Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM Quietly Kills Off Next-Gen Hybrid Pickups, SUVs To Follow?

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    December 18, 2012

    GM's full-size hybrid pickups, the Chevrolet Silverado Hybrid and GMC Sierra Hybrid have offered the best fuel economy in the class since being introduced in 2009. However, they haven't been a sales success as GM had expected. Last year, GM sold 3,114 Hybrid trucks and SUVs, from a high of 8,797 vehicles in 2009.

    Last week at the press introduction of the new Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra, GM North America President Mark Reuss told GreenCarReports that a hybrid model isn't in the cards.

    “In this truck we decided to go with the EcoTec3 technology, with the V-6 and the two V-8s, and we think that's the best solution for our customers. So with this next generation it will not be a hybrid,” said Reuss.

    This response mostly confirms earlier reports, the first being from GMInsideNews.com back in August that cited information from sources that GM would be killing off its hybrid trucks and SUVs.

    When asked about what the future holds for the hybrid system in SUVs, Reuss declined to comment.

    Source: GreenCarReports.com

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at [email protected] or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    This is a sad statement as GM failed to Market these hybrids. They are best in class fuel economy and the Hybrid SUV's were awesome. Costs were high due to the small amount made. If they had actually marketed them properly and built them in proper quantity, more would have bought them at a reasonable price.

    This makes me wonder how much they were paid by the Oil Companies to NOT make a Hybrid truck/suv. These are desired and wanted auto's they just need to be properly sold and marketed. I can see Toyota doing this and having a run away sales success.

    This tends to not forecast well for what GM might do to the VOLT if the VOLT and ELR do not sell well after 3-4 years.

    So damned focus on instant profits that they cannot seem to see long term on how they need to spread this technology across more auto's.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    These Hybrid Silverado trucks have a 40,000 base price - the 1500 Silverado has a 23,000 base price. To me, it's a no-brainer... the Vortec V6 is rated at 15 & 20 mpg, while the hybrid is 20 & 23 mpg.....OH, and 17,000 more in price. Plus all the extra techie stuff on the hybrid that will most likely fail after years of use..

    WAY too expensive & most likely, too expensive to keep for the long term...especially after the warranty is over.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This was not a good move from the start. Many complain about the high price of the Volt when these trucks were way more expensive vs the regular one. Yes they did get more MPG but not much and when something goes wrong how much more expensive will they be to repair.

    Also the truck market is not where you are going to get many tree huggers or people worried about MPG.

    The key to the truck market is to get the best MPG while keeping the trucks simple and not much more expensive than they already are.

    You can sell the Volt to a lot of people who are trying to save the world a tree at a time but I really do not see them buying many trucks or Tahoes.

    Smaller more efficent powerful engines, Diesels if they goverment stops making it more difficult to sell, and smaller trucks like the Colorado are going to be the keys to the half ton market in the future.

    Most truck owners are not in to BS and science experiments. The money wasted here would be better spent on the Spark electric and the Volts next two generations. Once they improve those and find a way to cut cost they may get way with a Volt like driveline later on but not now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I still think they lost something special they had with the first generation of hybrid pickups - generator function. They had 3-prong outlets in the bed, and could be used as an emergency or construction site generator. That's a lot of extra utility to make the extra cost worthwhile. The first gen didn't get as much of a fuel economy bump, but it also didn't carry as much of a price bump. Perhaps if this function were available on the 2-mode, it'd be an easier sell.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I still think they lost something special they had with the first generation of hybrid pickups - generator function. They had 3-prong outlets in the bed, and could be used as an emergency or construction site generator. That's a lot of extra utility to make the extra cost worthwhile. The first gen didn't get as much of a fuel economy bump, but it also didn't carry as much of a price bump. Perhaps if this function were available on the 2-mode, it'd be an easier sell.

    Exactly, GM missed the boat on properly marketing this to the construction industry as the Electrical prongs in the bed took nothing away from carrying rock, dirt, etc but gave a ton of usefulness to allowing construction on site where no power existed yet.

    Having this as a option package or building a dedicated work truck that gave more than the single electrical outlet. There are far better ways to market a hybrid truck with the generator feature that would appeal to buyers.

    GM Failed at marketing the Hybrid full size Trucks and SUV's. Executives are still looking for instant profits and instant gratification rather than long term of what these platforms bring in long term benefits.

    Try and find a hybrid truck or SUV in the used car lot, if you do your research, you will find these are some of the longest owned vehicles as buyers do not want to give up the gains they got with these 4x4 hybrids as 22mpg is far better than the 15mpg the gas only versions get.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    just doing some ratio power figures, even if the 6.2L hits 400hp (hopefully more like 420) the 4.3 should hit 300hp with 300lbft also, if not be close..

    ....why can't this be the "hybrid version" with an updated 2-mode? --only kinda serious about this....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm pulling back hard on spending. My vehicles are weeks (300c) or months (Avalanche) from being paid off. The LLC that owns C&G got some new contracts recently and I'm going to be writing off every last thing I can. Both of us may be putting a lot of expensable miles on soon and we might find a cheap EV lease to take advantage of the situation and keep the miles off the ICE vehicles.
    • All of that waste is reprocessable back into fuel again, but due to outdated regulations and fear mongering dating back to the 1970s, it is only waste because we say it is waste.  Breeder reactors can extract additional energy out of those nuclear byproducts and turn it back into useable fuel in another type of reactor.  The only reason we don't do that is because it could be used to make bomb quality isotopes.  But if WE are the ones doing it, why are we afraid we might accidentally make the bomb isotopes? The remaining radioactive material left over from those next two steps in the process, if we got out of our own way and did them, would condense the entire container seen above down to a relatively benign thimble size. 
    • Scary times ahead folks, watch your spending, debt load and be cautious as we are in for a crazy 4 years. 'Flashing a warning': Economist says Trump's plans leading to 'a terrible outcome'
    • Considering the number of folks that have had their life cut short in Hanford here due to what was supposed to be storage for life of radioactive Liquid, I would say this will fail and contaminate the earth, animals or humans in a new and destructive way. Honestly, I remember this from the news and the science behind it that it is the best way to store Nuclear waste, as a glass solid and then put it into an underground bunker like the old salt mines in the SW. SRS - Programs - Waste Solidification QUOTE: The largest radioactive waste glassification plant in the world, DWPF converts the high-level liquid nuclear waste currently stored at the Savannah River Site (SRS) into a solid glass form suitable for long-term storage and disposal. Scientists have long considered this glassification process, called “vitrification,” as the preferred option for immobilizing high-level radioactive liquids into a more stable, manageable form until a federal repository is ready.
    • ummmm yeah... Deep geological disposal... Away from where humans live deeeeeep down bee-low. Away from the top soil deep in the earth's core.  Sealed in containers that wont leak, sealed in chambers that will contain the leakages, if there is a such a leakage to begin with, that themselves wont leak deeeeeeeeep down bee-low with nuclear waste that has been neutralized.   All nice things when spoken but what IS the reality and the TRUTH about this storage? Colour me just a tad skeptical.  And why? We cant seem to stop a freakin' faucet from leaking with attempts and trials and errors that span a millennia. We cant seem to stop ANY liquids from escaping their containment, again, a practice that we have tried to do spanning a millennia or two or three.   Even four and five...  So know, we wanna poison the earth from deeeep inside as we are NOT content of killing our planet from above.   My my!!!   We are quite the destructive little shytes we are!!!   
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search