Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Hyundai Could Take Over Fiat Chrysler Automobiles

      WHY?!

    Rumors of a possible buyer for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles have popped up again. Late last week, the Asia Times learned from sources that Hyundai Motor Group CEO Chung Mong-koo is waiting for "an expected decline" in shares of FCA before launching a takeover bid attempt. This is expected to launch sometime between the summer and "prior to the Fiat-Chrysler annual shareholders’ meeting in May 2019."

    Reportedly, FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne drew Hyundai's attention by using interest from Great Wall Motor.

    The deal is being spurred by Paul Singer, the principal of Elliott Management. Singer made headlines in April by pressuring Hyundai to merge with Mobius, their parts' division to create a new holding company and demanded the company to pay investors more than $10 billion in “excess cash.”

    Marchionne has been trying his damnedest to try and find a merger partner for the past few years.

    • Tried to work with General Motors CEO Mary Barra about possibly merging the two companies in 2015, but was turned down.
    • Rumors about possibly merging with Volkswagen, but was told no.
    • Various Chinese automakers considered bidding on FCA, but most deny it.
    • Great Wall was considering only purchasing Jeep. However, plans for this were put on ice

    Here is the question we find ourselves wondering about, why would Hyundai consider buying FCA? Aside from getting their hands on Jeep and Ram Trucks (FCA's money makers), FCA would be gaining the most from this possible deal.

    To throw another wrench into this, Hyundai is currently in the midsts of a reorganization effort and part of that includes possibly replacing Mong-koo who is 80 years old.

    Both FCA and Hyundai declined to comment.

    Source: Asia Times
    Thanks @regfootball for the news tip

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Honestly, I see no valid reason for Hyundai to do this, I can see the 80 year old leader stirring the pot to create attention for the company but not really going through with this. The future for FCA is a break up I believe and closer of some product lines. FCA was foolish to waste billions on Alfa to bring it back to life and Fiat can be the Dodge of Europe but otherwise their auto's are garbage that has no valid use in the US or other markets. 

    Sergio's leadership has been a political game of making money for this 1% club friends but no real growth of the company. He has failed in regards to growing the company and properly investing back into said name sakes.

    Sergio Failure could be the death of all these brands long term if someone does not properly step up and close down the brands that are sucking life from the company and allow to flourish those brands that can.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see this as a very good union.  

    Dodge - Sports car / Sports SUV brand

    Jeep - duh

    Ram - Trucks

    Chrysler - American luxury, plus another place to use Genesis platforms

    Kia - Where it is now, but move the K900 to Chrysler and Stinger to Dodge, while giving a shared platform for future Sedona/Pacifica and some of the crossovers with Jeep.

    Hyundai - Where it is now, maybe toss a platform or two to Chrylser to fill in the blanks.

    Genesis - Don't touch, just keep on keepin on. 

    If nothing else, just getting the economies of scale would help Chrysler and Dodge live. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Funny, the Hyundai Accent was sold in Mexico as a Dodge in the past.    The Stinger would definitely fit in with Dodge, even has a Mopar-ish name already.  

    I could see Hyundai being a far more competent owner of Chrysler assets than Fiat has been... could be interesting. 

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I stand totally corrected by @Drew Dowdell and @Cubical-aka-Moltar You guys have convinced me of a better way forward for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram than anything Fiat / Alfa / Maserati could do.

    I am assuming that the whole FCA mess would have to be bought, so maybe Fiat could actually get a superior subcompact platform from Hyundai to replace the garbage they currently have. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, dfelt said:

    I stand totally corrected by @Drew Dowdell and @Cubical-aka-Moltar You guys have convinced me of a better way forward for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram than anything Fiat / Alfa / Maserati could do.

    I am assuming that the whole FCA mess would have to be bought, so maybe Fiat could actually get a superior subcompact platform from Hyundai to replace the garbage they currently have. 

    The main thing is that Kia / Hyundai have money and FCA does not. They already share some 4-cylinder engines.  They could combine transmission tech fairly easily since none of Chryslers are actually made by Chrysler.  I would imagine the Pentastar would die in favor of Kia's 3.8 liter.  A shame, but it is what it is.  Chrysler's hybrid version of it is da-bomb though and I bet Kia and Hyundai could make use of it. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sergio, like Cerberus and Daimler before him, saw a property to be exploited rather than maintained and cultivated.  Wall Street capitalism has its points, but the financial subjugation of the economy one sector at a time is really causing some serious problems for all concerned. . . . . except for the 1%.  Which is why Sergio is doing this: the search for more money.  Corporate raiders on Wall Street would be proud of this guy.  Michigan on the other hand . . . .

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see this making sense for Hyundai if Sergio can shut down at least Chrysler and maybe Dodge also.  The Pacifica as a product would be a good fit to rebadge to Hyundai and Kia.  Chrysler/Dodge have nothing else that Hyundai needs, they already have the Genesis cars for rear drive luxury, they have the Stinger as a performance sedan, which is way better than any Dodge.  Maybe you could argue a Challenger/Charger are full size rear drivers, but that is a dying market.

    Ram trucks and Jeep make perfect sense for Hyundai, they have no overlap as it is with those brands.  Hyundai can pick and chose between the 4, 6 and 8 cylinder engines they have and FCA has to power such products.

    Alfa Romeo and Maserati give them that high end luxury car, that Genesis will never be.  They can try as much as they want with Genesis, but it will always come across as a fancy Hyundai just like Acura comes across as a fancy Honda.   But the other option could be for Hyundai to buy all of FCA, and then sell Alfa and Maserati to the Chinese and get a quick $5-10 billion in cash.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, frogger said:

    Well I hope Hyundai has tonnes of money to burn, I'm guessing almosy all models in progress at FCA aside from Jeep and RAM are crappy because FCA.

     

    And if Hyundai buys FCA, Sergio gets what he wants for his overlords in Italy ----- a successful quest for more money.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/2/2018 at 10:23 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I see this as a very good union.  

    Dodge - Sports car / Sports SUV brand

    Jeep - duh

    Ram - Trucks

    Chrysler - American luxury, plus another place to use Genesis platforms

    Kia - Where it is now, but move the K900 to Chrysler and Stinger to Dodge, while giving a shared platform for future Sedona/Pacifica and some of the crossovers with Jeep.

    Hyundai - Where it is now, maybe toss a platform or two to Chrylser to fill in the blanks.

    Genesis - Don't touch, just keep on keepin on. 

    If nothing else, just getting the economies of scale would help Chrysler and Dodge live. 

     

    Kinda thinking along the same line when I heard about it...might be the best melting of two companies that I can see right now.

    Dodge and Chrysler would give the Korean twins and style and substance-maybe even a set of balls. Could give a great mix of old school and even a nod the the tuner crowd. (older now) Grow a car company for the car guys...

    One of the few mixes were both could pretty much keep the current product line- maybe share some future products....

    If properly done, could make a very dangerous pair......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hyundai has the scale and FWD platforms that FCA badly needs.

    I mean is the merger worth having some vestigial control over Ferrari? And Jeep is Jeep, RAM trucks would just be a knockout l, but then why save Chrysler or Dodge?

    Maybe the 300 could be reborn on the Genesis G80 platform to keep its costs down, but seriously that is already what the G80 is....a Hyundai value play almost full size heavy solidly built RWD luxury sedan. Slightly smaller than the 300 but really a modern 300 would be better downsized compared to the Charger anyways. 

     

    Tau vs HEMI V8. Who wins there? 

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can see discussion on Chrysler as potentially jockeying vs. Genesis, but hyundai has nothing like what Dodge offers. As a dedicated performance arm, Dodge is potentially quite worth keeping on.

    richard-rawlings-of-gas-monkey-garage-putting-the-new-dodge-challenger-hellcat-through-it-s-paces-with-one-of-the-best-burnouts-of-58086.jpg

     

    It's not like Dodge is still way back here and overlapping hyundai :

    i3Al4YQ.png

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Hyundai has the scale and FWD platforms that FCA badly needs.

    I mean is the merger worth having some vestigial control over Ferrari? And Jeep is Jeep, RAM trucks would just be a knockout l, but then why save Chrysler or Dodge?

    Maybe the 300 could be reborn on the Genesis G80 platform to keep its costs down, but seriously that is already what the G80 is....a Hyundai value play almost full size heavy solidly built RWD luxury sedan. Slightly smaller than the 300 but really a modern 300 would be better downsized compared to the Charger anyways. 

     

    Tau vs HEMI V8. Who wins there? 

     

     

    Ferrari has already been legally separated from FCA.  Maserati is as well. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Rivian has opened a new 8 stall 350kW fast charger station at Lynnwood mall plus a 9th Handicap fast charge stall. Seems when remote service is being done they are tagged red as two of the units are. They take credit or debit cards on top of if you setup a Rivian app account.  There are now over 100 fast charge stations within a 5 mile radius of where I live.
    • Happy Birthday!!! Cheers!!!  
    • Yes. Ferrari was always a company selling towards the top tier rich.  I am not sure about Porsche's marketing after 1945, but I do know that Porsche wanted to go up market, really up market,  to sell to the rich in the late 1990s.    Rolex watches were always expensive.  But not always being a  chic jewellery accessory.  Rolex watches were expensive time pieces because they were highly precise time pieces meant for professions that required time pieces that were precise in time telling. Also, Rolexes were also engineered to be tough and not break in those job environments. Therefore the high price tags of them were because the high standard of engineering that went into them.  The value of the brand went up because of the people that bought them praised them. It was after the quartz movement of the 1960s and 1970s that Rolex needed to re-invent themselves as battery powered watches were MORE precise ate their lunch. So...like many other "swiss" automatic watch makers launched their new image as luxury time pieces. It was easy for Rolex to do as Rolex was coveted as a great engineered watch to begin with.   Like I said...its a boys club that they want to be known as and bought by (rich) people that have bought into that boys club mentality.  It aint for you or for @ccap41.   Even if you or @ccap41 had the money, its obvious that you guys have not fallen for this marketing gimmick.  Its barely for me either.  1. I cant afford Ferraris, Porsches or Rolexes. 2. I do not want to be in a Porsche Boys club.  I like Porsches and all, but Im not in their camp.  Not because of the boys club marketing schemes. Its just that I am not a rabid Porsche guy fanatic.  3. If I had 1% money, I am not sure Id be a Ferrari guy either.  After deep thought, I am more of a Ferrari guy than I am a Porsche guy.  But maybe not enough for me to fall for this kind of sales scheme either. 4.  Rolex...   I do like a Rolex.  But I am not one to boast about what kind of time piece Im wearing. So...nix me on that club as well. 5. It looks like I am aligned with you and @ccap41's take on this, but with me, I shrug it off.  I see why the companies want to go down this road. And I see why there are some people...rich people...that do not mind giving their monies away to these companies. And at the end of the day, its what makes them happy and superior to the rest of us as we do not have the time or money or will to buy into any of this. And kudos for them for buying into that lifestyle.    At the end of the day, whether we are talking about Ferrari or Porsche or Rolex, some of their product, past and present, have been REALLY REALLY EXCELLENT product. Whether we are talking about looks and style or engineering and technology, all 3 have styled and engineered awesomeness.  We could talk about their products that were failures, but wouldnt that signal some sort of sour grapes analogy on our part? Its a company's right to mold their brand image as they wish.   Whether we agree to it as individuals is irrelevant. What is relevant though is how collectively we ALL feel about it.  In Ferraris case its a huge success. Porsche and Rolex have to work on it just a tad more. But I feels its successful.  If there is a downfall for Porsche, I think it has more to do with their decisions to being a sports car maker ALONGSIDE being a (rich) family grocery getter/soccer mom SUV maker.  The failure of having two opposing identities is killing Porsche.  And it is a double edged sword.  On the one hand, if not for the SUVs, Porsche would have been gone by the early 2000s.  The inevitable was prolonged?  Rolex... Too many boutique time piece makers have propped up in the last 15 years that took their place in some areas of the really expensive realm.  Quartz time pieces keep on being a nuisance to them. This time around its the fashion watch trend. The name brand watch sellers like Michael Korrs and Hugo Boss and even Porsche that have taken some of Rolexes market share.  The advent of smart watches also hurts them.  So they decided to change it up in the sales realm.  Are there enough Rolex worshippers out there that will buy cheaper Rolexes or older models just to get that one highly anticipated limited edition time piece? Well...although watches are strictly fashion devices today, there are more than enough fashionable time pieces around for people to by-pass Rolex fandom.  Some have their own unique look to them and are sought after and some just emulate Rolex but watch brand snobs are too few today so Rolex has a steep hill to climb because most people that wear watches dont give a shyte what kind of watch you wear.  Unlike cars, car snobbery actually still exits...  Hence why Ferrari is still king of the douchiness and going on strong. Stronger than ever Id say.    
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search