Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    GM Considers Outsourcing Some Production Of Commercial Vans To Boost Midsize Truck Production

      GM Is Trying To Squeeze Out More Midsize Trucks, So Some Commerical Van Production May Move Elsewhere

    General Motors' midsize trucks has become a bright spot for the company. Originally forecasted to sell around 80,000 this year, the company is now on track to selling near 120,000 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon trucks by the end of year. The two model are also the fastest-selling vehicles this year with the average time a Colorado sat on a dealer lot landing around 27 days. The Canyon was slightly longer with a 37 day average.

     

    But this has caused a supply problem for GM. The Wentzville, Missouri plant where both trucks are built has been pushed to the limits. Currently, the plant has three shifts and also builds models during the weekend. Even workers at the plant have agreed to plan to adjust break times to eliminate a six-minute lull between shifts.

     

    This appears to be not enough and GM is now looking into other measures. Automotive News has learned that GM is looking into outsourcing production of cutaway models of Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana, the other models built at Wentzville, to AM General. This was revealed to workers by a note sent out by GM earlier in the week.

     

    “The truck and van continue strong sales. This potential partnership would free up production capacity and allow the organization to capitalize on our ability to build midsize trucks to further satisfy customer demand,” said the note.

     

    According to a source, cutaway vans account for one-third of total production at Wentzville.

     

    AM General, the folks who brought you the Hummer, has been in the process of expanding its contract manufacturing business. Back in August, the company announced a deal with Mercedes-Benz to build the R-Class crossover that would then be sent over to China.

     

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    Smart Move by GM, I expect this to continue strong well through the end of next year now that they have the diesel also.

     

    Like Drew, I wonder how fast they can spin up production at the contractor for the van work.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    El Kabong

    Presumably AM General is at least familiar with GM processes. And if they're working as hired guns they can probably get up and running pretty quickly.

    What a wonderful problem for GM to have in the truck segment.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted (edited)

    .

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    I'm not going to let this stay up here because it's just going to cause a fight.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    I wonder how long the Savana and Express will last anyway.  They are like 20 year old designs and the Euro-style vans are taking over.  The Promaster is a bad vehicle luckily.  But I wonder if GM could allocate that whole factory to pick ups, and build a new van off a new platform some place else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    I wonder how long the Savana and Express will last anyway.  They are like 20 year old designs and the Euro-style vans are taking over.  The Promaster is a bad vehicle luckily.  But I wonder if GM could allocate that whole factory to pick ups, and build a new van off a new platform some place else.

    I do wonder if they plan to replace those oldies w/ a modern style van anytime soon.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu

    I believe the problem is, GM's fullsize van in Europe is a joint venture, they don't have their own design like FCA (horrible FWD POS) or Ford (Transit, much nicer) so they may not have the authority to commit to the fullsize van market here with their European fullsize vans.  I hope they don't hand the market over completely to Ford here in the U.S.

     

    On the other hand, Ford is caught with their pants down here in the U.S. in midsize trucks.  When they dropped the Ranger, they had the audacity to state that the FIESTA would take over as the vehicle of choice for Ranger customers... they held the completely erroneous notion that Ranger customers were more interested in a CHEAP VEHICLE than an actual small pickup truck... everyone can see how that panned out.  Fiesta sales aren't exactly taking up the slack... and I don't see any aftermarket Fiesta Ranchero conversions yet.  ;)

     

    Another point:  how will Ford market their Aussie Ranger here with a tried-and-true steel body, next to their aluminum F-series?  They would sound like hypocrites.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Yeah, the large Opel/Vauxhall Movano is a JV w/ Renault (it's based on the Renault Master), and the midsize Vivano is based on the Renault Trafic.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu

    Yeah, the large Opel/Vauxhall Movano is a JV w/ Renault (it's based on the Renault Master), and the midsize Vivano is based on the Renault Trafic.

    Hmmm... and Renault is in bed with Datsun, and Chevy sells the Datsun NV200 here in the U.S. as the City Express...  :huh:

     

    Which, BTW, I have seen like ZERO City Express vans around here on the road, and only very few NV200s... the Transit Connect RULES the tiny van market.  We won't mention the ProMaster City...

    Edited by ocnblu
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

     

    Yeah, the large Opel/Vauxhall Movano is a JV w/ Renault (it's based on the Renault Master), and the midsize Vivano is based on the Renault Trafic.

    Hmmm... and Renault is in bed with Datsun, and Chevy sells the Datsun NV200 here in the U.S. as the City Express...  :huh:

     

    Which, BTW, I have seen like ZERO City Express vans around here on the road, and only very few NV200s... the Transit Connect RULES the tiny van market.  We won't mention the ProMaster City...

     

    I have yet to see a City Express or a Pro Master City in the Phoenix area.  The only NV200s I've seen are on the front row of the Nissan dealer.  Maybe GM could do a JV to get a variation of the NV1500-3500 and put GM engines and Chevy/GMC noses on them.. 

     

    Note that Nissan hasn't used the Datsun name in the US in 30 years or so.. :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

    .

     

     

    Drew, honestly, preemptively modding remarks like that is strange.  Should I have qualified it as to why it would have helped?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

    I believe the problem is, GM's fullsize van in Europe is a joint venture, they don't have their own design like FCA (horrible FWD POS) or Ford (Transit, much nicer) so they may not have the authority to commit to the fullsize van market here with their European fullsize vans.  I hope they don't hand the market over completely to Ford here in the U.S.

     

    On the other hand, Ford is caught with their pants down here in the U.S. in midsize trucks.  When they dropped the Ranger, they had the audacity to state that the FIESTA would take over as the vehicle of choice for Ranger customers... they held the completely erroneous notion that Ranger customers were more interested in a CHEAP VEHICLE than an actual small pickup truck... everyone can see how that panned out.  Fiesta sales aren't exactly taking up the slack... and I don't see any aftermarket Fiesta Ranchero conversions yet.  ;)

     

    Another point:  how will Ford market their Aussie Ranger here with a tried-and-true steel body, next to their aluminum F-series?  They would sound like hypocrites.

     

     

    ....and yet drew has no problem with blu's constant fight causing jabs at Ford.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu

     

    I believe the problem is, GM's fullsize van in Europe is a joint venture, they don't have their own design like FCA (horrible FWD POS) or Ford (Transit, much nicer) so they may not have the authority to commit to the fullsize van market here with their European fullsize vans.  I hope they don't hand the market over completely to Ford here in the U.S.

     

    On the other hand, Ford is caught with their pants down here in the U.S. in midsize trucks.  When they dropped the Ranger, they had the audacity to state that the FIESTA would take over as the vehicle of choice for Ranger customers... they held the completely erroneous notion that Ranger customers were more interested in a CHEAP VEHICLE than an actual small pickup truck... everyone can see how that panned out.  Fiesta sales aren't exactly taking up the slack... and I don't see any aftermarket Fiesta Ranchero conversions yet.  ;)

     

    Another point:  how will Ford market their Aussie Ranger here with a tried-and-true steel body, next to their aluminum F-series?  They would sound like hypocrites.

     

     

    ....and yet drew has no problem with blu's constant fight causing jabs at Ford.

     

    Wings, this post you quoted has some positive remarks about Ford and their vans.  And you have to agree that dropping the Ranger and the reasoning they gave was off the mark.  Plus I think it is a valid point I brought up about the new Ranger, without denegrating the F-series.

    Edited by ocnblu
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    El Kabong

    Indeed.

    Anyhoo, an extra 40,000 GM passenger trucks per year going into garages is a boon for GM's market share, especially with their half-tons still outstripping the competition as well.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    surreal1272

    .

     

     

    Drew, honestly, preemptively modding remarks like that is strange.  Should I have qualified it as to why it would have helped?

    Interesting that you had no problem with his modding when you first came here.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • trinacriabob
      Current-gen Mazda 3 sedan ... driven for a week ... it has been a long time since I've driven any Mazda

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      This rental experience, lasting one week, was a surprise all the way around.  The first thing that comes to mind is how helpful the agents were upon renting and returning the vehicle. I got my assigned category of vehicle, plus a small upward bump, assuming this sedan could be considered midsized.  The current Mazda 3 sedan appears to have grown up and, with its thicker pillars and haunches, looked like it was going to be a nicer car for an entire week than the only other time I’ve rented a Mazda 3, about 5 years ago, and for which that rental lasted only 1 day. Do I like the way the current Mazda 3 looks?  Mostly yes, and some no.  I like the flow of the silhouette and, to some extent, the definition of the volumes.  The side profile is attractive enough.  The same could be said for the rear fascia and taillamp assembly.  However, I’m not a fan of the trademark too tall grille for this size of car. Its Mazda’s current vernacular and it probably works a little better on their larger vehicles, but this is just my opinion. The Mazda 3’s interior is spartan in its volumes and finishes, almost looking Germanic.  I have different feelings about the instrument cluster than I do the overall dashboard.  The main instrument pod is very clearly and cleanly laid out.  It has 3 main pods, with the center pod, which can be configured in many ways, dominating the others.  The tachometer is to the left and larger and very readable fuel and temperature gauges are to the right.  As for the remainder of the dash, a slightly angled and narrow almost tear drop like infotainment screen is embedded into the cowl.  Ventilation slots are thin and run horizontally.  The climate control panel is workable, but not as visually appealing, and even symmetrical, that other vehicles are currently using.  The steering wheel feels good to the touch, with its materials, but, even with upward seat adjustments, I did not have the command I wanted over the top of the dashboard.  It felt slightly more astronaut or race-car driver-like than I would have wanted.  However, the seating shape is conventional and supportive, so comfort wasn’t as issue.  Seating is neither too cushy nor too hard.  I did need some extra time to get used to 2 areas in terms of using settings.  The first was that the infotainment display was not a touch screen, but one operated by a large dial sitting right behind the gear selection lever.  It was not that intuitive and it would lead me to return to the home setting to try again.  The other was the cluster of controls on the left side of the steering wheel.  In some of the audio controls, there was too fine of a line between tabbing up or down or pushing into it.  At times, I didn’t get the intended result I was looking for. The Mazda 3’s forte seems to be its handling.  It inspired some confidence and, as I found myself on some expressways with a legal speed limit of 75 mph, I noticed that quickly changing lanes and the feeling of being in control were both very good.  However, in this niche, I’ve had vehicles that were quieter and more isolated.  I remember the last-gen Mazda 3 of a handful of years ago as being both grainy in its engine and busy as it rode on washboard pavement.  This one is much improved.  However, there is the engine hum, which some may like, and maybe a marginally higher amount of road noise or tire thum coming through than in some of its current competitors.  When you put your foot into it, it definitely makes itself heard, albeit as a rhythmic purr.  The engine is a 2.5-liter 4-cylinder, a displacement that was once so common, and it is naturally aspirated.  The transmission is a 6-speed geared automatic.  Shifts were clean and, consistent with the other communication from its mechanical aspects to its driver, shifts 1-2 and 2-3 were felt, though not at all unpleasant, in normal to spirited driving.  Even some step-gear and DSG transmissions have gotten to the point where they seemingly “slush” into the next gear.  While I might like drivability that is even quieter and more isolated, I appreciated a 2.5-liter 4-cylinder engine and a 6-speed automatic transmission instead of a CVT.  The reliability of Mazda powertrains is supposedly good. Even though the cabin front position is low for my taste, the seats are supportive and there is enough leg room, though it’s also a little more work to get into and out of the car.  Rear seat legroom seems acceptable for medium-height adults, albeit probably not so much for tall people.  The somewhat thicker rear pillar does not impede visibility when turning one’s head toward the rear.  Visibility through the greenhouse is workable and, in concert with the Mazda 3’s styling, is appealing.  Trunk space is also good for the Mazda 3’s size and the split folding rear seats make it even more generous. I did not calculate the Mazda 3’s fuel economy.  Compared to a smaller 4-cylinder displacement and a CVT, the fuel needle moved a little more quickly, but, also, the vehicle does not come with a very large tank.  It also did not spin at lower rpms while maintaining highway speed, with some vehicles in the same niche now cruising along at, say, 1800 rpms, either because of more gears or a CVT.  I’d say I was noticing slightly over 2000 rpms when maintaining highway speed.  Still, it got acceptable fuel mileage. It did not affect what I was going to write, but I did glance at professional reviewers’ opinions on the Mazda 3.  Most are very pleased with the vehicle.  Again, I thought it was competent, and I really appreciated its road manners and its feeling planted but liked, instead of loved, most of the other aspects of its drivability and its features. However, it’s worth taking note of the Mazda 3’s price point and good record.- - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      It's on the bucket list. Happy St. Patrick's Day!
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Big question is what version of Supercharging will Tesla put in here as they seem to be bloody slow at rolling out V4 chargers to compete with EVgo, Chargepoint, Electrify America, etc. Tesla strikes sweeping deal to install Supercharger stations outside of popular fast food chain
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Very cool Tech, Breakthrough that could help reduce cost of electric motors as no RARE EARTH metals are needed to create magnets now. A novel two-step grain boundary diffusion process using TaF5 and Pr70Cu15Al10Ga5 for realizing high-coercivity in Nd-Fe-B-sintered magnets without use of heavy rare-earth - ScienceDirect
    • surreal1272
      Toyota News: Toyota EV Blitzkrieg for 2025 has begun

      By surreal1272 · Posted

      And let’s make sure we are telling the whole truth about recalls and who is getting hit the most @G. David Felt     https://caredge.com/guides/automaker-with-the-most-recalls#Most_Vehicles_Recalled_in_2024_Ford_Tops_the_List

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search