Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Alfa Romeo Goes Back To The Drawing Board Due To China

      With Chinese Auto Market Experiencing Some Downs, Alfa Romeo Goes Back To The Drawing Board

    Last May, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced some ambitious plans for Alfa Romeo. By 2018, the brand would hopefully sell 400,000 vehicles annually thanks to 5 billion Euro investment that will lead to the introduction of eight new models. This past week, FCA is going back to the drawing board.

     

    Speaking with analysts on the company's third-quarter results, CEO Sergio Marchionne said due to the weakness of imported luxury vehicles in the Chinese market, FCA is currently reassessing their plans. Marchionne said a good chunk of the 400,000 vehicle sales was assigned to China. But in light of what is happening in the country, those proposed sales will need to absorbed into other regions.

     

    Now all of the vehicles that Alfa Romeo that Alfa Romeo has planned will still be developed, but the brand will need to 'rejig' its plans to focus on launching models that will suit Europe and North American rather than China. Plans for the revised rollout will happen in January.

     

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    You can roast me all you want, I do not care, but this is the worlds UGLIEST car Ever. This continues to prove the idiot leading FCA needs to be fired and this brand put back where it should have stayed in the history books. Waste of Billions that should have stayed in the states to build new models for Jeep, Dodge, Ram and Chrysler.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow. I wish continued failure for the Fiat brand of FCA. Because it's the only one that isn't contributing anything. Someone ougt to raise the flag of wasted effort on escalation of commitment. I can see the worth in Alfa Romeo, and then Maserati. But man is it going to be ardous to build them up.

     

    All this while FCA US is getting shafted, and being taken advantage of by the strong American Auto Industry Recovery. 

     

    I have never seen so much product potential wasted by terrible mismanagement. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the thing. Sergio talks a lot about automaker consolidation and restructuring.

     

    Other than the Ferrari sale, we have yet to see something of this nature at FCA itself.

     

    Because it would mean closing Serg's pet brands.  Serg is bleeding Chrysler to keep Fiat, Alfa, Maserati and for some reason Lancia (Italy Only) alive. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If FCA wanted real consolidation, they could probably keep Fiat as the small cheap car brand, pick one of Dodge and Chrysler for the middle, dump Alfa and put the effort into Maserati as the luxury brand.  Then you have a 3 step car line up.  Jeep and Ram stay for trucks and SUVs.   But they won't do that because they like having 8 boutique brands rather than 4 strong ones.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think they need to choose between Dodge and Chrysler.  

     

    Fiat - niche small fun hatchbacks and crossovers at a cheap price.  Price of Scion + Cuteness of Mini

    Dodge - FCA's answer to Ford and Chevy in cars and some crossovers

    Chrysler - FCA's answer to Buick, the Avalon/ES, Acura, and Lincoln in cars and maybe a crossover or three, plus the Minivan.  300 would need to move up in status by a good chunk.

    Maserati - The BMW/Benz/Cadillac competition - too sporty to go up against Lexus.  They would need to come down in their segments, probably take over the Guilia... but not go as far south as Mercedes and BMW have gone.

     

    Ram and Jeep stay right where they are.

     

    edit:  And yes, I think this could work globally even if they just rebranded the Dodge/Chrysler vehicles as Fiats or Lancia's (only one or the other) overseas, but Chrysler could probably be used with success.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And people said GM needed Pontiac and Saturn, etc.  And GM is doing better with 4 brands than they did with 8.   There just seems like a lot of overlap still in FCA and you don't need to be all things to all people.  Jeep builds crossovers and SUVs, do you really need carbon copies of them in other brands if Jeep, Dodge and Chrysler are all in the same dealership?  Do we need a 300 and a Charger?  And is Maserati ever really going to compete?  

     

    Sergio wants to consolidate, but has an army of low volume niche products, and probably about 1/3rd of their products are really profitable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think they need to choose between Dodge and Chrysler.  

     

    Fiat - niche small fun hatchbacks and crossovers at a cheap price.  Price of Scion + Cuteness of Mini

    Dodge - FCA's answer to Ford and Chevy in cars and some crossovers

    Chrysler - FCA's answer to Buick, the Avalon/ES, Acura, and Lincoln in cars and maybe a crossover or three, plus the Minivan.  300 would need to move up in status by a good chunk.

    Maserati - The BMW/Benz/Cadillac competition - too sporty to go up against Lexus.  They would need to come down in their segments, probably take over the Guilia... but not go as far south as Mercedes and BMW have gone.

     

    Ram and Jeep stay right where they are.

     

    edit:  And yes, I think this could work globally even if they just rebranded the Dodge/Chrysler vehicles as Fiats or Lancia's (only one or the other) overseas, but Chrysler could probably be used with success.

     

    And people said GM needed Pontiac and Saturn, etc.  And GM is doing better with 4 brands than they did with 8.   There just seems like a lot of overlap still in FCA and you don't need to be all things to all people.  Jeep builds crossovers and SUVs, do you really need carbon copies of them in other brands if Jeep, Dodge and Chrysler are all in the same dealership?  Do we need a 300 and a Charger?  And is Maserati ever really going to compete?  

     

    Sergio wants to consolidate, but has an army of low volume niche products, and probably about 1/3rd of their products are really profitable.

     

    Biggest problem with FCA is their Unionized BS agreements that makes them think they have to keep their mass production going as well as keep stupid Italian lines alive. They are going down the Bankrupt road and will hit it soon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They need to fix the holes in their lower brands before they go about trying to restart Alfa.

    I was really hoping the Giulia platform might get off the ground before something like this went down...

    They need small cars that don't have Fiat badges stat.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Toronto Transit is starting to use BYD electric buses in 2025.  There is a factory in Ontario building them. Thanx for the links.  I am intrigued by BYD.  I am not opposed to BYD EVs as much as I thought I would be and t has nothing to do with the political climate we are experiencing right now.  I didnt think Chinese automanufacturing would be as advanced as it is.  BYD is impressive. And I feel like I did a massive arrogant error in thinking that Chinese vehicles would be sooooo inferior to Western automobiles.  Part of the mis-information that our Western media and thought processes go, I guess.   My daughter is taking an Oriental history class in university this semester. The course is focused on Korea, China and Japan. I am helping her with several essays that she needs to write for the class.  Yeah, I am reading her material in detail as if I was taking the course. LOL.   I am fathoming a guess that this would be the primary reason as to why I have switched my focus to BYD automobiles lately.      
    • We'll see if Toyota is first, Mercedes already has solid state on the road in prototype form.  I would imagine they want that ready for the next generation S-class EV that replaces the EQS.  And usually the S-class gets the technology first.  E-class EV is due out in 2027, I don't know if they would be ready that fast, and even if so, is this expensive tech that starts on S-class and 10 years later ends up on a regular car. From their media release: Safer, lighter, more efficient and 25 percent longer range in the first vehicle: solid-state cell chemistry delivers higher energy density and weight reduction, with improved driving efficiency and cell safety  Mercedes-Benz, together with Mercedes AMG High Performance Powertrains (HPP) based in Brixworth UK, developed and patented new innovative solid-state battery pack  Mercedes-Benz integrated solid-state battery, with cells from U.S.-based solid-state battery leader Factorial Energy, into slightly modified EQS Sedan  Road tests with new solid-state battery in "621 mile" EQS development car started in February 2025
    • I suspect with Hyundai having their solid-state battery plant started for testing of the battery packs that Toyota is going to have to really spend money to catch up to the Koreans. Hyundai to launch all-solid-state EV battery pilot line next month Hyundai Set to Launch All-Solid-State Battery Production - Batteries Daily Hyundai Solid-State Battery Pilot Line Starts Production In March Hyundai starts solid-state battery production in March Lots of stories covering it, 
    • Hard to get the actual Chinese press release here, but this is their global site. News Center-BYD
    • I actually posted this when BYD rolled out their 3rd generation platform of 1000V EVs with 1000V 5 min charging.  BYD's 1,000V Super E-Platform offers charging 400km in 5 minutes BYD has an American presence here in building other things than EVs. PRESS RELEASE - Technological Innovations for a Better Life | BYD USA Commercial Buses School Buses Trucks Forklifts Energy Skyrail Autos
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search