Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Cadillac Dangles $5,000 to Lincoln Owners to Get Into An Escalade

      Can Cadillac tempt Lincoln owners into an Escalade?

    With Lincoln beginning to roll out an all-new Navigator, Cadillac is trying to sway current Lincoln owners with a new offer on the Escalade.

    Bloomberg obtained a memo sent to dealers that reveals a $5,000 discount on the Escalade for any owner of a Lincoln model from 1999 to the current model year. GM spokesman Jim Cain confirmed the authenticity of the memo.

    This beginning of an offensive by Cadillac to keep the Escalade ahead of the new Navigator. Ford is also rolling out a new Expedition which is expected to steal some of the huge market share GM currently has in the segment.

    The deal is available if you decide to lease or purchase a new Escalade, and can be combined with other offers.

    “I don’t know that this will hurt their launch. But it is a way for Lincoln customers to step up into something more meaningfully luxurious,” said Cain.

    Throwing some shade at Lincoln might not be the wisest idea. At the moment, a redesign for the Escalade isn't expected till 2020. Plus, we think the Navigator blows the Escalade out of the water when it comes to the interior. We can't say which one is the better driving model till we get some drive time in both.

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Ram 1500's that are 4X4 with the 3.6. 3.21 gears are only rated to tow 4650 with the quad cab. 

    F150 with the base 3.3,, 4x4, 3.55 gears, and largest cab is only rated at 5000lbs. 

    The lowest number I could configure the Silverado down to was 6000lbs

    All of which are probably difficult to find on a lot because I'd assume a work level truck has the trailer tow package that won't have the granny tall gears that drastically drops all of these down to the levels I looked up. 

    2 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    I think the diesel Colorado is rated for over 10,000 pounds...

    Nope. I'm pretty sure 7600 or 7700lbs. The non-diesel I think is 7000lbs. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    LOL a boat that big causing that much sag.. definition of more money than brains. 

    True, but of course they could have properly leveled it out by adding 3rd party airbags to help with the load.

    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It's more than any V6 gasoline crossover today and only 400lbs less than a V8 Durango or Grand Cherokee.  

    Have to scan it in but my sister and her exhusband used to drive a fully loaded Buick Roadmaster Station wagon pulling a large boat. Another of GM's awesome rides that could handle the same load as that cadillac car.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Supposedly my Jeep is rated at 6200lbs for the V6.   Though I doubt I'll ever tow anything...

    The Pentastar would be screaming trying to pull that up a hill

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, dfelt said:

    True, but of course they could have properly leveled it out by adding 3rd party airbags to help with the load.

    Yup, but more money than brains to figure that out... 

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I do like the exterior styling of the Escalade in this current generation. I was not really enamored with it before. The interior isn't bad either, in fact I would rather it above average.

    There are things about the new Navigator I have really been impressed with from an exterior perspective and some others I want to see in person before passing final judgement. The interior is the best thing I have seen in a large SUV. Period.

    When any competitor names their rival by name and backs it up with paying money to limit sales loss it is a huge compliment to that product. 

    So, I would assume the Navigator is all that and the proverbial bad of chips!

    Edited by lengnert
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/14/2017 at 11:58 AM, dfelt said:

    Towing with Escalades is very common, I see the following all the time around washington state.

    We used to trailer with our cars:

     

    Now in modern day, we trailer with our Escalades:

     

    Trailering3.jpg

    Even though I think sometimes too much boat is pulled with them.

    That Escalade is way overloaded. It can tow, but that is too much tongue weight. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/14/2017 at 5:44 PM, dfelt said:

    Have to scan it in but my sister and her exhusband used to drive a fully loaded Buick Roadmaster Station wagon pulling a large boat. Another of GM's awesome rides that could handle the same load as that cadillac car.

    The 7000 lb V4P package was unique to the Fleetwood.  The V92 B-cars were rated at 5000 lbs.
     

    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    That Escalade is way overloaded. It can tow, but that is too much tongue weight. 

    Right- we're maybe just seeing the leading edge of windshield of that boat; who knows how much farther rearward the trailer wheels are.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, lengnert said:

    I do like the exterior styling of the Escalade in this current generation. I was not really enamored with it before. The interior isn't bad either, in fact I would rather it above average.

    There are things about the new Navigator I have really been impressed with from an exterior perspective and some others I want to see in person before passing final judgement. The interior is the best thing I have seen in a large SUV. Period.

    When any competitor names their rival by name and backs it up with paying money to limit sales loss it is a huge compliment to that product. 

    So, I would assume the Navigator is all that and the proverbial bad of chips!

    Even a non Ford guy like me is impressed...

    On 11/14/2017 at 3:54 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Supposedly my Jeep is rated at 6200lbs for the V6.   Though I doubt I'll ever tow anything...

    It would be fun to tow a camper behind that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, KevinW said:

    The 7000 lb V4P package was unique to the Fleetwood.  The V92 B-cars were rated at 5000 lbs.
     

    It is amazing the amount of towing capabilities we put on cars compared to the CUV / SUVs of today.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Even a non Ford guy like me is impressed...

    It would be fun to tow a camper behind that.

    I have to ask..... i sense there is some antipathy towards the modern Fords ( LOL).... it would make me think there may have been a clunker or two Blue Ovals in your past?  Either that or a Transit van up and insulted your Mom or something....?

    What gives, AHWNN?   

     

     

    Edited by lengnert
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, lengnert said:

    I have to ask..... i sense there is some antipathy towards the modern Fords ( LOL).... it would make me think there may have been a clunker or two Blue Ovals in your past?  Either that or a Transit van up and insulted your Mom or something....?

    What gives, AHWNN?   

     

     

    Damned if I know...I love the vintage blue oval stuff.  I just try to be honest with myself and deal with what I feel.

    We have had several Fords lately as rentals and they have performed flawlessly.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    Spelling.
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

    Damned if I know...I love the vintage blue oval stuff.  I just try to be honest with myself and deal with what I feel.

    We have had several Fords lately as rentals and they ahve performed flawlessly.

    Haha, yeah sometimes it is just a 'thing' we have for a product or brand.  It took me a long time (decades) to get over my anti GM bias. I still do not favor a GM over a Ford model, but I can appreciate the vehicles they make now.   

    Except for Camaros! They will always be crap!  (At least in comparison to the almighty Mustang)..….... hahahahahaha

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, lengnert said:

    Haha, yeah sometimes it is just a 'thing' we have for a product or brand.  It took me a long time (decades) to get over my anti GM bias. I still do not favor a GM over a Ford model, but I can appreciate the vehicles they make now.   

    Except for Camaros! They will always be crap!  (At least in comparison to the almighty Mustang)..….... hahahahahaha

    My favorite car was a 66 Mustang fastback 289 4 speed, Wimbledon white, not a spot of rust on her.

    I would give my eye teeth for a 68 Mustang California Special...or a 69 Fastback...or a 70 Boss 302. Calypso Coral or Grabber Green on the 70 Boss 302...gold was a signature color in 69 for the Mustang. make that one a GT (last year for the early year GT cars, and fairly rare) with gold paint and a black interior.

    Modern cars...of all of the cars on the planet the only two that actually excite me as modern cars to own are the GTI/Golf R and WRX/STI.  Everything else leaves me pretty cold as an ownership proposition.

    In terms of fandom, I really like Audi and Porsche...but I am a blue collar guy so I would look silly driving either of them.

    Only GM car I could see myself pulling the actual trigger on is the Bolt...only car I could see buying from Ford would be the Focus ST.

    Only chryco product I could see spending my own money on is the Renegade with a Trailhawk package.

    ....hate to say it but I think given the choice of Camaro, Mustang or Challenger I would take the Challenger.  At least today...ask me tomorrow and my answer would change.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I know there will be a new Escalade coming soon, but realistically, they could give the current one an exterior visual refresh and a substantial interior refresh and keep it on the market a while longer. The powertrain is still more than competitive, especially now with the 10-speed. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, lengnert said:

    I have to ask..... i sense there is some antipathy towards the modern Fords ( LOL).... it would make me think there may have been a clunker or two Blue Ovals in your past?  Either that or a Transit van up and insulted your Mom or something....?

    What gives, AHWNN?   

     

     

    I have only had two fords in my life, 1969 Camper Special that I inherited and loved till the day I sold it as my career took off and I had to relocate to california and was not going to take the truck and camper and my 1991 Ford Escort GT  that I bought new. Loved that Mazda Built Pocket Rocket. Was great till the Wife got rearended in it and it was totaled. But other than her neck injury, she was over all safe and uninjured. Since then every time I have tried to buy a ford, the sales people and poor quality have pushed me away.

    5 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I know there will be a new Escalade coming soon, but realistically, they could give the current one an exterior visual refresh and a substantial interior refresh and keep it on the market a while longer. The powertrain is still more than competitive, especially now with the 10-speed. 

    I would totally do this and focus on releasing an AWD Escalade EV that could put a line in the sand much with how Chevy did with the Bolt!

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • MOU means that these companies have signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" to explore the participation, involvement and synergy sharing in relation to the business integration through a joint holding company. Back in August 1st, 2024 Nissan and Honda created a Joint Holding Company for the commencement of a strategic partnership focused on intelligence and electrification. This was to start the consideration towards integration of the two companies. Mitsubishi Motors has now signed onto this MOU to explore the possibility of achieving synergies at an increased level through business participation or integration. In basic terms, the three companies have agreed to join forces in sharing costs to move forward with EV platform R&D while they also look at the ICE "Internal Combustion Engine" gas side of having shared platforms to reduce costs and hopefully save the three auto companies by keeping them alive.  While Nissan and Honda have agreed to move forward in this integration of the two auto companies, Mitsubishi Motors will make a final decision by the end of January 2025 about possibly joining in with the integration of Mitsubishi Motors into this joint 3 auto company venture. Nissan and Honda have already agreed to a full SDV or Software-defined vehicles program moving forward that will allow them to have a solid crucial collaboration of intelligence and electrification for future products. Both companies have stated that the acceleration of technology and the rapid change of the auto industry will allow these two companies to maintain global competitiveness and deliver more attractive products and services for customers worldwide. Nissan global mobility product line merged with Honda four-wheel-vehicles, motor cycles and power products can allow both companies to become more attractive to shareholders and innovation of products to sell to customers worldwide according to the CEOs of both companies. Nissan and Honda have stated the following: Nissan and Honda aim to become a world-class mobility company with sales revenue exceeding 30 trillion yen ($190 Billion U.S. Dollars) and operating profit of more than 3 trillion yen ($19 billion U.S. Dollars). The expected synergies from the business integration at this time are: 1. Scale advantages by standardizing vehicle platforms By standardizing the vehicle platforms of both companies across various product segments, the companies expect to create stronger products, reduce costs, enhance development efficiencies, and improve investment efficiencies through standardized production processes. The integration is projected to increase sales and operational volumes, allowing the companies to reduce development costs per vehicle, including for future digital services, while maximizing profits. By accelerating the mutual complementation of their global vehicle offerings - including ICE, HEV, PHEV, and EV models - Nissan and Honda will be better positioned to meet diverse customer needs around the world and deliver optimal products, leading to improved customer satisfaction. 2. Enhancement of development capabilities and cost synergies through the integration of R&D functions In accordance with the MOU to deepen strategic partnership and the joint research agreement on fundamental technologies dated August 1, the two companies have started joint research in fundamental technologies in the area of vehicle platforms for next-generation software-defined vehicles (SDVs), which is the cornerstone of the field of intelligence. After the business integration, both companies will encompass more integrated collaboration across all R&D functions, including fundamental research and vehicle application technology research. This approach is expected to enable both companies to efficiently and swiftly enhance their technological expertise, achieving both improvements in development capabilities and reductions in development costs through the integration of overlapping functions.   3. Optimizing manufacturing systems and facilities The companies anticipate that optimizing their manufacturing plants and energy service facilities, combined with improved collaboration through the shared use of production lines, will result in a substantial improvement in capacity utilization leading to a decrease in fixed costs.   4. Strengthening competitive advantages across the supply chain through the integration of purchasing functions To fully leverage the synergies from optimizing development and production capacity, both companies intend to boost their competitiveness by improving and streamlining purchasing operations and source common parts from the same the supply chain and in collaboration with business partners.   5. Realizing cost synergies through operational efficiency improvements The companies expect that the integration of systems and back-office operations, along with the upgrade and standardization of operational processes, will drive significant cost reductions.   6. Acquisition of scale advantages through integration in sales finance functions By integrating relevant areas of sales finance functions of both companies and expanding the scale of operations, the companies aim to provide a range of mobility solutions, including new financial services throughout the vehicle lifecycle, to customers of both organizations.   7. Establishment of a talent foundation for intelligence and electrification The human resources of the companies are an invaluable asset, and establishing a strong human resource foundation is crucial for the transformation that will come with the business integration. After the integration, increased employee exchanges and technical collaboration between the companies are expected to promote further skill development. Moreover, by leveraging each company's access to talent markets, attracting exceptional talent will become more attainable. Method of business integration and stock listing Nissan and Honda, with the result of the consideration, plan to establish, through a joint share transfer, a joint holding company that will be the parent company of both companies. This will be subject to approval at each company's general meeting of shareholders and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for this business integration, based on the premise that Nissan's turnaround*1 actions are steadily executed. Both Nissan and Honda will be fully owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company*2. Additionally, the companies plan to continue coexisting and developing the brands held by Honda and Nissan equally. Shares of the newly established joint holding company under consideration are planned to be newly listed (technical listing) on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”). The listing is scheduled for August 2026. With the listing of the joint holding company, both Nissan and Honda will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company and will be scheduled to be delisted from the TSE. However, shareholders of both companies will continue to be able to trade shares of the joint holding company issued during this share transfer on the TSE. The listing date of the joint holding company and the delisting date of both Nissan and Honda will be determined in accordance with the regulations of the TSE. Regarding the organizational structure of the joint holding company, and both companies which will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company after the business integration, the optimal structure for realizing synergies, including the integration of R&D functions, purchasing functions, and manufacturing functions, will be discussed and considered within the integration preparatory committee, with the aim of establishing an organizational structure that enables efficient and highly competitive business operations after the business integration. The CEO's of all three companies had the following to say: Marking the announcement, Nissan Director, President, CEO and Representative Executive Officer Makoto Uchida said: “Honda and Nissan have begun considering a business integration, and will study the creation of significant synergies between the two companies in a wide range of fields. It is significant that Nissan's partner, Mitsubishi Motors, is also involved in these discussions. We anticipate that if this integration comes to fruition, we will be able to deliver even greater value to a wider customer base.“ Honda Director and Representative Executive Officer Toshihiro Mibe said: "At this time of change in the automobile industry, which is said to occur once every 100 years, we hope that Mitsubishi Motors' participation in the business integration discussions of Nissan and Honda will lead to further social change, and that we will be able to become a leading company in creating new value in mobility through business integration. Nissan and Honda will start the discussion from today onwards with an aim to clarify the possibility of business integration by around the end of January in line with the consideration of Mitsubishi Motors." Comment from Mitsubishi Motors Director, Representative Executive Officer, and President and CEO Takao Kato said: “In an era of change in the automotive industry, the study between Nissan and Honda about a business integration will accelerate synergy maximization effects, bringing high value also to the collaborative businesses with Mitsubishi Motors. In order to realize synergies and to make the best use of each company's strengths, we will also study the best form of cooperation.” Upon looking at the press releases, it makes total sense that these companies would look to merge as each company is having a challanging time. Nissan globally has seen a 33.7% reduction in sales taking the estimated 2024 market share to 5.2%.  Honda globally has seen a 9% reduction over all with a 32% reduction in the asian rim leaving them with a 2024 estimated 5.4% market share. Mitsubishi Motors globally has seen a reduction year over year of a 10.7% drop leaving them with a 2024 estimated market share of 4.6%. All three auto companies lag the industry in technology connected auto's, feature / functions and especially EVs. All three companies have seen their profits turn into negative earnings for their respective companies leaving them with no real ability to perform R&D in building EVs to compete in China or the U.S. let alone Europe that has mandates in place for the end of ICE by 2035. End result is it looks like for these companies to survive, merging into one company that shares platforms and technology especially in the software and battery sectors will be the only way to move forward. View full article
    • I think I'm dreaming ... this vehicle would be the oldest of my handful of favorite "blast from the past" cars. A Cutlass Salon coupe in perfect condition, the first year I liked the colonnade Cutlass (and it's last year, of 3, with round headlamps in the colonnade), those huge bucket seats, and, oddly, A/C is there, but with manual windows.  It featured the new but not as popular 260 (4.3L) V8.  It also featured the light enamel blue they didn't repeat.  If the exhaust system is tight, this car will be whisper quiet. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (Numbers Matching Drivetrain) for sale: photos, technical specifications, description See anything odd?  Come on.  Quick. . . . It has Buick rally wheels instead of Oldsmobile rally wheels. * sigh ... I wonder what time frame this ad goes back to *
    • She was on the BBC    Oh..stop that!!!  The British Broadcasting Corporation is what I meant and she had fame.   He had fame and that means both were meant to be at that fame crossroad.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03g4wl6 You guys have a dirty mind    Maybe that song of his, super freakay, was a reference to her  
    • She can afford it ... whatever that may be.  Money talks and bullshit walks, as they say.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search