Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Rumorpile: Hyundai Could Take Over Fiat Chrysler Automobiles

      WHY?!

    Rumors of a possible buyer for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles have popped up again. Late last week, the Asia Times learned from sources that Hyundai Motor Group CEO Chung Mong-koo is waiting for "an expected decline" in shares of FCA before launching a takeover bid attempt. This is expected to launch sometime between the summer and "prior to the Fiat-Chrysler annual shareholders’ meeting in May 2019."

    Reportedly, FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne drew Hyundai's attention by using interest from Great Wall Motor.

    The deal is being spurred by Paul Singer, the principal of Elliott Management. Singer made headlines in April by pressuring Hyundai to merge with Mobius, their parts' division to create a new holding company and demanded the company to pay investors more than $10 billion in “excess cash.”

    Marchionne has been trying his damnedest to try and find a merger partner for the past few years.

    • Tried to work with General Motors CEO Mary Barra about possibly merging the two companies in 2015, but was turned down.
    • Rumors about possibly merging with Volkswagen, but was told no.
    • Various Chinese automakers considered bidding on FCA, but most deny it.
    • Great Wall was considering only purchasing Jeep. However, plans for this were put on ice

    Here is the question we find ourselves wondering about, why would Hyundai consider buying FCA? Aside from getting their hands on Jeep and Ram Trucks (FCA's money makers), FCA would be gaining the most from this possible deal.

    To throw another wrench into this, Hyundai is currently in the midsts of a reorganization effort and part of that includes possibly replacing Mong-koo who is 80 years old.

    Both FCA and Hyundai declined to comment.

    Source: Asia Times
    Thanks @regfootball for the news tip

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    Honestly, I see no valid reason for Hyundai to do this, I can see the 80 year old leader stirring the pot to create attention for the company but not really going through with this. The future for FCA is a break up I believe and closer of some product lines. FCA was foolish to waste billions on Alfa to bring it back to life and Fiat can be the Dodge of Europe but otherwise their auto's are garbage that has no valid use in the US or other markets. 

    Sergio's leadership has been a political game of making money for this 1% club friends but no real growth of the company. He has failed in regards to growing the company and properly investing back into said name sakes.

    Sergio Failure could be the death of all these brands long term if someone does not properly step up and close down the brands that are sucking life from the company and allow to flourish those brands that can.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    I see this as a very good union.  

    Dodge - Sports car / Sports SUV brand

    Jeep - duh

    Ram - Trucks

    Chrysler - American luxury, plus another place to use Genesis platforms

    Kia - Where it is now, but move the K900 to Chrysler and Stinger to Dodge, while giving a shared platform for future Sedona/Pacifica and some of the crossovers with Jeep.

    Hyundai - Where it is now, maybe toss a platform or two to Chrylser to fill in the blanks.

    Genesis - Don't touch, just keep on keepin on. 

    If nothing else, just getting the economies of scale would help Chrysler and Dodge live. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Funny, the Hyundai Accent was sold in Mexico as a Dodge in the past.    The Stinger would definitely fit in with Dodge, even has a Mopar-ish name already.  

    I could see Hyundai being a far more competent owner of Chrysler assets than Fiat has been... could be interesting. 

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt

    I stand totally corrected by @Drew Dowdell and @Cubical-aka-Moltar You guys have convinced me of a better way forward for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram than anything Fiat / Alfa / Maserati could do.

    I am assuming that the whole FCA mess would have to be bought, so maybe Fiat could actually get a superior subcompact platform from Hyundai to replace the garbage they currently have. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
    Just now, dfelt said:

    I stand totally corrected by @Drew Dowdell and @Cubical-aka-Moltar You guys have convinced me of a better way forward for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram than anything Fiat / Alfa / Maserati could do.

    I am assuming that the whole FCA mess would have to be bought, so maybe Fiat could actually get a superior subcompact platform from Hyundai to replace the garbage they currently have. 

    The main thing is that Kia / Hyundai have money and FCA does not. They already share some 4-cylinder engines.  They could combine transmission tech fairly easily since none of Chryslers are actually made by Chrysler.  I would imagine the Pentastar would die in favor of Kia's 3.8 liter.  A shame, but it is what it is.  Chrysler's hybrid version of it is da-bomb though and I bet Kia and Hyundai could make use of it. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74

    Sergio, like Cerberus and Daimler before him, saw a property to be exploited rather than maintained and cultivated.  Wall Street capitalism has its points, but the financial subjugation of the economy one sector at a time is really causing some serious problems for all concerned. . . . . except for the 1%.  Which is why Sergio is doing this: the search for more money.  Corporate raiders on Wall Street would be proud of this guy.  Michigan on the other hand . . . .

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    I see this making sense for Hyundai if Sergio can shut down at least Chrysler and maybe Dodge also.  The Pacifica as a product would be a good fit to rebadge to Hyundai and Kia.  Chrysler/Dodge have nothing else that Hyundai needs, they already have the Genesis cars for rear drive luxury, they have the Stinger as a performance sedan, which is way better than any Dodge.  Maybe you could argue a Challenger/Charger are full size rear drivers, but that is a dying market.

    Ram trucks and Jeep make perfect sense for Hyundai, they have no overlap as it is with those brands.  Hyundai can pick and chose between the 4, 6 and 8 cylinder engines they have and FCA has to power such products.

    Alfa Romeo and Maserati give them that high end luxury car, that Genesis will never be.  They can try as much as they want with Genesis, but it will always come across as a fancy Hyundai just like Acura comes across as a fancy Honda.   But the other option could be for Hyundai to buy all of FCA, and then sell Alfa and Maserati to the Chinese and get a quick $5-10 billion in cash.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74
    23 hours ago, frogger said:

    Well I hope Hyundai has tonnes of money to burn, I'm guessing almosy all models in progress at FCA aside from Jeep and RAM are crappy because FCA.

     

    And if Hyundai buys FCA, Sergio gets what he wants for his overlords in Italy ----- a successful quest for more money.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    daves87rs
    On 7/2/2018 at 10:23 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I see this as a very good union.  

    Dodge - Sports car / Sports SUV brand

    Jeep - duh

    Ram - Trucks

    Chrysler - American luxury, plus another place to use Genesis platforms

    Kia - Where it is now, but move the K900 to Chrysler and Stinger to Dodge, while giving a shared platform for future Sedona/Pacifica and some of the crossovers with Jeep.

    Hyundai - Where it is now, maybe toss a platform or two to Chrylser to fill in the blanks.

    Genesis - Don't touch, just keep on keepin on. 

    If nothing else, just getting the economies of scale would help Chrysler and Dodge live. 

     

    Kinda thinking along the same line when I heard about it...might be the best melting of two companies that I can see right now.

    Dodge and Chrysler would give the Korean twins and style and substance-maybe even a set of balls. Could give a great mix of old school and even a nod the the tuner crowd. (older now) Grow a car company for the car guys...

    One of the few mixes were both could pretty much keep the current product line- maybe share some future products....

    If properly done, could make a very dangerous pair......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Suaviloquent

    Hyundai has the scale and FWD platforms that FCA badly needs.

    I mean is the merger worth having some vestigial control over Ferrari? And Jeep is Jeep, RAM trucks would just be a knockout l, but then why save Chrysler or Dodge?

    Maybe the 300 could be reborn on the Genesis G80 platform to keep its costs down, but seriously that is already what the G80 is....a Hyundai value play almost full size heavy solidly built RWD luxury sedan. Slightly smaller than the 300 but really a modern 300 would be better downsized compared to the Charger anyways. 

     

    Tau vs HEMI V8. Who wins there? 

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    balthazar

    balthazar 15,107

    Posted (edited)

    I can see discussion on Chrysler as potentially jockeying vs. Genesis, but hyundai has nothing like what Dodge offers. As a dedicated performance arm, Dodge is potentially quite worth keeping on.

    richard-rawlings-of-gas-monkey-garage-putting-the-new-dodge-challenger-hellcat-through-it-s-paces-with-one-of-the-best-burnouts-of-58086.jpg

     

    It's not like Dodge is still way back here and overlapping hyundai :

    i3Al4YQ.png

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
    20 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Hyundai has the scale and FWD platforms that FCA badly needs.

    I mean is the merger worth having some vestigial control over Ferrari? And Jeep is Jeep, RAM trucks would just be a knockout l, but then why save Chrysler or Dodge?

    Maybe the 300 could be reborn on the Genesis G80 platform to keep its costs down, but seriously that is already what the G80 is....a Hyundai value play almost full size heavy solidly built RWD luxury sedan. Slightly smaller than the 300 but really a modern 300 would be better downsized compared to the Charger anyways. 

     

    Tau vs HEMI V8. Who wins there? 

     

     

    Ferrari has already been legally separated from FCA.  Maserati is as well. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • smk4565
      Tariff Tuesday - Buick's Tough Spot

      By smk4565 · Posted

      Buick is at risk of becoming Chrysler, a 1 model brand.  They can keep the Enclave since it is built here, and the XT6 is dying this year which might help sales.  They won't kill the brand since they don't want to buy out dealers, so you cut them down to 1 model and hope dealers opt-out.   The Envista and Encore GX hit a sweet spot of small SUV at under $30k, but the tariffs would wreck that formula.  Although the Kia Seltos, Hyundai Kona,  VW Taos are all imported too and would suffer the same problem.  
    • smk4565
      Buick News: Buick Electra Sub-Brand Launches in China with the Electra GS Concept

      By smk4565 · Posted

      This thing looks worse than the EQS.  2 things that car companies need to get rid of is the bar of soap design and the yoke steering wheel.  And I just saw Mercedes is going to steer by wire and showed a yoke style steering wheel.  People don't want yokes in a car.  
    • Paolino
      Tariff Tuesday - Buick's Tough Spot

      By Paolino · Posted

      Frankly, I'm upset over this. I've always had a soft spot for Buick.
    • Drew Dowdell
      Tariff Tuesday - Buick's Tough Spot

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      Last week, April 15th, Tax Day for those of us in the U.S., we started a new series called Tariff Tuesday. President Trump’s tariffs amount to one of the largest single increases in taxes on the American People in history. The tariffs which, if fully implemented, will raise $1.4 trillion in revenue, an increase per household of $1,900 to $7,600 per year. Trump's tariff policies change daily, sometimes hourly, so as always, this information is correct for at least 15 minutes after publication. Each week we document the effects the tariff have or could have on the U.S. automotive industry.  Last week we made the case that under Trump's tariff policies, affordable sports cars are dead. Prediction: Buick - Killed in the US while Killing it in China Buick is in a bit of a pickle. The number of models they field in the U.S. has dwindled down to just four.  In spite of the decrease in offerings, the brand has shown growth in recent years with a significant jump of 39% in the first quarter of 2025.  It seems as though Americans were catching on to Buick's new offerings.  Buick specializes in inexpensive but premium-feeling small and medium-sized crossovers with just the U.S.-built Enclave filling the large crossover spot. However, Buick's best sellers all come from overseas.   The Encore GX is Buick's best seller with 58,239 units sold in 2024. The second runner up is the Buick Envista at 51,316 units.  These two models account for more than 50% of all Buick sales in the U.S.  Both models are built in South Korea. The Buick Envision is their third best seller (47,340) and accounts for about a third of all sales. It is built in China. The Enclave is their most expensive model. It is built in the US. 2024 sales numbers are distorted (26,400) as it was a model change-over year, but they have typically moved around 40,000 units a year. The South Korean built Encore GX and Envista would face 25% tariffs, adding at least $6,000 - $7,000 to the base price of the vehicles.  This pushes the roughly $24,000 Envista and $26,000 Encore GX base prices to between $29,750 to $32,500 respectively.  The same currently goes for the Chinese-built Envision. While Trump has raised tariffs on most Chinese imports over 100%, vehicles and vehicle parts from China are under an exemption that keeps the tariff at "only" 25%.  The base price of the Envision is $36,500 and with the tariff would likely go over $45,000. While these imported Buick models are excellent values at their current prices and Buick routinely tops the reliability charts, such significant price increases push these models into territory they where not intended to compete in. At nearly $30,000, a base Buick Envista would have to compete with the much larger, more capable, and just as nice U.S.-built Honda CR-V. Across the Pacific, Buick is doing well in China. They have eleven models on sale today with six more coming on a new EV/PHEV/EREV platform showcased with the Buick Electra GS Concept. Buick and GM are making major inroads in the hot EV market their with 40% increases in EV/PHEV market share. They are also showcasing LFP batteries with faster charging technology than is currently available in the U.S.   Buick China is so confident in their new platform, they are launching an entire sub-brand called Electra that will feature these six new models. We don't see how Buick can maintain its momentum in the US with massive price increases on its three most popular models that comprise most of their sales. Barclays estimates that GM will cease all imports from South Korea and China, totaling roughly 450,000 vehicles over multiple brands due to tariffs. Rather than on-shoring production, GM may just chose to shutter the brand in the U.S. entirely and let it live on solely in China. While Buick is no longer a major selling brand in the US, ending it removes choice and competition for American consumers. That increased cost and loss of choice are tied directly to the Trump tariffs.     View full article
    • G. David Felt
      Buick News: Buick Electra Sub-Brand Launches in China with the Electra GS Concept

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Seems GM has surpassed Tesla in battery cell production according to Bloomberg story and interview with Mary. GM Produces More Battery Cells In The US Than Tesla

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search