Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Average Transaction Price of A New Car Goes Up

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    April 18, 2012

    New analysis from TrueCar, an online research firm, shows the average transaction price of new cars are on the rise.

    TrueCar looked at sales data from last month and found that the average price was 30,748, a rise 6.9% over the previous year.

    So why the increase in average price? The answer lies in the options list. Consumers are ticking more boxes on the list like never before, with the average new car being very close to “fully loaded.”

    For example, Ford’s president of the Americas, Mark Fields recently told investors that the Focus is selling for an average of $3,100 more per car than the previous model year.

    Aside from the option list, the other factor is automakers cutting back on the incentives. This is due to automakers, especially the big three changing their business model to focus more on forecasting and producing vehicles at a proper volume than flooding dealers with too many vehicles.

    TrueCar predicts that the average price will begin to level out, sometime when the average price hits $31,000.

    Source: USA Today

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    WOW, I like the little focus, but would not pay 3100 more for it. I do think the younger generation is expecting far more toys on an auto compared to what we had growing up in the 70's and 80's.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    WOW, I like the little focus, but would not pay 3100 more for it. I do think the younger generation is expecting far more toys on an auto compared to what we had growing up in the 70's and 80's.

    Yes, manual windows, manual vinyl seats and a cassette deck don't cut it anymore (what my first car had). Small cars don't have to be depressing gray and stripped inside anymore...can get them quite loaded and civilized today.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For the burdensome hardships of cranking down windows ( and the like).... perhaps a lot more younger folk could get into a new car, rather than having to wait until they are 50 yrs old.

    AFA power seats go- who ever re-adjusts their seat after setting it once? Waste of money & excess weight. At least you use power windows regularly...

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For the burdensome hardships of cranking down windows ( and the like).... perhaps a lot more younger folk could get into a new car, rather than having to wait until they are 50 yrs old.

    The youfs can always ride a bike, the bus, or buy used cars..

    AFA power seats go- who ever re-adjusts their seat after setting it once? Waste of money & excess weight. At least you use power windows regularly...

    Seats get adjusted if you have two people using the car.. though memory seat settings make that chore easier.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yea, but I had a rental car a few years back that had manual levers for raising and lowering the seat, twist knob for lumbar support, all worked very well. Cheaper to produce, let chance of failure. We need to stop producing a disposable society and have people understand what it means to work hard to pay for something nice and learn to take care of things.

    Maintenance is NOT a dirty word.

    My first vehicle was a 1976 Series 5 Luv truck with the Isuzu 4 banger and 5 speed manual. Manual windows, Manual door locks, Manual bench seat. AM/FM radio. This my dad bought new from LeeJohnson Cheverolet in Summer of 75 for $1575 out the door. I loved that truck and when I turned 16, my dad gave me the option of $2k towards a vehicle of my choice and needing to get a job for car payments or I could have his truck.

    I took his truck, got a job and restored it to factory stock spec. and sold it when I went to Japan for College in 1989 for $3500 to a lady in Kirkland who still has it and drives it. She loves it and babies it. I do wish some time I could have that truck back. It had real style.

    We need to roll back some of the stupid laws that have bloated entry level cars and this would open up a ton of folks to driving.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    snapback.pngbalthazar, on , said:

    >>"Focus is selling for an average of $;3,100 more per car"<<

    Say what?

    $ = $ So $3,100 more than previous Focuses. The html editor Mudmonster uses is broken, it looks like.

    Yeah, its a bug with IPBoard software.. We know about it and we're waiting on a fix..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The youfs can always ride a bike, the bus, or buy used cars..

    If they have no bread, let them eat cake.

    The "youfs" are currently 50... and every year that cars get more expensive compared to average income, the higher that number will go up. Soon all cars will be designed for 90 year olds... the numbers on the dashboard will be 6 inches tall, the controls will be like a Fisher Price activity center... good for arthritic hands will lousy motor control... and they will largely drive themselves... at 35 mph with the left turn signal on for miles... without the ability to turn off the self-drive feature. Have fun.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The youfs can always ride a bike, the bus, or buy used cars..

    If they have no bread, let them eat cake.

    The "youfs" are currently 50... and every year that cars get more expensive compared to average income, the higher that number will go up. Soon all cars will be designed for 90 year olds... the numbers on the dashboard will be 6 inches tall, the controls will be like a Fisher Price activity center... good for arthritic hands will lousy motor control... and they will largely drive themselves... at 35 mph with the left turn signal on for miles... without the ability to turn off the self-drive feature. Have fun.

    I don't where this 50 number comes in, but I know plenty of people my age (early 40s) and younger that are buying new cars...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't where this 50 number comes in, but I know plenty of people my age (early 40s) and younger that are buying new cars...

    It is the current average age of a new car buyer. So for the plenty of people you know buying cars, there are plenty of 60 year olds offsetting them. To negate BK's buying of the Challenger at 20 something, there is a 80 year old buyer... or two 65 year olds.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The fact that the average selling price of a new car is up 7% from last year is rather depressing. The reason behind it is not so bad: more features do lead to a higher MSRP. Ditching power everything for manual everything sounds nice until you cannot sell those cars unless there is a large discount attached to that "stripper car". I remember when small cars were essentially penalty boxes. I would never wish anyone a Chevette or an early-80s Escort since they had power nothing and all was manual and cheap. Thirty years ago the Big Three basically hated small cars while the Japanese built decent ones, hence why they are still around. A GOOD small car now can lead to the next purchase to be a more profitable larger car... or crossover for the family. As for the current average age of new car buyers, that is a shame. The only reason that is true is because there are relatively few people under 40 that can afford to BUY a new car. (Leasing is another story.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yea, but I had a rental car a few years back that had manual levers for raising and lowering the seat, twist knob for lumbar support, all worked very well. Cheaper to produce, let chance of failure. We need to stop producing a disposable society and have people understand what it means to work hard to pay for something nice and learn to take care of things.

    Maintenance is NOT a dirty word.

    My first vehicle was a 1976 Series 5 Luv truck with the Isuzu 4 banger and 5 speed manual. Manual windows, Manual door locks, Manual bench seat. AM/FM radio. This my dad bought new from LeeJohnson Cheverolet in Summer of 75 for $1575 out the door. I loved that truck and when I turned 16, my dad gave me the option of $2k towards a vehicle of my choice and needing to get a job for car payments or I could have his truck.

    I took his truck, got a job and restored it to factory stock spec. and sold it when I went to Japan for College in 1989 for $3500 to a lady in Kirkland who still has it and drives it. She loves it and babies it. I do wish some time I could have that truck back. It had real style.

    We need to roll back some of the stupid laws that have bloated entry level cars and this would open up a ton of folks to driving.

    Agreed!

    What ever happened to simple cars?

    People may laugh at my Cavaliers, but they are stupid easy to fix....

    And I like crank widows....Tend to roll them down a bunch....I've have a motor gone in a hurry...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is the current average age of a new car buyer. So for the plenty of people you know buying cars, there are plenty of 60 year olds offsetting them. To negate BK's buying of the Challenger at 20 something, there is a 80 year old buyer... or two 65 year olds.

    I'd say we're going to see the average age of new car buyers continue to rise for the next few years.

    Here's your food for thought on the subject. There are 100 million Baby Boomers in the United States of Americaland and Canadaland combined. Starting back in 2006, every year, a group of around 5 million of them turn age 60. That means, somewhere in North America, about 10,000 Baby Boomers hit the big Six-Oh per day, which averages out to about 7 people per minute. This rate of aging won't end until around the end of the decade or very early the next.

    That huge group of pre-Senior Citizens are all retiring at about age 60 as well. And what do you do when you retire? You usually buy a new car of some sort.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From what I've read, my generation (X) is much smaller than the Baby Boomers or the Millennials/Gen Y.. the Boomers are still going to be a big part of car sales for quite a while (since the youngest ones are under 50).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Horrible development, and will only get worse as these criminal CAFE standards slam their way down our throats.

    What do you recommend: repealing CAFE standard entirely? CAFE is not a reason new car prices are higher. A factor that does count is all the safety features and technology that goes into them now. A cheap stripper car that could be bought in 1990 or 1980 can no longer be bought in 2012.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That huge group of pre-Senior Citizens are all retiring at about age 60 as well. And what do you do when you retire? You usually buy a new car of some sort.

    Most of the well-off retirees I've known have dialed back the bling at retirement, but increase the travel. The not-so-well-off retirees become an oxymoron as they work until they die.

    From what I've read, my generation (X) is much smaller than the Baby Boomers or the Millennials/Gen Y.. the Boomers are still going to be a big part of car sales for quite a while (since the youngest ones are under 50).

    Wiki used to have some good hard numbers, but no more.

    Its actually quite shocking the numbers, which vary somewhat depending on the boundary years used to separate the 'gens'...

    1945-1964 9 years Boomers 80 million

    1965-1979 14 years Gen X 49 million

    1980-1999 19 years Gen Y 78 million

    (from http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1731528,00.html)

    Its especially crazy to compare the average births per year... 8.88 million births per year for Boomers to 3.2 million births per year for Gen X.

    I agree the Boomers will be influencing cars for a while, but I also wonder if more of their money goes towards longevity instead of new cars. The Boomers have a lot of money and WILL increase the average lifespan by dumping a lot of money into medical science concerning aging... which will keep them around even longer, but at what impact, financially?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ That is the volume at birth, but the volumes today are quite close in each 5-yr age bracket from 15-59.

    Obviously a greater percentage of Boomers have died than Gen X or Gen Y.

    Not sure that comparing the above volumes, over such a large year span, WRT vehicle purchases today, means anything.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    riv, what I'm saying about CAFE is... the studies say the new standards will add $2k-$3k to the price of a vehicle, in addition to any other forms of price creep.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    riv, what I'm saying about CAFE is... the studies say the new standards will add $2k-$3k to the price of a vehicle, in addition to any other forms of price creep.

    Oh really. I did not know that.

    As for Baby Boomers and cars, health care will be extremely high and stay high for a long time because it seems to me that they would like to avoid death. What impact financially: more catering to elderly needs at the expense of almost everyone else. If you don't believe me, drop by SW or South Florida sometime.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Very cool read and video on how Tires are made. Where Are Michelin Tires Made And Who Owns The Brand?
    • This is an interesting read. Korea is the only country with EVs that are head-to-head with China and in some ways better. This nanotube technology will allow Korea to move way farther forward than the U.S. in automotive options. Advances in carbon nanotube applications enhance battery dry process
    • I got a better idea for Trump: Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state, Id prefer for the US to become Canada's 4rth Territory.  Not even province status. In order for the United Stated Territories of America to become a full blown province, Americans would have to prove their allegiance and loyalty to the Royalty of King Charles the Third since Canada is a Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy of the British Commonwealth realm.  Trump's job and title would be a perfect revival for an old tradition.  King Charles the Third's court jester. And we could throw him a bone...and have a playing card named after him since he likes those kinds of things    
    • Im glad to get that off my chest  
    • This is what Andy Palmer said, the dude of what the article in the link is about.     "Hybrids are a road to hell. They are a transition strategy, and the longer you stay on that transition, the less quickly you ramp up into the new world," Palmer said. "If you just delay transitioning to EVs by diluting it with hybrids then you are more uncompetitive for longer, and you allow the Chinese to continue to develop their market and their leadership. I honestly think it's a fool's errand," he added.   And him being the dude that helped engineer the Nissan Leaf and was later the dude in charge of Nissan's EV department, I am 100% in agreement with him.  And I would also like to add: The Chinese government pushed and pushed hard for EVs.  Pushed hard not only on the global stage but MOSTLY got ALL Chinese people ON BOARD with EVs.  They had several reasons to do so.  China has lots and lots of minerals and important ingredients to make said batteries. An essential part of EV transition.  But most IMPORTANTLY, China WANTS to REPLACE the USA for being the defacto country  in political, social, economical influence in the world that the USA enjoyed since the end of WW2 in 1945.  And since they knew they lacked behind in ebery metric that would push them to that status, they had only one move to make. It was a Hail Mary pass, but kit was to dominate in the the tech world and it happened to be in the automobile realm. EVs. And while China was seeking to dominate in this arena, and CAREFULLY nurtured it, the USA phoqued themselves over.  Idiot Americans were fooled to believe ALL the negative commentary on EVs. Uneducated morons liked the drill baby drill commentary. Smart but greedy fools failed to see what was coming next and failed even further to see the threat that is China and ITS technological breakthroughs.  ALL from morons that had biased reasons to be anti-EV. From the Joe Rogans and Alex Jones of the world that thrive from clicks for the podcast youtube and other shytty platforms to anti-EV biases from Big Oil.  And lastly, stupid politicians that failed American citizens in different decades from keeping Americans poor and stupid by not giving them educations. By PURPOSELY DEFUNDING the American school system, by PURPOSELY lying to them on DIFFERENT subjects and while these American politicians were greedily looking to make America into a fascist, oligarch world, they failed to see and acknowledge the OTHER threats the world was giving to the US OTHER than the war threats.  The technological warfare.   Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the Chinese regimes were on about EVs.  And if Trump decides to cut EV subsidies, even of only to allow Tesla to sell, the Chinese are building European factories to build EVs there. Slowly.  They are FLOODING the market with Chinese EVs as we speak in Europe.  The next step is to flood North America with Chinese EVs. The starting point IS Mexico.  If one is educated, one could see the disaster that is to come for GM, Ford.  Stellantis is going to get the disaster first in Europe.  Chinese EVs are going to flood Mexico.  INEXPENSIVE Chinese EVs.  Then WILL come the factories in Mexico.  So much for the "NOBODY WANTS EVs" rhetoric that the uneducated, wrongfully informed Americans (and Canadians to some degree) keep on spewing...   Its really IS a big deal. I SEE that rhetoric play about the failure of VW and Stellantis and even GM when these fools squeal about how they are failing because they have put all their monies on EVs.  The thing is, they didnt put their monies FAST enough on EVs and also concetrated on producing ICEVs when they should have just NIXED them waaaay before.  Of course that is Monday morning quarterbacking from me as I say that, but I ALSO saw the writing on the wall about EVs being THE future.  Had Americans NOT been LIED to about this whole thing about scare tactics about EVs, GM and Ford would have ALL the working EVs RIGHT NOW not ONLY to shut down Tesla, but to even shut down Chinese EVs. Elon Musk could have TAKEN China ALL to himself if he was 5% the visionary he thinks he is.   But he was too busy STILL selling us on colonizing Mars...  Whatever happened to that super loop thing anyway?  Yeah...a billion dollar boondoggle that had everybody fooled.  Chinese politicians, engineers and all around smart folk must be STILL laughing at all the gullible Americans and greedy fools that the US has churned out the last 15 years...    But hey...   Now lets keep on shopping because its the Christmas season and we should all consume because its good for the economy while we wait for tariffs to hit us because Canada and Mexico reasons, because our eggs are expensive while we get fleeced by insurance companies but we dont want healthcare because communism and education education education but Ivy Leaguers  they too smart so they elitist but Democrats wanting to forgive student debt no good but keep on having insanely expensive school tuitions while other areas in the country and young folk not having ACCESS to an education while calling some countries of the world as shytehole countries while ALSO keep on having school shootings because teachers arent packing but also those shytehole country folk  are eating the dogs and they are eating the cats.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search