Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM's Top Lawyer, Delphi Exec Get Grilled By Senate

      The Senate Grills GM's Top Lawyer and Delphi CEO

    Another day, another senate hearing into the General Motors ignition switch recall. Today, two new people were grilled by the committee about their knowledge in this mess.

    First up was Michael Millikin, GM's General Counsel. Millikin testified that he didn't know about the issue till February of this year. He also testified that lawyers working for GM during April 2013 had information pertaining to this from a case they were working on. However, they failed to notify engineers about the problem.

    "That was tragic. If they had brought it to my attention at that time, I certainly would have made sure that they had done something," Millikin said.

    Lower-level lawyers were among those fifteen people who let go a couple months ago.

    However, many of the senators were wondering why Millikin was still employed with the company.

    "I do not understand how the General Counsel for a litigation department that had this massive failure of responsibility, how he would be allowed to continue in that important leadership role in this company," said Senator Claire McCaskill, chairwoman of the Senate Commerce subcommittee.

    The senators said Millikin should be held responsible for the actions of the lower-level lawyers.

    “My view is the team has to change,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal.

    Millikin testified that the company has brought in an outside law firm to review the litigation department.

    Also testifying today was Delphi CEO Rodney O'Neal. Delphi was the company who manufactured the switches and was being called in to explain their role in the recall. O'Neal testified that the company followed the specifications given by GM when making the switch. That included the low resistance turn because GM wanted it to turn smoothly.

    "GM knowingly approved a final design that included less torque than the original target. In our view, that approval established the final specification," said O'Neal.

    GM CEO Mary Barra who was at the hearing said that it was GM's fault for the design of the part, not Delphi.

    Source: Reuters, The Detroit News, (2)

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    About time Delphi was grilled on this and NO I do not buy it was just GM's fault. Delphi knew this was not good and should have built the part to the original spec not a lower spec. Also my gut tells me Delphi probably came back to GM and said you could build it at this lower spec and it would save X amount per part equaling millions that can go to executive bonuses for saving money.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 7/17/2014 at 7:46 PM, dfelt said:

    About time Delphi was grilled on this and NO I do not buy it was just GM's fault. Delphi knew this was not good and should have built the part to the original spec not a lower spec. Also my gut tells me Delphi probably came back to GM and said you could build it at this lower spec and it would save X amount per part equaling millions that can go to executive bonuses for saving money.

     

    I would disagree with that latter part. Especially when you consider this story from The Detroit News in April - Bad blood cited between GM, ignition switch supplier Delphi

     

    A couple of key quotes: 

     

      Quote

     

    At the same time, GM was looking for ways to cut costs to cover an ever-widening cost gap with its foreign competitors. Squeezing suppliers for pricing concessions was a lot easier than addressing its own inefficiencies and uncompetitive business model.

     

    “They had Delphi over a barrel and they knew it. GM just went after them and put on all sorts of pressure to reduce costs,” said John Henke, president of Planning Perspectives Inc., which tracks relations between automakers and their suppliers. “The two companies hated each other. If you were a Delphi engineer and you worked with GM, you didn’t want to get out of bed in the morning.”

     

    Henke and other analysts believe the caustic relationship between General Motors and Delphi led to substandard parts being shipped by the supplier. And they say the dysfunctional state of Detroit’s automobile industry in the years leading up to its near-death experience in 2008 and 2009 helps explain why GM would have accepted them and installed them on its vehicles. 

     

      Quote

     

    Henke has been asking suppliers to rate their relations with automakers since 1992. From 2002 to 2007, GM was consistently rated the worst company to do business with in his annual survey.

     
    “Relations with GM were definitely the most contentious,” he said. “They were so cost-oriented; price took precedence over quality. Suppliers were threatened with loss of business if they didn’t reduce the cost of their components. They had to be incredibly creative to meet GM targets.”

     

      Quote

     

    Competing with other suppliers for business was often a brutal process at GM, according to Henke, who says the automaker routinely summoned parts manufacturers to its headquarters, put the representatives of each company in a different room and then asked them to name their lowest price for a given component. The GM purchasing reps would then take the lowest figure and challenge the other companies to beat it. And they would keep doing that until none of the suppliers was willing to go any lower.

     
    That sometimes resulted in suppliers bidding so low that they had to cut corners to meet the promised price. And that, says Henke, is one reason why GM ended up receiving parts that did not meet its own specifications, as the company now says happened with the ignition switches from Delphi. And he said GM was willing to accept those parts because the alternative — delaying production — was too costly.

     

    Should Delphi get some of the blame? Sure. But all roads lead back to GM.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very interesting to read this. This information is what the news needs to be sharing about the problems in the culture of the company and how bean counters and lawyers tend to affect and play games with peoples life all over a few cents.

     

    Did they ever look at their own stupidty for over paying assembly line labor, over paying executives and the wasteful bonuses plus not having cleaned up their own product lines. It was hard on this country but the near death was a good thing I think in forcing the company to clean up its act. Hopefully this will force them to continue to do the right thing and get better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Not Overthinking is a good thing this year with all the craziness going on. Washington just raised their gas tax 6 cents per gallon, so 55 cents for WA tax and 18.4 for Fed tax, so a 73.4 cents in fuel tax on top of the gas price. On average 40 to 45 cents per gallon cheaper at Costco/Sams Club here. Worth waiting in line unless I have a dollar discount at Fred Meyers which I get about once a month. Makes it worth fueling up at their slow pumps to save $32 on a tank full. Like you Drew, not renewing Sams Club, just not seeing the value in comparison to Costco here. Sadly Dell has done a RTO for full campuses, Hybrid for all others. As such, I now have to go into work 3 days a week. Lucky our Light Rail just opened up, so rather than 1 to 1 1/2 hrs in my own auto to drive into Seattle. I can drive 5 min to the Lynnwood rail station, jump on the train and be 4 blocks from the office 35 min later. Seattle requires all businesses to provide mass transit passes, good on the busses, trains or ferry system. Looking at fueling up every 4 to 5 weeks now for my Escalade.
    • I have a Costco on one side of me in a shopping center I'm always in and a Sam's on the other side of me in another area I'm always in. I have both memberships, though the Sam's is not getting renewed when it's up.  Both are within 7 minutes of the house. I have my favorite stations marked in GasBuddy and the cheapest prices in the county are those two plus a Speedway that sometimes gives me bonus discounts that is near one of my clients. I probably put way too much effort into figuring out which is the cheapest because I compare the E85 price to the others but have to factor the drop in MPG and the cashback rebates my Costco credit card gives me. There is a spreadsheet on my phone. I'm making a concerted effort to not overthink things this year.
    • It's cheaper here, too, but not THAT significant. It's more like 8c-15c. I also have to be around one. My town of 10k people does not have a Sam's Club or Costco, hahaha.  I will almost always fill up when I'm near a Sam's Club, but I'm not waiting in line for 15 minutes. 
    • Site search here does suck and there's not a lot I can do about it.   Using "site:cheersandgears.com {search terms}" in google might help. At least for me, there is a 35c - 45c difference to fuel at not-Costco/Sams.  Filling a 27 gallon tank makes it worth the wait to fill at a warehouse club.  Once in a while I get Speedway deals and can fill up with E85 for super cheap.
    • I've done it and showed @G. David Felt in the past (posted here). I've tried finding the video but have had no luck. If you have super hero powers as an admin/site owner, please find it! I'll try and remember to do it again the next time I get gas.  There are places to wait in lines around here but those are the exception to the rule, not the rule. From my house, I could drive the two blocks away, fill up, and get back home in under 10 minutes. There are never lines in town and it takes no time to start pumping using a credit card.  Or I could find a Sam's Club and wait 5-15 minutes in line before pumping gas, but they're the only places you're waiting in line and it isn't every time. I've certainly gotten gas at a Sam's Club and not waited in line.  Yes, a heat pump would be necessary here for battery efficiency for at least a third of the year. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

This Article

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search