Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Rumorpile: FCA Considers Calling It Quits on Diesel

      Might be revealed at FCA's latest four-year plan announcement

    More and more automakers are beginning to turn away from diesel due to demand for the fuel dropping and the rising costs of making engines compliant. The latest automaker that could be leaving the diesel fraternity is Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

    The Financial Times has learned from sources that FCA plans on eliminating diesel engines from their passenger vehicles by 2022. This will be announced during the reveal of FCA's new four-year plan expected to take place on June 1st. FCA will continue to utilize diesel engines in commercial vehicles (including Ram Trucks), though it is unclear for how long.

    FCA declined to comment on this report when asked by Reuters.

    Source: Financial Times (Subscription Required), Reuters via Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    Edited by William Maley

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt
    32 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Almost none of FCA's last 4 year plan was actually implemented except for Alfa (late) and a couple Jeeps.... 

    So true in thinking about this, 4 year Vapor Plans. Wonder what the new 4yr Vapor plan will be once the new CEO takes over. 

    With the changing of the Guard, this makes one wonder why bother releasing a 4yr plan with an outgoing CEO. Might as well wait till the new CEO is in at least 90 days and then release a plan.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    Considers?  Volvo just announced that they aren’t going to develop another internal combustion engine, that the one in cars now is the last they will make.  You can’t put money into diesel it is yesterday’s technology.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    William Maley
    18 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    Volvo is FAR from relevant in the industry, and this latest announcement from them diminishes them even further.

    So Jaguar Land Rover, Infiniti, GM (to a point) announced their electrification plants are they "FAR from relevant"?

    Volvo is taking a big gamble with their decision and I like they are taking a chance. Whether or not it will work out remains to be seen.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    daves87rs
    7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Almost none of FCA's last 4 year plan was actually implemented except for Alfa (late) and a couple Jeeps.... 

    Still wondering why they  bother making plans.....they could just make it up on the way.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    regfootball
    On 2/26/2018 at 3:46 PM, smk4565 said:

    Considers?  Volvo just announced that they aren’t going to develop another internal combustion engine, that the one in cars now is the last they will make.  You can’t put money into diesel it is yesterday’s technology.

    bet those Mercedes diesels are still sweet tho ^^huh^^^

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565
    1 hour ago, regfootball said:

    bet those Mercedes diesels are still sweet tho ^^huh^^^

    The ones they quit selling in the USA 2 years ago?  And they only have them in Europe because it is so diesel heavy, they won't develop a new diesel.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
    3 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Notice the fine print.  Trucks and other commercial vehicles from FCA will still be available with economical, durable diesel powerplants. 

    Probably Jeeps as well. All Jeeps are technically classified as light trucks, so while the Renegade and Compass will probably never get diesels, the Wrangler and Grand Cherokee still probably could. 

    This announcement really means just no Chrysler 300, Alfa Romeo Guilia, or Maserati Ghibli diesels.... in Europe, no Fiat 500 diesels.  So it's a much smaller announcement than it appears.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
    5 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Notice the fine print.  Trucks and other commercial vehicles from FCA will still be available with economical, durable diesel powerplants. 

    :roflmao: ECONOMICAL :huh::wacko: 

    Yes they get solid high mpg, but due to the much higher cost of the powertrain as well as the cost of the fuel, it has been proven that for 90% Plus of buyers, Diesel is NOT ECONOMICAL!

    balthazar and others did the math and it ran from 10 to 20 years to break even on Diesel!

    :roflmao:  ECONOMICAL :roflmao: 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
    10 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    :roflmao: ECONOMICAL :huh::wacko: 

    Yes they get solid high mpg, but due to the much higher cost of the powertrain as well as the cost of the fuel, it has been proven that for 90% Plus of buyers, Diesel is NOT ECONOMICAL!

    balthazar and others did the math and it ran from 10 to 20 years to break even on Diesel!

    :roflmao:  ECONOMICAL :roflmao: 

    As with all things, it depends on how you use it.  If you already own a boat or camper that you tow often... if you are using your truck for hauling work like my parents do.... then diesel will make up the cost sooner.   Using a gasoline turbo V6 in that way will cause the fuel economy to drop much faster than it would with a diesel.

    That said, I want to remind people that you should never measure the ROI in years but in miles.  I have a friend who leases his vehicles and barely does 20k miles in 3 years where as Balth might do 20k in a year.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I hate to say stuff like this, but you can profile people fairly easily.  A certain emboldened member with a smaller view of the world used to get on my case about this.  Go see the world and learn to make inferences.  At any rate, I was boarding a plane in Jacksonville and, in front of me, was a guy with a baseball cap and all I could see was the rear camo effect.  When he got up, I saw Trump 2024.  I felt like saying something to him, along the lines of how is it that the most conservative people support the most depraved individual.  I thought I should skip it since I didn't want to end up in an argument and on a "do not fly" list for some airline.  He was white with salt and pepper hair but had that Charles Bronson brow.  So, you know ... ex-military, high paying trades, utilities, government job ... or alligator trapper.  For all these so-called conservative people, we've never had a first lady (lower case in her case) where you're a k**t hair away from seeing the R/X rated stuff.  I'm originally from SoCal and NOTHING shocks me, but that and the whole circus of everyone involved - extended family, loyal friends - is over the line for me for the job at hand. Houston is not my favorite place.  However, I handle it much better than Dallas or San Antonio, which don't interest me.  I don't like their interior location and the brushy looking mesquite.  Houston has a distinct and attractive downtown.  There's the Space Center.  There are the museums, of which MFAH is free one day of the week.  There's Galveston, and even if the not the nicest beach, water can be so therapeutic, just watching the cruise ships or freight ships come and go.  Lastly, there are some beautiful neighborhoods, with newer homes in the darker red brick, completely hidden in a pine canopy, which is never the case in other big Texas cities.  It reminds of Atlanta, which I very much liked.  So, between that, and the welcoming and freewheeling people, I can hang in H-town for a while and find new indie coffeehouses and eateries.  There's so much food and it's easy to gain weight there.  I agree ... I hate Orlando FL ... a bad knock-off of Las Vegas and Las Vegas is already bad. I've never been to Hawai'i and Alaska.  I'm not so sure I'm interested.  If I have to fly that far, I'll just cross a pond.  I also have an issue with Hawaiians since some of the locals of Samoan stock have issues with haolis, having heard this from white folks I knew who wanted to move there and then came back because of the passive-aggressive discrimination.  The only states are a cluster in the middle in which I have never set foot and it's not that pressing for me - ND, SD, Nebraska, and Montana.  So, I'm at 44 of them and that's good enough for now.
    • oldshurst442
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

    • oldshurst442
      Beautiful Cars Appreciation Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Watching "The Hunger Games" why do I feel we are going down a dark path?
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      The question I am hearing from more and more Americans: "Can we RECALL the President and VP?" Sadly, NO is the answer. It would take a motion to add to our constitution to allow a recall of the folks as even the Senate and House members are protected with no way to recall them either.  Interesting is that most states have in their constitution the ability to recall state politicians including the Governor that has happened in a few states over the last Century. Most recent was California.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search