Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Honda Joins The Turbocharging Party


    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    November 19, 2013

    It has been a few years since Honda did a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in one of their vehicles (first-generation Acura RDX), but the company is coming back with turbocharged engines with a vengeance. This morning in Tokyo, Honda introduced three new turbocharged VTEC engines; a 1.0L three-cylinder unit, and two four-cylinder engines displacing 1.5L and 2.0L.

    The new engines utilize direct injection and advanced cooling techniques, such as pistons with cooling galleries to run relatively high compression ratios for turbocharged engines (10.6:1 for the 1.5L and 9.8:1 for the 2.0L).

    Honda said these "engines will be applied on a number of future global models, depending on local market requirements and vehicle characteristics," without saying anything further.

    Will we see any of these engines in the U.S.? We're not quite sure, but we'll let you know if anything changes.

    Source: Honda

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.comor you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Press Release is on Page 2


    Honda Announces All-New VTEC TURBO Engine Series

    19 November 2013

    Honda has announced the introduction of three all-new VTEC TURBO engines as part of its growing Earth Dreams Technology range. These new engines come in three capacities; 1 litre, 1.5 litre and 2 litre, and will deliver a dynamic performance, as well as class-leading output and fuel economy.

    All three engines will be direct-injection petrol turbos, utilising variable valve motion technology such as Honda’s refined VTEC technology. Together with Honda’s 1.6 litre diesel engine and hybrid technology, these new turbo engines will be applied on a number of future global models, depending on local market requirements and vehicle characteristics.

    Based on a completely new engine structure and utilising its newly developed turbo systems, Honda has downsized its engines and produced a highly efficient 1 litre direct-injection, 3-cyclinder turbo engine as well as a 1.5 litre direct injection, 4-cyclinder turbo engine. Both engines have low friction throughout and are able to achieve class-leading output and environmental performance.

    The first VTEC TURBO set to come to Europe will be the high-output 2 litre, direct injection, 4-cyclinder turbo engine, which will appear in the forthcoming Civic Type R. A highly efficient and highly responsive engine, it will have an output in excess of 280ps and will be EURO 6 compliant.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    For all the Money Honda put into F1 racing, I sure do not see a payback in terms of translating that technology into current selling auto's.

    I agree with your list Drew, I wonder if they will use TT on any of these engines as Performance engines?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/19/2013 at 7:44 PM, dfelt said:

    For all the Money Honda put into F1 racing, I sure do not see a payback in terms of translating that technology into current selling auto's.

    I agree with your list Drew, I wonder if they will use TT on any of these engines as Performance engines?

    Well the 2.0T is going to be used in the Euro-spec Civic Type R where it produces around 280 HP.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Looks quite conventional apart from the vertical orientation of the turbocharger. Conventional as in air-to-air intercooler, conventional (separate) exhaust manifold and single turbo.

    Will probably be OK engines, but don't look for maximum torque peaking at 1,200 rpm.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/20/2013 at 12:58 AM, dwightlooi said:

    Looks quite conventional apart from the vertical orientation of the turbocharger. Conventional as in air-to-air intercooler, conventional (separate) exhaust manifold and single turbo.

    Will probably be OK engines, but don't look for maximum torque peaking at 1,200 rpm.

    Vertical? I'm confused by what you means, as the orientation looks to be standard (parallel to crankshaft). As for intercooling, why wouldn't you use air to air? And the single turbo is likely bolted directly to the cylinder head, which has an integrated "manifold".

    Should be interesting to see how they perform.

    Edited by fuel_sipping
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • About time someone held Tesla accountable for the lies of FSD. China has forced them due to the failure of being able to self drive and it is now called in China "Intelligent Assisted Driving" or IAD.  IAD sounds like a terrorist bomb. Tesla Forced to Change Name of "Full Self-Driving" in China, Since Its Cars Can't Fully Drive Themselves
    • Sensible ... and efficient 
    • I believe that you can get a good read on people - most of the time - and I knew I never liked him early on, not knowing much about him.  Then, when you read about him in more detail, it's both off putting and corroborates what you guessed in the first place. After driving that rented Tesla, and which I promptly exchanged, I know I would never want one of their products.  In the last year, I walked up to a parked Chevy EV (Bolt, not sure) and, while an EV, everything, such as the dash, looked more conventional and with a reasonable learning curve. I have way more questions than answers when it comes to EVs.  The next one for me is going to be ICE or hybrid.  The range on that rented Tesla was also not enough for the long distances and open spaces I'd be covering.
    • Genesis is on my list, specifically the GV60. The EV GV 70 also seems to lease well. We went to the Pittsburgh Auto Show last month (ewww, public days, I had to mingle with peasants) but oddly, the Korean trio brought very few EVs. Only the EV9 was there. He did like the look of that one, but the ZDX is more his size. I wanted him to look at the EV6 and the Ioniq 6, but neither were there.
    • Narcissist never think they are wrong, nor do they ever think what they do should affect them. I also think he is looking to mess up the government more so that his companies can take over key areas to run increasing his perceived power, control and money. To Musk, he probably thinks the drop is a short-term thing as anyone that goes against Tesla is now considered a Terrorist. The conversion from Democracy to Fascist communism with what he sees as everyone should only be driving a Tesla is his narcissistic view imho. This is why I hope Tesla now fails as an auto company and everyone else succeeds as he clearly is out of his Ketamine fueled brain.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

This Article

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search