Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: GM Service Document Reveals 3.6L Twin Turbo, LS7 V8 For 2014 Camaro

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    December 21, 2012

    The folks at Camaro5.org got their hands on General Motors service document on decoding VIN number on 2014 model year vehicles for dealers and found some interesting information.

    First is the 2014 Camaro which features a listing of the 7.0L LS7 V8 engine from the current Corvette Z06 (505 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque). Speculation has it being for a new Camaro model, the rumored Z28 model.

    Next, the document references a LF3 engine which is noted as "ENGINE GAS, 6 CYL, 3.6L, SIDI, DOHC, VVT, ALUM, TWIN TURBO". In plain English, it could be the long rumored 3.6L twin-turbo V6. The document doesn't list the 3.6L twin-turbo in any of the models.

    Other items the document notes is the 2014 Buick Verano looks be dropping its base 2.4L four-cylinder and going towards a 1.6L turbo-four. The 2.0L turbo model will stick around.

    Source: Camaro5.org

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at [email protected] or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Not a great suprise as I figured they would have a nice send off for the Zeta Camaro.

    Just imagine what the Alpha Camaro will bring with the less mass and as much or more power with a better suspension.

    Imagine if they are using a 505 HP V8 in the present car the next GenV in the 6 Gen Camaro should have similar numbers and better MPG.

    The 1.6 will not only have better MPG and power but it I expect will have a much flatter torque curve.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The 1.6T in the Verano should address both fuel economy and power concerns. It's got 200 lb-ft of torque at about 1600rpm...would be a nice boost to the scoot.

    Excellent news. Perfect for that car. I think for most folks that will be the sweet spot on that car. That also means the Cruze can continue on with the 1.8 and 1.4 and not intrude on the Verano. Although, I certainly can bet the cruze may get an engine with more pop at some point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I suspect the 1.6 will find its way into many products and the Encore is one of them

    I suspect the Encore was another case where the vehicle was ready before the engine they wanted was. Not that GM ever does that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    lol. GM does that all the time!

    why the twin turbo is going into the current camaro.....it may become a big volume unit in the alpha camaro and on the alpha ats and cts platform. this gets it into the public before it arrives in the next camaro. break the mental barrier so to speak. corvette could get this motor someday too. Lambdas would benefit.

    1.6t in the encore would be perfect.

    i wonder if the chevy SS will get the TT also. Buick T type or grand national?

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about a GMC Terrain Typhoon II Ghost Rider Edition AWD.

    Paint Black Diamon,

    Comes with the Denali Package fully loaded but all Chrome is Black Chrome and on the front doors under the

    GMC Typhoon II

    Ghost Rider Edition

    Then you have at the end of the edition a Flaming head

    Using the new Twin Turbo V6. :D

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All companies develop their cars and engines on different schedules.

    But many also get the new platform and new engine at the same time. Just look at the Verano It has been through the 2.4 and now 2.5 and next will get the 1.6 Turbo.

    At least they worked hard to get the trucks and the Vette out with the new V8.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What are the rumored power figures for the 3.6TT?

    Not sure but the GM show cars with it were around 425 HP as was the Jay Leno Camaro they built him. The Holden Torano also if I recall was in the low 400 HP range too.

    From what talk there has been I have heard from 425-440 HP for the 3.6 and that there may also be a 3.0 if it was not killed and it would be 340-375 HP.

    Other than just lose talk and the show cars there really has not been much out of GM that we know for sure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I doubt you'll see the Z/28 name on the LS7 Camaro.

    I have to agree. I suspect the Z name will remain on hold till the new Alpha plaform arrives.

    This is the engine that should have been in the 1LE. A Z06 for the Camaro line. They may just make this happen now the Z06 engines are available.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If it is indeed the case, it will be a big mistake. A 3.6 TT will not be cheaper, lighter, more powerful or significantly (if at all) more fuel economical than the LT1. If it is used as the base engine it will raise the base price significantly and doesn't make any sense. If used as a mid-tier engine, you end up with a car that is more expensive than the V8 powered top-tier model. If used as the replacement for the LS3, it will raise the price of the SS, lower it's performance and make it less desirable to most Camaro buyers.

    What would have been a perfect fit for the Camaro will be the 4.3L V6 from the new Sierra. Tuned for a car instead of a truck, it'll make about 320 hp / 320 lb-ft. Similar in output to the 3.6 but with a much stouter bottom end. With AFM, the reduced drag from the pushrod valvetrain and the ability to use taller cruise gearing, the fuel economy will likely be as good or better than the 3.6 DOHC engine.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the 4.3 / 6 would be a market failure. the twin turbo, regardless of whether it has net benefit over the v8, will be in tune with where the market is going. If GM is putting it one car, it makes sense for them to spread it throughout the variety of cars.

    If i was buying a Camaro, I really would take a hard look at a 3.6 OHC TT over the v8. I like the cammy sound and behavior of OHC engines.

    I fully expect the 2.5 to be the base engine in the alpha camaro.

    It would be cooler if its a 4.3 to be a small block v8 4.3

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All companies develop their cars and engines on different schedules.

    But many also get the new platform and new engine at the same time. Just look at the Verano It has been through the 2.4 and now 2.5 and next will get the 1.6 Turbo.

    At least they worked hard to get the trucks and the Vette out with the new V8.

    Toyota almost always alternates engine and car. When they do a new Camry, the engine carries over till the mid-cycle. Honda usually does that, but being in "oh $h!!" mode, they've shuffled things around lately. Nissan is still running the same engines from a few years ago though they've added direct injection.

    Basically, engine and transmission programs run independently from car programs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the 4.3 / 6 would be a market failure. the twin turbo, regardless of whether it has net benefit over the v8, will be in tune with where the market is going. If GM is putting it one car, it makes sense for them to spread it throughout the variety of cars.

    If i was buying a Camaro, I really would take a hard look at a 3.6 OHC TT over the v8. I like the cammy sound and behavior of OHC engines.

    I fully expect the 2.5 to be the base engine in the alpha camaro.

    It would be cooler if its a 4.3 to be a small block v8 4.3

    Even if the 4.3 is all new the name is a marketing issue.

    Most people still laugh and joke of the old shaker it used to be. The memories still lingered throught the Vortec era.

    Having owned several I know the engine improved first hand but They should have changed the engine to a 4.2 or 4.5 or some other size just to stress the point this was an all new engine.

    There really is no driving lust and love for the 4.3. It is just the engine people get when they buy a base truck for the most part.

    I do wonder if they have any plans to use it in the Colorado.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3.6TT is a nice surprise; I was expecting a lower displacement (3.0L to 3.2L) in order to increase block strength. If GM met durability requirements with a the larger displacement engine, then great. Cadillac will benefit image-wise from this engine IMHO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In the latests Hot Rod they stated GM is already working on tune kits for some of their Turbo engines. It did not go into detail but it did say they would be similar to like what I have on my 2.0 now.

    In other words they will make the premium required and you will see boost levels over 20 PSI.

    I would not be suprised for them to push past 300 HP and more boost on the new 2.0. The Transmission is all that holds back mine as the old 4 speed is at the limit at 315 FT LBS.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They need a clever brand name for the 4.3 to make it successful like Ford has their Ecoboost V6 in the F150.

    How does huge pushrod 90 degree v6 sound?

    I assume it's 90 degree since its based off the v8. I very well could be wrong.

    It will likely be a good engine, it just doesn't come with marketing tag lines that are currently popular built into it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • How time flies. The S.S. United States made the trip, being towed by tugs down the Atlantic and around the entirety of Florida.  They have pulled it in to Mobile Bay, ahead of schedule. If I find myself in Pensacola in the very near future, I will go over and look at it, if that's possible.  I've never seen it and I've always wanted to. Big kudos for every report I've seen on this:  they just refer to its destination as "the Gulf" ... period.  I noticed that.  I approve.
    • I haven't seen any photos or diagrams of the new Charger internals, but it's the only domestic I can think of that is available in both ICE and EV with the same styling and platform...would be interesting to compare the floor and underside of each  (Some of GM's EVs like the Silverado and Equinox share a name but little else w/ the ICE versions).  
    • TELO started in 2023 with a dream, design and build a modern EV truck from the ground up that incorporates electrification and 21st century technology. TELO states that they would build a modern EV truck that had Toyota Tacoma capabilities, Tesla-like range and efficiency, in a footprint of a Mini Cooper. June 13th, 2024, Tela announced a partnership with Aria Group, a leading manufacture to build their first fully functional EV truck called the TELO MT1. TELO Trucks TELO is the brain child of 3 influential men, Founder CEO Jason Marks to the left in the photo, Founder CTO Forrest North center, and Founder CCO Yves Behar right in the photo. A little history to understand the men: Jason Marks - Jason led the Autonomous Vehicles and Driver Assistance Systems test programs at National Instruments (NI), where he was a Chief Business Development Manager. He developed the test systems for five major U.S. automakers' Autonomy and ADAS test systems for their 2024 model year vehicles. He's an experienced Sales, Marketing, and R&D leader with patents in LiDAR. Forrest North - Forrest was on the early Tesla team where he developed the battery pack on the Roadster that's on its way to Mars. He founded Mission Motors, one of the first electric motorcycle companies that broke the land speed record for an electric motorcycle. He founded and sold Plugshare, which was the #1 app for finding charging stations. He's an experienced entrepreneur with over 15 patents in electric vehicle batteries and charging. Yves Behar - Yves founded Fuseproject in 1999, an award-winning, international multidisciplinary design studio. As CEO and Creative Lead, Béhar works with brands like Herman Miller, Samsung, L'Oreal, Puma, SodaStream and Prada and has also co-founded start-ups including August Home, Canopy Space and FORME Life. Béhar's works are included in permanent museum collections worldwide, and he speaks frequently on topics including design, technology and sustainability. In September 2024, TELO hired Automotive Design Luminary Dale Beever as Director of design technical operations. Dale was formerly the President of ICG Inc., Beever has been the creative force behind some of the most iconic vehicles on the road today. He served as the design engineering lead for award-winning efforts in both automotive and aerospace, including Ford Motor Co.’s 50th Anniversary edition Mustang, the Lincoln Continental Concept, the Airstream Nest RV, and the Icon A5 by ICON Aircraft. Beever’s expertise in digital modeling, design engineering, and industrial design—combined with his deep understanding of advanced 3D technologies—enables him to evolve the look and feel of iconic machines while staying true to classic vehicular design. With a top notch assembly of automotive folks to lead the company, TELA built their first simple roll cage version to test their RWD/AWD powertrain. TELO has since expedited to building their minicooper sized five passenger, four door EV pickup with a bed equal to that which comes on a Toyota Tacoma. The TELO MT1 is 152 inches in length, 73 inches wide and 66 inches in height.  Compared to a Toyota Tacoma truck that is 212.3 inches long, 75 inches wide, and 71 inches in height. TELO MT1 also drives home their efficient packaging design by comparing it to a Ford eTransit Connect van that has an overall length of 176 inches, 75 inches wide, and 72 inches in height. TELO motto is "Designed to do more with less" had been a driving goal that has delivered on it in more ways than one. Taking a page from Chevrolet Avalanche, the MT1 comes with a mid-partition or what Chevrolet called a mid-gate. This allows the 60-inch bed to expand to carry a full 4-by8-foot plywood sheet of wood. Yet TELO also allows this to give configuration change that can accommodate up to eight passengers. 2WD will have a 2,000lb payload capacity versus 4WD will have a 1,700lb payload capacity. This all while delivering a 0-60 mph time of 4 seconds, up to 350-mile range and up to 500hp depending on powertrain configuration. The RWD has 300hp and AWD has 500hp. Battery choice is standard with 260 miles of range or long range with 350 miles of range. Wheel size is 215/65 R 16 in a General Grabber A/T tire for ultimate in traction of your lifestyle choice from mountains to beach. TELO MT1 is an innovative approach to modern lifestyle living that allows one to haul just about anything or anyone. From a truck standpoint you have a secure tonneau cover to protect ones belongings, be it work tools during the week to weekend essentials on the go. TELO has picked up some of the best ideas across the auto industry to incorporate it into one of most versatile pickup trucks. The TELO storage tunnel takes what Rivian has done one step farther as mentioned earlier when stated that the midgate could be folded down to be converted into hauling 8 passengers. The storage tunnel becomes the footwell for a third row of seats, converting your truck into an SUV. TELO has taken the motto of "Nothing in Excess" in their approach to the interior. Blending clean, understated patterns with natural fabrics and recycled materials in a TELO approach to minimal, but functional comfort and utility. Official interior images have not been shown yet in their test mules, but their press release images are as follows for digital design. Safety is a key part of the TELO company philosopy. As such, TELO will be incorporating the latest safety technology from sensors to predict and classify collisions before they happen to airbags, and structural technology to make the auto safer for everyone on the road. TELO has stated the "Range to Roam" is key, the long range battery is a 106 kWh battery pack with a 20 minute to 80% fast-charge within the footpring of this subcompact EV. Being classified as a Subcompact, means the ease of city parking is that much easier while having the interior space of your average midsize vehicle. With the pricing of current on market EVs, many would wonder how expensive will the TELO MT1 truck be and what is a reservation fee? TELO MT1 Pre-Order One can reserve their TELO MT1 with a $152 deposit which gets you a promised base price before configuration of $41,520 2WD 260 mile range 300 hp truck base truck. The same deposit fee if you choose the 500hp / 4WD with standard 260 mile battery at $46,019. One can also choose to pay an additional $3,980 for the long range 350 mile battery pack which makes the prices $45,500 in 2WD or $49,999 in 4WD. Currently TELO offers eight color choices. Blizzard White Ocean Blue Dark Emerald Sand Dune Sunset Orange Cool Steel Night Shadow Sable Bronze At this time, no official start of manufacturing has been announced. Will update once I hear back from TELO on estimated manufacturing of the MT1 truck. View full article
    • I will agree with you if they truly swap out the floor pan to optimize internal space for the EV option, but how many auto companies truly do that? Even Tesla has not been able to have a flexible production line with all their EVs. I get the point you make but have not seen the Germans specially build a flexible platform that can support both ICE and EV well yet. German roomy EV is a joke as I have tried to sit in the various EVs made and not found any to be very comfortable and roomy yet.
    • Nonsense! Manufacturers can swap out the entire floor pan. And people tend to prefer traditional looking cars, regardless of how they are powered. The weird looking EVs don’t sell well the traditional looking EVs sell great. The Model-3 may have the design language of a bar of Zest, but it is still essentially a 3 box sedan. The GV60 and Bolt sell in spite of their looks but generally they are just pod cars no matter how much the manufacturers try and tell us they are crossovers.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search