Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Dodge Challenger Adds All-Wheel Drive for 2017

      All-Wheel Drive in a Muscle Car? Say it isn't so!


    Dodge is doing something that can be considered as sacrilegious in the muscle car class. They are adding an all-wheel drive version of the Challenger to their lineup.

    The 2017 Challenger GT will go on sale early next year with a base price of $34,990 (includes $1,095 destination charge). The all-wheel drive system that the Challenger will use is the same one found in the Charger AWD - power is sent to the rear wheels until slip is detected, at which point the front axle will hook up to the transfer case and get power. The bad news is that you can only get the GT with the 3.6L Pentastar V6 with 305 horsepower and 286 pound-feet of torque, and eight-speed automatic. On the plus side, the GT will come with the Super Track Pak that brings launch control, performance pages, and other items.

    Not much sets the Challenger GT apart from other models in terms of the exterior. The GT comes with a new hood, LED head and taillights, decklid spoiler, and a set of 19-inch wheels wrapped in all-season tires.

    Source: Dodge
    Press Release is on Page 2


    New 2017 Dodge Challenger GT Is World’s First and Only All-wheel-drive American Muscle Coupe

    • Dodge Challenger GT Joins Charger AWD to Complete the Dodge Lineup of All-wheel-drive Muscle Cars, Delivering Unparalleled Year-round Performance
    • Segment-first: 2017 Dodge Challenger GT is the first two-door American muscle car with all-wheel drive, providing muscle car enthusiasts all-weather driving confidence exclusive to Dodge
    • Challenger GT features the same high-performance all-wheel-drive system found in the award-winning Dodge Charger AWD with active transfer case and front-axle disconnect
    • Dodge’s award-winning 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine is standard, delivering 305 horsepower at 6,350 rpm and a responsive 268 lb.-ft. of torque at 4,800 rpm
    • New 2017 Dodge Challenger GT model has a starting U.S Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $33,395 (excluding $1,095 destination charge)
    • Dodge Challenger GT AWD production is scheduled to begin in January 2017 and vehicles will be available in dealerships the first quarter of 2017

    December 7, 2016 , Auburn Hills, Mich. - Designed and engineered for world-class precision, the new 2017 Dodge Challenger GT all-wheel drive (AWD) delivers the performance, power and all-weather capability to carve through some of the worst weather Mother Nature can dish out.
     
    From winding through twisty stretches of mountain roads, escaping away to a snow-covered ski resort, to daily commutes through the slush and snow of Northeastern and Midwestern winters, the Challenger GT AWD is built to handle it all.
     
    “Dodge is shifting the muscle car paradigm with the new 2017 Dodge Challenger GT – the world’s first and only all-wheel-drive American muscle coupe,” said Tim Kuniskis, Head of Passenger Cars – Dodge, SRT, Chrysler and FIAT, FCA – North America. “The Challenger has always been the most wide-ranging and functional muscle coupe, and now, with the new 305-horsepower all-wheel-drive Challenger GT, we are stretching the functional and geographic boundaries even further.

    Available this winter
    The new 2017 Dodge Challenger GT AWD model has a starting U.S Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $33,395 (excluding $1,095 destination charge).
     
    With production beginning in January, the all-wheel-drive Dodge Challenger GT is scheduled to arrive at Dodge dealerships nationwide in the first quarter of 2017.

    Power, precision and prowess
    The 2017 Dodge Challenger GT AWD features Dodge’s award-winning 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine, delivering 305 horsepower at 6,350 rpm and a responsive 268 lb.-ft. of torque at 4,800 rpm.
     
    A tuned induction system and dual exhaust from the manifolds back to the tips help deliver more than 90 percent of the engine’s peak torque from 1,800 to 6,400 rpm – all for outstanding drivability and responsiveness. With the standard TorqueFlite eight-speed automatic transmission, Challenger GT offers up to an EPA-estimated 18 city/27 hwy miles per gallon (mpg).

    The Dodge Challenger GT features Dodge’s high-performance all-wheel-drive system. Also found in the Charger AWD, this technologically advanced system includes an active transfer case and front-axle disconnect for excellent all-season performance and fuel economy. The Challenger GT seamlessly transitions between rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive with no driver intervention. Under normal driving conditions, the front axle is disengaged and 100 percent of the engine’s torque is directed to the rear wheels. This preserves the outstanding fun-to-drive performance and handling characteristics inherent to rear-wheel-drive vehicles. When sensors indicate the need for additional traction, the system automatically engages the front axle, instantly transitioning Challenger GT into all-wheel-drive mode.
     
    Enhanced with Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC), the Challenger GT AWD has impressive handling on all surfaces, especially snow and ice. VDC provides excellent traction on slippery surfaces and also helps the driver maintain the desired vehicle path. Enhancing the on-road dynamic performance using precise front-to-rear torque control integrated with the Electronic Stability Control (ESC) system, VDC maintains Challenger’s fun-to-drive character, regardless of road conditions.
     
    In addition, the new Dodge Challenger GT AWD features paddle shifters and Sport mode. With Sport mode active, gear changes are quicker and revs are held higher for even more performance-oriented acceleration and higher shift dynamics. For even more control, the driver can also use the die-cast steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters and view gear election through the full-color Electronic Vehicle Information Center (EVIC) centered in the instrument cluster.
     
    The Challenger GT Super Track Pak button activates Dodge Performance Pages and launch control features embedded in the 8.4-inch touchscreen radio. Visible performance information, such as reaction times, 0-60 times, G-force indicator and lap times, can be monitored, and even mirrored, in the 7-inch thin-film transistor (TFT) customizable cluster display. The new Challenger GT model also features three-mode ESC with “full-off” mode, a fun feature for drifting through snowy scenes.

    All-weather traction all year long, rain, sleet, snow or shine
    For muscle car enthusiasts who want more all-weather traction, the new 2017 Dodge Challenger GT delivers premium amenities inside and out, including 19-inch aluminum wheels with Hyper Black finish and P235/55R19 BSW all-season performance tires, projector fog lamps, a deck-lid rear spoiler, ParkSense rear park assist and ParkView rear backup camera.
     
    Challenger GT is equally well equipped on the inside with standard features, such as premium Nappa leather seating, heated and ventilated front seats with four-way power driver lumbar adjustment, heated steering wheel with power tilt and telescoping column, Uconnect 8.4-inch touchscreen display with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, six Alpine speakers with 276-watt amplifier, bright pedals, universal garage door opener and Hectic Mesh aluminum bezels.
     
    GT Interior Package
    The all-new GT Interior package, which is unique to this Challenger AWD model, includes performance Nappa leather and Alcantara suede seats – available on a V-6 for the first time – nine Alpine speakers, including a subwoofer and a 506-watt amplifier, and the Dodge performance steering wheel. U.S MSRP for the GT Interior package is $995.

    Performance-inspired design, all year round
    1971-inspired design, both inside and out, the Dodge Challenger GT features refined exterior styling and heritage muscle-car appearance with split grille, pronounced and functional power bulge hood, LED halo headlamps and LED tail lamps.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    29 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    And what a long strange trip its been!

    We will assume you are the right kind of "Dead Head" for a strange trip in a Chrysler product....!

    Lol! Never could listen to the Grateful Dead save for a few songs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I actually like that it comes basically fully loaded for the price, should be a nice daily driver that looks good.  I think a 2.3 EB/AWD Mustang with performance pack would be pretty nice too :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

    FCA is not rolling the dice here. 

    There is no risk, there is only listening to customers wants.  And as stew mentioned, it is a simple add on.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It's all off-the-shelf parts.  This is the technological equivalent of Chevy adding AWD to the Camaro by using ATS parts.... and likely as equally not difficult. 

    And also without any warrant for its existence....

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Stew said:

    Again, some people gotta bash it just because of the manufacturer......................

    No you are just overly sensitive about Chrysler. Like any other brand you have to take the bad and the good. 

    I like GM but I can give you a laundry list of issues they have too. 

    This is a very old car a very over weight car and one that should have been replace long ago. Yet they are saddled with it not due to Chrysler but mismanagement by Fiat and Sergio. It is clear as day and I can not see how you can not be even more upset about this than a GM fan. 

    To continue to defend and make excesses is just a means to an end of the brand if they do not get it together soon. 

    Same on the 300 Chrysler had a really good thing going that even Lincoln would envy. Now they are saddled with a old sedan that is discounted to the point it is priced with a Malibu and Fusion. Good for the buyer bad for Chrysler that could be getting top ATP for a car like this. Now there is talk that the 300 will go away if there is a LX replacement. 

    This is just bad management by FCA and I really wish Fiat has not bought Chrysler now. 

    I really do fear for their future out side Ram and Jeep. 

    The first sign of danger to the cars was years ago when they removed the Dodge name from the Trucks. How better to kill the cars or sell off the trucks at some point. 

    Do you not think they should have replaced the LX by now with a modern platform and a new updated V8 and V6? How long should they wait? 

    Should they not have let Chrysler have the funds to do a entire line of cars and small cross overs to give Fiat the Volume they dearly need vs putting money into Alfa and Maserati? 

    If they had treated Chrysler as they have Jeep Fiats issues would be much less.  

    Where am I wrong for pointing out a better funded Chrysler being put in the lead of the corporation would be the best move? 

    4 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Interesting idea on the supercharged V6....

    The sad part was for some unknown reason he put a pig hood ornament on it with wings. He no longer works there and we never got why he put it on the car as it was great looking car outside the hood ornament. 

    It must have been a good idea under the influence?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Stew said:

    I personally don't want to see it become a small compact 4 seater because it's size is what gives it it's appeal.  not everyone wants a tight sportscar.  i would like to see them make a smaller cuda to compete sure, but leave the Challenger alone (speaking of size and capabilities of course).  if all 3 were carbon copies of each other they would all lose their purpose for being, I LOVE the fact that they all 3 have distinct personalities. 

    It does not have to go that way. 

    But it can be made into a modern lighter and stiffer platform that would make it a even better and more competitive car. 

    Here again it is a failure of Fiat not so much Chrysler.

    Just imagine this. We know what they have done with an old over weight car. Imagine the same people with the proper amount of money doing a much more modern car that is still in the same vein as what we have.

    You can stick an engine in and you can add AWD but a clean sheet of paper platform can deliver so much more.  

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The only Challenger I see where AWD would be beneficial would be the SRT 8 versions ESPECIALLY the Hellcat.

    But alas, I dont think AWD will be offered for those.

    Sure its a no big deal add on as the Charger and 300 have this and I applaud this move ONLY because it MIGHT make pony car guys think about how the pony car segment COULD evolve to to spice things up performance wise vis-a-vis the competitor German sport coupe cars that have AWD...

    Or maybe not.

    Alls I know about a Hellcat is that its got insane power and its hard to get that power to the ground effectively.

    I LOVE me that Hellcat power. But AWD would do it some good.

    Mind you, a new svelte platform would also benefit a Hellcat.

    AWD on a Challenger?

    Call it boring for me....

    A 300C also had it a DECADE ago...

    BIG DEAL!!!

    GIVE ME A BRAND NEW CHALLENGER INSTEAD!!!

    I STILL LOVE THIS HELLCAT THOUGH!!! BUT I WANT A NEW PLATFORMED CHALLENGER HELLCAT EVEN MORE!!!

     

     

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

    No need to go to extremes. Many people love the style of the challenger, performance with V6 is more than adequate, would never own an SUV and don’t want 4 doors – yet live in a Northern climate and can’t justify a RWD coupe anything.  Until now.  And let’s face it, nobody will notice the added weight, because nobody will be cutting apexes with one.  But they will certainly notice AWD.

    EXACTLY.  GIVE CHRYSLER CREDIT FOR TRYING A NICHE HERE.

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Stew said:

    I personally don't want to see it become a small compact 4 seater because it's size is what gives it it's appeal.  not everyone wants a tight sportscar.  i would like to see them make a smaller cuda to compete sure, but leave the Challenger alone (speaking of size and capabilities of course).  if all 3 were carbon copies of each other they would all lose their purpose for being, I LOVE the fact that they all 3 have distinct personalities. 

    Why the Challenger sells is due to its heritage Mopar styling AND ITS SIZE.  Now that the Camaro and Mustang are lilliputes, and no one can inhabit them, the Challenger is more of a luxury GT.  Some folks like to use their car year round and in this case, since the Charger is ugly, the real mopar fans can finally get the nicer looking car AND NOT have to keep it in the garage in winter.  think older baby boomers who maybe just want this as a second car, for looks only, and really don't give a fuck about whether its heavy or whether they will lap the Nurburgring.  This is the car you take to Madison to go see a football game on a fall weekend when your kid starts his first day of college.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

    I get that people are anxious for an update, and I'm sure it's on the drawing board as we speak, but the logic by some is baffling. Hyper just claimed failure by the entire corporation FCA....... because the headlines did not read all new product is ready to go, instead of what they offered.

    I'm speechless

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    55 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    EXACTLY.  GIVE CHRYSLER CREDIT FOR TRYING A NICHE HERE.

     

    Trying a niche is not the problem but they could  and should have added a V8 to that niche, seeing as how they have had AWD with the 5.7L in the past on the exact same platform. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted

    I suspected torque limitations at first, but a quick search shows that they did not offer AWD with Charger V8 and 8 speed in the recent past.  

    My conclusion is that FCA didn't make the 8 cyl AWD because the new larger 8 speed trans can't fit.  Thus,  an engineering decision. I am sure the dealers would want to offer AWD for both, if they could, but they can't.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    I suspected torque limitations at first, but a quick search shows that they did not offer AWD with Charger V8 and 8 speed in the recent past.  

    My conclusion is that FCA didn't make the 8 cyl AWD because the new larger 8 speed trans can't fit.  Thus,  an engineering decision. I am sure the dealers would want to offer AWD for both, if they could, but they can't.  

    I was told by an FCA rep that the take rate on the older V8-AWD setup was too low for them to bother certifying the new setup.  Not sure if it's true or not, but sounded reasonable. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)

    Posted (edited)

    3 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I was told by an FCA rep that the take rate on the older V8-AWD setup was too low for them to bother certifying the new setup.  Not sure if it's true or not, but sounded reasonable. 

    Ran across that too, but several people swear that it was just an excuse.  Seems more plausible to me that physical limitations are the cause, rather than lack of sales.  Completing the setup for V8 is minor, if you are already doing it for V6.  And lets face it, the 8 speed is bigger than a 5 speed.  Kind of a smoking gun, imo.

    Edited by Wings4Life
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, regfootball said:

    EXACTLY.  GIVE CHRYSLER CREDIT FOR TRYING A NICHE HERE.

     

    Why...they certainly don't deserve it...

    23 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I was told by an FCA rep that the take rate on the older V8-AWD setup was too low for them to bother certifying the new setup.  Not sure if it's true or not, but sounded reasonable. 

    Makes sense...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    Ran across that too, but several people swear that it was just an excuse.  Seems more plausible to me that physical limitations are the cause, rather than lack of sales.  Completing the setup for V8 is minor, if you are already doing it for V6.  And lets face it, the 8 speed is bigger than a 5 speed.  Kind of a smoking gun, imo.

    It really could be either. I'm sure V8 sales of all of the LX cars can't be more than about 20%.... AWD being even 20% of V8s is probably optimistic.  So 1/25th of the cars being sold in that power train configuration really doesn't make for a good business case.  

    The 8-Speed AWD is actually more compact than the 5-speed AWD when you account for the forward drive shaft.  In the 8-speed it is integrated into the transmission, in the 5-speed, it's external. 

    It's kinda a moot point now anyway... the LX cars are headed for the dust bin at the end of this generation... and I'm rather sad about that. If my business takes off next year like I hope, maybe I'll pick up a 300C Hemi to use as a daily since I don't want to wheel a truck around everywhere...... heck, I've got 6 garages.... I might as well use them. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It really could be either. I'm sure V8 sales of all of the LX cars can't be more than about 20%.... AWD being even 20% of V8s is probably optimistic.  So 1/25th of the cars being sold in that power train configuration really doesn't make for a good business case.  

    The 8-Speed AWD is actually more compact than the 5-speed AWD when you account for the forward drive shaft.  In the 8-speed it is integrated into the transmission, in the 5-speed, it's external. 

    It's kinda a moot point now anyway... the LX cars are headed for the dust bin at the end of this generation... and I'm rather sad about that. If my business takes off next year like I hope, maybe I'll pick up a 300C Hemi to use as a daily since I don't want to wheel a truck around everywhere...... heck, I've got 6 garages.... I might as well use them. 

    My thoughts exactly regarding the transmission. There is no reason for the V8 exclusion other than an economic one. Just sucks that they won't do both engines. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's not like the Pentastar is a particularly compact engine.  It's one of the best general purpose V6es on the market, but it is rather large.  I think both the Ford 3.7 and GM 3.6 are smaller, if only slightly.  The Toyota and Hondas are much smaller

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I was told by an FCA rep that the take rate on the older V8-AWD setup was too low for them to bother certifying the new setup.  Not sure if it's true or not, but sounded reasonable. 

     

    So here we are hearing directly from an FCA rep that an AWD sedan w/ a V8 didn't sell, but they thought it'd be a good idea to put AWD in a less practical car w/ a bunch less power.

     

    Yep, seems like a good idea to me.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Frisky Dingo said:

     

    So here we are hearing directly from an FCA rep that an AWD sedan w/ a V8 didn't sell, but they thought it'd be a good idea to put AWD in a less practical car w/ a bunch less power.

     

    Yep, seems like a good idea to me.

    When you have lemons you make lemon aide.

    In other words you are a auto engineer with little budget and a very old car so what do you do? You take what you have and make the best of it.

    We saw this very same thing at Pontiac when they put a V8 in the FWD GXP GP. Not a great car but considering they had no money and an old W body to work with it was better than nothing.

    Note the GXP was on the road to the bail out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, hyperv6 said:

    No you are just overly sensitive about Chrysler. Like any other brand you have to take the bad and the good. 

    I like GM but I can give you a laundry list of issues they have too. 

    This is a very old car a very over weight car and one that should have been replace long ago. Yet they are saddled with it not due to Chrysler but mismanagement by Fiat and Sergio. It is clear as day and I can not see how you can not be even more upset about this than a GM fan. 

    To continue to defend and make excesses is just a means to an end of the brand if they do not get it together soon. 

    Same on the 300 Chrysler had a really good thing going that even Lincoln would envy. Now they are saddled with a old sedan that is discounted to the point it is priced with a Malibu and Fusion. Good for the buyer bad for Chrysler that could be getting top ATP for a car like this. Now there is talk that the 300 will go away if there is a LX replacement. 

    This is just bad management by FCA and I really wish Fiat has not bought Chrysler now. 

    I really do fear for their future out side Ram and Jeep. 

    The first sign of danger to the cars was years ago when they removed the Dodge name from the Trucks. How better to kill the cars or sell off the trucks at some point. 

    Do you not think they should have replaced the LX by now with a modern platform and a new updated V8 and V6? How long should they wait? 

    Should they not have let Chrysler have the funds to do a entire line of cars and small cross overs to give Fiat the Volume they dearly need vs putting money into Alfa and Maserati? 

    If they had treated Chrysler as they have Jeep Fiats issues would be much less.  

    Where am I wrong for pointing out a better funded Chrysler being put in the lead of the corporation would be the best move? 

    The sad part was for some unknown reason he put a pig hood ornament on it with wings. He no longer works there and we never got why he put it on the car as it was great looking car outside the hood ornament. 

    It must have been a good idea under the influence?

    Yes, because I just bought a Chrysler Beetle and a Dodge Camry????????   Wait..........

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Stew said:

    I got 2 Toyota Dakotas and a Ford Silverado Z71. 

     

    You have some rare as hell trucks there bud! Hold on to them!

    ;)

     

     

     

    * And I mean nothing derogatory by it. I'm just playing around, k.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    Nope, Heard they have a Rotting Frame Issue as they bog down in the Tundra on the northern slope.

    :roflmao: 

    Oh no, didn't realize.  May have to try a Nissan Tacoma All-Terrain.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Stew said:

    Oh no, didn't realize.  May have to try a Nissan Tacoma All-Terrain.

    Same Problem with the Frame. That pesky Toyota Frame issue has plagued some potentially awesome auto's. The Rogue Runner would have been great if not for the Frame too. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    With all the snow across the nation recently and more on the way, I wonder how many Challenger owners wish they had AWD.

    Agree, I think with all the crazy weather more and more wish they had AWD.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Argh.  This is a question I almost want to avoid. The A380 is incredible.  Yes, I had a roundtrip through AA on British.  They have a small economy section at the back, upstairs.  Then I flew a one way from Italy to New York-JFK on an Emirates "fifth freedom" flight segment.  They have economy taking the entire main level, with none upstairs. Economy seats are a little wider on the A380 ... definitely on Emirates, at least.  It was an outstanding flight because of that.  On British, I paid for an economy seat upstairs and the curvature of the exterior translates into windows that are too sloped and with an odd and bigger void in between the cabin and the exterior.  I will be sitting downstairs if there is a future flight on one. The 747-8 isn't as comfortable in economy because the seats are traditional economy width.  I feel more comfortable in one because I know it.  It's also much more photogenic all the way around.  You feel good when it pulls up to the gate and you see that beautiful and proportioned machine through the big glass windows. The humidification is good on both planes. It's really sad that no more passenger quadjets are being produced.  It's easier to get onto an A380 if Europe bound (British, Lufthansa, Emirates, and others via connections, with Air France holding back).  For a 747-8, Lufthansa is the only choice and I am grateful to them for that.
    • My car has a supposed 525 mile highway crusing range on a full tank (19.5 gallons).   I haven't fully tested that since I tend to fill up at 1/2 tank when on road trips..but I have recorded averages of 29.5 and 30 mpg on road trips, which is pretty good for a comfortable 4200lb AWD sedan..
    • @trinacriabob in your flying in recent years, have you had a trip on an A380?    If so, how does it compare to the larger Boeings? 
    • Right.  It's not the aircraft themselves, but the haste and sloppiness.  ("Haste makes waste.")  This 777 X is ambitious and the folding wingtips are novel.  They will be very late with delivering this plane.  I now like some Boeing and some Airbus.  It's a mix.  In the recent past, I took a ride on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner and I definitely like it more than the Airbus 350 (even though the Airbus 350 has that photogenic curved winglets).  The cabin fatigue from flying is much reduced on the Dreamliner. Yesterday, I was on two domestic Boeing 737 Max 8 segments back to back on Southwest.  I like its newer features - ambient lighting, larger bins, a little quieter.  So, if it's working, it's a very nice rendition of the 737.  It's too bad that their newest version of this storied workhorse had to be tainted.  I get on and sigh.  If it keeps a clean track record going forward, people may be less weirded out as the statistics may become better. It is.  However, I'm not a fan of the leg design, which is also now popular on sofas.  The biggest turnoff for me in sofas - when I bought a sleeper for another room with the last stimulus money - was the amount of product that had nailheads all over the place.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search