Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Ford Explorer, Lincoln Crossover To Go Rear Drive

      Is Ford Working On A Rear-Drive Crossover?

    The Truth About Cars has learned that Ford is working on a new rear-drive vehicle, but it isn't a sedan. Sources tell TTAC that it happens to be crossover that Ford and Lincoln will get. Ford's version will wear the Explorer name, while Lincoln's version is currently un-named.

    So why a crossover and not sedan? The Truth About Cars says that the full-size market is shrinking, due to the popularity of crossovers. Also, the next Ford Taurus is reportedly canned for the U.S., thus making the case for a rear-drive sedan is out of the question for the moment.

    Adding more fuel to this fire is police car sales. Year-to-date, the Police Interceptor Utility are 52 percent while the Police Interceptor is down 7 percent. Also, the Police Interceptor Utility is outselling the Police Interceptor by 2:1.

    Doing a rear-drive crossover could give Ford an good base to build a pursuit ready vehicle to take on the Chevrolet Tahoe PPV.

    Source: The Truth About Cars


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • At my PT today, I got filled in on all the drama by my PT guy who had a Superbowl Party at his home. Was funny to hear about the halftime show. Heard that Idiot47 left in the 3rd quarter and told Roger Goodell that the Superbowl was a joke and he was going to bounce. Roger responded that apparently the Chiefs did too.
    • I am not a football fan, don't hate KC, but was pulling for the Eagles and glad they won. 
    • My interest in sportsball waxes and wanes over the years.  I've had an affinity for the Steelers, Dolphins, Browns and Broncos over the years, when I lived in those areas.  The Browns have been consistently horrible for so long, I still follow them to a degree but not at rabid fanboy level.  Didn't watch the Super Bowl last night, went to an IMAX showing of the new 'Becoming Led Zeppelin' documentary...great music from before my time catches my interest more than current sportsball...
    • I just remain loyal to my hometown professional teams, with the exception of football.  So, it would be the Lakers (NBA) and the Dodgers (MLB).  The absence of professional football in Los Angeles, coinciding with my absence, led me to abandon any childhood/teen loyalties, so I now consider myself a Seattle Seahawks fan.   In a Super Bowl like the recent one, where I have no opinion on the teams, I don't care who wins.  The same would have been true with Chicago and Indianapolis in 2007.  Who gives a rat's ass?  I was on the hillsides of the Golden Gate Bridge with thousands of others watching the QM2 sail under the bridge with a slim margin and into the bay for the first and only time thus far.  Most Super Bowl memories blend together over the years.  San Francisco on February 4, 2007 doesn't fade. As far as college football goes, I don't like UCLA, USC, or Cal Berkeley.  I would have not liked going to any of these schools.  The same would hold true for Notre Dame.  That would have been like pulling teeth. When it comes to Pac 10/12, I am a Huskies fan, for obvious reasons.  That has led me to dislike Oregon.  I have no loyalties from a past (tense) "Big 10" "experience," which was even more of a teeth puller. If you've moved a time or two, you'll run into locals who have never moved.  They may know nothing outside of a 125 mile radius.  You might encounter such a local who acts like the late Marge Schott or a Bubba (possibly under the umbrella of the "basket of deplorables") who asks you, out of the side of their mouth, of course, "How about dem (insert name of local team)?" It doesn't go over well that you don't give a shit because you have deep roots somewhere else and your loyalties won't be changing.  You should see the completely disoriented looks on their faces.
    • That Hate for the Chiefs is understandable, Idiot47 loves them and expects them to win, so that would make the 50.5% of Americans that did not vote for Idiot47 to hate the Chiefs. It is what it is.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search