Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Chevrolet Ponders An Expansion of the Corvette

      Most likely model could be an electric crossover

    General Motors has toyed with the idea of expanding the Corvette lineup, but has always gotten cold feet as there were worries that expansion would dilute the image. But a new report from Bloomberg says the company is considering this idea again, this time in electric form.

    Sources say that designers are currently on "several Corvette-brand concept vehicles that target a wider range of buyers," that will "blend Corvette’s reputation for high-performance driving and rakish styling with creature comforts such as more interior room and storage." If approved, the new model would be electric and could arrive as early as 2025, utilizing GM's new BEV3 electric platform and Ultium batteries. The most likely candidate at the moment is a crossover, following in the footsteps of Ford with their Mach-E.

    Not surprising, a GM spokesman declined to comment.

    Source: Bloomberg via Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    • Bentley is niche, Cadillac is exclusive.
    • Cadillac halo sports car is in development as we type.
    • Cadillac “Tesla fighters” are coming, as you are aware (Lyriq & Celestiq), as are MB’s ‘Tesla fighters’. Gm is not considering a Corvette-oriented SUV- that’s rumor mill fodder.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    CT5 interior is fine for a $36k start price, no complaints there, CTS interior wasn’t up to par for a $46k start price.  The XT6 interior is about the same as a Kia Telluride, the XT6 is overpriced for what it is.  
     

    Problem is Cadillac isn’t a premium boutique brand, they are the American Acura.  They aren’t the American Bentley as they should aim to be.

    KIA? That's F'n laughable. Not even close to the XT6 in quality and fit and finish. Can you get real wood and real carbon fiber or real aluminum interior trim in the Kia? No, not even a sq. cm of it. Even the Cadillac leather is several notches above anything Kia has on the road, I believe it's called Pleather in the Kia.

    Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.

    I stated GM has Cadillac "positioned to be" a premium boutique luxury division, not that it currently is today, but they're on the right path.

    Acura? Seriously? Also laughable. Acura doesn't have RWD and RWD based AWD sedans like Cadillac does, all Acura's are FWD and FWD based AWD cars. No comparison to Cadillac CT4 and CT5 handling and performance, just add V Series and it's game over for Acura, with no V8 even available in their lineup. 

    And why would GM want Cadillac to be a massively over priced British car with horrible reliability ratings that's owned by a huge German car company also with reliability issues?!

    I noticed you had no reply to my comment about the new 2021 Escalade...MB wishes they had a real Escalade BOF competitor.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    • Bentley is niche, Cadillac is exclusive.
    • Cadillac halo sports car is in development as we type.
    • Cadillac “Tesla fighters” are coming, as you are aware (Lyriq & Celestiq), as are MB’s ‘Tesla fighters’. Gm is not considering a Corvette-oriented SUV- that’s rumor mill fodder.

    Alfa Romeo is really exclusive, exclusive isn't a good thing necessarily.  

    I am curious what Cadillac, Mercedes and others come up with as Tesla fighters.  But traditional auto makers tend to want to make EV's look futuristic and funky, and then they don't sell because they don't look like a regular car (Nissan Leaf for example).  And I think they'll be behind on power and range, as we have seen with the Taycan and even the EQS the rumor is 460 hp in the base model, but a base model Tesla Model S has 670 hp.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, USA-1 said:

    KIA? That's F'n laughable. Not even close to the XT6 in quality and fit and finish. Can you get real wood and real carbon fiber or real aluminum interior trim in the Kia? No, not even a sq. cm of it. Even the Cadillac leather is several notches above anything Kia has on the road, I believe it's called Pleather in the Kia.

    Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.

    I stated GM has Cadillac "positioned to be" a premium boutique luxury division, not that it currently is today, but they're on the right path.

    Acura? Seriously? Also laughable. Acura doesn't have RWD and RWD based AWD sedans like Cadillac does, all Acura's are FWD and FWD based AWD cars. No comparison to Cadillac CT4 and CT5 handling and performance, just add V Series and it's game over for Acura, with no V8 even available in their lineup. 

    And why would GM want Cadillac to be a massively over priced British car with horrible reliability ratings that's owned by a huge German car company also with reliability issues?!

    I noticed you had no reply to my comment about the new 2021 Escalade...MB wishes they had a real Escalade BOF competitor.

     

    "Positioned to be". ?  The Cadillac brand is 110 years old, they aren't positioned yet?

    What are XT4, XT5, XT6?  Front drive turbo 4 or V6 crossovers, same as Acura RDX, Lexus RX350 and Acura MDX.  Those are the top 3 selling Cadillacs too.  Why aren't those SUVs rear drive with handling and V8s or hybrid turbo V6?

    Also the CT5 is Cadillac's top sedan and it starts at $36k, that is Acura TLX pricing for a midsize sedan, I suppose you could compare it to an Infiniti Q60 also for the same drive wheels to be more accurate.   But Cadillac doesn't have any high end sedans/coupes/convertibles like all the other big luxury makers do, nothing in the $100k+ range like Tesla, Porsche, Mercedes, BMW, Audi, etc.

    Mercedes makes 2 SUVs that are better than the 2021 Escalade, the G-wagon is more luxurious and far superior off road, and the GLS is faster, higher performance in GLS580 or AMG trims and way more luxurious in Maybach trim.   The 2021 Escalade starts at $76,195 and the Maybach GLS600 starts at $160,500.  Where is the $160,000 Cadillac?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • Alfa is also a niche brand. XT4 outsold the entire brand. Also; it's a 'regular look' car and still no one wants one.

    • Model S sales peaked in 2018. The 2nd 'refresh' just announced is so mild no one will know anything was done to it other than 2 new wheels. But being 'in the thick' of BE performance/range is what you need to be competitive; if you have to be #1 on the spec sheet, mercedes will NEVER 'compete' with Tesla.

    A given vehicle isn't a sales leader because of how far it goes or how fast it goes 0-60. It's the aggregate of the entire vehicle; you always try to boil it down to 1 factor.

    1 minute ago, smk4565 said:

    The Cadillac brand is 110 years old, they aren't positioned yet?

     

    Benz still building the patentwagon in 2021?

    Markets, approaches, stradegies and products change to meet the same shifting factors in consumers. Look at mercedes' roots, horribly spartan, underpowered, archaic sedans... why did they reinvent themselves as a 'German Cadillac' the way they did?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, smk4565 said:

    "Positioned to be". ?  The Cadillac brand is 110 years old, they aren't positioned yet?

    What are XT4, XT5, XT6?  Front drive turbo 4 or V6 crossovers, same as Acura RDX, Lexus RX350 and Acura MDX.  Those are the top 3 selling Cadillacs too.  Why aren't those SUVs rear drive with handling and V8s or hybrid turbo V6?

    Also the CT5 is Cadillac's top sedan and it starts at $36k, that is Acura TLX pricing for a midsize sedan, I suppose you could compare it to an Infiniti Q60 also for the same drive wheels to be more accurate.   But Cadillac doesn't have any high end sedans/coupes/convertibles like all the other big luxury makers do, nothing in the $100k+ range like Tesla, Porsche, Mercedes, BMW, Audi, etc.

    Mercedes makes 2 SUVs that are better than the 2021 Escalade, the G-wagon is more luxurious and far superior off road, and the GLS is faster, higher performance in GLS580 or AMG trims and way more luxurious in Maybach trim.   The 2021 Escalade starts at $76,195 and the Maybach GLS600 starts at $160,500.  Where is the $160,000 Cadillac?  

    You know what I meant by "positioned to be". Changes are constantly made in the automotive world. Look at MB for example, up and down the gauntlet with changes.

    Good luck with that massively overpriced box on wheels G wagon that handles horribly on and off road. 

    It's not that they can't make a $100k+ vehicle CT6 was just that with the Platinum and Blackwing and now the new Escalade Platinum. It's GM top brass cutting good cars that were selling and you know it.

    "Mercedes makes 2 SUV's better than the 2021 Escalade" but the Escalade just launched so you have no data to support that statement just your biased MB viewpoint.

    Wow now you're going to try to compare a $110k fully loaded fullsize BOF 2021 Escalade Platinum to a sub-framed massively overpriced $160k Maybach GLS600 that happens to be the ugliest SUV on sale right now with a smorgasbord waterfall grille and tacky mesh inlays below? Yeah, that makes a ton of sense.

    News Flash: new $100k+ Cadillac Flagship vehicle is on the way.

     

    Mercedes-Maybach GLS 600 SUV | Uncrate

    2021 Cadillac Escalade Deals, Prices, Incentives & Leases ...

    A New Video Showcases Every Aspect of the 2021 Cadillac ...

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

    Good luck with that massively overpriced box on wheels G wagon that handles horribly on and off road. 

    It's not that they can't make a $100k+ vehicle CT6 was just that with the Platinum and Blackwing and now the new Escalade Platinum. It's GM top brass cutting good cars that were selling and you know it.

    "Mercedes makes 2 SUV's better than the 2021 Escalade" but the Escalade just launched so you have no data to support that statement just your biased MB viewpoint.

    Wow now you're going to try to compare a $110k fully loaded fullsize BOF 2021 Escalade Platinum to a sub-framed massively overpriced $160k Maybach GLS600 that happens to be the ugliest SUV on sale right now with a smorgasbord waterfall grille and tacky mesh inlays below? Yeah, that makes a ton of sense.

    News Flash: new $100k+ Cadillac Flagship vehicle is on the way.

     

    Mercedes-Maybach GLS 600 SUV | Uncrate

    2021 Cadillac Escalade Deals, Prices, Incentives & Leases ...

     

    The G-wagen sells well, probably the #1 selling vehicle in the world with a starting price over $125k. 

    The CT6-V was the same price as a base V6 S-class and they killed it off because Cadillac was still not competitive in the segment.  Just like the XLR, STS-V, ELR bombed.  If any of these top end Cadillacs (outside of Escalade) had any success they'd still be here, GM top brass isn't going to just cut profitable, well selling products.  We'll see what $100k Cadillac comes next, but they haven't had a good track record.

    And sure I will compare a Maybach GLS (which goes up to $190k) to an Escalade, because you said Mercedes wishes they had an Escalade competitor, when in reality they have an SUV that costs up to double the price of an Escalade, and sells better globally than the Escalade.  

    All these SUVs cost more than an Escalade:

    Mercedes GLS, Mercedes G-class, BMW X7 (BMW X8 coming soon), Audi SQ8/RS Q8, Lamborghini Urus, Porsche Cayenne, Bentley Bentayga, Rolls-Royce Cullinan, Aston Martin DBX, Maserati Levante, Tesla Model X, Range Rover.  

    That's over a dozen SUVs on market that are positioned above the Escalade and Bentley is working on another, Ferrari working on one as well.  Cadillac's problem is they see the Escalade as the top, when it should be more the mid point and clearly they can go above it, because the market is flooded with SUVs costing 2-3 times more than the Escalade.

    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • '21 Escalade can hit $125K via the current build & price. I've done it. $190K is not "double" $125K.
    • Mercedes doesn't even build the g-wagoneer; it's farmed out. Their flagship vehicle and someone else builds it.
    • Escalade-V, CT4 and CT5 Blackwing (Feb 1), CT8 / Celestiq, all in the pipeline.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The G-wagen sells well, probably the #1 selling vehicle in the world with a starting price over $125k. 

    The CT6-V was the same price as a base V6 S-class and they killed it off because Cadillac was still not competitive in the segment.  Just like the XLR, STS-V, ELR bombed.  If any of these top end Cadillacs (outside of Escalade) had any success they'd still be here, GM top brass isn't going to just cut profitable, well selling products.  We'll see what $100k Cadillac comes next, but they haven't had a good track record.

    And sure I will compare a Maybach GLS (which goes up to $190k) to an Escalade, because you said Mercedes wishes they had an Escalade competitor, when in reality they have an SUV that costs up to double the price of an Escalade, and sells better globally than the Escalade.  

    All these SUVs cost more than an Escalade:

    Mercedes GLS, Mercedes G-class, BMW X7 (BMW X8 coming soon), Audi SQ8/RS Q8, Lamborghini Urus, Porsche Cayenne, Bentley Bentayga, Rolls-Royce Cullinan, Aston Martin DBX, Maserati Levante, Tesla Model X, Range Rover.  

    That's over a dozen SUVs on market that are positioned above the Escalade and Bentley is working on another, Ferrari working on one as well.  Cadillac's problem is they see the Escalade as the top, when it should be more the mid point and clearly they can go above it, because the market is flooded with SUVs costing 2-3 times more than the Escalade.

    They never even gave CT6 a chance! So yes, they do cut very well built cars that aren't part of the company's future plans and they were selling very well and very competitive, so do your research.

    Cadillac dealer buddy of mine said CT6-V Blackwings and most CT6's were selling before they even hit the ground at the dealerships!

    Price isn't a comparable metric anyway. With what you get from the Escalade it should cost $150k, but GM chooses to go after a larger crowd and they build and sell probably as many Escalade's as all the exotic SUV's you mentioned combined. 

    That Maybach GLS is not a direct competitor to Escalade nice try. How much can it tow? How many can it comfortably seat? Guarantee the Escalade can tow more and it fits more people much more comfortably as well, so you get much more than you pay for. Escalade has an 8,100 lb. tow capacity and 1,640 payload cap.  Oh right Mercedes doesn't recommend towing with GLS600 and probably doesn't even have an available hitch. 

     

    Escalade not the top Cadillac the FLAGSHIP Celestiq is on the way...

     

     

    Edited by USA-1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    • Model S sales peaked in 2018. The 2nd 'refresh' just announced is so mild no one will know anything was done to it other than 2 new wheels. But being 'in the thick' of BE performance/range is what you need to be competitive; if you have to be #1 on the spec sheet, mercedes will NEVER 'compete' with Tesla.

    A given vehicle isn't a sales leader because of how far it goes or how fast it goes 0-60. It's the aggregate of the entire vehicle; you always try to boil it down to 1 factor.

    Benz still building the patentwagon in 2021?

    Markets, approaches, stradegies and products change to meet the same shifting factors in consumers. Look at mercedes' roots, horribly spartan, underpowered, archaic sedans... why did they reinvent themselves as a 'German Cadillac' the way they did?

    Mercedes built the fastest car in the world for the 1900-1909 decade, they had the ultra lux 540k roadster driven by royalty in the 30's, the 770k limos used by the Nazis, the 1954 300SL, the 600 Grosser which cost double a Rolls-Royce in 1963, the 450SEL 6.9 in the 1970s (the most powerful, fastest sedan at the time) the V12 W140 in the 90s, the 604 hp S65 in the early 2000s when a Corvette ZO6 had 405 hp.  Mercedes has long had performance cars, they took place in the first automobile race in 1894, they set the land speed record in 1904 at 97 mph and again in 1911 at 141 mph.  They have 125 years of racing history, no brand can say that.

    As far as competing with Tesla, I think Mercedes will have a hard time.  I think Mercedes can outdo Tesla on interiors and build quality all day long, but will be tough to beat Tesla on range and performance and possibly technology and self driving.  Mercedes has some advantages like manufacturing capacity, but they are starting from well behind as far as EV's go.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    a luxury brand with no coupe, no convertible?

    Daimler is killing the s-class coupe & convertible, the e-class coupe & convertible, the C-class coupe & convertible, the CLS coupe, one of the GT models, and rumors have floated there will be more. [~ MB dealer webinar via Business Insider, July 2020]
     

    Huh.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    • '21 Escalade can hit $125K via the current build & price. I've done it. $190K is not "double" $125K.
    • Mercedes doesn't even build the g-wagoneer; it's farmed out. Their flagship vehicle and someone else builds it.
    • Escalade-V, CT4 and CT5 Blackwing (Feb 1), CT8 / Celestiq, all in the pipeline.

    G-wagon is hand built, that is they they farm it out.  They can't run it down their line in Stuttgart.  And the S-class is really their flagship car, it has all their best tech and they just built the most advanced car factory in the world to build it.  And the S-class goes to the highest price aside from the Black Series cars or AMG One that are specialty projects.  

    Escalade-V, CT4, CT5 Blackwing is all good, but I think they can do more.  The CT5 Blackwing will have 650 hp, but it will still have an interior out of a $40k car.  And the other problem I think the CT5 Blackwing will run into is it will probably be $80-90k, a base Tesla Model S has 670 hp and will be faster without even going to the Plaid. 

    They need a more luxurious sedan than the CT5.   Maybe they will hit a home run with Celestiq and solve that problem, too early to tell on that.  

    And where are XT4, XT5, XT6 V-series?  Unless they are just putting all R&D into a future line of electric SUVs and plan to kill those 3 off by 2025 and don't want to waste money on them, in which case I'd agree with their strategy.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, balthazar said:

    Daimler is killing the s-class coupe & convertible, the e-class coupe & convertible, the C-class coupe & convertible, the CLS coupe, one of the GT models, and rumors have floated there will be more. [~ MB dealer webinar via Business Insider, July 2020]
     

    Huh.

    S-class coupe/convertible going away because they have a new AMG designed SL taking over that whole upper end segment.   The GT coupe/convertible are staying for the next generation.  And the market for $150k convertibles is small.

    CLS is going to die and maybe AMG GT 4-door because they have the EQE and EQS, so 2 sedans die, 2 new sedans take their place.  

    Nothing confirmed on the C and E coupe/convertible.  I suspect they keep one or the other, they won't kill both.  There was also rumor of merging them into a CLK type car that would be a coupe/convertible in that middle range which would make sense, because they have to have a 2-door option that isn't a $100k car like the SL.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    But those were 'some of the slowest selling models'.

    But they built them.  They have always had high performance cars going back to 1902.  That is why Mercedes is the best luxury brand, they have a reasonably priced A220 or GLB250 and they have $225k S-classes and $300k AMG sports cars and they have every body style, sedan, coupe convertible, wagon, hatchback, crossover coupe, SUV, 4-door coupe, etc.  

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    mercedes also produced thousands of sub-100-hp sedans with no power amenities, didn't get around to A/C until circa 1969, offered decades of s-class cars 15 years behind the industry leading edge, killed off their most iconic FI car after only 3 years to build a 4-banger slushbox, floated on the profits of tons of trucks and vans, built a number of failed cheap cars that tried to coast in on the badge, built a flop of a minvan, canceled what would have been a flop of a small pickup they developed with outside engineering help, built a flop of a maybach (Daimler lost 300K euros on everyone built, but kept building them for 10 years),  teased dozens & dozens of designs they never produced, cut their gullwing revival off at the knees, copied Cadillac mercilessly while trying to cultivate a true luxury sedan (they just did it again with their mega glass screen (which actually is just a pane over 3 different screens), got caught doing emissions cheating and fined $2.2 billion, adopted/promoted the false narrative that Benz "invented" the automobile, nursing tons of vehicle problems, failures to report recalls, is hopelessly behind on the BE front......

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The G-wagen sells well, probably the #1 selling vehicle in the world with a starting price over $125k. 

    The CT6-V was the same price as a base V6 S-class and they killed it off because Cadillac was still not competitive in the segment.  Just like the XLR, STS-V, ELR bombed.  If any of these top end Cadillacs (outside of Escalade) had any success they'd still be here, GM top brass isn't going to just cut profitable, well selling products.  We'll see what $100k Cadillac comes next, but they haven't had a good track record.

    And sure I will compare a Maybach GLS (which goes up to $190k) to an Escalade, because you said Mercedes wishes they had an Escalade competitor, when in reality they have an SUV that costs up to double the price of an Escalade, and sells better globally than the Escalade.  

    All these SUVs cost more than an Escalade:

    Mercedes GLS, Mercedes G-class, BMW X7 (BMW X8 coming soon), Audi SQ8/RS Q8, Lamborghini Urus, Porsche Cayenne, Bentley Bentayga, Rolls-Royce Cullinan, Aston Martin DBX, Maserati Levante, Tesla Model X, Range Rover.  

    That's over a dozen SUVs on market that are positioned above the Escalade and Bentley is working on another, Ferrari working on one as well.  Cadillac's problem is they see the Escalade as the top, when it should be more the mid point and clearly they can go above it, because the market is flooded with SUVs costing 2-3 times more than the Escalade.

    Yeah, its a good thing Benz never has to cancel cars buy the dozens. Oh wait. They’re doing that now. See Balths above response about all the cancelled Benz models.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, USA-1 said:

     

    That Maybach GLS is not a direct competitor to Escalade nice try. How much can it tow? How many can it comfortably seat? Guarantee the Escalade can tow more and it fits more people much more comfortably as well, so you get much more than you pay for. Escalade has an 8,100 lb. tow capacity and 1,640 payload cap.  Oh right Mercedes doesn't recommend towing with GLS600 and probably doesn't even have an available hitch. 

     

    Escalade not the top Cadillac the FLAGSHIP Celestiq is on the way...

     

     

    All GLS's can tow 7,700 lbs (if you get the optional class IV hitch which is like $500 or something).  And the Maybach GLS seats 4. And you are right, it isn't comparable to an Escalade.  Escalade buyers have to drive themselves, Maybach owners pay someone to drive for them.  

    We'll see what the final Celestiq is in final version and what they price it at.  The Mercedes EQS has a larger screen than the Celestiq has, but I think these huge screens are gimmicks, and screens are basically cheap.  They could put a 36 inch touch screen in a Kia Forte and probably only raise the cost of the car by $500.  So everyone will have screens, what isn't cheap is actual leather, wood, metal, suspension systems, powertrains, etc.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/25/2021 at 11:12 PM, USA-1 said:

     

    I'm hearing the same thing, that they're still backlogged with 2020 base C8 orders. 18 mo. wait if you ordered one today. Thanks Ronavirus you b@stard...

     

     

    The Horsepower Obsessed video I posted got blocked on the site I think?

    Anyway...Ill be posting his latest one. Hopefully this video wont get blocked.  He has heard rumours that the Z06 will be POBISSIBLY REVEALED in July. THAT doesnt mean the Z06 will be available for sale. THAT rumour could very well be true that the Z06 will be availbale for sale in 2023. But its POSSIBLE that Chevy will REVEAL the Z06 in July! 

    Its not much...but its something!   

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    All GLS's can tow 7,700 lbs (if you get the optional class IV hitch which is like $500 or something).  And the Maybach GLS seats 4. And you are right, it isn't comparable to an Escalade.  Escalade buyers have to drive themselves, Maybach owners pay someone to drive for them.  

    They could put a 36 inch touch screen in a Kia Forte and probably only raise the cost of the car by $500.  So everyone will have screens, what isn't cheap is actual leather, wood, metal, suspension systems, powertrains, etc.  

     

    So NOW you agree that Maybach GLS doesn't compare to the Escalade when you brought it into the post earlier?!?? Or did you just want to sound like a typical conceited Mercedes owner? Will you ever make up your mind? ?

    10000/1 in sales Cadillac Escalade to Mayback GLS for a reason and it's not just the cost difference, it's practical usable space and more for your money, something that most reasonable people can agree on.

     

    smk4565

    22 hours ago, USA-1 said:

    Good luck with that massively overpriced box on wheels G wagon that handles horribly on and off road. 

    It's not that they can't make a $100k+ vehicle CT6 was just that with the Platinum and Blackwing and now the new Escalade Platinum. It's GM top brass cutting good cars that were selling and you know it.

    "Mercedes makes 2 SUV's better than the 2021 Escalade" but the Escalade just launched so you have no data to support that statement just your biased MB viewpoint.

    Wow now you're going to try to compare a $110k fully loaded fullsize BOF 2021 Escalade Platinum to a sub-framed massively overpriced $160k Maybach GLS600 that happens to be the ugliest SUV on sale right now with a smorgasbord waterfall grille and tacky mesh inlays below? Yeah, that makes a ton of sense.

    News Flash: new $100k+ Cadillac Flagship vehicle is on the way.

     

     

     

     

    Expand  

    The G-wagen sells well, probably the #1 selling vehicle in the world with a starting price over $125k. 

    The CT6-V was the same price as a base V6 S-class and they killed it off because Cadillac was still not competitive in the segment.  Just like the XLR, STS-V, ELR bombed.  If any of these top end Cadillacs (outside of Escalade) had any success they'd still be here, GM top brass isn't going to just cut profitable, well selling products.  We'll see what $100k Cadillac comes next, but they haven't had a good track record.

    And sure I will compare a Maybach GLS (which goes up to $190k) to an Escalade, because you said Mercedes wishes they had an Escalade competitor, when in reality they have an SUV that costs up to double the price of an Escalade, and sells better globally than the Escalade.  

     

     

    And NOW you also agree with what I stated earlier when you quite comically compared a Kia to a Cadillac and I brought up the high grade leather, real wood, real carbon fiber and real aluminum trim pieces that a Cadillac has that the Kia doesn't.?? Not to mention one is a Luxury make and the other is an Econobox.

    I think you've once again dug that hole deep enough...

     

    USA-1

    On 1/28/2021 at 12:59 PM, smk4565 said:

    CT5 interior is fine for a $36k start price, no complaints there, CTS interior wasn’t up to par for a $46k start price.  The XT6 interior is about the same as a Kia Telluride, the XT6 is overpriced for what it is.  
     

    Problem is Cadillac isn’t a premium boutique brand, they are the American Acura.  They aren’t the American Bentley as they should aim to be.

    KIA? That's F'n laughable. Not even close to the XT6 in quality and fit and finish. Can you get real wood and real carbon fiber or real aluminum interior trim in the Kia? No, not even a sq. cm of it. Even the Cadillac leather is several notches above anything Kia has on the road, I believe it's called Pleather in the Kia.

    Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.

     

     

     

     

    Edited by USA-1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Sending a Christmas eve chuckle your way: Here's Dyan Cannon, who has again poured herself into her clothing, to attend a Lakers game, which she does often. It looks like she can easily fit down many chimneys.  Maybe even into a Christmas gift stocking. I find the different chapters of Dyan Cannon humorous.
    • @Drew Dowdell @Robert Hall @trinacriabob @A Horse With No Name @ccap41 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442  And including all of the C&G members that are here that I do not interact with often enough or those I have forgotten their handles. Wishing each and every one of you a Merry Xmas Eve and Merry Xmas.  To those that do not celebrate Xmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Holidays, Happy time off. Wishing each and every person here a restful end to the year, one of love, respect, relaxation to you and your families. Wishing all the best!
    • MOU means that these companies have signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" to explore the participation, involvement and synergy sharing in relation to the business integration through a joint holding company. Back in August 1st, 2024 Nissan and Honda created a Joint Holding Company for the commencement of a strategic partnership focused on intelligence and electrification. This was to start the consideration towards integration of the two companies. Mitsubishi Motors has now signed onto this MOU to explore the possibility of achieving synergies at an increased level through business participation or integration. In basic terms, the three companies have agreed to join forces in sharing costs to move forward with EV platform R&D while they also look at the ICE "Internal Combustion Engine" gas side of having shared platforms to reduce costs and hopefully save the three auto companies by keeping them alive.  While Nissan and Honda have agreed to move forward in this integration of the two auto companies, Mitsubishi Motors will make a final decision by the end of January 2025 about possibly joining in with the integration of Mitsubishi Motors into this joint 3 auto company venture. Nissan and Honda have already agreed to a full SDV or Software-defined vehicles program moving forward that will allow them to have a solid crucial collaboration of intelligence and electrification for future products. Both companies have stated that the acceleration of technology and the rapid change of the auto industry will allow these two companies to maintain global competitiveness and deliver more attractive products and services for customers worldwide. Nissan global mobility product line merged with Honda four-wheel-vehicles, motor cycles and power products can allow both companies to become more attractive to shareholders and innovation of products to sell to customers worldwide according to the CEOs of both companies. Nissan and Honda have stated the following: Nissan and Honda aim to become a world-class mobility company with sales revenue exceeding 30 trillion yen ($190 Billion U.S. Dollars) and operating profit of more than 3 trillion yen ($19 billion U.S. Dollars). The expected synergies from the business integration at this time are: 1. Scale advantages by standardizing vehicle platforms By standardizing the vehicle platforms of both companies across various product segments, the companies expect to create stronger products, reduce costs, enhance development efficiencies, and improve investment efficiencies through standardized production processes. The integration is projected to increase sales and operational volumes, allowing the companies to reduce development costs per vehicle, including for future digital services, while maximizing profits. By accelerating the mutual complementation of their global vehicle offerings - including ICE, HEV, PHEV, and EV models - Nissan and Honda will be better positioned to meet diverse customer needs around the world and deliver optimal products, leading to improved customer satisfaction. 2. Enhancement of development capabilities and cost synergies through the integration of R&D functions In accordance with the MOU to deepen strategic partnership and the joint research agreement on fundamental technologies dated August 1, the two companies have started joint research in fundamental technologies in the area of vehicle platforms for next-generation software-defined vehicles (SDVs), which is the cornerstone of the field of intelligence. After the business integration, both companies will encompass more integrated collaboration across all R&D functions, including fundamental research and vehicle application technology research. This approach is expected to enable both companies to efficiently and swiftly enhance their technological expertise, achieving both improvements in development capabilities and reductions in development costs through the integration of overlapping functions.   3. Optimizing manufacturing systems and facilities The companies anticipate that optimizing their manufacturing plants and energy service facilities, combined with improved collaboration through the shared use of production lines, will result in a substantial improvement in capacity utilization leading to a decrease in fixed costs.   4. Strengthening competitive advantages across the supply chain through the integration of purchasing functions To fully leverage the synergies from optimizing development and production capacity, both companies intend to boost their competitiveness by improving and streamlining purchasing operations and source common parts from the same the supply chain and in collaboration with business partners.   5. Realizing cost synergies through operational efficiency improvements The companies expect that the integration of systems and back-office operations, along with the upgrade and standardization of operational processes, will drive significant cost reductions.   6. Acquisition of scale advantages through integration in sales finance functions By integrating relevant areas of sales finance functions of both companies and expanding the scale of operations, the companies aim to provide a range of mobility solutions, including new financial services throughout the vehicle lifecycle, to customers of both organizations.   7. Establishment of a talent foundation for intelligence and electrification The human resources of the companies are an invaluable asset, and establishing a strong human resource foundation is crucial for the transformation that will come with the business integration. After the integration, increased employee exchanges and technical collaboration between the companies are expected to promote further skill development. Moreover, by leveraging each company's access to talent markets, attracting exceptional talent will become more attainable. Method of business integration and stock listing Nissan and Honda, with the result of the consideration, plan to establish, through a joint share transfer, a joint holding company that will be the parent company of both companies. This will be subject to approval at each company's general meeting of shareholders and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for this business integration, based on the premise that Nissan's turnaround*1 actions are steadily executed. Both Nissan and Honda will be fully owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company*2. Additionally, the companies plan to continue coexisting and developing the brands held by Honda and Nissan equally. Shares of the newly established joint holding company under consideration are planned to be newly listed (technical listing) on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”). The listing is scheduled for August 2026. With the listing of the joint holding company, both Nissan and Honda will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company and will be scheduled to be delisted from the TSE. However, shareholders of both companies will continue to be able to trade shares of the joint holding company issued during this share transfer on the TSE. The listing date of the joint holding company and the delisting date of both Nissan and Honda will be determined in accordance with the regulations of the TSE. Regarding the organizational structure of the joint holding company, and both companies which will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company after the business integration, the optimal structure for realizing synergies, including the integration of R&D functions, purchasing functions, and manufacturing functions, will be discussed and considered within the integration preparatory committee, with the aim of establishing an organizational structure that enables efficient and highly competitive business operations after the business integration. The CEO's of all three companies had the following to say: Marking the announcement, Nissan Director, President, CEO and Representative Executive Officer Makoto Uchida said: “Honda and Nissan have begun considering a business integration, and will study the creation of significant synergies between the two companies in a wide range of fields. It is significant that Nissan's partner, Mitsubishi Motors, is also involved in these discussions. We anticipate that if this integration comes to fruition, we will be able to deliver even greater value to a wider customer base.“ Honda Director and Representative Executive Officer Toshihiro Mibe said: "At this time of change in the automobile industry, which is said to occur once every 100 years, we hope that Mitsubishi Motors' participation in the business integration discussions of Nissan and Honda will lead to further social change, and that we will be able to become a leading company in creating new value in mobility through business integration. Nissan and Honda will start the discussion from today onwards with an aim to clarify the possibility of business integration by around the end of January in line with the consideration of Mitsubishi Motors." Comment from Mitsubishi Motors Director, Representative Executive Officer, and President and CEO Takao Kato said: “In an era of change in the automotive industry, the study between Nissan and Honda about a business integration will accelerate synergy maximization effects, bringing high value also to the collaborative businesses with Mitsubishi Motors. In order to realize synergies and to make the best use of each company's strengths, we will also study the best form of cooperation.” Upon looking at the press releases, it makes total sense that these companies would look to merge as each company is having a challanging time. Nissan globally has seen a 33.7% reduction in sales taking the estimated 2024 market share to 5.2%.  Honda globally has seen a 9% reduction over all with a 32% reduction in the asian rim leaving them with a 2024 estimated 5.4% market share. Mitsubishi Motors globally has seen a reduction year over year of a 10.7% drop leaving them with a 2024 estimated market share of 4.6%. All three auto companies lag the industry in technology connected auto's, feature / functions and especially EVs. All three companies have seen their profits turn into negative earnings for their respective companies leaving them with no real ability to perform R&D in building EVs to compete in China or the U.S. let alone Europe that has mandates in place for the end of ICE by 2035. End result is it looks like for these companies to survive, merging into one company that shares platforms and technology especially in the software and battery sectors will be the only way to move forward. View full article
    • I think I'm dreaming ... this vehicle would be the oldest of my handful of favorite "blast from the past" cars. A Cutlass Salon coupe in perfect condition, the first year I liked the colonnade Cutlass (and it's last year, of 3, with round headlamps in the colonnade), those huge bucket seats, and, oddly, A/C is there, but with manual windows.  It featured the new but not as popular 260 (4.3L) V8.  It also featured the light enamel blue they didn't repeat.  If the exhaust system is tight, this car will be whisper quiet. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (Numbers Matching Drivetrain) for sale: photos, technical specifications, description See anything odd?  Come on.  Quick. . . . It has Buick rally wheels instead of Oldsmobile rally wheels. * sigh ... I wonder what time frame this ad goes back to *
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search