Dodge Challenger Adds All-Wheel Drive for 2017

This car, with that propulsion system and at that price, just doesn't make sense to me.

Pair it up with a V8 and stop wasting everyone's time FCA. Good grief. They are just phoning it in if it doesn't involve a Jeep or a Fiat. Probably why they are headed to the great crapper in the sky. 

29 minutes ago, FordCosworth said:

This car, with that propulsion system and at that price, just doesn't make sense to me.

Me either....

7 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

Pair it up with a V8 and stop wasting everyone's time FCA. Good grief. They are just phoning it in if it doesn't involve a Jeep or a Fiat. Probably why they are headed to the great crapper in the sky. 

...and can't get there fast enough IMHO.  They are copying a design from 1970 for crying out loud...I was 5 years old in 1970....now several people I went to high school with are grand parents...when you rely on a design from half a century ago, your brand is dead....

3 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Me either....

...and can't get there fast enough IMHO.  They are copying a design from 1970 for crying out loud...I was 5 years old in 1970....now several people I went to high school with are grand parents...when you rely on a design from half a century ago, your brand is dead....

I have no problem with the design but this is just pure neglect and half-assery by FCA. 

AWD 

V6 

AWD w/ V8

FCA giving us quality real products the customer wants 

13 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

I have no problem with the design but this is just pure neglect and half-assery by FCA. 

I have no problem with the design per se, but when the main car they are relying on is a copy of a half century old design, and they go half way on the power train, that to me really shows they don't care much.

Show me that you care and then maybe I will be willing to drop coin on product....

Boo on leaving the 5.7 out of the equation.  That said, i could see myself getting a used one as a dail driver in a few years time.  I am really starting to wonder if the reason the Hemi AWDs died was actually sales or something else, like the Hemi and 8 speed being too large to fit the current AWD system, at least without making i look like a 4x4?  Heck, let's just jack the MFer up, give it underbody armor and some nice fat all terrain tires, give the the Hemi and sale them like hotcakes in the northern region.  I mean wtf not!

Honestly though, if they had put the 5.7 in, people would bitch it isn't the 6.4.  if they put the 6.4 in people would bitch because they didn't use the hellcat.  it is kind of like them killing car models to concentrate on the much higher demand SUVs and people bitch.  Ford says they are going to do it and they get praise.  They could replace every model tomorrow with brand new ones all on new platforms and people would bitch.  just saying.......

Here is another example of where they need to put the money into making a new car on a new platform.

This is an old over weight Chrysler based on an Older over weight Benz E class from around the early 1990's.

It has gotten to the point that even the media does not even use this car in comparisons with the Mustang and Camaro.

Now they are pushing this back to 2021 so I get the feeling we may be seeing the last of the cars from Chrysler.  Sergio has raped and pillaged Chrysler Jeep to the point that they receive little in return.

Yet they have a new Alfa that will under perform in sales and never really be a challenger to the Germans outside being a car for those who want something different and like to spend time a the dealer waiting rooms.

I really wonder how long the Dodge engineers will hang around as they try so hard but get so little support.

2 minutes ago, hyperv6 said:

Here is another example of where they need to put the money into making a new car on a new platform.

This is an old over weight Chrysler based on an Older over weight Benz E class from around the early 1990's.

It has gotten to the point that even the media does not even use this car in comparisons with the Mustang and Camaro.

Now they are pushing this back to 2021 so I get the feeling we may be seeing the last of the cars from Chrysler.  Sergio has raped and pillaged Chrysler Jeep to the point that they receive little in return.

Yet they have a new Alfa that will under perform in sales and never really be a challenger to the Germans outside being a car for those who want something different and like to spend time a the dealer waiting rooms.

I really wonder how long the Dodge engineers will hang around as they try so hard but get so little support.

Please show me any proof of this.  We actually knew for a very long time it would be 2021 before the LX replacements appeared.  Also, VERY little of LX was based on the old Benz platform and at this point EVERY single E-class part has been replaced and it now shares nothing with that old platform.  Also, for the size the weight is average, they really need Aluminum blocks on their Hemis to cut weight from he nose.  In this climate and with what is selling it makes MUCH more sense to concentrate on trucks and SUVs unless you are Toyota or Honda, that is just how it is right now and you act as if they are the only ones doign this when that isn't remotely the truth.

24 minutes ago, Stew said:

Honestly though, if they had put the 5.7 in, people would bitch it isn't the 6.4.  if they put the 6.4 in people would bitch because they didn't use the hellcat.  it is kind of like them killing car models to concentrate on the much higher demand SUVs and people bitch.  Ford says they are going to do it and they get praise.  They could replace every model tomorrow with brand new ones all on new platforms and people would bitch.  just saying.......

I see what you're saying but being in any variation of a V8 is a no brainer to me. 

3 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

I see what you're saying but being in any variation of a V8 is a no brainer to me. 

Me too, but you know what I say is correct.  If they decide to counter with an AWD Camaro it will simply use ATS hardware which means turbo 4 or V6 and this wouldn't surprise me at all.  I bet they would get praised for it. 

19 minutes ago, Stew said:

Please show me any proof of this.  We actually knew for a very long time it would be 2021 before the LX replacements appeared.  Also, VERY little of LX was based on the old Benz platform and at this point EVERY single E-class part has been replaced and it now shares nothing with that old platform.  Also, for the size the weight is average, they really need Aluminum blocks on their Hemis to cut weight from he nose.  In this climate and with what is selling it makes MUCH more sense to concentrate on trucks and SUVs unless you are Toyota or Honda, that is just how it is right now and you act as if they are the only ones doign this when that isn't remotely the truth.

Actually the LX replacements were pushed back several times before the 2021 date was set. Either way it is long overdue. I love the Challenger but it is long past time to move it into a more modern platform. 

Just now, surreal1272 said:

Actually the LX replacements were pushed back several times before the 2021 date was set. Either way it is long overdue. I love the Challenger but it is long past time to move it into a more modern platform. 

I do agree there, but compared to say, the Taurus, explorer, flex, etc it isn't that old of a platform as all of those ARE on a platform from the 90s.  I am not saying I agree with the neglect, but you can't judge them harshly for a thin and then praise another fordoing the same thing.  The whole industry is heading in the direction .of concentrating on trucks and SUVs while leaving the cars alone for longer.  These are still businesses so they are still going to flow to where the profit is. 

I can't help but wonder who the target buyer for this is??

Who is demanding a huge, 2 door, auto-only AWD V6 sled priced in the mid-upper 30's?? What is the point of the car?? A Golf R, WRX/STI, or Focus RS all kill this car for similar or less money. And off a ton more practicality to boot.

In other words, AWD widebody Hellcat or bust. 

13 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

I can't help but wonder who the target buyer for this is??

Who is demanding a huge, 2 door, auto-only AWD V6 sled priced in the mid-upper 30's?? What is the point of the car?? A Golf R, WRX/STI, or Focus RS all kill this car for similar or less money. And off a ton more practicality to boot.

 

In other words, AWD widebody Hellcat or bust. 

EXACTLY!

There are so many other vehicle out there for similar money(higher and lower) that do the job of this so much better. It isn't like this 3.6 is going to win many drag races matched to a 4500lb sled. realistically(and sadly) my 2.0T Escape probably won't be far behind this in a race. and it does all of the other things this is supposed to do...better.. AWD/4WD Jeep Cherokee 3.6 is in the same ballpark.

2 hours ago, Stew said:

Please show me any proof of this.  We actually knew for a very long time it would be 2021 before the LX replacements appeared.  Also, VERY little of LX was based on the old Benz platform and at this point EVERY single E-class part has been replaced and it now shares nothing with that old platform.  Also, for the size the weight is average, they really need Aluminum blocks on their Hemis to cut weight from he nose.  In this climate and with what is selling it makes MUCH more sense to concentrate on trucks and SUVs unless you are Toyota or Honda, that is just how it is right now and you act as if they are the only ones doign this when that isn't remotely the truth.

The media reported a while back that it was 2018 and then later it was pushed to 2021 Do a search on Autoblog or any of the other sites that reported it. It was well reported. 

The cars platform was based on the Benz platform and that is part of the weight issue. The car just as a Chrysler is two generations older than Ford and Chevy. 

For Chrysler to survive as a automaker they will need to have smaller cars be it of their own or with a partner. The market watchers have pointed that out clearly. Selling smaller cars to meet regulation in fuel economy is a must. They for sure are not doing it with Fiat as it is. 

Second the only small efficient crossovers they have are at Jeep. Ram is in need of a new truck soon too as Ford is ahead a gen and Chevy will have a new one in about a year and a half. It is a very competitive market. 

For someone who like Chrysler you appear much in denial and it is to their detriment. I am not a Chrysler fan but I for sure do not want to lose another American brand as we have lost too many. 

It was also made clear that there has been some consideration that they may kill the V8 also. Not sure how serious that is but Ford is nearly there now so it is a possibility. 

The real shame is they have some very talented engineers there as we have seen what they have done with the old outdated products. Imagine what they could do with a clean sheet of paper. If I were Sergio I would take all that wasted Alfa money and pump it into Chrysler and tell them to do what they do best. 

Where is this wrong. To defend what is going on is Nuts. In fact if this were GM I would as a GM fan be so very pissed off as I have been in the past when they have failed to do what was right. 

Even their trucks and SUV models need more work soon as they are getting old and not market leading. Not bad but not the best in segment other than the mini van that is dying like the Coupe. 

Let put it this way the LX is selling at low prices and high discounts. This is a segment where they could be making a good ATP on a modest amount of models but the powers to be in Italy don't care. 

The sooner you get rid of Sergio the better chance they have to pull it out. 

The real question is who will partner with Chrysler or who will buy Jeep and Ram from them when they fail. Fiat is hemorrhaging more money than Jeep and Ram can support. 

16 hours ago, ccap41 said:

EXACTLY!

There are so many other vehicle out there for similar money(higher and lower) that do the job of this so much better. It isn't like this 3.6 is going to win many drag races matched to a 4500lb sled. realistically(and sadly) my 2.0T Escape probably won't be far behind this in a race. and it does all of the other things this is supposed to do...better.. AWD/4WD Jeep Cherokee 3.6 is in the same ballpark.

Simple, someone looking for all-weather capability in a pretty package.  I doubt they are expecting high sales, but this is a no-brainer as there is basically no real work or certification needed to make his happen as everything is just being carried over from the Charger.  This actually should have been done years ago (like when they were still making Hemi AWDs. 

The reason for V6 only is obvious, it's not a performance biased system with torque limitations.

That said, kudos to FCA for offering it.  I bet it sells well. 

It just doesn't make any sense at all to me. Buy a Jeep Grand Cherokee, Cherokee, Charger/300, Ford Edge, the new Equinox and Traverse do everything better... You can get a 4X4 Cherokee Laredo E(Not sure what the "E" is for but it's a step up from the Laredo by $2,000) for less money than this Challenger.

20 hours ago, Stew said:

Me too, but you know what I say is correct.  If they decide to counter with an AWD Camaro it will simply use ATS hardware which means turbo 4 or V6 and this wouldn't surprise me at all.  I bet they would get praised for it. 

In fairness though, the Camaro would get a pass but it's because it's much lighter than the Challenger and the addition of AWD would not hurt it that much. A V6 Challenger is just too heavy to justify the addition of AWD. That is the biggest problem with it. Just my opinion though. 

GM would also put a proper "athletic" AWD system in the Camaro that would likely be capable of SS duties as well. Not just whatever is on the shelf(okay maybe they would because of the ATS/CTS).

19 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

It just doesn't make any sense at all to me. Buy a Jeep Grand Cherokee, Cherokee, Charger/300, Ford Edge, the new Equinox and Traverse do everything better... You can get a 4X4 Cherokee Laredo E(Not sure what the "E" is for but it's a step up from the Laredo by $2,000) for less money than this Challenger.

No need to go to extremes. Many people love the style of the challenger, performance with V6 is more than adequate, would never own an SUV and don’t want 4 doors – yet live in a Northern climate and can’t justify a RWD coupe anything.  Until now.  And let’s face it, nobody will notice the added weight, because nobody will be cutting apexes with one.  But they will certainly notice AWD.

3 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

No need to go to extremes. Many people love the style of the challenger, performance with V6 is more than adequate, would never own an SUV and don’t want 4 doors – yet live in a Northern climate and can’t justify a RWD coupe anything.  Until now.  And let’s face it, nobody will notice the added weight, because nobody will be cutting apexes with one.  But they will certainly notice AWD.

So you narrowed the population down to like 5 people.

1: You and everybody in the US knows it is a SUV/CUV craze happening, not coupes

2: Add an AWD system to an already bloated car and performance is..like the Cherokee

3: How many people "won't own a vehicle w/ 4 doors"? Again, almost none. This is supported by the SUV/CUV sales and car sales being down.

4: Narrow that field down to the northern third of the US and you have 5 people who will buy these.

4 hours ago, Stew said:

Simple, someone looking for all-weather capability in a pretty package.  I doubt they are expecting high sales, but this is a no-brainer as there is basically no real work or certification needed to make his happen as everything is just being carried over from the Charger.  This actually should have been done years ago (like when they were still making Hemi AWDs. 

This!!!!

1 minute ago, ccap41 said:

So you narrowed the population down to like 5 people.

1: You and everybody in the US knows it is a SUV/CUV craze happening, not coupes

2: Add an AWD system to an already bloated car and performance is..like the Cherokee

3: How many people "won't own a vehicle w/ 4 doors"? Again, almost none. This is supported by the SUV/CUV sales and car sales being down.

4: Narrow that field down to the northern third of the US and you have 5 people who will buy these.

 

I would buy it for exactly the reasons wings said.  generally the Charger AWDs have been as quick, if not quicker, than their RWD counterparts so low to mid 6s in the 1/4 in plenty adequate and BTW considerably quicker than a V6 Cherokee, 2.0T Escape, or 3.6 GC.  They aren't looking for SUV like sales either.  100 or so a month should more than suffice afterall, as I mentioned, development costs would be next to nothing. 

3 minutes ago, Stew said:

I would buy it for exactly the reasons wings said.  generally the Charger AWDs have been as quick, if not quicker, than their RWD counterparts so low to mid 6s in the 1/4 in plenty adequate and BTW considerably quicker than a V6 Cherokee, 2.0T Escape, or 3.6 GC.  They aren't looking for SUV like sales either.  100 or so a month should more than suffice afterall, as I mentioned, development costs would be next to nothing. 

...and the other four would be....?

In all seriousness, I cannot see the appeal here.

Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

...and the other four would be....?

In all seriousness, I cannot see the appeal here.

It isn't going to set the world on fire for sure, but it is free money.  If it even adds just a few sales they are good. 

Just now, Stew said:

It isn't going to set the world on fire for sure, but it is free money.  If it even adds just a few sales they are good. 

They do need all of the help they can get.....!

Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

They do need all of the help they can get.....!

Yip, well, i think part is to give the V6 some love since the 5.7 and 6.4 are getting the TA versions and the Hellcat is getting the widebody. 

I would venture to say the reason for the V6 only is because that is all this system can handle. Nothing more and nothing less. I am sure the engineers would have liked to offered more and may in the future but the money may just not be there for them to do more. GM in the pre bailout years did some odd things dictated by budgets and available hardware.

The truth is the Hell Cat needed this more than any model as it can not put down the power it has now. They are going to a wide body edition. In other words flairs with larger stickier tires. That tells me they just did not get the funding they needed to do it and do it right.

This was way I pointed out it has to be thought to be an engineer at Chrysler right now as you are forced into an AWD V6 while they try to market a BMW fighting Alfa that is doomed from the start.

FCA lets the all pro models sit on the bench while they over play and over pay on the second string they put into the game.

I am watching Buick as I could see an AWD coupe ending up there at some point. the problem is with such a weak coupe market right now it may get pushed back.

I wonder how much weight this added to the car? It would be nice if they could Supercharged this engine. I had a co worker that did that to his V6 and it ran pretty well. Not real cost effective over just ordering a V8 but if you wanted something different.

Come January when blizzards are everywhere, I bet they will be a hit.

14.5-14.8 in the 1/4 

2.0T Escape 15.2-15.5

The Cherokee V6 lays almost directly on top of that with the Grand Cherokee behind them by a couple/few tenths.

Exactly, JUST BUY A CHARGER AWD! They start almost $3,000 cheaper as well.

2 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

Come January when blizzards are everywhere, I bet they will be a hit.

 

Yeah a "sporty" car that is only a few inches off the ground will be a huge hit when there are 12 inches of snow on the ground.

5 minutes ago, hyperv6 said:

It would be nice if they could Supercharged this engine. I had a co worker that did that to his V6 and it ran pretty well. Not real cost effective over just ordering a V8 but if you wanted something different.

Then we're back to the AWD system and what it can and cannot handle.

1 minute ago, Wings4Life said:

Come January when blizzards are everywhere, I bet they will be a hit.

 

Generally people put them away here in the snow belt not because of the RWD but because they have them fixed up and just don't want them in the salt.

Many people who live where there is little snow fail to understand we have driven RWD cars for over 100 years in the snow and they get by fine. Good tires and a limited slip dif will get you anywhere.

I even see Vette out year round with the right tires.

Hell I have one guy here at work with a motorcycle that will ride it year round even in a foot of snow. It is a Russian Army bike with a side car and the side car has a drive wheel.

Today they are calling for up to 16" just north of me here and by Sunday we may have 7" here and more if the wind comes from the north more. Welcome to the Ohio snow belt.

I get around mostly on side and back roads to avoid the people who can't drive or the ones with bald tires. Yes too many drive with bald tires and that is why they can't get around.

5 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

14.5-14.8 in the 1/4 

2.0T Escape 15.2-15.5

The Cherokee V6 lays almost directly on top of that with the Grand Cherokee behind them by a couple/few tenths.

Exactly, JUST BUY A CHARGER AWD! They start almost $3,000 cheaper as well.

Yeah a "sporty" car that is only a few inches off the ground will be a huge hit when there are 12 inches of snow on the ground.

Then we're back to the AWD system and what it can and cannot handle.

True!

9 minutes ago, hyperv6 said:

I would venture to say the reason for the V6 only is because that is all this system can handle. Nothing more and nothing less. I am sure the engineers would have liked to offered more and may in the future but the money may just not be there for them to do more. GM in the pre bailout years did some odd things dictated by budgets and available hardware.

The truth is the Hell Cat needed this more than any model as it can not put down the power it has now. They are going to a wide body edition. In other words flairs with larger stickier tires. That tells me they just did not get the funding they needed to do it and do it right.

This was way I pointed out it has to be thought to be an engineer at Chrysler right now as you are forced into an AWD V6 while they try to market a BMW fighting Alfa that is doomed from the start.

FCA lets the all pro models sit on the bench while they over play and over pay on the second string they put into the game.

I am watching Buick as I could see an AWD coupe ending up there at some point. the problem is with such a weak coupe market right now it may get pushed back.

I wonder how much weight this added to the car? It would be nice if they could Supercharged this engine. I had a co worker that did that to his V6 and it ran pretty well. Not real cost effective over just ordering a V8 but if you wanted something different.

Interesting idea on the supercharged V6....

Again, some people gotta bash it just because of the manufacturer......................

11 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

14.5-14.8 in the 1/4 

2.0T Escape 15.2-15.5

The Cherokee V6 lays almost directly on top of that with the Grand Cherokee behind them by a couple/few tenths.

Exactly, JUST BUY A CHARGER AWD! They start almost $3,000 cheaper as well.

Yeah a "sporty" car that is only a few inches off the ground will be a huge hit when there are 12 inches of snow on the ground.

Then we're back to the AWD system and what it can and cannot handle.

Agreed and anyone who would take a car like that through a foot of snow, AWD or not, needs their head examined. Physics will take over at that point. 

Again this is coming from someone who would take a Challenger in a heartbeat over the Camaro or the Mustang. 

1 minute ago, surreal1272 said:

Agreed and anyone who would take a car like that through a foot of snow, AWD or not, needs their head examined. Physics will take over at that point. 

Or, if you are an FCA customer, the hallucinogenics you were on when you bought the thing...

4 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Or, if you are an FCA customer, the hallucinogenics you were on when you bought the thing...

Hallucinogenics got Jeep this!

Though cool info as it has gone through various colors and the current in 96 was Cameo. Full info on this first 4x4 SUV is at 

http://www.allpar.com/cars/concepts/jeep/bolide.php

Course there was also Jeeps 4x4 XJ-001 version too:

No mater how you look at it, some one was on Puff The Magic Dragon!

25 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Or, if you are an FCA customer, the hallucinogenics you were on when you bought the thing...

Hey now! That only happened once!

28 minutes ago, Stew said:

Again, some people gotta bash it just because of the manufacturer......................

Probably not the brand so much, as people just hate being wrong.

I love how some take it to extremes to bolster their argument too.  A blizzard in the forecast takes time to accumulate 1 foot of snow.  I can leave in the morning with snow coming down hard, and it still takes about 12 hours or more to accumulate.  And the whole time plows are running hard on major roads, only secondary roads are difficult. Also, a Challenger with AWD is worlds better than RWD, regardless of amount of snow.  Fusion AWD can plow through fresh powder very effectively, and probably has same ground clearance as Challenger.   I would not hesitate to head out with heavy snow coming in it, and I doubt a Challenger that is much heavier would either.  Me thinks some of these guys have little experience with snow, AWD or both.  AWD rocks.

36 minutes ago, Stew said:

Again, some people gotta bash it just because of the manufacturer......................

No, it's just a stupid idea. I don't WANT the Challenger to be a piece of sh!t and dated. I WANT it to be great and compete to push the Mustang and Camaro more like great competition does.

5 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

No, it's just a stupid idea. I don't WANT the Challenger to be a piece of sh!t and dated. I WANT it to be great and compete to push the Mustang and Camaro more like great competition does.

I personally don't want to see it become a small compact 4 seater because it's size is what gives it it's appeal.  not everyone wants a tight sportscar.  i would like to see them make a smaller cuda to compete sure, but leave the Challenger alone (speaking of size and capabilities of course).  if all 3 were carbon copies of each other they would all lose their purpose for being, I LOVE the fact that they all 3 have distinct personalities. 

15 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

Probably not the brand so much, as people just hate being wrong.

 

I love how some take it to extremes to bolster their argument too.  A blizzard in the forecast takes time to accumulate 1 foot of snow.  I can leave in the morning with snow coming down hard, and it still takes about 12 hours or more to accumulate.  And the whole time plows are running hard on major roads, only secondary roads are difficult. Also, a Challenger with AWD is worlds better than RWD, regardless of amount of snow.  Fusion AWD can plow through fresh powder very effectively, and probably has same ground clearance as Challenger.   I would not hesitate to head out with heavy snow coming in it, and I doubt a Challenger that is much heavier would either.  Me thinks some of these guys have little experience with snow, AWD or both.  AWD rocks.

 

So we're back to limiting the ownership of these cars to well populated areas that can plow snow effectively because it's necessary. I'm experienced some in snow but are you experienced in rural areas that don't get plowed at all?

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/awd-system-demand-set-to-outpace-light-vehicle-growth-559339511.html

2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

So we're back to limiting the ownership of these cars to well populated areas that can plow snow effectively because it's necessary. I'm experienced some in snow but are you experienced in rural areas that don't get plowed at all?

I live in the suburbs and drive everywhere, including rural.  My preference for harsh winters is of course my wife’s CUV.  But I have to tell you, ask any AWD sedan owner how well their vehicle does in the snow, and they will all praise it. Every single last one of them.  And finally, the absolute last vehicle I would want to drive in any snow, is a RWD coupe.  Just the way it is.

For those who spend a lot of cash to get winter tires and wheels to deal with winter, you no longer have to.  Basic performance all seasons will be more than enough with AWD.  The amount of additional traction you get from the front wheels with all the powertrain weight on top, is magical. 

I live in the boonies with big mountains and have driven fwd, rwd, rwd with snow tires, 4x4 and AWD.  my preference is AWD because it maintains the best traction easily.  And here they may plow the main roads, but even then the conditions remain extremely slick especially if temperatures are too low for the salt/sand/chemicals to be effective.  This is why m brother always gets AWD with his cars and why he wanted AWD for his ATS. 

33 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

Hey now! That only happened once!

Gives a whole new meaning to wild and interesting trip by car....!

Just now, Stew said:

I live in the boonies with big mountains and have driven fwd, rwd, rwd with snow tires, 4x4 and AWD.  my preference is AWD because it maintains the best traction easily.  And here they may plow the main roads, but even then the conditions remain extremely slick especially if temperatures are too low for the salt/sand/chemicals to be effective.  This is why m brother always gets AWD with his cars and why he wanted AWD for his ATS. 

AWD would make an infinite amount of sense for you....!

Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

Gives a whole new meaning to wild and interesting trip by car....!

All I can think of is this,

Just now, surreal1272 said:

All I can think of is this,

 

And what a long strange trip its been!

We will assume you are the right kind of "Dead Head" for a strange trip in a Chrysler product....!