Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Cadillac's CEO Has Some Strong Words On Self-Driving Vehicles

      Cadillac's CEO Has Some Sharp Words For Technology Companies Working On Autonomous Vehicles

    The past year has seen autonomous vehicles making headlines with a number of technology companies such as Google and Apple working on their own vehicles. But Cadillac CEO Johan de Nysschen says autonomous vehicles shouldn't take away the act of driving to those who enjoy it.

     

    “Autonomous driving and driving passion must co-exist,” de Nysschen said to a group at the 10th annual J.D Power Automotive Marketing Roundtable in Las Vegas last week.

     

    “We’re after balance.”

     

    Standing in front of a picture of Google's autonomous prototype, de Nysschen said, “Many autonomous car (prototypes) emphasize sheer functionality. It would be a mind-numbing experience going from point A to B. My goodness, you might as well take the bus.”

     

    GM's plan with autonomous vehicles is to develop ones “enhance the joy of driving, but eliminate the tedious parts," such as the hassle of stop-and-go rush hour explain de Nysschen. An example brought was the upcoming semi-autonomous Super Cruise system that will debut on the 2017 CT6 and CTS.

     

    “The difference between Super Cruise and fully autonomous lies more in the legal than the technical arena. I’ll leave it at that,” said de Nysschen.

     

    Source: Wards Auto

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I like his thinking, keep the auto enjoyable to drive but also allow it to to semi auto when you are in heavy stop n go traffic. Be interesting to see how this works out.

     

    More interesting is how people accept or handle this and when an accident happens and if they think it is GM's fault or their own.

     

    Someone I can see decides to put it on cruze and takes a nap and wakes up in a wreck and says this is GM's fault.

     

    Not a fan of all these self protection idiot features.

     

    If you do not want to be a responsible driver, than take the bus, uber, taxi, etc.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but I'm getting the message that this new Super Cruise will be fully automous capable right out of box.

     

    That would be great as people would only need an over the air update to enable it, espcially years after the legal hurdles facing these technologies get sorted.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but I'm getting the message that this new Super Cruise will be fully automous capable right out of box.

     

    That would be great as people would only need an over the air update to enable it, espcially years after the legal hurdles facing these technologies get sorted.

     

    By the description of what SuperCruise does, it would have to be fully autonomous capable.  It sounds like it is the legal department holding things up. 

     

    SuperCruise can drive for you in heavy traffic situations and can drive for you on an open highway.   To do either of those things, all the hardware that fully autonomous requires would need to be already in place . 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This deal I fear is not a matter of if but when one of these cars F up.

     

    How will the system and companies deal with it once it does?

    We have auto pilots and all sorts of pilot assist modes but yet planes still crash. We have safety's on guns yet people still shoot themselves. We have some of the most advanced GPS but yet it still recalculated to a empty field. We have guided missiles yet they still miss their targets at times.

     

    Like the old joke of the guy who bought the camper that had cruise control and set it then walked to the back of the RV before it crashed. [Not sure it really happened but I have seen worse mistakes] I suspect that there will be issues and this whole deal can really change the whole program.

     

    Like flying cars a Idea that just has too many variables and then you mix in human and mechanical or electrical error.

     

    Hell I had a battery go bad in one car driving it. The car started to shut down systems. like the lights, Radio and even the Speedometer stopped working. The car did keep running but that was about it. Lights flashing and bells dinging we made it home even though it sounded like a 777 going down.

     

    As of now I have a Collision system in my GMC that is worthless with so many false signals. The lane control works if you are on wide road but back roads it goes off all the time when the road is narrow, The collision alert goes off with false signals with curves and road side objects. It can scare the hell out of you as the ABS presets and the alarm and lights go off when nothing is around.

     

    I know these are advanced system but I just expect things will not be as smooth as the automakers think.

    Even the self parking misses now and then as it is now. 
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, the quintessential issue lies with who's at fault when a system breaks down. BTW, I'm not really for self-driving, so a balance seems like a good deal.

     

    No systems will ever be perfect. But that still means less people will die or crash severity will be reduced. So many ethical perspectives, like an economic one.

     

    What are the economic benefits? - Not only for automakers, but think about it. Less traffic jams. Less lost time, countless other things.

     

    Are all markets fully competitive? - You can bet these will be driven downwards in price. In the last few years we've seen technology migrate really quickly. 3-4 years, and we're going to see this in mass-market segments. 

     

    Are all customers fully informed? - Nope. It's a work in progress, but there are incentives at play here for all players at the table.

     

    Have all external and internal costs been fully included? There's a potential that every system could degenerate over the service life of the vehicle. Potentially every vehicle with this technology could be affected. In this sense, internalizing all the costs would prove this prohibitive.

     

    We could also go to the different frameworks, such as consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories about self-driving cars. Utility? Virtue? Rights? Fairness? Categorical Imperatives? 

     

    I think it's such an exciting ethical issue, for autos... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So here's a question about self driving cars:  Can it recognize a road closure?  What happens if your maps are out of date?

     

    Here in Pittsburgh, one street was suddenly switched from 2 way to 1 way with one lane converted into a bike lane.  Even with instant update Google Maps, it would take a few days for that change to be reflected in the Google Map ecosystem.   Does your Benz just plow into the bike lane until you get a map update?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Very cool read and video on how Tires are made. Where Are Michelin Tires Made And Who Owns The Brand?
    • This is an interesting read. Korea is the only country with EVs that are head-to-head with China and in some ways better. This nanotube technology will allow Korea to move way farther forward than the U.S. in automotive options. Advances in carbon nanotube applications enhance battery dry process
    • I got a better idea for Trump: Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state, Id prefer for the US to become Canada's 4rth Territory.  Not even province status. In order for the United Stated Territories of America to become a full blown province, Americans would have to prove their allegiance and loyalty to the Royalty of King Charles the Third since Canada is a Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy of the British Commonwealth realm.  Trump's job and title would be a perfect revival for an old tradition.  King Charles the Third's court jester. And we could throw him a bone...and have a playing card named after him since he likes those kinds of things    
    • Im glad to get that off my chest  
    • This is what Andy Palmer said, the dude of what the article in the link is about.     "Hybrids are a road to hell. They are a transition strategy, and the longer you stay on that transition, the less quickly you ramp up into the new world," Palmer said. "If you just delay transitioning to EVs by diluting it with hybrids then you are more uncompetitive for longer, and you allow the Chinese to continue to develop their market and their leadership. I honestly think it's a fool's errand," he added.   And him being the dude that helped engineer the Nissan Leaf and was later the dude in charge of Nissan's EV department, I am 100% in agreement with him.  And I would also like to add: The Chinese government pushed and pushed hard for EVs.  Pushed hard not only on the global stage but MOSTLY got ALL Chinese people ON BOARD with EVs.  They had several reasons to do so.  China has lots and lots of minerals and important ingredients to make said batteries. An essential part of EV transition.  But most IMPORTANTLY, China WANTS to REPLACE the USA for being the defacto country  in political, social, economical influence in the world that the USA enjoyed since the end of WW2 in 1945.  And since they knew they lacked behind in ebery metric that would push them to that status, they had only one move to make. It was a Hail Mary pass, but kit was to dominate in the the tech world and it happened to be in the automobile realm. EVs. And while China was seeking to dominate in this arena, and CAREFULLY nurtured it, the USA phoqued themselves over.  Idiot Americans were fooled to believe ALL the negative commentary on EVs. Uneducated morons liked the drill baby drill commentary. Smart but greedy fools failed to see what was coming next and failed even further to see the threat that is China and ITS technological breakthroughs.  ALL from morons that had biased reasons to be anti-EV. From the Joe Rogans and Alex Jones of the world that thrive from clicks for the podcast youtube and other shytty platforms to anti-EV biases from Big Oil.  And lastly, stupid politicians that failed American citizens in different decades from keeping Americans poor and stupid by not giving them educations. By PURPOSELY DEFUNDING the American school system, by PURPOSELY lying to them on DIFFERENT subjects and while these American politicians were greedily looking to make America into a fascist, oligarch world, they failed to see and acknowledge the OTHER threats the world was giving to the US OTHER than the war threats.  The technological warfare.   Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the Chinese regimes were on about EVs.  And if Trump decides to cut EV subsidies, even of only to allow Tesla to sell, the Chinese are building European factories to build EVs there. Slowly.  They are FLOODING the market with Chinese EVs as we speak in Europe.  The next step is to flood North America with Chinese EVs. The starting point IS Mexico.  If one is educated, one could see the disaster that is to come for GM, Ford.  Stellantis is going to get the disaster first in Europe.  Chinese EVs are going to flood Mexico.  INEXPENSIVE Chinese EVs.  Then WILL come the factories in Mexico.  So much for the "NOBODY WANTS EVs" rhetoric that the uneducated, wrongfully informed Americans (and Canadians to some degree) keep on spewing...   Its really IS a big deal. I SEE that rhetoric play about the failure of VW and Stellantis and even GM when these fools squeal about how they are failing because they have put all their monies on EVs.  The thing is, they didnt put their monies FAST enough on EVs and also concetrated on producing ICEVs when they should have just NIXED them waaaay before.  Of course that is Monday morning quarterbacking from me as I say that, but I ALSO saw the writing on the wall about EVs being THE future.  Had Americans NOT been LIED to about this whole thing about scare tactics about EVs, GM and Ford would have ALL the working EVs RIGHT NOW not ONLY to shut down Tesla, but to even shut down Chinese EVs. Elon Musk could have TAKEN China ALL to himself if he was 5% the visionary he thinks he is.   But he was too busy STILL selling us on colonizing Mars...  Whatever happened to that super loop thing anyway?  Yeah...a billion dollar boondoggle that had everybody fooled.  Chinese politicians, engineers and all around smart folk must be STILL laughing at all the gullible Americans and greedy fools that the US has churned out the last 15 years...    But hey...   Now lets keep on shopping because its the Christmas season and we should all consume because its good for the economy while we wait for tariffs to hit us because Canada and Mexico reasons, because our eggs are expensive while we get fleeced by insurance companies but we dont want healthcare because communism and education education education but Ivy Leaguers  they too smart so they elitist but Democrats wanting to forgive student debt no good but keep on having insanely expensive school tuitions while other areas in the country and young folk not having ACCESS to an education while calling some countries of the world as shytehole countries while ALSO keep on having school shootings because teachers arent packing but also those shytehole country folk  are eating the dogs and they are eating the cats.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search