Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    General Motors Exec: ELR Is Not Our Tesla Competitor

      Mark Reuss Talks About The ELR

    Many people see the Cadillac ELR as General Motors' direct competitor to the Tesla Model S, but GM's head of global product development, Mark Reuss says it isn't.

    “People like to say the ELR is, but it’s really not. It’s a different car, it’s a different price point. It’s way-different technology,” Reuss said.

    Ruess goes onto say that he isn't sure if the company has a direct competitor to Tesla.

    So why do many people consider the ELR a competitor to the Model S? Probably from a quote from former GM CEO Dan Akerson back in September.

    "If you want to compete head-to-head with Tesla, and we ultimately will, you want to do it with a Cadillac,”

    Source: The Detroit News

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at [email protected] or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    The thing is that Akerson never actually said that the ELR was the competitor for the Tesla. Quite frankly I think that GM could easily build a competitor for the Tesla S using just the tech they have from the Spark EV. The Spark EV has the highest combined efficiency rating of any EV car for 2013 at 119 MPGe and has an EV range of 82 miles using a 21-kWh lithium-ion battery pack. Compare that to the Tesla S which uses a 85 kWh lithium-ion battery pack for 265 miles. 

    Again:

    85 kWh lithium-ion battery pack is 265 miles
    21 kWh lithium-ion battery pack is 82 miles

    That means the Spark has an EV pack that is 4X smaller but gets only 3X less range. Easier done. Multiply the Spark's 21kWh pack by 4 and you would have an EV range of 328 miles. Meaning we have another situation where if GM wanted to, they could devour the market. 

    It could be more profitable to simply outshine Tesla with a larger EV with a larger capacity battery than to pay them right now what their inflated Market Cap suggests they are worth. Furthermore Even with an increase of battery capacity I believe ,or at least I've read, that capacity would not necessarily translate in to equal amounts of weight. In other words, a 21 kWh battery is not that much lighter than a 85 kWh battery. If the car that surrounds it is lighter using less weighty materials, which GM has access to, then the bump in weight could be nullified. The only real superior quality the Tesla's battery has is Quick/Super-charging

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read there are dealers giving $20,000 off to sell ELR's.  This car is a flop, the idea of the car itself was bad, to charge $76k for it was a horrible idea.  Had they priced it at $55k from the start, maybe they would have sold a few, but this car is tanking faster than the Allante or XLR did.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read there are dealers giving $20,000 off to sell ELR's.  This car is a flop, the idea of the car itself was bad, to charge $76k for it was a horrible idea.  Had they priced it at $55k from the start, maybe they would have sold a few, but this car is tanking faster than the Allante or XLR did.

     

    I want to explicitly understand your reasoning behind it, on what basis? Based on "maybe they would have sold a few," sales?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM needs to build a real Tesla competitor and defeat it.  The ELR is not that car.  It is an overpriced, upmarket Volt.

     

    I have no idea whether the ELR is a flop or not simply because we have no idea of GM's sales expectations for that car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The ELR in May had a 725 day supply on dealership lots, I wouldn't say they are moving.  I guess with the big discounts though (and probably them not building any) has got it down to 194 days now.  But that is still over 6 months.  The CTS has a 215 day inventory supply.  BMW and Audi have supplies less than 45 days by comparison.

     

    The ELR selling 60 a month or whatever they are getting is what makes it a flop.  Had they priced it at $54,000 maybe they could have sold like 250 a month and it wouldn't have been as embarrassing.  Either way they should drop the car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The ELR in May had a 725 day supply on dealership lots, I wouldn't say they are moving.  I guess with the big discounts though (and probably them not building any) has got it down to 194 days now.  But that is still over 6 months.  The CTS has a 215 day inventory supply.  BMW and Audi have supplies less than 45 days by comparison.

     

    The ELR selling 60 a month or whatever they are getting is what makes it a flop.  Had they priced it at $54,000 maybe they could have sold like 250 a month and it wouldn't have been as embarrassing.  Either way they should drop the car.

     

    So based on your logic, other cars such as GTR, B class electric, Z4, Mini Coupe/RS/Paceman, CL, SLS, R8, TT are flop also since they were outsold by your flop in July. All those cars should also be dropped.

     

    SLS should have been priced at $55,000 also so that it would not have been embarrassed by lowly Challenger.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The bottom line is that the ELR, as sexy hot and luxo as it is should have been priced at no more than $60K. GM would have made mad profit on it still. It has NOTHING to do with Cadillac not being able to command $75K for a vehicle. It has to do with any car maker not being able to command $75K for a car that is a compact based on a lower brand and not a sports car. At $75K people expect either a TRADITIONAL luxurious experience, (meaning big and comfy) or a car with some serious speed capabilities.

     

    So... that in mind..

     

    1) If Cadillac had of tuned the ELR to do 0-60 in at least the 4-4.5 range, they could have marketed it as a Sport Coupe.. an exotic one at that, IMO better looking than the i8. 

    2) If Cadillac had of simply put the ELR's Voltec in a car the size of the CTS or XTS.. or just put it in either and changed the styling slightly, they'd most likely already have Tesla filing for BK. (ok that might be exaggerating) 

     

    3) Tesla did both of those things. They made a larger mid-size, slapped an IPAD in the dash and made it dash to 60 in times  of 5.9, 5.4, and 4.2 secs based on which battery pack U bought with the car. Keep in mind that the MAJORITY of the Teslas U see on the road are the 5.9sec variety, as my Chevy Impala found out recently literally beating one down and then getting the thumps up from the driver

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Strange tiding we be living in but Zero-cylinder auto's will be found in all levels from entry to extreme luxury!

    Electric is different, though...for engine cars 4cyl traditionally means small, frugal, economical....

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Alas, the rotary is zero cylinders but is probably dead forever.

     

    However, I think GM will bring out a full electric that will be much better than the Tesla at some point. They have too many good engineers on staff not to,

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Alas, the rotary is zero cylinders but is probably dead forever.

     

    However, I think GM will bring out a full electric that will be much better than the Tesla at some point. They have too many good engineers on staff not to,

    I suspect they are working on a future high volume, sub $30k full electric...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I assume this is like Blazer EV size, and the Blazer has a lot better range.  Also a tough size of SUV anymore, because the "compact" SUVs like the Rav4 an CRV aren't so compact any more, they are kind of like mid-size vehicles and if you need bigger than that you go right to the 3 row.  That is why vehicles like the Edge and Venza got killed, and the Blazer (ICE) is probably getting killed.
    • Interesting, according to the website your Navigator has a 23 gallon tank compared to the 32 gallon tank my escalade has. Looked up the certified fuel pump filling speed, 23 gallons take 7 min. The gas industry has stated that the average 20 to 24 gallon fuel fill up take on average 8 minutes due to temperature, pump speed, how clean the fuel filter is in the pump equipment, etc. of course they also say the larger the tank the longer the fueling. So depending on how much gas you have in your tank it could be much shorter. So if you have a quarter tank of gas and are filling up, I can see this taking 5 min.
    • We live in different worlds, brother. It does not take more than 5 minutes at a pump to fill my Navigator. If I decide to walk inside and grab something to eat or drink, sure the time goes up. Just filling a tank though, 5 minutes. 
    • Refill time is only true if your driving a Subcompact or compact, much longer for mid size and especially full size ICE fuel tanks and then if you fuel at Costco or Walmart with their fuel discount, plan to spend 10 to 15 min in line if not longer before getting to the pump. Published paper from Standford University shows the average EV battery will also last 38% longer than current expected life as stated by the auto industry with the University requesting that auto companies test more realistically their battery packs. Dynamic cycling enhances battery lifetime | Nature Energy
    • I get that some are worse than others but a general 30% is pretty standard for the industry, as a whole. Yes, I'd need independent research for something I'd actually be buying, but most of those numbers aren't all that great.  Yes, I also realize that ICE vehicles lose about the same efficiency in the winter months as well. But, we also all know it only takes 5-10 minutes to replenish an ICE tank in the winter.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search