Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    2022 Cadillac CT4 and CT5 Blackwing Bring A Performance Edge

      Missing the hot V models? Here are their replacements.

    After months of rumors and spy photos, Cadillac finally spilled the beans on their new high-performance CT4 and CT5 Blackwing. These new models are planned to give German rivals a bruising when they start arriving at dealers later this summer. Here is what we know.

    CT4 Blackwing

    The smaller of the two Blackwing models starts with a twin-turbo 3.6L V6 engine with 472 horsepower and 445 pound-feet of torque. To achieve this power, Cadillac upgraded the various internals with titanium connecting rods and a revised crankshaft. Power is routed to the rear-wheels by either a six-speed manual or ten-speed automatic. Performance figures are impressive with a 0-60 mph time of 3.8 seconds (automatic transmission) and a top speed of 189 mph.

    In terms of handling, the CT4 Blackwing features an electronic limited-slip rear differential and latest version of Magnetic Ride Control 4.0 - Cadillac claims the latter is the quickest-reacting suspension in the world. A set of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires keep the vehicle glued to the road, while optional optional carbon ceramic brakes bring it to a quick stop.

    Visually, the CT4 Blackwing uses a new grille with larger openings to gobble up more air; functional fender vents, front splitter, and a rear spoiler. A carbon fiber package that claims to reduce aerodynamic lift by 214 percent is an option.

    CT5 Blackwing

    For those who want something a bit more mad can direct their attention to the CT5 Blackwing. Under its hood lies a massaged 6.2L supercharged V8 engine with 668 horsepower and 659 pound-feet of torque. Again, power is routed to the rear-wheels via a six-speed manual or ten-speed automatic. 0-60 mph takes 3.7 seconds (automatic transmission) and can cruise towards 200-plus mph. 

    What does this massaged V8 engine have? For starters. there's a larger supercharger (1.7-liters), aluminum cylinder heads, titanium intake valves, and improved airflow. 

    Like the CT4, the CT5 Blackwing gets Magnetic Ride Control 4.0 and electronic limited-slip rear differential. A set of forged 19-inch wheels exclusive to the Blackwing come wrapped in a set of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires. 

    Outside, a new grille with larger openings to allow for more air, front splitter, and rear spoiler are the key changes to note. A carbon fiber package is optional.

    How Much?

    The CT4 Blackwing will set you back $59,990, and the larger CT5 Blackwing will cost $84,990. Both prices include a $995 destination charge. You can head down to your nearest Cadillac dealer to place a pre-order for either model right now.

    Source: Cadillac

    V-Series Blackwing: Ultimate Track Capability, Zero Compromise

    • The 2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing and CT5-V Blackwing, two of the most powerful Cadillacs ever, raise the bar on performance

    The 2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing and CT4-V Blackwing represent the pinnacle of Cadillac performance and craftsmanship, leveraging championship-winning racing heritage to create the most track-capable Cadillacs ever, while continuing to set new standards for luxury and comfort.

    Leveraging a Cadillac racing history that began in 1949 and has seen sustained success over the last two decades, the V-Series Blackwing models were developed with driver engagement and performance at the top of mind.

    “V-Series Blackwing stands for the very highest level of execution from Cadillac and offers a distinctly American vision of performance: incredible power and luxurious craftsmanship, with absolutely zero compromise,” said Brandon Vivian, executive chief engineer, Cadillac. “We looked to our championship-winning racing heritage and brought an uncompromising eye for detail to create two cars that elevate the V-Series experience.”

    V-Series Blackwing vehicles build on the already excellent performance dynamics of the CT5-V and CT4-V to create the top tier of the Cadillac sedan lineup.

    Highlights include:

    • Evolutions of the track-ready Cadillac 6.2L Supercharged V8 in the CT5-V Blackwing and 3.6L Twin-Turbo V6 in the CT4-V Blackwing
    • Upgraded TREMEC six-speed manual transmission standard
    • Available 10-speed automatic transmission
    • Electronic Limited Slip Rear Differential enhanced to reduce mass and improve on-track reliability
    • Advanced suspension refinements providing greater body control and a more agile feel
    • Magnetic Ride Control 4.0, the world’s fastest reacting suspension technology, sharpening the balance between daily-driving comfort and high-performance track capability
    • Unique structural enhancements improving steering response and handling on the track
    • Cadillac’s largest ever factory-installed brakes, available on the CT5-V Blackwing
    • Extensive validation including 12-hour and 24-hour track testing
    • Customizable integrated digital gauge cluster with Custom Launch Control and Performance Traction Management settings

    Liberating performance
    The CT5-V Blackwing uses an upgraded 6.2L supercharged V8 that, thanks to a higher flow air-intake and revised exhaust system, is rated at 668 horsepower (498 kW) and 659 lb-ft of torque (893 Nm), making it the most powerful production Cadillac ever. Each engine is hand-built at GM’s Bowling Green Assembly facility in Kentucky and features a signed engine builder’s plate.

    The CT4-V Blackwing sports an evolution of the Cadillac 3.6L Twin-Turbo V6 that features revised control system software and an improved air intake system to create 472 horsepower (352 kW) and 445 lb-ft of torque (603 Nm). The turbos’ low-inertia (titanium-aluminide) turbine wheels enable more precise and responsive application of torque throughout the rev range.

    Highlighted features and output:

    • CT5-V Blackwing: 6.2L Supercharged V8 - 668 hp, 659 lb-ft of torque
      • GM-estimated top track speed: over 200 mph
      • GM-estimated 0-60 mph: 3.7 seconds (automatic transmission)
      • Most powerful Cadillac ever
      • Air intake airflow is improved by 46 percent vs. the CTS-V
      • Compact, high-output 1.7L four-lobe Eaton supercharger with small-diameter rotors that enable boost to be generated earlier in the rpm band for instantaneous response
      • Rotocast A356T6 aluminum cylinder heads are stronger and handle heat better than conventional aluminum-alloy heads
      • Lightweight titanium intake valves
      • Track-capable wet-sump oiling and vent system with external oil separator and drainback
    • CT4-V Blackwing: 3.6L Twin-Turbo V6 - 472 hp, 445 lb-ft of torque
      • GM-estimated top speed: 189 mph
      • GM-estimated 0-60 mph: 3.8 seconds (automatic transmission)
      • Most powerful and fastest Cadillac in the subcompact class
      • Air intake restriction is improved by 39 percent vs. the ATS-V
      • Turbocharger compressors matched for peak efficiency at peak power for optimal track performance
      • Titanium connecting rods (manual transmission only) and revised crankshaft counterweights reduce main/rod bearing reciprocating loads
      • Re-targeted piston oil squirters, which direct engine oil at the bottoms of the pistons, for improved temperature control
      • The manifold-integrated water-to-air charge cooling system contributes to more immediate torque response
      • Airflow routing volume is reduced by 60 percent when compared to a conventional design that features a remotely mounted heat exchanger

    Track-capable braking systems
    Both V-Series Blackwing models feature advanced high-performance braking systems that have been extensively track and road-tested. The exclusive V-Series Blackwing wheel designs enable an even larger rotor over the previous CTS-V, making the CT5-V Blackwing braking system the largest factory-installed brakes in Cadillac history. Additionally, an available carbon-ceramic brake package for the CT5-V Blackwing, featuring cross-drilled rotors, deliver several benefits including weight savings, durability and heat management.

    Highlighted features:

    • CT4-V Blackwing: 14.96 x 1.34-inch (380 X 34 mm) front rotors and 13.4 x 1.1-inch (340.5 x 28 mm) rear rotors
    • CT5-V Blackwing: 15.67 x 1.42-inch (398 X 36 mm) front rotors and 14.7 x 1.1-inch (373.5 x 28 mm) rear rotors
    • Staggered Brembo® six-piston front calipers and four-piston rear calipers
    • Available on the CT5-V Blackwing, the lightweight carbon-ceramic brake package significantly improves heat management, as well as greater resistance to wear under extreme conditions on the racetrack, while also reducing unsprung mass and rotating mass:
      • 53-pound (24 kg) reduction in unsprung weight
      • 62-pound (28 kg) reduction in rotating mass
    • High-performance copper-free brake linings comply with California law and deliver superior fade resistance with an excellent pedal feel on and off the track
    • Brake systems are integrated to each vehicles’ selectable drive modes, including brake pedal feel. Brake pedal feel can also be assigned within My-Mode and V-Mode

    Manual transmission is standard
    Rare for sport sedans today, a six-speed TREMEC manual transmission is standard on both vehicles. It has been optimized for each V-Series Blackwing vehicle to provide an engaging experience on the track or on the road. Details include:

    • LuK twin-disc clutch for high torque capacity and great pedal feel
    • Active Rev Matching accessible via a console mounted toggle switch to automatically adjust engine speed to match anticipated downshifts
    • No-Lift Shift allowing the driver to shift gears without letting off the gas pedal. In the case of the CT4-V Blackwing, it allows the turbos to remain spooled, resulting in faster lap times
    • Transmission and rear differential cooling – the manual and automatic transmissions use the same track-performance cooling system for greater track performance
    • Clutch and brake pedals positioned for optimal driver ergonomics
    • A physical barrier stop for the clutch pedal rather than a hydraulic master cylinder stop provides greater driver feedback during clutch operation
    • A shorter shifter ratio than previous generations for more precise shifts

    Ten-speed automatic transmission
    The CT5-V Blackwing and CT4-V Blackwing are available with a 10-speed electronically controlled automatic transmission. It is tuned to complement the dual-personality experience of each respective model.

    Highlighted features:

    • Tap Shift/Manual Mode allowing the driver to use integrated magnesium paddle shifters to select a gear and hold it until selecting the next gear, up or down
    • Sport Mode providing real-time interpretation of driving conditions, adjusting the transmission to reduce shift busyness and improve performance, while retaining aggressive driving dynamics
    • Twenty-four-hour track testing resulted in several improvements in response to the demands of a high-g track environment, including a unique oil pan design and priority valve changes
    • Unique control systems with performance calibrations tailored for each model
    • Ten forward gears offer the most available transmission speeds in each sedans’ respective segments, helping keep the engines within their optimal rpm bands, while also anticipating the next shifts
    • Dynamic Performance Mode is calibrated specifically for V-Series Blackwing to deliver track focused shift patterns and automatically activates when high-g forces are experienced in Sport or Track mode
    • An auxiliary pump primes the automatic transmission system from the time the vehicle door is opened for improved cold-shift performance.

    Both V-Series Blackwing models also feature an enhanced Electronic Limited Slip Rear Differential. It weighs less and has been optimized for each driving mode and each Performance Traction Management setting.

    Highlighted features:

    • More control of the rear differential compared to traditional open and mechanical limited-slip differentials
    • Enhances road grip by automatically allocating torque to the rear wheel with the most traction during hard cornering — with the capability of sending up to 1,475 lb-ft (2,000 Nm) of locking torque across the axle
    • High-performance differential cooler
    • An aluminum housing replacing the previous generation cast iron housing, reducing mass by more than 22 pounds (10 kg)
    • Exclusive integrated heat exchanger for enhanced cooling

    Advanced suspension systems and strengthened chassis
    V-Series Blackwing combines the fourth generation of Magnetic Ride Control (MR 4.0), with improvements to the front and rear suspension systems. Stiffer spring rates, unique hollow stabilizer bars, higher-rate bushings and more enable a driving experience that isolates the driver from road imperfections, while also providing a precise, engaging connection with the road.

    MR 4.0 highlights:

    • Immense performance envelope that gave Cadillac engineers the freedom to optimize everyday driving and aggressive track performance
    • New accelerometers and an inertial measurement unit that transmit and process changes in road conditions four times faster than the previous generation system
    • Secondary temperature maps that enable engineers to compensate for changes in damper fluid temperature for more consistent performance, even during performance driving
    • Inertial measurement unit that provides more precise measurements of body motion relative to the wheel for more accurate readings under heavy braking, hard cornering and other driving conditions
    • Improved magnetic flux control that creates a more consistent and accurate transition between rebound and compression
    • Improvements to transient body control that allow the vehicle to remain more level while transitioning between corners

    MacPherson strut front suspension:

    • Ride link includes an all-new 100-percent elastomer bushing on the CT4-V Blackwing and a retuned hydro bushing on the CT5-V Blackwing, for improved ride response
    • Handling link has cross-axis ball joints for improved lateral control and quicker steering response

    Five-link independent rear suspension:

    • Lateral link features stiffer bushings for faster response and increased cornering agility
    • Toe link has cross-axis ball joints for increased stability and driver confidence
    • Rear knuckles have increased stiffness for improved braking and better control during cornering
    • Rear cradle mounts have been stiffened for optimum balance between road comfort and track performance

    V-Series Blackwing models are built on Cadillac’s award-winning rear-wheel drive architecture and feature unique structural enhancements including shock tower braces, an underside shear plate and thicker rear cross members to improve chassis rigidity. Along with the unique suspension elements, the stiffer structure enhances steering response, handling and the everyday driving experience.

    All-day performance, on and off the track
    The CT5-V Blackwing and CT4-V Blackwing build on Cadillac’s racing heritage and were developed to be track-capable straight from the factory. That includes an intensive validation program to ensure consistent performance during the most challenging track conditions.

    Validation for both models included:

    • Twenty-four-hour continuous track testing with the available automatic transmission, available carbon fiber aero package, aluminum wheels and available carbon ceramic brake package
    • Twelve-hour continuous track testing with the standard manual transmission, available carbon fiber aero package, aluminum wheels and available carbon ceramic brake package

    Functional aerodynamics, including an available carbon fiber aero package, contribute to the V-Series Blackwing models’ track prowess to support a variety of cooling needs for the cars’ respective engines, transmissions, axles and other supporting systems.

    Additionally, MICHELIN® Pilot Sport 4S tires developed exclusively for the V-Series Blackwing models contribute to their balance of track capability and road comfort. Highlights include:

    • Unique, multiple-compound tread composition:
      • Contact patch composed of three unique tread rubber compounds
      • Racing “R compound” used for the majority of the tread
      • Compounds optimized for wet traction, enhanced street and track durability, as well as rolling resistance
    • The mold shape of the tire has been specifically engineered for Blackwing models to optimize contact with the road
    • Tire sizes:
      • CT5-V Blackwing tire size: 275/35ZR19 (front) and 305/30ZR19 (rear)
      • CT4-V Blackwing tire size: 255/35ZR18 (front) and 275/35ZR18 (rear)

    Both V-Series Blackwing vehicles feature standard forged aluminum alloy wheels with staggered widths, front to rear. These forged wheels are stronger and lighter than conventional cast aluminum.

    Wheel sizes:

    • CT5-V Blackwing: Front – 19 x 10 inches / Rear – 19 x 11 inches
    • CT4-V Blackwing: Front – 18 x 9 inches / Rear – 18 x 9.5 inches

    Coming this summer
    Reservations for both vehicles open on Feb. 1, 2021 at 7:30 p.m. ET on Cadillac.com, with deliveries later this summer. Pricing begins at $59,9901 for the CT4-V Blackwing and $84,9901 for the CT5-V Blackwing.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    The CT5 is a C-Class competitor with C63 S level performance but it is priced higher than that. 
     

    As far as soft close doors go, they are part of a $3650 option package on the Escalade Premium Luxury trim, or included on Platinum, and not even offered on any other Cadillac.  Mercedes does most options as al a carte so you aren’t forced in to big option packages to get stuff you don’t want.  

    How many times does this have to explained to you? The CT5 is a tweener size that is closer in size to a E Class than the C-Class. And what you call "al a carte", I call "nickel and diming" you to death. Your bar moving changes nothing here.

     

    Again, charging extra for two USB-C ports that should already been in the back of a supposed four door family sedan and $700 for airbags. BTW, those soft close doors are not offered on the E-Class at all unless you opt for the AMG models. That makes those doors a $30-50K option if you really want them since they can only be had on the AMG. Want to try that again?

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    The CLA45 is faster around Virginia International Raceway than the CT4-V, CT5-V, Jaguar F-Type R, Alfa Romeo Gulia Quadrafolio and 718 Cayman S.  
     

    And 81,000 of the 129,000 vehicles Cadillac sold last year were front drive based.

    Guess it didn't dawn on you that I am talking about their cars and not their CUVs/SUVs. Not one FWD Cadillac sedan or coupe in the last 13 years. Furthermore (since you wanted to go there), how many FWD based car/CUVs constitute the total number sold by Benz? Oh and that FWD original CLA45 comes in at the same price (just a few grand under) as the CT4 Blackwing so get back to us when that comparison comes out instead of comparing it to a lower trim CT4-V.

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mercedes sold 75,000 FWD-based vehicles in the (down) year of '20 in the U.S. alone. 

    Vast majority of these in both cases are AWD, but at least Cadillac isn't building FWD-based sports sedans

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    How many times does this have to explained to you? The CT5 is a tweener size that is closer in size to a E Class than the C-Class. And what you call "al a carte", I call "nickel and diming" you to death. Your bar moving changes nothing here.

     

    Again, charging extra for two USB-C ports that should already been in the back of a supposed four door family sedan and $700 for airbags. BTW, those soft close doors are not offered on the E-Class at all unless you opt for the AMG models. That makes those doors a $30-50K option if you really want them since they can only be had on the AMG. Want to try that again?

    Guess it didn't dawn on you that I am talking about their cars and not their CUVs/SUVs. Not one FWD Cadillac sedan or coupe in the last 13 years. Furthermore (since you wanted to go there), how many FWD based car/CUVs constitute the total number sold by Benz? Oh and that FWD original CLA45 comes in at the same price (just a few grand under) as the CT4 Blackwing so get back to us when that comparison comes out instead of comparing it to a lower trim CT4-V.

    The CT5 is exactly the same size as the E-class, but it starts $20,000 cheaper.  The Hyundai Sonata and CT5 are also the same size and are only $10,000 different in starting price.  Unless the Sonata is a CT5 competitor, then the CT5 is not an E-class competitor.  And that is correct on the soft close doors it is only on E53/E63, I thought the E450 offered it. 

    Why do cars differ from SUVs?  SUVs are the majority of sales?   If I wanted a performance SUV (which I don't since I don't like SUVs) then Cadillac has no option.  And 80% of Cadillac sales are SUVs. 

     Also offering a FWD product doesn't have any effect on the rear drive products, unless they replace rear drive with front drive.  The CLA was an added model, the C/E/S-classes are all still there and all still rear drive as always, nothing changed.  Corvette sells the Spark and Sonic in the same showroom as the Corvette, but that doesn't mean the Corvette isn't a performance car.  Now if they made the Corvette front drive, or if Mercedes made the E-class front drive, then that is a problem and I would have issue with that.

    Fair comparison to pit a $65k CLA45 against a $65k CT4 V-Blackwing and see who wins on a track.  The CLA45 on VIR ran a 2.58.2 and the most recent CTS-V ran a 2.56.8 so that little FWD based Mercedes is only 1.4 seconds a lap down to the fastest Cadillac ever.   And the CLA is faster than the ATS-V was around that track.  Thus my point that the CLA is the CT4 competitor, C-class is the CT5 competitor. 

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    https://www.best-selling-cars.com/brands/2019-full-year-global-mercedes-benz-sales-worldwide/

    Quote

    In 2019, Mercedes-Benz sales worldwide increased by 1.3% to a record 2,339,562 cars.

     

    Sounds impressive, right?

    Quote

     At the same time, Mercedes-Benz maintained its leading position among the luxury car brands for the fourth year in a row.

    pretty phoquing awesome, right?

    UNTIL...you get to THIS statement down below...

    Quote

     Last year’s model offensive with a total of more than ten new or revised models led to a significant boost in unit sales, particularly of Compact Cars and SUVs, and contributed to the overall sales growth. 

    Quote

    In 2019, every third Mercedes-Benz vehicle sold globally was an SUV. With sales of about 783,700 units the GLA, GLB, GLC, GLC Coupé, EQC, GLE, GLE Coupé, GLS and G-Class, the SUVs were Mercedes-Benz’s strongest-selling segment in 2019 (-4.5%).

    Selling SUVs is not that big of a deal anymore...

    The REAL focus here SHOULD be...and a complete phoquing lie when analysts keep on banging the luxury car brand thing...

     

    Quote

     

    Record Mercedes-Benz Compact Cars Sales in 2019 

    In 2019, every fourth Mercedes-Benz sold was a Compact Car: More than 667,000 units of the A- and B-Class, CLA, CLA Shooting Brake, GLA and GLB were delivered last year (+9.5%). This represents an increase of more than 30,000 unit sales when compared to the prior record established in 2016.

     

     

    A Class and B Class cars are NOT luxury cars.  Taxi liveries of of the E Class and NOT luxury cars. The C Class is NOT downright luxury.  Its Pontiac level in MOST European and Asian markets.  The article does say that the C Class and E Class enjoyed sales increases as well. But when one peels off the REAL story, one realizes that Mercedes Benz does NOT sell nearly as many LUXURY cars as many idiots in the industry claim they sell...

    Im not going too much into detail, Ive done a similar exercise a year ago. I dont have to assume and guesstimate. Ive got cold hard numbers to work with right here.

    2 339 562 - 667 000 = 1 672 562 

    Im NOT going to minus the taxi liveries and the Chevrolet/Pontiac trim leveled C Class and E Class and GLA and GLB CUV sales.   (AND...I wonder of commercial truck sales are included in this figure as well...)

    But REMEMBER...THAT 1 672 562 sales number becomes soooooo much SMALLER.  

    One thing that is being FORGOTTEN in the mix is that Daimler in 2021 will be (hot news right from the press)...Daimler will be spun off into its OWN brand.  What will Daimler be peddling?  The trucks. The busses. The sanitation vehicles, the lories, the public transportation busses, the military vehicles.

    WHY?

    BECAUSE APPARENTLY, image plays a BIG factor and NEWBIES that want to buy new cars today  and folk that have REALIZED that A Class and B Class vehicles are NOT luxury are NOW starting to make a  NEGATIVE connection to the commercial stuff that  the company builds.  Most of that comes from investors and the EV folk so M-B is off shooting Daimler in one direction while M-B could keep a "clean" image to sell EVs and to get investor money to build EVs.

    https://europe.autonews.com/automakers/daimler-become-mercedes-benz-split-trucks-unit-cars

     

    Quote

     

    Daimler plans to split up into the world’s largest makers of luxury cars and commercial vehicles, renaming itself Mercedes-Benz and separately listing its truck unit by year-end.

    The plan to distribute a majority of Daimler Truck to shareholders is the most significant shake-up Ola Kallenius has made since taking over the top job at the German giant almost two years ago.

    The spinoff will appease investors who long advocated for the move, citing a stubbornly low valuation for the group company. While Daimler recently tweaked its corporate structure to give more independence to its main divisions, it was viewed as a half measure and did little to boost sentiment.

     

     

     

    If...Mercedes is the WORLD'S most selling LUXURY car company...then WHAT is the BIG deal regarding commercial trucks?  

    BECAUSE REALITY is that MOST Mercedes branded cars EVERYBODY sees on the roads ARE NOT LUXURY cars. But AVERAGE JOE and COMMERCIAL type vehicles.   FAR from the "luxury" nameplate EVERYONE seems to be tooting.  Spinning off Daimler and renaming the busses and sanitation trucks as Daimler would eliminate some of that non-luxury appeal and make it easier to sell EVs to folk that know nothing about Mercedes history... 

    Which is IRONIC to what we are talking about here about Cadillac... 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Mercedes sold 75,000 FWD-based vehicles in the (down) year of '20 in the U.S. alone. 

    Vast majority of these in both cases are AWD, but at least Cadillac isn't building FWD-based sports sedans

    75,000 out of 275,000, not 80,000 out of 129,000.   And not counting Mercedes 50k Vans sales, since MB Vans are were on fire last year with the rise of home delivery I imagine.  

    Cadillac builds 2 rear drive sedans, Mercedes builds 5 rear drive sedans (if you count CLS separate of E), 1 rear drive wagon, 3 rear drive coupes, 4 rear drive convertibles and the tis after taking away the SLC and S-class coupe/convertible which are still on dealer lots..  So 13 rear drive cars to 2.  Who is more committed to performance?

    • Like 1
    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The CT5 is exactly the same size as the E-class, but it starts $20,000 cheaper.  The Hyundai Sonata and CT5 are also the same size and are only $10,000 different in starting price.  Unless the Sonata is a CT5 competitor, then the CT5 is not an E-class competitor.  And that is correct on the soft close doors it is only on E53/E63, I thought the E450 offered it. 

    Why do cars differ from SUVs?  SUVs are the majority of sales?   If I wanted a performance SUV (which I don't since I don't like SUVs) then Cadillac has no option.  And 80% of Cadillac sales are SUVs. 

     Also offering a FWD product doesn't have any effect on the rear drive products, unless they replace rear drive with front drive.  The CLA was an added model, the C/E/S-classes are all still there and all still rear drive as always, nothing changed.  Corvette sells the Spark and Sonic in the same showroom as the Corvette, but that doesn't mean the Corvette isn't a performance car.  Now if they made the Corvette front drive, or if Mercedes made the E-class front drive, then that is a problem and I would have issue with that.

    Fair comparison to pit a $65k CLA45 against a $65k CT4 V-Blackwing and see who wins on a track.  The CLA45 on VIR ran a 2.58.2 and the most recent CTS-V ran a 2.56.8 so that little FWD based Mercedes is only 1.4 seconds a lap down to the fastest Cadillac ever.   And the CLA is faster than the ATS-V was around that track.  Thus my point that the CLA is the CT4 competitor, C-class is the CT5 competitor. 

    Your arms must be getting pretty tired from all that bar moving. The whole price to car size ratio has already been explained to you. My original points stand but hey, Benz only “added” a FWD car to their sedan lineup lol.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    75,000 out of 275,000, not 80,000 out of 129,000.   And not counting Mercedes 50k Vans sales, since MB Vans are were on fire last year with the rise of home delivery I imagine.  

    Cadillac builds 2 rear drive sedans, Mercedes builds 5 rear drive sedans (if you count CLS separate of E), 1 rear drive wagon, 3 rear drive coupes, 4 rear drive convertibles and the tis after taking away the SLC and S-class coupe/convertible which are still on dealer lots..  So 13 rear drive cars to 2.  Who is more committed to performance?

    And stop with the embellishment. You have the C, E, CLS, and S. Four. Everything else is a derivative of those four and half of those are being (or have already been) phased out.

     

    Nice job sidestepping the options /package debate though. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

     

    If...Mercedes is the WORLD'S most selling LUXURY car company...then WHAT is the BIG deal regarding commercial trucks?  

     

    It is an investor move really.  Daimler is the #1 truck company in the world, as a stand alone company would be worth about $35 billion, of which Mercedes-Benz would be the largest shareholder.  Also they will still be able to share any technology with each other.  And Mercedes-Benz (the corporation) can push toward EV cars and get investor money as the next Tesla.  

    Also Karl Benz invented the car, Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhem Maybach didn't put their car on sale until 1889, so Benz's name should be on the company anyway.  

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Benz couldn’t have “invented” the car when there were cars that pre-dated it, but keep swilling that kool-aid.

    - - - - -

    The point where everyone gets confused is; mercedes is akin to General Motors, not to Cadillac. Mercedes is a mass-volume mainstream corporation, not a brand. It’s certainly not a ‘luxury brand’.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Your arms must be getting pretty tired from all that bar moving. The whole price to car size ratio has already been explained to you. My original points stand but hey, Benz only “added” a FWD car to their sedan lineup lol.

    So a $36,000 CT5 is direct competition to a $55,000 E350?  Or a $48k CT5-V to a $74k E53? (all before options).  Are buyers cross shopping that big a price gap?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    And stop with the embellishment. You have the C, E, CLS, and S. Four. Everything else is a derivative of those four and half of those are being (or have already been) phased out.

     

    Nice job sidestepping the options /package debate though. 

    AMG GT 4-door is their 5th sedan.  Also the Nurburgring record holder for a 4-door.  If the Blackwing superior to AMG, then the Blackwing will beat it.   And Mercedes has 2 EV sedans coming in a year or so, so they will have to phase out CLS and AMG GT-4 because they have too many sedans.  

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So a $36,000 CT5 is direct competition to a $55,000 E350?  Or a $48k CT5-V to a $74k E53? (all before options).  Are buyers cross shopping that big a price gap?  

    Cadillac base prices are vapor- Cadillac doesn’t build a $36K CT5, just like Tesla doesn’t build any $37K Model 3’s.

    But to address the question; cross-shopping doesn’t happen going uphill, but give a -say- $60K shopper a better driving car at $48K in the same segment and yeah; cross-shopping does occur. Remember, Cadillac wasn’t in the lux sports sedan segment at all 20 years ago - it was all bmw & mb.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So a $36,000 CT5 is direct competition to a $55,000 E350?  Or a $48k CT5-V to a $74k E53? (all before options).  Are buyers cross shopping that big a price gap?  

    A $60K Corvette competes with the $100K Porsche 911, so yes they are cross shopping. I just do not know how many more times this has to be explained to you. If a Maybach was once able to "compete" with a Rolls Royce, despite the HUGE price gulf between, then a Cadillac can sure as hell compete with an overpriced Benz.

    16 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    AMG GT 4-door is their 5th sedan.  Also the Nurburgring record holder for a 4-door.  If the Blackwing superior to AMG, then the Blackwing will beat it.   And Mercedes has 2 EV sedans coming in a year or so, so they will have to phase out CLS and AMG GT-4 because they have too many sedans.  

    Are you kidding me? A similar in power AMG GT 4-door STARTS at $140K. It better beat everything Cadillac has. We won't even get into the oft delayed EVs from Benz. Vaporware does not count.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moving on from the wash, rinse, repeat nature of debating the same s*** with a Daimler fanatic, I just dig the fact that a six speed manual comes standard on the Blackwing!

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Moving on from the wash, rinse, repeat nature of debating the same s*** with a Daimler fanatic, I just dig the fact that a six speed manual comes standard on the Blackwing!

    Try getting a manual in an AMG Mercedes sedan... 

     

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Try getting a manual in an AMG Mercedes sedan... 

     

    But you get to choose the al a carte thing like rear side impact airbags and USB-C ports (for those unsuspecting backseat passengers) though so it is wash lol!

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Cadillac base prices are vapor- Cadillac doesn’t build a $36K CT5, just like Tesla doesn’t build any $37K Model 3’s.

    But to address the question; cross-shopping doesn’t happen going uphill, but give a -say- $60K shopper a better driving car at $48K in the same segment and yeah; cross-shopping does occur. Remember, Cadillac wasn’t in the lux sports sedan segment at all 20 years ago - it was all bmw & mb.

    That is true for everyone, no one really stocks base models, but it is starting point for reference.  The Mercedes is BMW options list is probably longer than anyone outside of Porsche.  I also don't know how many people are looking at a $60k 5-series or E-class and then decide to spend $48k on a Cadillac.  But that is Cadillac's (and Lexus, Acura and Infiniti) best move to undercut on price.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    A $60K Corvette competes with the $100K Porsche 911, so yes they are cross shopping. I just do not know how many more times this has to be explained to you. If a Maybach was once able to "compete" with a Rolls Royce, despite the HUGE price gulf between, then a Cadillac can sure as hell compete with an overpriced Benz.

    Are you kidding me? A similar in power AMG GT 4-door STARTS at $140K. It better beat everything Cadillac has. We won't even get into the oft delayed EVs from Benz. Vaporware does not count.

    I don't think anything competes with Rolls-Royce.  The original Maybach did, but the current Maybach does not.  Nor does Mercedes claim it to, the point of Maybach is to elevate the brand over BMW and Audi and maybe go after Bentley. 

    Also Cadillac is more than welcome to make a sedan that starts at $140k, no one is stopping them.  They can go up market if they want, but instead they killed the CT6 and replaced the CTS with a $10k cheaper CT5.  So I think we know what direction Cadillac wants to go.  And same goes for Lincoln or Acura, they don't have to build all their products on a Ford/Honda chassis with a turbo 4 or share switchgear, they choose to do that.  Which is why most buyers choose not to buy their product.  And that's fair both ways.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The original Maybach did

    100 years ago.  That was your grandfather's time.  The time of Duesenbergs of which the Duesys would put Rolls Royces to shame.  Which nobody today references other than a small teeny weeny part of the automotive enthusiast world.    I would stop using Maybach in that kind of reference  because Duesenbergs are as relevant today as Maybachs are...  And quite honestly, Maybachs were ugly.  Duesy's were pretty.

    27 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Also Cadillac is more than welcome to make a sedan that starts at $140k, no one is stopping them.

    YOU found it strange that a CT5-V Blackwing could be optioned to $125 000.  

    28 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

     They can go up market if they want, but instead they killed the CT6 and replaced the CTS with a $10k cheaper CT5.  So I think we know what direction Cadillac wants to go.

    Well... dont forget that a Celestiq is coming...

    https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/03/cadillac-celestiq-electric-flagship-sedan-in-development/comment-page-2/   

     

    Quote

     

    General Motors plans to announce the development of the Cadillac Celestiq flagship luxury sedan during its EV Day press event in Michigan today.

    The Cadillac Celestiq will represent “the ultimate expression of Cadillac design and technology, with a bold, dramatic presence, and unparalleled refinement and innovation,”

     

     

    A BOUTIQUE vehicle personally and custom built to the buyer.  

    Several posters in this forum questioned this vehicle, including yourself,  because of where Cadillac was 30 years ago. However, the new 2021 Escalade PROVES that the engineers and product developers over at Cadillac finally understand what Cadillac was and is all about.    YOU keep on mentioning Maybach, but fail to realize that Cadillac is REALLY going back to its beginnings.  

    The Corvette C8 also proves what the best from General Motors could accomplish further proving that the Celestiq WILL be a true Rolls Royce competitor.  

    The Blackwing CT6 was done for because of the push to EVs.  The Cadillac money, R&D energy that is the engineering and product developers needed to step away from the CT6 to further concentrate the oush further to EVs, the BEV3 platform, the Lyriq and the especially the Celestiq.   BECASUE the Celestiq is to be a BOUTIQUE, custom built by hand, all the PROPER LOGISTICS need to be in place for that to happen...

    YOU see it as GM beancounting and downsizing.  Reality says that GM is being SERIOUS in giving Cadillac the PROPER tools to actually BECOME Cadillac again...

      

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    That is true for everyone, no one really stocks base models, but it is starting point for reference.  The Mercedes is BMW options list is probably longer than anyone outside of Porsche.  I also don't know how many people are looking at a $60k 5-series or E-class and then decide to spend $48k on a Cadillac.  But that is Cadillac's (and Lexus, Acura and Infiniti) best move to undercut on price.

    The reference starting point would be ATP per model (with some allowance toward how each is equipped... but I submit it does not have to be an exact match). That tells you what the consumer is willing to spend. Stripped with zero options and every box checked is irrelevant. IDK of those per-model figures are available. 

     

    48 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I don't think anything competes with Rolls-Royce.  The original Maybach did, but the current Maybach does not.

    Yeah- the Maybach 1.0 was a rebadge with a 1970's 2-tone paint job. No coupe, no convertible, no SUV. It didn't compete. 
    But more to the point- what a monstrous missed opportunity for MB; RR sold 5152 cars last year; there's a market there for sure. This is a huge feather in BMW's cap vs. Daimler.

    The problem here is two-fold; 'mercedes' doesn't have anywhere near the rep / clout as RR, and the name 'Maybach' now ranks up there with Edsel as a failed brand. It can never return as an independent brand.

    Frankly, Rolls needs to charge more, as they also lose money on every car (2019 profit / 2020 production), but half of what Daimler did building a cheaper car.  

    48 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Nor does Mercedes claim it to

    When the news broke that Maybach was being eliminated, Daimler absolutely stated they would "expand the s-class, still hoping to compete with the likes of Rolls Royce & Bentley, aiming to capture more of the market that the 2 storied British brands have successfully expanded into with 'lower end' models that range between $180K and $300K." [ ~ WSJ]

    The '21 s650 Maybach starts at $202K and you can only build it up to $230K [ I said 'only'], so Daimler is leaving $70K on the table.

    Of course, they'd never get that in this segment.

    Maybach was a great opportunity, but it was a miserable, mismanaged failure.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    You found it strange that a CT5-V Blackwing could be optioned to $125 000.  

    Well... dont forget that a Celestiq is coming...

    https://gmauthority.com/blog/2020/03/cadillac-celestiq-electric-flagship-sedan-in-development/comment-page-2/  

     

     

    A BOUTIQUE vehicle personally and custom built to the buyer.  

    Several posters in this forum questioned this vehicle, including yourself,  because of where Cadillac was 30 years ago. However, the new 2021 Escalade PROVES that the engineers and product developers over at Cadillac finally understand what Cadillac was and is all about.    YOU keep on mentioning Maybach, but fail to realize that Cadillac is REALLY going back to its beginnings.  

    The Corvette C8 also proves what the best from General Motors could accomplish further proving that the Celestiq WILL be a true Rolls Royce competitor.  

    YOU see it as GM beancounting and downsizing.  Reality says that GM is being SERIOUS in giving Cadillac the PROPER tools to actually BECOME Cadillac again...

      

    Because the CT5 starts at $36k and the interior is nowhere near what you should get in a $100k car, let alone $125k.   If the CT5 had an interior on par with the 2021 Escalade, then it would be a worthy A6/E/5 competitor.

    They better bring it with Celestiq, and I hope they do.  Cadillac needs serious cars, not Chevy/GMC re-engineered products.    Celestiq will not be a Rolls-Royce competitor.  They couldn't even compete with an A8 on the CT6, now all of a sudden they are going after the Phantom?  

    • Disagree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I don't think anything competes with Rolls-Royce.  The original Maybach did, but the current Maybach does not.  Nor does Mercedes claim it to, the point of Maybach is to elevate the brand over BMW and Audi and maybe go after Bentley. 

    Also Cadillac is more than welcome to make a sedan that starts at $140k, no one is stopping them.  They can go up market if they want, but instead they killed the CT6 and replaced the CTS with a $10k cheaper CT5.  So I think we know what direction Cadillac wants to go.  And same goes for Lincoln or Acura, they don't have to build all their products on a Ford/Honda chassis with a turbo 4 or share switchgear, they choose to do that.  Which is why most buyers choose not to buy their product.  And that's fair both ways.

    Pay attention to what I said. The original Maybach was built to compete with RR but was far cheaper, something you were clearly okay with, yet somehow the CT5 can’t compete with the E Class because it is also cheaper? Olds is right. Get new material because what you’ve said on this entire thread is old, outdated, and at times just flat out wrong. 

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    Because the CT5 starts at $36k and the interior is nowhere near what you should get in a $100k car, let alone $125k.   If the CT5 had an interior on par with the 2021 Escalade, then it would be a worthy A6/E/5 competitor.

    They better bring it with Celestiq, and I hope they do.  Cadillac needs serious cars, not Chevy/GMC re-engineered products.    Celestiq will not be a Rolls-Royce competitor.  They couldn't even compete with an A8 on the CT6, now all of a sudden they are going after the Phantom?  

    Except it’s not a $36K caddy competing with a $100K car. It’s an $85K Blackwing that does and until you’ve actually sat in said Blackwing, you are just talking out of thin air about the interior. Shall we bring up how plain Jane a base E Class interior looks? Nothing but black everywhere I see. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    Because the CT5 starts at $36k and the interior is nowhere near what you should get in a $100k car, let alone $125k.   If the CT5 had an interior on par with the 2021 Escalade, then it would be a worthy A6/E/5 competitor.

    They better bring it with Celestiq, and I hope they do.  Cadillac needs serious cars, not Chevy/GMC re-engineered products.    Celestiq will not be a Rolls-Royce competitor.  They couldn't even compete with an A8 on the CT6, now all of a sudden they are going after the Phantom?  

    But a badge reengineered S Class is okay for the likes of the Maybach name though right?

     

    Again, get new material. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/7/2021 at 9:39 AM, balthazar said:

    Mercedes sold 75,000 FWD-based vehicles in the (down) year of '20 in the U.S. alone. 

    Vast majority of these in both cases are AWD, but at least Cadillac isn't building FWD-based sports sedans

    Knock it all you'd like, the CLA45 is a pretty bad-ass little sedan. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    CT4-V Blackwing is better.

    At what? 

    I mean, I think I'd prefer the RWD CT4-Vwith a manual transmission as well but that doesn't take anything away from how bad-@ss the CLA45 is. 

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    At what? 

    I mean, I think I'd prefer the RWD CT4-Vwith a manual transmission as well but that doesn't take anything away from how bad-@ss the CLA45 is. 

    Define what is bad ass about the CLA45?

    I think your meaning AMG CLA45 and even then that is just a turd of a Jellybean style wise. Nothing that makes it look any hotter compared to the Cadillac.

    And dare we say a true from the start RWD for Cadillac, True from the Start FWD for the CLA!

    AMG CLA45

    image.png

    CT4-V

    image.png

    CT4-V Blackwing

    image.png

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    CT4-V Blackwing is better.

     

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    At what? 

    I mean, I think I'd prefer the RWD CT4-Vwith a manual transmission as well but that doesn't take anything away from how bad-@ss the CLA45 is. 

    The Alpha platform is superbly weighted and balanced, one of the absolute best balanced platforms in the industry. The FWD based CLA does not have that. 

    The Alpha platform does everything that the enthusiast crowd loved about BMWs from 2003 before BMWs got heavy and lost their steering feel.  But Pole movers like SMK pulled up the goal and decided that flabby 3-series were the new ideal. 

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    Pay attention to what I said. The original Maybach was built to compete with RR but was far cheaper, something you were clearly okay with, yet somehow the CT5 can’t compete with the E Class because it is also cheaper? Olds is right. Get new material because what you’ve said on this entire thread is old, outdated, and at times just flat out wrong. 

    Except it’s not a $36K caddy competing with a $100K car. It’s an $85K Blackwing that does and until you’ve actually sat in said Blackwing, you are just talking out of thin air about the interior. Shall we bring up how plain Jane a base E Class interior looks? Nothing but black everywhere I see. 

    The 2005 Maybach 62 cost MORE than the 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom by $46,250.   And the base model Maybach 57 had the same price as the Phantom.  Then 2 years later Maybach put the 57S and 62S on sale and the 57S was 40k more than a Phantom and the 62S was about $100,000 more than the Phantom.  I don't know why you think the Maybach's were cheaper than a Rolls.  

    As far as the CT5 goes, The CTS undercut the 5-series and E-class by $10k, and the CT5 undercuts the CTS by $10k.   If Cadillac wanted an E-class competitor why did they price it lower than the CTS?  Why not upgrade the vehicle and move it up market.  

     

     

    23 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    But a badge reengineered S Class is okay for the likes of the Maybach name though right?

     

    Again, get new material. 

    The Maybach name is a trim level.  Why is GMC Yukon Denali a good idea and S-class Maybach not a good idea?  It is the same thing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The 2005 Maybach 62 cost MORE than the 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom by $46,250.   And the base model Maybach 57 had the same price as the Phantom.  Then 2 years later Maybach put the 57S and 62S on sale and the 57S was 40k more than a Phantom and the 62S was about $100,000 more than the Phantom.  I don't know why you think the Maybach's were cheaper than a Rolls.  

    As far as the CT5 goes, The CTS undercut the 5-series and E-class by $10k, and the CT5 undercuts the CTS by $10k.   If Cadillac wanted an E-class competitor why did they price it lower than the CTS?  Why not upgrade the vehicle and move it up market.  

     

     

    The Maybach name is a trim level.  Why is GMC Yukon Denali a good idea and S-class Maybach not a good idea?  It is the same thing.

    And there you go moving the field goal around the yard to justify you avoiding answering real questions and pushing your own Kool-Aid Daimler agenda.

    ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    The Alpha platform is superbly weighted and balanced, one of the absolute best balanced platforms in the industry. The FWD based CLA does not have that. 

    The Alpha platform does everything that the enthusiast crowd loved about BMWs from 2003 before BMWs got heavy and lost their steering feel.  But Pole movers like SMK pulled up the goal and decided that flabby 3-series were the new ideal. 

    The CLA45 is faster around a racetrack than the Alpha platform ATS-V, the CT4-V and CT5-V.  So if the Alpha platform was that good, shouldn't a 464 hp ATS-V be faster around the track than a 382 hp CLA45?  

    Also I don't t think Cadillac owners were asking for an E90 3-series with a cheaper interior.  Which is why the ATS tanked, wrong car for the market, and the CT4 sales are tanking and it hasn't even been on sale long.  

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    The Alpha platform is superbly weighted and balanced, one of the absolute best balanced platforms in the industry. The FWD based CLA does not have that. 

    The Alpha platform does everything that the enthusiast crowd loved about BMWs from 2003 before BMWs got heavy and lost their steering feel.  But Pole movers like SMK pulled up the goal and decided that flabby 3-series were the new ideal. 

    Oh I've never said the Alpha platform cars weren't of the best in the industry. Just the broad statement "CT4-V Blackwing is better" is awfully generalized. 

    Also, I'm not trying to take a single thing away from the CT4-VB, I'm just saying the CLA45 isn't one that should really be criticized as it's great in its own way. Yeah, it's roots are "wrong wheel drive" but it's received great reviews for being an absolute hoot to drive. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, David said:

    Define what is bad ass about the CLA45?

    I think your meaning AMG CLA45 and even then that is just a turd of a Jellybean style wise. Nothing that makes it look any hotter compared to the Cadillac.

    And dare we say a true from the start RWD for Cadillac, True from the Start FWD for the CLA!

    AMG CLA45

    image.png

    CT4-V

    image.png

    CT4-V Blackwing

    image.png

    First of all, I'm not dismissing the CT4-VB. I'm saying the CLA45 isn't one to pick on. It's freakin quick(0-60 in 4 seconds flat - yes, 0.2 slower than the CT4-VB, negligible unless you're smk), AWD system capable of "drift mode", and it still receives all sorts of praise for it's handling while being wrong-wheel drive-based. 

    Looks are subjective and I'm not a fan of the CT4's overall styling. It just doesn't do much for me nor does the CLA. CT5 is better with the longer proportions. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, David said:

    And there you go moving the field goal around the yard to justify you avoiding answering real questions and pushing your own Kool-Aid Daimler agenda.

    ?

    What goal post, it was stated that Maybach was cheaper than Rolls and that is the same as Cadillac being cheaper than Mercedes.  Except the Maybach was NOT CHEAPER than a Rolls, they were priced the same.  Cadillac prices their cars below the Germans not the same like Maybach did when they went against Rolls-Royce.  

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The 2005 Maybach 62 cost MORE than the 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom by $46,250.   And the base model Maybach 57 had the same price as the Phantom.  Then 2 years later Maybach put the 57S and 62S on sale and the 57S was 40k more than a Phantom and the 62S was about $100,000 more than the Phantom.  I don't know why you think the Maybach's were cheaper than a Rolls.  

    As far as the CT5 goes, The CTS undercut the 5-series and E-class by $10k, and the CT5 undercuts the CTS by $10k.   If Cadillac wanted an E-class competitor why did they price it lower than the CTS?  Why not upgrade the vehicle and move it up market.  

     

     

    The Maybach name is a trim level.  Why is GMC Yukon Denali a good idea and S-class Maybach not a good idea?  It is the same thing.

    Fair point on the price front, back then. However, they still couldn’t compete and sold the remaining US back overseas when the sales turned sour. Now, they are exponentially cheaper than the Rolls while still thinking they are competing with them. The core point stands. You feel it’s okay for them to target the big boys at a lower price point but somehow it’s wrong for Cadillac to do the same. That’s the goalpost moving we are all referring to. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    What goal post, it was stated that Maybach was cheaper than Rolls and that is the same as Cadillac being cheaper than Mercedes.  Except the Maybach was NOT CHEAPER than a Rolls, they were priced the same.  Cadillac prices their cars below the Germans not the same like Maybach did when they went against Rolls-Royce.  

    Yet you struggle to not stay focused on the FACT this was about the Cadillac CT4 & 5 V-Blackwing edition. Everyone time someone points out how Daimler is now BEHIND Cadillac, you have to throw in EVERYTHING else NOT RELATED to this focus on this thread.

    What does Rolls or Maybach have to do with the BlackWings? NOTHING, you could ignore and just stay focus and would be better for it, but you have to flitter off into the back 40 Upper 40 Lower 40 to play smoke n mirrors about the fact that Cadillac Luxury maker has a pair of high quality LUXURY Speed Demon cars and Daimler is now BEHIND them. 

    Normal as everyone leap frogs in this industry.

    You would rather bring in CUVs, FWD Appliance auto's that have been heavily massaged by their AMG division of lower level or higher level than seeing where these auto's truly are.

    What Ever! ?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The CLA45 is faster around a racetrack than the Alpha platform ATS-V, the CT4-V and CT5-V.  So if the Alpha platform was that good, shouldn't a 464 hp ATS-V be faster around the track than a 382 hp CLA45?  

    Also I don't t think Cadillac owners were asking for an E90 3-series with a cheaper interior.  Which is why the ATS tanked, wrong car for the market, and the CT4 sales are tanking and it hasn't even been on sale long.  

    The top of the line CLA45 should be faster than a no longer made ATS-V or mid-range CT4-V. Again, those goalposts are getting mighty tired. 

    5 minutes ago, David said:

    Yet you struggle to not stay focused on the FACT this was about the Cadillac CT4 & 5 V-Blackwing edition. Everyone time someone points out how Daimler is now BEHIND Cadillac, you have to throw in EVERYTHING else NOT RELATED to this focus on this thread.

    What does Rolls or Maybach have to do with the BlackWings? NOTHING, you could ignore and just stay focus and would be better for it, but you have to flitter off into the back 40 Upper 40 Lower 40 to play smoke n mirrors about the fact that Cadillac Luxury maker has a pair of high quality LUXURY Speed Demon cars and Daimler is now BEHIND them. 

    Normal as everyone leap frogs in this industry.

    You would rather bring in CUVs, FWD Appliance auto's that have been heavily massaged by their AMG division of lower level or higher level than seeing where these auto's truly are.

    What Ever! ?

    To be fair, I brought up Maybach and Rolls (their huge current price differences) in counter to his assumption that Cadillac can’t compete with lower priced models n

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The whole point, that SMK intentionally misses is that Cadillac can compete at a lower price point and that’s mostly because the German competition is overpriced in the U.S. to begin with. It’s not that hard to figure out honestly but that BS has hijacked this thread for too long so...again, I love that a six speed manual comes standard on the Caddy’s!

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    Fair point on the price front, back then. However, they still couldn’t compete and sold the remaining US back overseas when the sales turned sour. Now, they are exponentially cheaper than the Rolls while still thinking they are competing with them. The core point stands. You feel it’s okay for them to target the big boys at a lower price point but somehow it’s wrong for Cadillac to do the same. That’s the goalpost moving we are all referring to. 

    But they aren't targeting Rolls-Royce anymore.  They tried and it didn't work.   What they did realize is that there are people that will pay for an upgraded S-class or GLS to be chauffeured in, and they capitalized on that market.  Really Cadillac should do the same with the Escalade and Celestiq and maybe Lyric, I don't know how expensive that will be.   But China has a lot of chauffeur driven cars.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    The whole point, that SMK intentionally misses is that Cadillac can compete at a lower price point and that’s mostly because the German competition is overpriced in the U.S. to begin with. It’s not that hard to figure out honestly but that BS has hijacked this thread for too long so...again, I love that a six speed manual comes standard on the Caddy’s!

    Cadillac's best argument is that they are cheaper than the Germans.   I think Cadillac should target Acura, Infiniti and Lincoln and really try to dominate those makers who they can probably almost put out of business if they tried.  They aren't going to convert the Tesla faithful nor are they going to beat the Germans, it has been 20 years of seriously trying to compete with the Germans, and 20 more years before that with half-ass attempts like the Cimarron and Allante and Seville.  I don't understand why they keep trying the same old stuff.

    And I watched the Autoline interview with Cadillac's chief engineer, and I sort of got the sense that this is both the last hurrah of their gas performance sedans, and he sort of mentioned they looked at a rear drive SUV, but didn't go that direction.  I think GM won't put money into a gas Cadillac after this year, and XT4/XT5/XT6 will probably be around as is for another 4-5 years as they just die on the vine, before they just make this brand all EV.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    But they aren't targeting Rolls-Royce anymore.  They tried and it didn't work.   What they did realize is that there are people that will pay for an upgraded S-class or GLS to be chauffeured in, and they capitalized on that market.  Really Cadillac should do the same with the Escalade and Celestiq and maybe Lyric, I don't know how expensive that will be.   But China has a lot of chauffeur driven cars.

    They are still targeting RR as well as Bentley. 

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    Cadillac's best argument is that they are cheaper than the Germans.   I think Cadillac should target Acura, Infiniti and Lincoln and really try to dominate those makers who they can probably almost put out of business if they tried.  They aren't going to convert the Tesla faithful nor are they going to beat the Germans, it has been 20 years of seriously trying to compete with the Germans, and 20 more years before that with half-ass attempts like the Cimarron and Allante and Seville.  I don't understand why they keep trying the same old stuff.

    And I watched the Autoline interview with Cadillac's chief engineer, and I sort of got the sense that this is both the last hurrah of their gas performance sedans, and he sort of mentioned they looked at a rear drive SUV, but didn't go that direction.  I think GM won't put money into a gas Cadillac after this year, and XT4/XT5/XT6 will probably be around as is for another 4-5 years as they just die on the vine, before they just make this brand all EV.

    Not even bothering with the rest of the nonsense and I’ll just focus on your first sentence. Price was not best argument when cars like the 2nd gen CTS-V was spanking the Germans. It was the better drivers car overall. The same applies to the Blackwing as well. 
     

    I do find it a bit hilarious that you think Cadillac won’t convert Tesla owners but I bet you think Benz can even though they are further down the EV pipeline than GM. Just stop the fanboy nonsense already. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, David said:

    Everyone time someone points out how Daimler is now BEHIND Cadillac, you have to throw in EVERYTHING else NOT RELATED to this focus on this thread.

    Diamler isn't behind Cadillac, in pretty much any metric you'd like to use. 

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, David said:

    What does Rolls or Maybach have to do with the BlackWings? NOTHING, you could ignore and just stay focus and would be better for it, but you have to flitter off into the back 40 Upper 40 Lower 40 to play smoke n mirrors about the fact that Cadillac Luxury maker has a pair of high quality LUXURY Speed Demon cars and Daimler is now BEHIND them. 

    Scroll back and you'll find USA and Balthy mentioned Rolls and Maybach before smk did, Thursday, to help with your search. 

    If you're an honest man, you'd get on those two for mentioning Rolls and Maybach. 

    Diamler is miles ahead of Cadillac. Cadillac wishes and dreams they could be what Mercedes and BMW are. 

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Daimler isn't competing with Cadillac, it's competing with General Motors.

    GM is worth 15% / $10 billion more than Daimler, and sold 7.7 million units in '19, vs. 2.8 million.

    - - - - -
    Ya, I'm sure it was me who sent things down another track. Oopsie.

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Daimler isn't competing with Cadillac, it's competing with General Motors.

    GM is worth 15% / $10 billion more than Daimler, and sold 7.7 million units in '19, vs. 2.8 million.

    - - - - -
    Ya, I'm sure it was me who sent things down another track. Oopsie.

    I assume that is before the split of Diamler's large truck division? I'm not sure what percentage of business that is, but I'd assume it is a decent chunk and "Diamler" will be worth a good bit less. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Those that cannot accept a multi-cultural world and immigration deserve to lose everything. I will stay professional, but believe that our North American Economy is about to get far worse over the long term than it is now. It is amazing how people do not seem to realize that the first two years of a new president is dealing with the ramifications of the last president. The high inflation was due to the failed policies of those before. We now have low unemployment and a strong economy. Will be interesting to see how it ends.
    • I say, let it get worse.  The people have spoken and this is what the MAJORITY voted for.  He even got the popular vote.  Therefore the people of America have spoken.   This is what they want.  This is what they feel comfortable with.   But I dont want to hear ANY whining from ANYBODY about what possibly may happen with him Him in power.  Fool me once,  shame on you!  Fool me twice, shame on me?   Technically this is how that saying goes.  But you never know. Maybe it really IS the lefty libtards that are the problem.   Hopefully it IS the lefty libtards that are the problem and the Messiah Trump will BE the solution to ALL of our problems.   I will be the first one to apologize if He actually does fix America's and Canada's problems.  And unite ALL of the world and the world gets to sing Kumbaya ALL in unison. Hopefully He is the next coming of Christ.   Keeping my fingers crossed but I aint holding my breath if you know what I mean.   
    • @oldshurst442 This pretty much sums up just how bad it is going to get. Trump's economic plans would worsen inflation, experts say | AP News
    • Not just iPhones... He tariffed Canadian wood the first time around as Pres and the prices of wood skyrocketed so American home builders bought American wood which was and is more expensive than Canadian wood.  I guess that is good for American wood producers. But for the fact that house prices also skyrocketed.  And considering that Canada and US have a more or less good trading thing going on...so not that good.  Not for the US and not good for Canada.  But Donald thinks otherwise. And all the folk that voted for him this time around think that the economy will get better?  I hope so for their sake. But Elon and Jeff B's billions rose quite a bit upon the announcement of his re-election.  I wonder if those  people that voted for him, I wonder if their wealth also rose instantly?    You poor bastards... You have no idea what is coming to you... (those that voted for him.  With the excemption of the rich of course)     Donnie Rides Again
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search