Jump to content
Create New...
  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    Amidst Falling Sales, Republicans Turn Chevrolet Volt Into Political Scapegoat

    G.Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    March 10, 2012

    Life hasn’t exactly been easy for the Chevrolet Volt. Although it was just recently named 2012 European Car of the Year in Opel Ampera guise, GM announced previous to the awarding they were suspending production for little over a month because of slow sales and dealers rejecting further allotments. On top of that, the Volt has had some image issues stemming from the NHTSA’s disclosure late last year about how an example they t-boned caught fire some three weeks after it was tested in May 2011.

    It’s only insult to injury then Republican politicians have turned to bashing the Volt in debates and interviews, associating the car with radical left-wing environmentalism and government bailout money. Republican Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich decided to fault the Chevy plug-in hybrid for lack of space for a gun rack of all things (the Volt can indeed accommodate one, if you were curious), and frontrunner Mitt Romney said it was “an idea whose time has not come.” Perhaps the worst bit of uninformed criticism came from conservative group American Tradition Partnership Inc. who said the Volt was an “exploding Obamamobile.”

    GM CEO Dan Akerson testifying before Congress about the Volt in January said, “Although we loaded the Volt with state-of-the-art safety features, we did not engineer the Volt to be a political punching bag. And that, sadly, is what the Volt has become.” How right you are — or were — Dan.

    Mr. Akerson also went onto say that he thinks Volt sales have been pinched because of the political trash talk. Challengers to the Obama administration, on the other hand, see it as an effective way of resonating with their voters. Art Spinella, an analyst who studies new car buyers as president of CNW Marketing Research, noted Republicans buy Chevys, especially the Silverado pickup, in greater numbers than Democrats do. And while Chevy buyers tend to identify as Republican, less than 14 percent of Volt owners lean to the political right.

    While it’s difficult to tell how much of an effect the political hate speech has had on Volt sales, Akerson isn’t alone in believing sales could be much better without the GOP bashing it. Volt sales totaled up to 7,671 cars last year, falling short of GM’s target of 10,000 cars by a little over 2,000. In the first two months of 2012 GM only sold about 1,600 Volts, and that sales track is falling way short of Akerson’s year-end goal of 45,000. Art Spinella says part of that huge divide is due to attacks on the campaign trail.

    Buyers who identify as conservative “will not buy a car that has anything at all that they perceive being associated with the administration,” Spinella said.

    Akerson isn’t the only non-political figure out there who’s upset that the Volt has founded itself stranded in political crossfire, either. Everyone’s favorite auto-exec and registered Republican who helped to develop the Volt, former GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz, is outraged as well.

    “I don’t mind criticizing Obama, I don’t mind criticizing the Democrats, and, you know me, I think global warming is huge hoax perpetrated by the global political left,” Lutz said. “But when it comes to telling outright lies to advance your political purposes and damage an American company that is greatly on its way back, hurt employment in Hamtramck, Michigan, I just think it’s totally outrageous.”

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Politics aside, the Volt is not succeeding on the market as a product. It is not succeeding even with $7,500 in purchase subsidies. The way I see it, there shouldn't even be 1 cent of subsidy for Hybrids or Electric cars. They should either be viable products on their own merits or we should wait for the time when the market decide that they are -- whether that is 10 years or 100 years.

    • Agree 3
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually, no, we don't "subsidize" gasoline, we just don't tax gasoline like the Europeans do to create an artificially high price for whatever politcal, environmental or revenue agenda they have. There is no direct subsidy on the sale or purchase of Gasoline, Diesel or Kerosene fuel, period.

    What is frequently termed "oil subsidies" are not really subsidies at all. They can be broken down to 4 categories...

    (1) Tax Deductions for domestic production. These basically matches the typical tax breaks that countries which export oil to the USA offer or partly compensate for the regulatory costs of US manufacturing. All businesses get these. They are there mainly to keep production domestic -- otherwise it will be cheaper to drill and refine elsewhere. If we eliminate it for oil companies we'll be singling out the oil ndustry as the ONLY industry which does not receive these tax breaks.

    (2) Capital Equipment depreciation allowance. Companies write down the depreciation of equipment. All companies get it, not just oil companies. An airline for instance gets to depreciate their jets and oil companies an oil rig.

    (3) Foreign Tax Credits. Companies get tax credits for taxes they pay overseas against taxes they have to pay domestically. Again, all companies, and in fact individuals, get this. If as part of your job, you do work in Europe and are taxed in Europe under their tax laws, you get to take all of those taxes paid as a deduction against your income when filing your US tax returns because they are no longer your income!

    (4) Non-tangible Drill Cost write down. This is the ONLY area where the oil industry gets different treatment compared to other industries. And, the only difference is that they get to take it all in the first year and not over multiple years. The magnitude of the deduction is not different from that we extend to other businesses on intangible write downs.

    The most important thing that one needs to know is that the total amount of tax breaks given to the oil industry is a mere $4 billion. Quite insignificant given the $625 billion US oil consumption and amounts to less than 1% of the price at the pump or 4 cents of the $4 you may pay for one gallon. More importantly, of this 4 billion, only $0.8 billion is given in a manner not also extended to all other US manufacturers and industries as legitimate tax deductions.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Want to fix Volt sales-it's pretty simple-make them cheaper.

    This has NOTHING to do with Politics, because we can rip on toyotas all day long, but at the end of the day they do what it takes to make the sales.

    Match the Pi-then we can talk...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    and weren't SUV's and big trucks the "political punching bags" of a few years ago? or how about C4C...? if you don't want them to be "punching bags".....build toyota's. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Specificaly, I would not buy a Volt despite the tax incentives (dollars out of the taxpayer pocket) because it is overpriced, ugly, and it has a cheap/wierd interior.

    General Motors also sends too many of its jobs overseas directly or indirectly especially considering the taxpayer bailout. All its vehicles should be 90- 100% made in the USA, and not 10% owned by Prince All Weed.

    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Welcome to the boards, Mr. Green. We're glad to have you on board.

    General Motors also sends too many of its jobs overseas directly or indirectly especially considering the taxpayer bailout. All its vehicles should be 90- 100% made in the USA, and not 10% owned by Prince All Weed.

    You're going to have to back yourself up on this one.

    1.) New GM (GM post-bankruptcy) has been very good about keeping jobs here in the U.S. For example, the Chevrolet Sonic, which replaced the old Korean-made Aveo, is built in Michigan. In fact, the Sonic is the only subcompact car that's produced Domestically — the North American Ford Fiesta is built in Mexico I believe, the Toyota Yaris is made in Japan, and the Nissan Versa is also built in Mexico. It's a big deal, too, because American automakers have never managed to turn a profit on a domestically-built car of the Sonic's size class, hence why most of them were produced overseas.

    2.) All vehicles sold everywhere have a certain percentage of foreign parts content. It doesn't matter if you buy a brand-new Chevy, brand-new Ford, or a brand-new Nissan. Welcome to the warm, fuzzy reality of Globalization where almost nothing is 100 percent home grown anymore.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Welcome to the end of the USA as you know it, and so on for your kids and grandkids. Demand from our companies made in USA parts.

    Next you will be surrendering to Islam, cause they're getting their way in Euroope. Stand for something, not globalization.

    • Disagree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Michael Green, you complained about the Volt's cost, then complained about the amount of domestic content/assembly of GM cars. There's no quick or easy way to have 90-100% US content in GM cars and keep costs at a reasonable level. You can't just have your cake, eat it too, and dictate the ingredients without some kind of sacrifice. I too would like to see an increase in domestic content, but there is a limit to what's reasonable without tradeoff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As a follow up to my last post, the Domestic/Foriegn parts content of the Sonic is 47 percent, with the major source of foriegn parts coming from Korea which I think was about 12 to 17 percent.

    I was going to snap a photo of the window sticker, but my phone decided to take a nap, so my apologies on that.

    Also worth noting is that I didn't notice the production date of that particular car. If it was produced at the start of the Sonic's production run late last year, then the Domestic parts content is sure to increase as the year goes on.

    I suspect this 'Michael Green' is a just a troll...only has 3 posts.

    It's hard to assume that.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Welcome to the end of the USA as you know it, and so on for your kids and grandkids. Demand from our companies made in USA parts.

    Next you will be surrendering to Islam, cause they're getting their way in Euroope. Stand for something, not globalization.

    Good...you tell that to Wall Street...let me know how that goes....

    Oh, and to bring you up to date, some companies are bringing back parts/production to the US.

    Helps to do your homework first....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The republicans did not make this political.

    Obama made GM political when he demanded his administration dictate how GM is run. For example, who the CEO should be.

    Some of us are worried about not only how the Government is throwing money all over the place, but also by how often said money lands in the hands of solid DNC voters and fundraisers.

    The problem is the kind of person who would by a hybrid or electric car, probably thinks American cars are inferior, and with batteries catching fire (I can say this as a Fiero owner) it only reinforces that thinking.

    Akerson says he coulda sold more Volts if not for the Republicans bashing it? Who's playing scapegoat now?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    kills me how greenies cried and screamed when GM got rid of the EV. Now GM again builds the most advanced alternate propulsion electric, and now people are still complaining. In adjusted dollars, the Volt is probably cheaper than the EV. Where are the libbers and greenies stepping up to the plate to save the earth?

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is the time to tell everyone and the politicians regardless of party to SHUT THE F*@K UP!

    How do you do this?

    Lower prices on the auto to start, marketing commercials that talk about the quality, the American jobs it created and have current owners interviewed talking about it.

    Then throw the hammer down by challanging America!

    They could even use the Death of the EV to call out these very same people.

    " You said we killed the EV for no good reason yet the market was not willing to support it! The market has asked for now and we have delivered to you the VOLT! American Engineered, American parts supplied, American MADE!!! Check it out at your local Chevy dealer now and when you see one on the road, thank them for supporting Jobs in America!"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What on earth does globalization have anything to do with religion.

    because... if nationalism in the "american made" nature isn't religion...obviously the opposite is! /sarcasm.

    if it's a better product, no matter where it's made, if it can compete, should stand by itself in the market place...untill something better comes along. look at the early history of the mustang for an example of this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm a bit baffled by the headline. Sales are falling? All auto manufacturers reports sales based on current month/year compared to current month/previous year, for example FEB 2012 compared to FEB 2011. Using that method, Volt sales have increased DEC, JAN, FEB. To my knowledge no manufacturer compares consecutive months in the current year. Just sayin' . . .

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Sending a Christmas eve chuckle your way: Here's Dyan Cannon, who has again poured herself into her clothing, to attend a Lakers game, which she does often. It looks like she can easily fit down many chimneys.  Maybe even into a Christmas gift stocking. I find the different chapters of Dyan Cannon humorous.
    • @Drew Dowdell @Robert Hall @trinacriabob @A Horse With No Name @ccap41 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442  And including all of the C&G members that are here that I do not interact with often enough or those I have forgotten their handles. Wishing each and every one of you a Merry Xmas Eve and Merry Xmas.  To those that do not celebrate Xmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Holidays, Happy time off. Wishing each and every person here a restful end to the year, one of love, respect, relaxation to you and your families. Wishing all the best!
    • MOU means that these companies have signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" to explore the participation, involvement and synergy sharing in relation to the business integration through a joint holding company. Back in August 1st, 2024 Nissan and Honda created a Joint Holding Company for the commencement of a strategic partnership focused on intelligence and electrification. This was to start the consideration towards integration of the two companies. Mitsubishi Motors has now signed onto this MOU to explore the possibility of achieving synergies at an increased level through business participation or integration. In basic terms, the three companies have agreed to join forces in sharing costs to move forward with EV platform R&D while they also look at the ICE "Internal Combustion Engine" gas side of having shared platforms to reduce costs and hopefully save the three auto companies by keeping them alive.  While Nissan and Honda have agreed to move forward in this integration of the two auto companies, Mitsubishi Motors will make a final decision by the end of January 2025 about possibly joining in with the integration of Mitsubishi Motors into this joint 3 auto company venture. Nissan and Honda have already agreed to a full SDV or Software-defined vehicles program moving forward that will allow them to have a solid crucial collaboration of intelligence and electrification for future products. Both companies have stated that the acceleration of technology and the rapid change of the auto industry will allow these two companies to maintain global competitiveness and deliver more attractive products and services for customers worldwide. Nissan global mobility product line merged with Honda four-wheel-vehicles, motor cycles and power products can allow both companies to become more attractive to shareholders and innovation of products to sell to customers worldwide according to the CEOs of both companies. Nissan and Honda have stated the following: Nissan and Honda aim to become a world-class mobility company with sales revenue exceeding 30 trillion yen ($190 Billion U.S. Dollars) and operating profit of more than 3 trillion yen ($19 billion U.S. Dollars). The expected synergies from the business integration at this time are: 1. Scale advantages by standardizing vehicle platforms By standardizing the vehicle platforms of both companies across various product segments, the companies expect to create stronger products, reduce costs, enhance development efficiencies, and improve investment efficiencies through standardized production processes. The integration is projected to increase sales and operational volumes, allowing the companies to reduce development costs per vehicle, including for future digital services, while maximizing profits. By accelerating the mutual complementation of their global vehicle offerings - including ICE, HEV, PHEV, and EV models - Nissan and Honda will be better positioned to meet diverse customer needs around the world and deliver optimal products, leading to improved customer satisfaction. 2. Enhancement of development capabilities and cost synergies through the integration of R&D functions In accordance with the MOU to deepen strategic partnership and the joint research agreement on fundamental technologies dated August 1, the two companies have started joint research in fundamental technologies in the area of vehicle platforms for next-generation software-defined vehicles (SDVs), which is the cornerstone of the field of intelligence. After the business integration, both companies will encompass more integrated collaboration across all R&D functions, including fundamental research and vehicle application technology research. This approach is expected to enable both companies to efficiently and swiftly enhance their technological expertise, achieving both improvements in development capabilities and reductions in development costs through the integration of overlapping functions.   3. Optimizing manufacturing systems and facilities The companies anticipate that optimizing their manufacturing plants and energy service facilities, combined with improved collaboration through the shared use of production lines, will result in a substantial improvement in capacity utilization leading to a decrease in fixed costs.   4. Strengthening competitive advantages across the supply chain through the integration of purchasing functions To fully leverage the synergies from optimizing development and production capacity, both companies intend to boost their competitiveness by improving and streamlining purchasing operations and source common parts from the same the supply chain and in collaboration with business partners.   5. Realizing cost synergies through operational efficiency improvements The companies expect that the integration of systems and back-office operations, along with the upgrade and standardization of operational processes, will drive significant cost reductions.   6. Acquisition of scale advantages through integration in sales finance functions By integrating relevant areas of sales finance functions of both companies and expanding the scale of operations, the companies aim to provide a range of mobility solutions, including new financial services throughout the vehicle lifecycle, to customers of both organizations.   7. Establishment of a talent foundation for intelligence and electrification The human resources of the companies are an invaluable asset, and establishing a strong human resource foundation is crucial for the transformation that will come with the business integration. After the integration, increased employee exchanges and technical collaboration between the companies are expected to promote further skill development. Moreover, by leveraging each company's access to talent markets, attracting exceptional talent will become more attainable. Method of business integration and stock listing Nissan and Honda, with the result of the consideration, plan to establish, through a joint share transfer, a joint holding company that will be the parent company of both companies. This will be subject to approval at each company's general meeting of shareholders and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for this business integration, based on the premise that Nissan's turnaround*1 actions are steadily executed. Both Nissan and Honda will be fully owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company*2. Additionally, the companies plan to continue coexisting and developing the brands held by Honda and Nissan equally. Shares of the newly established joint holding company under consideration are planned to be newly listed (technical listing) on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”). The listing is scheduled for August 2026. With the listing of the joint holding company, both Nissan and Honda will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company and will be scheduled to be delisted from the TSE. However, shareholders of both companies will continue to be able to trade shares of the joint holding company issued during this share transfer on the TSE. The listing date of the joint holding company and the delisting date of both Nissan and Honda will be determined in accordance with the regulations of the TSE. Regarding the organizational structure of the joint holding company, and both companies which will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company after the business integration, the optimal structure for realizing synergies, including the integration of R&D functions, purchasing functions, and manufacturing functions, will be discussed and considered within the integration preparatory committee, with the aim of establishing an organizational structure that enables efficient and highly competitive business operations after the business integration. The CEO's of all three companies had the following to say: Marking the announcement, Nissan Director, President, CEO and Representative Executive Officer Makoto Uchida said: “Honda and Nissan have begun considering a business integration, and will study the creation of significant synergies between the two companies in a wide range of fields. It is significant that Nissan's partner, Mitsubishi Motors, is also involved in these discussions. We anticipate that if this integration comes to fruition, we will be able to deliver even greater value to a wider customer base.“ Honda Director and Representative Executive Officer Toshihiro Mibe said: "At this time of change in the automobile industry, which is said to occur once every 100 years, we hope that Mitsubishi Motors' participation in the business integration discussions of Nissan and Honda will lead to further social change, and that we will be able to become a leading company in creating new value in mobility through business integration. Nissan and Honda will start the discussion from today onwards with an aim to clarify the possibility of business integration by around the end of January in line with the consideration of Mitsubishi Motors." Comment from Mitsubishi Motors Director, Representative Executive Officer, and President and CEO Takao Kato said: “In an era of change in the automotive industry, the study between Nissan and Honda about a business integration will accelerate synergy maximization effects, bringing high value also to the collaborative businesses with Mitsubishi Motors. In order to realize synergies and to make the best use of each company's strengths, we will also study the best form of cooperation.” Upon looking at the press releases, it makes total sense that these companies would look to merge as each company is having a challanging time. Nissan globally has seen a 33.7% reduction in sales taking the estimated 2024 market share to 5.2%.  Honda globally has seen a 9% reduction over all with a 32% reduction in the asian rim leaving them with a 2024 estimated 5.4% market share. Mitsubishi Motors globally has seen a reduction year over year of a 10.7% drop leaving them with a 2024 estimated market share of 4.6%. All three auto companies lag the industry in technology connected auto's, feature / functions and especially EVs. All three companies have seen their profits turn into negative earnings for their respective companies leaving them with no real ability to perform R&D in building EVs to compete in China or the U.S. let alone Europe that has mandates in place for the end of ICE by 2035. End result is it looks like for these companies to survive, merging into one company that shares platforms and technology especially in the software and battery sectors will be the only way to move forward. View full article
    • I think I'm dreaming ... this vehicle would be the oldest of my handful of favorite "blast from the past" cars. A Cutlass Salon coupe in perfect condition, the first year I liked the colonnade Cutlass (and it's last year, of 3, with round headlamps in the colonnade), those huge bucket seats, and, oddly, A/C is there, but with manual windows.  It featured the new but not as popular 260 (4.3L) V8.  It also featured the light enamel blue they didn't repeat.  If the exhaust system is tight, this car will be whisper quiet. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (Numbers Matching Drivetrain) for sale: photos, technical specifications, description See anything odd?  Come on.  Quick. . . . It has Buick rally wheels instead of Oldsmobile rally wheels. * sigh ... I wonder what time frame this ad goes back to *
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search