Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    2020 Cadillac CT4-V and CT5-V Aren't As Powerful As Their Predecessors

      ...More Potent Versions Could Be In the Pipeline...


    At an event tonight in Detroit, Cadillac delivered a one-two punch for those craving for a bit of performance with the introduction of the 2020 CT4-V and CT5-V. On paper, the two models aren't what we were expecting. Instead of the firebreathing monsters that were the ATS-V and CTS-V, the CT4 and CT5-V are more in line with middle children of German automakers - Audi S4, BMW M340i, and Mercedes-AMG C43 and E43.

    CT4-V

    To say we're a bit surprised that Cadillac is showing off the performance variant of their upcoming entry-level sedan would be an understatement - the reveal of the standard CT4 is expected to happen in a few weeks. Aimed at the likes of the Audi S3 and Mercedes-AMG A45, the CT4-V uses a 2.7L turbo-four from the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. It makes 320 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. Power flows through a 10-speed automatic to either rear or all four wheels. No manual is available. Other mechanical bits to be aware of are four-piston brake calipers at all corners, and Magnetic Ride Control being standard on RWD models - AWD sticks with conventional shocks.

    Design-wise, the CT4-V looks like it could be mid-cycle facelift for the ATS with a similar profile. The front end mimics the larger CT5 with a wide grille and unique headlight shape. Around back, there is a boat tail effect for the trunk lid with a small lip spoiler and quad tailpipes.

    CT5-V

    Cadillac appears to be playing it quiet with the CT5-V's design. The only bits that set it apart from the standard model are the dark trim, quad-tailpipes, rear diffuser, and new wheels. Under the hood is a twin-turbo 3.0L V6 making 355 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque. For those keeping score, that's 20 more horsepower than the CT5 with this same engine, while torque is unchanged. Like the CT4-V, the CT5 routes power through a 10-speed automatic and either rear- or all-wheel drive. An electronically controlled limited-slip differential, Magnetic Ride Control, Performance Traction Management system, and four-piston brakes finish off the changes.

    The CT4-V and CT5-V are expected to go on sale early next year.

    Our Big Concern

    We find ourselves wondering what is Cadillac thinking? On paper, these models make more sense as V-Sport models considering what's being presented. Badging them as V dilutes hardcore image that the past few models have brought forth. Why is Cadillac doing this? Autoblog may have an answer. According to a Cadillac representative, the brand is wanting to bring in a broader set of buyers to showrooms, hence they are making them less hardcore. This will allow them to bring V versions of other models like their crossovers. But there are hardcore versions coming in the pipeline according to the rep.

    Still, we can't help but wonder if GM has done their classic move of shooting themselves in the foot.

    Source: Cadillac


    Cadillac Reveals First-Ever CT4-V and CT5-V

    • Expanded lineup adds more choices for spirited performance. Highlights include available Super Cruise, AWD, Magnetic Ride Control 4.0, eLSD and new V-Mode

    Driven by Cadillac’s latest turbocharging technology and building on more than 15 years of performance credentials, the first-ever 2020 CT4-V and CT5-V were unveiled today, expanding choices for the brand’s V-Series performance sub-brand.

    Following the 2019 CT6-V, they grow the V-Series family with even more levels of performance, while preserving the lineage established by the original V-Series lineup introduced in 2004.   

    “The new V-Series sedan lineup defines modern sophistication by combining luxury appointments with thoughtful technology and athletic refinement for the discerning enthusiast,” said Brandon Vivian, Cadillac executive chief engineer. “We are inviting even more customers into the V-Series family by adding a new level of elevated performance between our Sport models and the ultimate, high-performance track capability that the V-Series has grown to represent.”

    The first-ever CT4 and recently introduced CT5 represent Cadillac’s realigned sedan portfolio, characterized by new proportions, innovative technologies and more appearance and performance choices. Each is built on Cadillac’s award-winning rear-wheel-drive Alpha architecture, with the V-Series models developed to deliver the ultimate blend of performance, presence and road-going refinement.

    Both share the latest standard V-Series performance technologies, including Magnetic Ride Control 4.0, which is tuned specifically for V models to enhance comfort without sacrificing performance-oriented responsiveness, and drive modes that include new V-Mode personalization. Each model is available in RWD or AWD and features a 10-speed automatic transmission, Brembo front brakes with eBoost electronic assist and a limited-slip rear differential on CT4-V and electronic limited-slip differential on CT5-V.

    Cadillac’s exclusive Super Cruise1, the first true hands-free driver assistance feature for the freeway, is available on more than 130,000 miles of limited-access freeways in the U.S. and Canada. It will be available on both new V-Series models.  

    “The new lineup expands the V-Series ethos, drawing more customers into the Cadillac Performance family, and the newest Vs are focused on elevated athleticism and luxurious refinement for customers wanting a dynamic daily drive,” said Mark Reuss, GM president. “And this is only the beginning of the V family. Cadillac’s passion for performance shines on a racetrack. Stay tuned.”

    Vehicle highlights

    CT5-V — The first-ever CT5-V builds on the precision-focused details of the all-new luxury sedan introduced earlier this year to offer elevated road performance and an engaging driving experience.  

    • Powered by Cadillac’s high-output 3.0L Twin Turbo V-6 engine, which uses low-inertia turbochargers to enhance power production across the rpm band. It is rated at a Cadillac-estimated 355 horsepower (265 kW), pending SAE certification.
    • 10-speed automatic transmission.
    • Electronic limited-slip rear differential.
    • Standard RWD and available AWD.
    • V-Series performance chassis with Magnetic Ride Control 4.0.
    • Performance Traction Management.
    • Vehicle Control Mode with customizable V-Mode.
    • Brembo front braking system.
    • 19-inch wheels and summer-only performance tires2 (all-season tires available with AWD).
    • Dark exterior accents and V-Series mesh grilles; unique rear diffuser and quad exhaust tips.
    • Super Cruise1 available.
    • Unique performance persona instrument cluster and V-Mode steering wheel control.

    CT4-V — Developed for a new generation of sedan customers, the first-ever CT4 blends nimble handling and Cadillac’s signature technology. The CT4-V takes these traits further, infusing the brand’s racing DNA for a dynamic, responsive and exhilarating driving experience.   

    • Powered by Cadillac’s high-output 2.7L Turbo engine featuring a unique three-step sliding camshaft that helps optimize performance at all speeds. It is rated at a Cadillac-estimated 320 horsepower (239 kW), pending SAE certification.
    • 10-speed automatic.
    • Limited-slip rear differential.
    • V-Series performance chassis with Magnetic Ride Control 4.0 (on RWD) or ZF MVS passive dampers (on AWD).
    • Vehicle Control Mode with customizable V-Mode.
    • Brembo front braking system.
    • 18-inch wheels and summer-only performance tires2 (all-season tires available with AWD).
    • Near-perfect 50/50 weight distribution for an exceptional feeling of balance and control.
    • Dark exterior accents and V-Series mesh grilles; quad exhaust tips, unique rear spoiler design that helps reduce rear lift while increasing grip for the rear tires.
    • Super Cruise1 available.
    • Unique performance persona instrument cluster and V-Mode steering wheel control.

    MORE TO COME
    The CT4-V and CT5-V go on sale early in the 2020 calendar year, with production at GM’s Lansing Grand River facility in Michigan. Additional product information, as well as details on additional V-Series variants and CT4 Luxury, Premium Luxury and Sport models, will be announced at a later date.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    18 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    I also love the '57 Eldorado Biarritz and place it high on my list as the '59

    Image result for 1957 cadillac eldorado biarritz

    I definitely wouldn’t kick it out of my driveway but the ‘59 has always drawn me in. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Biarritz came about when the prior convtertible-only Eldorado gained a hardtop in '56. Then; Seville=hardtop, Biarritz=convertible. In '61 the 'E' went back to being a convert only, was still called the Eldorado Biarritz thru ‘64. In '65 the series moved to become a sub-model; the Fleetwood Eldorado. This went thru at least ‘75. In ‘71 the hardtop reappeared. In the first year the convertible 'E' was gone, ‘77, the Biarritz returned and became-yes; a top level Eldorado luxury trim package.

    In '84, the convertible reappeared, but I see both a Biarritz hardtop trim and a Biarritz convertible mentioned for that year. '86 was the year of the (again) downsized 'E', handsome design but just. so. small. BIarritz package still available. By '92, I don't see it in the brochure; it was the Eldorado and the Eldorado Touring Coupe.

     

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Chevy and its Corvette NEED to go racing in the GT class WITH Ferrari, Porsche.

    Im not so sure Aston Martin needs this as much as they think they do. But Ill tell you one thing. They thought beating Ferrari, Porsche and Corvette is a status for them. 

     

    I do think that potential Corvette buyers in Europe care for IMSA wins.  Not so much for the American market though...

    Cadillac potential owners in China, Europe and in the US couldnt give two shytes about racing...

     

    I do agree that a lot of buyers don't care about motor racing, they are going to buy what they like.  Maybe some hardcore racing fans build up loyalty to a team and that helps build brand image and loyalty and that's all good.  I think in Europe it matter more than anywhere else, racing seems more popular there.

    GM's 6.2 liter V8 isn't European emissions compliant so this summer GM is pulling all V8 models form Europe, that includes the Corvette, so no need to worry about potential buyers there. 

    Regardless of what happens on the racetrack, the Chevrolet dealership experience isn't going to rival the Aston Martin or Porsche or Ferrari dealership experience.  

    2 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Didnt Cadillac have a Biarritz trim that did what ya'll are clamouring for Cadillac to do?

    I would want that too, but I also want Cadillac NOT to sell vehicles below a certain price point.  In fact, I prefer they stop selling vehicles below the 50 000 dollar threshold over a Biarritz/Avenir/Denali/ higher trim nameplate...

    And NO to the idea of a sub brand higher than Cadillac.

    Cadillac is...CADILLAC. Point finale.   

    A higher trim...yes...but not a sub brand.   Lets first start by  nixing the vehicles in those price points that are NOT befitting of the Cadillac name and then everything else.

     

    Barritz would work.  They can make XT6 Barritz, CT6, Barritz, Escalade Barritz.  Make those top engine trim with acoustic laminated glass and extra sound deadening, executive rear seat packages, upgraded leather, suede or silk headliners, etc.  Put that fiber optic headliner in that Rolls Royce has.  Something to make it a special model with a 20% price hike or whatever is deemed appropriate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    And the bar gets kicked over once again. From your “platinum” excuse to this sports cars nonsense, the only one who seems that “concerned” about it is you. And funny how you bring up GMCs use of Denali when Mercedes is whoring the AMG name like they’re working a Vegas street corner. More of that fanboy hypocrisy showing. 

    Every AMG has legit performance credentials.  AMG has the Nurburgring record for SUV, station wagon and 4-door car.  The GTR Pro I think has the record for front engine/rear drive car.  I imagine an A45 hatch will take the hatchback record unless there is some ultra powered Renault Clio Sport out there that I don't know about.

    I don't know if a Terrain Denali screams luxury, where as a 416 hp A45 is pretty damn fast.  Although I don't really knock GMC for having Denali everything bees GMC isn't a luxury brand.  If Cadillac does Barritz, they should be going for high end luxury with that.  I say V-series every Cadillac too, 100% of Cadillacs should have a V-series, especially when 320 hp counts as V-series these says.  That is why I think they needs SUVs on a rear drive platform.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, smk4565 said:

    I do agree that a lot of buyers don't care about motor racing, they are going to buy what they like.  Maybe some hardcore racing fans build up loyalty to a team and that helps build brand image and loyalty and that's all good.  I think in Europe it matter more than anywhere else, racing seems more popular there.

    GM's 6.2 liter V8 isn't European emissions compliant so this summer GM is pulling all V8 models form Europe, that includes the Corvette, so no need to worry about potential buyers there. 

    Regardless of what happens on the racetrack, the Chevrolet dealership experience isn't going to rival the Aston Martin or Porsche or Ferrari dealership experience.  

    I agree to all...except to one...

    The bolded part. 

    Buying a Corvette at a Chevy dealership should NEVER feel like a Porsche/Ferrari/Aston Martin dealership...

    Buying a Corvette at a Chevrolet dealership should be EXACTLY like buying a Chevrolet at a Chevrolet dealership.

    Corvettes are not boutique cars. They are mass produced.  Corvette sales over the years have never been lower than 6000 units (excluding the first 2-3-years), have gotten a few 10 000-15 000 sales and for the most part been over 20 000 units. As high as 50  000 and Id say constantly selling 30 000 -40 000 units. 

    Porsche 911s have at their most, sold 12 000 units in the US.  twice they did that.  Porsche constantly sells 8000-9000 units in the US.   

    Aston Martin and Ferrari even less than that. A LOT less.  As they should sell A LOT less...

    If Corvette were to be its own brand, than Id say Corvette would most definitely better be boutique like AM, Porsche Ferrari. But alas, Corvette is but a Chevrolet. And NOTHING wrong with that. 

    Hardcore Ferrari guys are NOT buying 911s and hardcore 911 guys are NOT buying Ferraris and both of those guys are definitely not buying Corvettes.  And hardcore Corvette guys...well they are extremely happy when their hotrodded Corvette kicks Ferrari and 911 ass...

    Aston Martin guys...probably own 1 Ferrari,  1 Porsche 911 AND some sort of vintage Corvette...possibly even a new Vette...7

    Hardcore Ferrari guys have several Ferraris in their garage.  Hardcore 911 guys probably own some sort of classic muscle car, but they will NEVER admit to owning it... 

     

     

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Every AMG has legit performance credentials.  AMG has the Nurburgring record for SUV, station wagon and 4-door car.  The GTR Pro I think has the record for front engine/rear drive car.  I imagine an A45 hatch will take the hatchback record unless there is some ultra powered Renault Clio Sport out there that I don't know about.

    I don't know if a Terrain Denali screams luxury, where as a 416 hp A45 is pretty damn fast.  Although I don't really knock GMC for having Denali everything bees GMC isn't a luxury brand.  If Cadillac does Barritz, they should be going for high end luxury with that.  I say V-series every Cadillac too, 100% of Cadillacs should have a V-series, especially when 320 hp counts as V-series these says.  That is why I think they needs SUVs on a rear drive platform.

    Whatever you have to tell yourself. Once they decided to slap that AMG brand on a FWD CLA, that was the end of any legitimate discussion about brand exclusivity. Doesn’t matter what lap times they got in the ring when they just slap it on any model they feel they can milk a few more grand out of. Doesn’t mean they are all “legit”. 

     

    Honestly this discussion just gets old. Always the same crap about the Vette, Cadillac, and GM in general not being up to a Mercedes fanboys “lofty” standards. We will just skip the fact that Benz should be ashamed that cars like the Vette shame the majority of German cars for far less coin but hey, that “dime store” interior. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/7/2019 at 4:41 PM, dwightlooi said:

    Back to the topic... my opinion is VERY SIMPLE:-

    • 320hp CT4-V and 355hp CT5-V should where the V/ previously used on the VSport models.
    • The high performance CT4-V and CT5-V can wear the V# used on the current CTS-V and ATS-V cars.
    • Cadillac can call both V/ and V# cars CTS-V models
    • This will not hurt the CTS-V brand, it'll be subtle yet very easy to differential by anyone who cares.

    I also believe that a 420 hp version of the 2.7T four banger is the one engine GM really stands to benefit from across the greatest number of models, and that it is EASILY attainable.

    Can they put the 2.7 in transversely where the 2.0 currently sits?  I'm thinking XT4 here. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/8/2019 at 5:46 PM, riviera74 said:

    Actually, I like the Brougham idea.  I believe that most Cadillacs sold now have a Platinum trim level that matches or exceeds Avenir or Denali at the moment.  Maybe Platinum should be the sub-brand.

    Cadillac should have snagged the Pullman or Autobiography trademark before Mercedes and Land Rover respectively.    Does anyone use Portfolio?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Can they put the 2.7 in transversely where the 2.0 currently sits?  I'm thinking XT4 here. 

    It would make a lot of sense for an XT4-V.  I could see that engine in the XT5 also, if not as an option, maybe as the only option since it would out power the 6 and probably get better gas mileage.

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Cadillac should have snagged the Pullman or Autobiography trademark before Mercedes and Land Rover respectively.    Does anyone use Portfolio?

    Jaguar had Portfolio for a while.

    I don't know why they don't use Barritz or Brougham or something from their past.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Can they put the 2.7 in transversely where the 2.0 currently sits?  I'm thinking XT4 here. 

    Yes and no.

    (1) The engine isn't the problem. You need a new oil pan and exhaust down pipe of course but that's not a big deal. The 2.7T four banger is 10~12mm taller but that's shorter than the empty space under the 2.0T's dress cover.

    (2) GM's new 9-speed transmissions, however, DO NOT have the torque rating to handle 348 lb-ft much less any higher output version of the 2.7T. This is part of the reason Ford did not adopt the GM-Ford 9T65 transmission, but instead made an 8-speed version of the decade old GM-Ford 6T75 (used in the XTS VSport, etc.) which they called the 8F57 to handle the Ford Ecoboost 2.7T V6's 380 lb-ft in the Edge ST.

    Basically, the quickie solution will be for GM for buy a few Ford 8F57 trannies for these applications.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, dwightlooi said:

    Yes and no.

    (1) The engine isn't the problem. You need a new oil pan and exhaust down pipe of course but that's not a big deal. The 2.7T four banger is 10~12mm taller but that's shorter than the empty space under the 2.0T's dress cover.

    (2) GM's new 9-speed transmissions, however, DO NOT have the torque rating to handle 348 lb-ft much less any higher output version of the 2.7T. This is part of the reason Ford did not adopt the GM-Ford 9T65 transmission, but instead made an 8-speed version of the decade old GM-Ford 6T75 (used in the XTS VSport, etc.) which they called the 8F57 to handle the Ford Ecoboost 2.7T V6's 380 lb-ft in the Edge ST.

    Basically, the quickie solution will be for GM for buy a few Ford 8F57 trannies for these applications.

    Or just build a ten-speed transmission that will handle all that torque.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Or just build a ten-speed transmission that will handle all that torque.

    That'll take time, money and it'll be a tough engineering project. The 9T65 barely fits all the 9-gears in its envelope which is about the same as the 6T75. It actually uses a chain drive to connect the axle to the output ring gear. If you want more torque handling, the transmission needs get bigger or it needs to lose gears or it needs exotic materials.

    IMHO, speeds are not as useful as many people think. Ford did not find the 9-speeds to be any more efficient than its 8-speeds and hence did not adopt them despite paying for part of their R&D. What's more important is the ratio spread. I'll venture to say that a 6-speed or even 5-speed will be practically as efficient as a 9 or 10-speed if it has the same ratio spread of 7.6:1. This is particularly so when you have an engine with a torque plateau of 348 lb-ft @ 1500-4000 rpm.

    Edited by dwightlooi
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am sure ZF makes something off the shelf that is transverse and can handle 350 lb-ft.  If they really wanted a higher output XT4 there are options out there.  In XT5 with more room I think it would be a no-brainer.  

    Although if XT4 and XT5 were built on the alpha platform, then none of this would be an issue.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    I am sure ZF makes something off the shelf that is transverse and can handle 350 lb-ft.  If they really wanted a higher output XT4 there are options out there.  In XT5 with more room I think it would be a no-brainer.  

    Although if XT4 and XT5 were built on the alpha platform, then none of this would be an issue.

    Actually, no, they don't.

    Borg-Warner has a Transverse 7-speed Dual Clutch with 440 lb-ft handling though. When used by VW-Audi Group it carries the designation DQ500. You'll find that in the RS3, the Golf R and the like.

    Getrag has a 7-speed Dual Clutch with at least 350 lb-ft capacity which is used by Mercedes in the CLA/GLA45 AMG cars where it is code named DCT 724.016.

    What has happened in Europe was the Automatic guys (like ZF) don't actually do high torque transverse boxes. The manual guys went into Dual Clutch boxes and fills that niche. High torque transverse converter autos is a uniquely American thing.

    These are dual clutch boxes though, not torque converter automatics.

    Edited by dwightlooi
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do they not have a ZF unit in any of the 2.0T Jeeps? Or are those all RWD-based? 

    Actually, is that only in the Wrangler at this point...?

    I definitely think I'm looking further ahead than they currently are, come to think of if..lol

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    51 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Do they not have a ZF unit in any of the 2.0T Jeeps? Or are those all RWD-based? 

    Actually, is that only in the Wrangler at this point...?

    I definitely think I'm looking further ahead than they currently are, come to think of if..lol

    JL Wrangler has a ZF 8spd w/ the 2.0T.    I've seen rumors the next gen GC may get this combo as the base powertrain. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    JL Wrangler has a ZF 8spd w/ the 2.0T.    I've seen rumors the next gen GC may get this combo as the base powertrain. 

    I guess I forgot it isn't in the Cherokee...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    They don’t use that transmission in any of the FWD/transverse engine models.  

    I meant the engine, which in turn, would mean the transmission as well. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    That'll take time, money and it'll be a tough engineering project. The 9T65 barely fits all the 9-gears in its envelope which is about the same as the 6T75. It actually uses a chain drive to connect the axle to the output ring gear. If you want more torque handling, the transmission needs get bigger or it needs to lose gears or it needs exotic materials.

    IMHO, speeds are not as useful as many people think. Ford did not find the 9-speeds to be any more efficient than its 8-speeds and hence did not adopt them despite paying for part of their R&D. What's more important is the ratio spread. I'll venture to say that a 6-speed or even 5-speed will be practically as efficient as a 9 or 10-speed if it has the same ratio spread of 7.6:1. This is particularly so when you have an engine with a torque plateau of 348 lb-ft @ 1500-4000 rpm.

    Then why won't GM/Ford build such a six-speed AT with the ratio spread that you speak of, if that is the most efficient AT ratio spread that can be done given a number of speeds?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    Then why won't GM/Ford build such a six-speed AT with the ratio spread that you speak of, if that is the most efficient AT ratio spread that can be done given a number of speeds?

    Because is very hard to do a wide ratio with a small number of speeds. Or, rather, it'll take a very large diameter planetary gear set. Most automatics get to >7 to 1 by using three planetaries in series. With 1 planetary set you can only get 3~4 speeds. By the time you put in all the additional planetary gear sets you may as well get more speeds from them. More gear sets in the same length however means smaller gear widths. Smaller gear widths means lower torque capacity.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    Because is very hard to do a wide ratio with a small number of speeds. Or, rather, it'll take a very large diameter planetary gear set. Most automatics get to >7 to 1 by using three planetaries in series. With 1 planetary set you can only get 3~4 speeds. By the time you put in all the additional planetary gear sets you may as well get more speeds from them. More gear sets in the same length however means smaller gear widths. Smaller gear widths means lower torque capacity.

    So in theory, if each set can get 4 speeds and manufacturers are putting 3 sets in, the maximum number of ratios is 12?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    So in theory, if each set can get 4 speeds and manufacturers are putting 3 sets in, the maximum number of ratios is 12?

    Not really...

    The GM-Ford 10-speed uses a total of four planetary gear sets and 6 clutches, although no more than 4 clutches and 3 sequential ratios are ever engaged at any one time (not counting the axle ratio). It is impractical to try to use every single element as input and output to one another.

    Edited by dwightlooi
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah... except they don;t sell the Escala. They sell the CT5 with a Mazda nose and a Honda Accord C-Pillar which copies, of all things, the stupid ipad on the dash design of unimaginative car interiors. They stuff it with a pair of WEAK SAUCE engines which took a great leap backwards in performance compared to the previous generation despite heaps of complexity and technology like the Tri-Power cam switching valve train.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know if the 2020 numbers are finalized/correct ~
    2018 CTS 2.0T : 268/295
    2020 CT5 2.0T : 275/295

    2018 CTS 3.6TT : 420/420
    2020 CT5 3.0TT : 404/400

    IF correct, those certainly do not depict "great leaps backwards" in power. What remains, of course, is the V8 version's output. Everyone seems wrapped around the 'V' badge as opposed to looking at the comparative engines.

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    I don't know if the 2020 numbers are finalized/correct ~
    2018 CTS 2.0T : 268/295
    2020 CT5 2.0T : 275/295

    2018 CTS 3.6TT : 420/420
    2020 CT5 3.0TT : 404/400

    IF correct, those certainly do not depict "great leaps backwards" in power. What remains, of course, is the V8 version's output. Everyone seems wrapped around the 'V' badge as opposed to looking at the comparative engines.

    Where did you get those numbers??? As announced, the CT5 numbers are:-

    • 2020 CT5 2.0T:        237hp / 258 lb-ft
    • 2020 CT5 3.0TT:     335hp / 400 lb-ft
    • 2020 CT5-V 3.0TT: 355hp / 400 lb-ft
    • 2020 CT5-V "High Performance" Edition:  Vaporware
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, regfootball said:

    Early CT5 design study unmasked!

    You worked too hard and researched too deeply. Cadillac's LOSER designers simply plagiarized their work from a car they see everyday while driving to work!

    Accord.jpg

    Edited by dwightlooi
    • Haha 2
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    You worked too hard and researched too deeply. Cadillac's LOSER designers simply plagiarized their work from a car they see everyday while driving to work!

    Accord.jpg

    Actually I never really saw the resemblance to the Accord before but you hit the nail on the head!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    just like the CT5, I can't tell if I like the accord or not.  I think it is one of those vehicles that only looks good in black.

    It's OK. It's just not a design feature that exudes "luxury" or "exclusivity". A luxury car that "looks" like a Honda Accord is, well, meh...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dwightlooi said:

    It's OK. It's just not a design feature that exudes "luxury" or "exclusivity". A luxury car that "looks" like a Honda Accord is, well, meh...

    Exactly.  A Cadillac should say something and leave a positive (or at least polarizing) impression on anyone who sees one going down the road.  I like the XT5 and the CT6, but the only Cadillac that truly leaves an impression is the Escalade.  Cadillac needs to fix that on all their other models ASAP.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The CTS coupe is an example of a polarizing Cadillac.  So terrible though.  With a gunslit back glass when viewed from inside the car, and just an ugly fat ass.  Difficult to believe it came from the same company that has ACED the coupe mystique innumerable times over its history.

    I did like the ATS coupe, but now I feel it was a bit too tame perhaps.  Where is Cadillac's GOLDILOCKS?  Escalade.  CT6.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    The CTS coupe is an example of a polarizing Cadillac.  So terrible though.  With a gunslit back glass when viewed from inside the car, and just an ugly fat ass.  Difficult to believe it came from the same company that has ACED the coupe mystique innumerable times over its history.

    I did like the ATS coupe, but now I feel it was a bit too tame perhaps.  Where is Cadillac's GOLDILOCKS?  Escalade.  CT6.

    I like the (2nd generation) CTS Coupe. It looks like the VW Corrado to be honest, but I like it. Can't say the same about the creaky Recaro seats in the car though. Those were a disgrace.

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    The CTS coupe is an example of a polarizing Cadillac.  So terrible though.  With a gunslit back glass when viewed from inside the car, and just an ugly fat ass.  Difficult to believe it came from the same company that has ACED the coupe mystique innumerable times over its history.

    I did like the ATS coupe, but now I feel it was a bit too tame perhaps.  Where is Cadillac's GOLDILOCKS?  Escalade.  CT6.

    I think the CTS Coupe is one of the ugliest vehicles of the modern era. It looks so incredibly bad from anywhere but the front. The sedan looks so good but the just quit on the coupe and just "made it work".

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the CTS coupe a lot..it grew on me...it's a very distinctive design and I like the sharp angles.    The ATS coupe is nice, but it just looks like a 2dr version of a 4dr...not as distinctive. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search