Jump to content
Create New...
  • G. David Felt
    G. David Felt

    50% EV Goal by 2030 in USA Backed by Auto Industry

      The south lawn of the White House is where President Biden nudged the auto industry forward on the move to battery electric auto's targeting new auto sales of 50% by 2030.

    President Biden was joined by the auto industry Executives of FORD, GM and Stellantis in the executive order targeting 50% of new auto sales by 2030.

    While largely symbolic, this nonbinding order sets federal expectations for automakers to rapidly transition from ICE to BEV cars and trucks. Transportation is the largest share of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

    While not in attendance, BMW, HONDA, VOLKSWAGEN and VOLVO have all signed off on this executive order backing to target 50% of their new auto sales to be BEV by 2030 mirroring these companies pledges to hit this as they sided with California and their CARB mandates a few years back.

    UAW is backing Ford and GM push to go all electric by 2035. This on top of the following statements from auto industry executives.

    “It has been said that this generation is the first to feel the impact of climate change, and the last that can do something about it. I am proud that Ford is leading the electric revolution and standing for stronger standards that protect people and the environment as we progress towards a zero-emissions transportation future. Ford has always been a leader in sustainability and our employees continue their tremendous efforts to leave our children and our grandchildren with a cleaner planet.”
    - Executive Chair Bill Ford

    “Ford is on an ambitious trajectory to lead the electrification revolution -- from being the only full-line American automaker to side with California in favor of stricter greenhouse gas emissions, to electrifying our most iconic and popular vehicles, like the F-150 Lightning, Mustang Mach-E and E-Transit. Customer demand has exceeded our expectations. So, we expect to be well positioned to have fully electric vehicles account for 40 to 50% of our U.S. sales by 2030. We’re counting on strong cooperation among the Biden Administration, Congress and state and local governments, and are doing our part by developing high-quality, zero-emission vehicles that customers want.”
    - CEO Jim Farley

    Yesterday, we met with the Biden administration and leaders across the industry to announce our shared aspiration to bring the nation closer to a more sustainable future by achieving 40-50% annual U.S. sales of electric vehicles by 2030. 

    I want to thank the administration for its leadership and support for the necessary policies that will accelerate #EV adoption, strengthen U.S. manufacturing, and provide good jobs for people and communities.

    This is a critical moment in time, as we work together to advance the industry and achieve our shared goal for a better planet for generations to come. https://lnkd.in/ec4aKSY3

    As such, the support and focus from the auto industry will drive new technology and new choices in personal mobility.

     

    Ford, GM and Stellantis Joint Statement on Electric Vehicle Annual Sales

    Ford Statements on Electric Vehicle Sales and White House Announcement | Ford Media Center

    Stellantis Media - Ford, GM and Stellantis Joint Statement on Electric Vehicle Annual Sales (stellantisnorthamerica.com)

    California Framework Automakers’ Joint Statement on New Federal Vehicle Emissions Standards. (bmwgroup.com)

    California Framework Automakers’ Joint Statement on New Federal Vehicle Emissions Standards (hondanews.com)

    FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces Steps to Drive American Leadership Forward on Clean Cars and Trucks | The White House

    Statements on the Biden Administration’s Steps to Strengthen American Leadership on Clean Cars and Trucks | The White House


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I'm coming to the conclusion that many of the OEMs are looking at strong support for EVs not only as a public image sort of thing, but as a chance to 'reset' the marketshare pie and get in early/gain market share. Because the actual market data in no way supports a mass (never mind an entire) shift to BE's. The '22s are out, it's 8 years until 2030, and BEs are 2% of the USDM. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50% of new auto sales being BEV is not hard to believe once we see and have various options of both Cars, Trucks and SUV/CUV in BEV at various price points.

    I think by 2025 we will see just how realistic this becomes depending on what is on the dealer lot / web site to purchase.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If all things are roughly equal--ICE appliances replaced by BEV appliances at the same price point, size and content level, I think they will sell.  I don't think the average consumer resource unit knows or cares what propulsion system powers their appliance, they only are looking at price point, efficiency, and features. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Problem is- it's not going to be at the same price point distribution; the majority of confirmed upcoming BE's are priced above the median new vehicle ATP.

    But I disagree; most don't care if they have a V6 or a turbo 4 because their operational interface is identical for both. Many consumers are resistant to significant operational changes... and for some- BEs simply won't work at all. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Problem is- it's not going to be at the same price point distribution; the majority of confirmed upcoming BE's are priced above the median new vehicle ATP.

    But I disagree; most don't care if they have a V6 or a turbo 4 because their operational interface is identical for both. Many consumers are resistant to significant operational changes... and for some- BEs simply won't work at all. 

    Yeah, I can see people trying to pump gas into an EV or lots of them getting run till the battery is flat.  But if they are too ignorant to learn the differences in their appliance, f’em. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Is it also a "F'em!" when they live in a high rise or park on the street?

    Are they supposed to dangle extension cords out their 5th floor windows??

    People that live in high rises often use public transit and don’t have cars.  Parking on the street would suck.   But for those use cases, that’s why the public charging infrastructure has to grow.  

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    'Often'.... perhaps. Public transport doesn't run always or everywhere.
    Hard data would be great, in fact; OEMs and Big Gov't should be looking directly at that before those folk are forced into a dwindling & aging pool of used IC vehicles.

    More & more in the construction field I see 'own transportation required' - I think the days of running around to pick up workers is falling into the bygone era.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it is a good goal, and as batteries get better the cost will get more attainable.  Look at where a Tesla or Nissan Leaf was 8 years ago vs now, big advancements, the range has basically doubled for the same cost.  Now they have they range, they just need to half the cost.

     

    But I also think OEM's don't care if an entry level car is $40k, because they will just offer 10 year car loans and if they sell fewer cars but make more profit they will be fine with that.  Look at right now, most of these car companies have a supply crunch, they are selling fewer cars, but they just charge more money for it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Those 'halving the battery costs' aren't going to be passed on to the consumer.

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    if they sell fewer cars but make more profit they will be fine with that.

    OK, so nobody needs to stuff 4-bangers in upper-level cars to "sell more".

    Thank God that strawman is dead & buried! ?

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can’t say this wasn’t planned..

    Many ask just how they are going to do, and how folks are going to pay for it. Well, you are getting a preview now…..

    First step are the “”shortages” you see now. Don’t get excited too much- I don’t expect them to rush back into demand. And since there is no advertising and customers are paying full price (or more) there is no rush to build more. Will screw the workers at some point though….

    The second is the one you see soon. The Middle East mess (politics or not) is going to turn quite nasty soon. Wall Street knows it, and is betting on it. Gas prices at some point in the future are going to jump quite a bit- double or triple what they are now. It will force consumers into EVs…..and whatever price they charge.

    Consumers aren’t going to just be pushed into it-they will have to be forced into it.

    That’s how they are going to make that goal…..

    Edited by daves87rs
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Futures speculation on the price of oil relies heavily on expected demand, also. 
    If BE's (theoretically and inexplicably-suddenly) jump in market share (breathing freely over here), the demand for fuel goes down.

    However; one significant driver of oil futures is the very recent disruptions in the oil production market, not just from the hurricane the other day affecting Gulf coast refineries, but the Keystone Pipeline death, rescinding drilling on federal lands (I'm not up-to-speed on this one tho), and general policies against production... then going off, hat-in-hand, begging OPEC to ship more oil. 

    Oct '20 WTI crude was $35/barrel. July 1 '21 : $75/barrel.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/22/2021 at 4:15 PM, balthazar said:


     

    Screen Shot 2021-10-22 at 7.02.45 PM.png

    I doubt the pool of data was very big as I know way too many people that want full size trucks and SUVs which Tesla does not have.

    Once the production spigot at Ford, GM and Rivian get going full speed, I doubt Tesla will have this title.

    Plus if this was so true then why is there like 50 plus Tesla at the local tesla lot by me. They should be out of stock or at least very thin like other dealers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was a Google search result analysis- the pool must've been incalculably huge.

    Tesla doesn't seem to have been affected by the chip shortage nearly as much, but to look at the big picture- they're market share in the USDM is still tiny- 2021's pace is still under 300,000. Couple that with how few Tesla dealers there are, and... yeah.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Cool that Hyundai came in 1st and 2nd place at Daytona, but I wonder how long the sport will survive when I see so few people in the stands. Hyundai Wins at Daytona for the First Time in IMSA TCR History - Hyundai Newsroom
    • Its tastefully done visually on the outside.  My fear was all for nothing as I was envisioning aggressive spoilers and aero body kits.  Although the Lyriq V does have different  body work making it look like its slightly lower to the ground than the standard Lyriq and that extra body work is more sporty in nature, its not aggressive at all.  And the extra body work is very minimal. In fact, nobody would notice the design cues as a sport oriented model let alone a V model.  The V Lyriq just looks like a refreshed model for the new year.  And that is how I prefer the Lyriq V to be styled.   In my neighborhood, Chevrolet Equinox EVs and Lyriqs are ubiquitous.   The Blazer EV slightly less so.  Its too expensive.  The Equinox EV hits the spot at the cheaper end of the Ultium platfrom spectrum while the Lyriq hits the spot and the higher priced spectrum of this platform.   I saw up close and personal at the Montreal auto show, the Optiq, and the Optiq renders the Blazer EV uselessly obsolete. The Optiq has the same shape and silhouette as the Blazer, the interior is more luxurious as its a Cadillac all the while being slightly more expensive than the Blazer rendering the Blazer unneccesary.  I predict the Optiq will also be a sales success going forward while the Blazer not so much.     
    • This is an intriguing future that KIA is envisioning with the different modules that they propose their PBV vans  be capable of transforming into and modules that be offered to be used.  Pretty impressive thought process and engineering.   I visited the Montreal auto show 2 weekends ago and saw Chevy's Bright Drop and was quite impressed with that family of EV vans, but if KIA succeeds with this idea and gives us this future, Id say this would be a far better design. I also saw VW's ID Buzz up close as well. Sat in the driver's seat, passenger seat up front and back. And although the discussion between a constant whining poster and David was that the VW's ID Buzz's exterior design is cuter, to which Id agree, and the interior is quite nicely done as well, the over all vision is bested by KIA.   VW is relying on nostalgia to succeed. Like how it was discussed byn this very whiny poster.  But...with a subpar EV powertrain to even GM's comparison of let alone Tesla,  and although w Tesla has failed to advance its superiority in EV technology over its competiton, KIA,  if they bring this future to reality, Id say KIA is killing it.  KIA is looking to the future not only to survive, but to take no prisoners and rule the EV world.   Id take future progress over nostalgic mediocrity any day of the week.   And athough Id buy an ID Buzz and proudly drive it even with the subpar EV powertrain as compared to its competiton, because the ID Buzz is that cute and fun to be seen in, its KIA that really desereves my tip of the hat with this concept. Well done KIA!!! 
    • I didn't know I had this on my computer.  I thought I'd share it. They're all models of the retired QE2.  The order is actually bottom up instead of top down: 1.  As inaugurated, with an open passenger space or sun deck up top behind the mast. 2.  Still wearing its wartime gray, given that the ship was dispatched to the Falklands for the short-lived 1982 war between the UK and Argentina over the islands; also, the open passenger space or sun deck became the first block of 2-story penthouse suites, right behind the bridge. 3.  Returned to its true Cunard scheme, with the black hull, but now additional 2-story penthouse suites have been placed behind the initial ones and practically extending to the funnel; also, the funnel is a lot thicker since the ship was converted to run on diesel-electric power during a major overhaul.  This ship didn't get older ... it got better, and it hardly looked like a 39 year-old vessel at the end of its service life. They didn't have to max out the cabins for sharp pencils in that day, so this is 963 feet (longer than 3 football fields) of ocean liner with sleek yacht-like looks.  This ship was born beautiful.  If life ever takes me to Dubai, I will stay in the harborside hotel into which this ship was converted.  
    • Very cool that Pizza Bank continues.  When the Seattle Link train finally crosses the lake, I may visit, ride on it, and might check their pizza, which was top notch, as was Pegasus's on the waterfront in Alki. - - - - - I am thoroughly disgusted.  Google Maps plans to relabel the Gulf of Mexico.  Much like Chicago's Sears Tower is still the Sears Tower to me and like Houston's Transco Tower is still the Transco Tower to me, the Gulf of Mexico will continue to be the Gulf of Mexico to me since this is about elitism and imperialism.  A certain individual cannot contain his hatred for that country.  Mexico may not be on my bucket list, but why take away this name, as if they gain that much from it to begin with?  I believe it was once the Gulf of New Spain, which would be okay since it's the gulf for many Spains, in a way.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search