It resets itself to the metro area you are in and seems to do a slightly better job than Google Maps.
    • If the Lyriq's proportions are off, then so are all of the "crossover coupes" from BMW, Mercedes, Audi, and Acura. 
    • Had to look up what Google Timeline was... apparently a feature of Google Maps.  I think I've used it, but several years ago...not something I actively use.  I mostly use Waze for navigation.  I use Google Maps at home on my laptop when exploring an area/planning a trip then Waze when I'm in the car. 
    • With all this discourse, I need some input. I have put off ... and forgetting about ... my election for the Google Timeline, which is about to sunset.  People seem to say it's phasing out for desktop, but will stay on phones.  Like others have said, they get more mileage out of it on their desktop/laptop than other their phone ... ditto for me. Who really benefits from the Timeline?  I've looked at it a few times, mostly to be amused. What election are you or people you know making?  What is/will be salvageable?  What do you recommend?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search