Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Detroit Preview: Mercedes-Benz Spills Some Details On 2019 G-Class Off-Road Ability

      Only 2 percent of G-Class buyers will take advantage of it


    Mercedes-Benz has been releasing a surprising amount of information on the upcoming 2019 G-Class before its debut at the Detroit Auto Show. Last month, the German automaker dropped some information concerning the interior. This latest batch of information deals with the off-road capability, something that only a small number of G-Class owners will take advantage of.

    Mercedes says the 2019 G-Class will retain a ladder-type frame, three differential locks, and a low range ratio. The front features an independent suspension setup with double wishbones on the axle. The rear retains a solid axle with four longitudinal control arms on each side. Ground clearance is slightly higher than the current G-Class  - 9.49 vs. 9.26 inches. 

    The 2019 G-Class will also come with 'G-Mode' that automatically adjusts the engine, transmission, suspension, and steering to improve off-road performance. G-Mode will automatically come on when one of the differential locks is engaged. A 360-degree view camera system helps with driving in difficult terrain.

    Mercedes will be fitting the G-Class with a nine-speed automatic transmission. Aside from improving fuel economy, the transmission will make driving the G-Class more comfortable and quieter.

    For now, you can look at pictures of a camouflaged 2019 G-Class tackling Austria's Schõckl Mountain test track.

    Source: Mercedes-Benz
    Press Release is on Page 2


    The new Mercedes-Benz G-Class: The legend on the Schöckl: More control, more comfort

    Every G-Class has to conquer the Schöckl. Mercedes-Benz uses the 1,445 metre high local mountain near the Austrian city of Graz as a test track. The 5.6 km route includes gradients of up to 60 percent and lateral inclinations of up to 40 percent. During the development stage, a "G" has to endure a good 2,000 strenuous kilometres on this very demanding course. The new G-Class masters the route with noticeably more control and comfort.

    The primary goal of development was to make the new G-Class even more effective off-road. The G thus remains a true G – thanks to its standard ladder-type frame, the three 100-percent differential locks and LOW RANGE off-road ratio. Its suspension is the result of collaboration between Mercedes-Benz G GmbH and Mercedes-AMG GmbH. The result is an independent suspension with double-wishbone front axle in combination with a rigid rear axle. During development work, the engineers had the task of fighting for every millimetre, because off-road capability also means maximum ground clearance. The raised axle with independent suspension decisively contributes to this, and additionally increases the stiffness of the body with a strut brace.

    Agile off-road as well

    The components of the double-wishbone front axle are directly fixed to the ladder-type frame without a suspension subframe. The attachment points on the frame of the lower wishbone in a Z-direction are positioned as high up as possible. This arrangement ensures good driveability beyond the asphalt. Specifically for the G-Class, the new front axle is designed in such a robust way that the off-road performance and off-road capabilities of its predecessor are maintained and partly even surpassed. The new rigid rear axle is guided with four longitudinal control arms on each side and a Panhard rod. The off-road vehicle stays on track more robustly, and is agile and effortless in off-road applications.

    The exceptional handling characteristics and driving safety on account of the driver's high level of control can only be experienced first hand. The following figures, however, clearly show that every little detail to improve the off-road characteristics has been checked and optimised where possible.

    As before, high ground clearance and long suspension travel form the basis for the further improved off-road characteristics of the G-Class. The figures speak for themselves:

    • Slope climbing ability of up to 100% on suitable surfaces
    • Ground clearance between the axles, 241 millimetres, plus 6 millimetres maximum fording depth now 70 centimetres in water and mud passages, plus 10 centimetres
    • Driving stability at angles of 35°, plus 7°
    • Angle of departure: 30°, angle of approach: 31°, plus 1°
    • Breakover angle: 26°, plus 1°
    • Suspension travel: Front axle: Spring/rebound travel of 85/100 millimetres; rear axle: Spring/rebound travel of 82/142 millimetres

    The new "G-Mode" paves the way where there are none

    One of the prerequisites for the improved off-road handling characteristics is the new "G-Mode". The G-Class changes to "G-Mode" independently of the chosen drive program as soon as one of the three differential locks has been activated or LOW RANGE has been engaged. This off-road mode adapts the adjustable damping of the chassis and the steering as well as the accelerator characteristic, avoids unnecessary gearshifts and ensures maximum off-road capability. A small "G" icon discreetly lights up in the instrument cluster. The G simply swallows up major bumps, and even in extreme terrain the driver does not have to frantically hold on to the steering wheel to effortlessly manoeuvre.

    New automatic transmission on board

    For the power transmission, the 9G‑TRONIC automatic transmission with torque converter was specifically adapted to meet the needs of the off-road icon. The developers have managed to reduce the shift and response times of the 9-speed transmission by means of a dedicated software application. The wide transmission ratio not only makes driving quieter and more comfortable especially at low engine speeds, it also simultaneously contributes to reducing fuel consumption.

    The new transfer case is flange-mounted directly on to the 9G-TRONIC. It is adjusted in such a way that 40 percent of the drive torque reaches the front axle and 60 percent reaches the rear axle. The permanent all-wheel drive ensures maximum traction.

    The low-range ratio can be engaged via the LOW RANGE switch in transmission mode N at speeds of up to 40 km/h. The gear ratio of the transfer case is then changed from 1.00 in HIGH RANGE to 2.93. It is possible to switch from LOW RANGE to HIGH RANGE at speeds of up to 70 km/h. The gear ratio of the transfer case is 2.93 and thus significantly shorter than in the predecessor model (2.1), which becomes noticeable particularly when pulling away on an extreme gradient.

    All-round visibility from a bird's-eye view is possible thanks to the optional 360° camera, the reversing camera and three further cameras. This means that obstacles located below the window line or in front of the vehicle such as a hill crest do not remain hidden. The information is presented clearly in full HD in a choice of different views on the multimedia system's display. Dynamic guide lines show the road and the width of the G-Class. In addition, the off-road screen specially designed for the G-Class also displays data such as height, gradient, angle, compass, steering angle and activated differential locks.

    Furthermore, for particularly arduous applications, 18-inch all-terrain tyres are available.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    26 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Hmmmm They really pushed the nose out there. It isn't actually a lot but for how flat the last one is this one looks pretty different. The rest looks the same which is perfect. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's a very subtle redesign.  The Autocar article said it was all new with a noticeable weight reduction.   I wonder if they have eliminated some of the classic details like the exposed screws that Balthy liked 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    So, I can't tell if this is just a refresh of the existing one or not.

    That's exactly what they were going for. :thumbsup:

    10 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    It's a very subtle redesign.  The Autocar article said it was all new with a noticeable weight reduction.   I wonder if they have eliminated some of the classic details like the exposed screws that Balthy liked 

    The exposed hinges are still there! 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After looking at the Autocar story, clearly hinges are still exposed, zooming into the pictures, you can see the external screws that are on the existing on sale version are gone. Internal is the biggest update as the external is just a refresh to me.

    Is it worth 6 figures? Yes to some, no to others. price wise it exceeds Escalade which does tell me Cadillac needs a V Sport and V edition of the Escalade.

    Off road capability, no, leave it to have an equal off road version in GMC as a Yukon Denali, Hummer like edition.

    Will have to see in person if this would be of internal space to me to be in any consideration. External, is does nothing for me, just an overpriced bread box still.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Max water fording depth is up to 27.5 inches on the new one, that is insane.  Anyone that buys a G-Wagen should take it off road at least once a year.  Even if you are a Real Housewives of Beverly Hills wannabe celeb driving this thing, it is a total waste of you don’t drive it up a mountain or over a sand dune or through a brick wall or something.

    The new model is said to be roomier on the inside it, and several hundred pounds lighter, same exterior size. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/4/2018 at 10:13 AM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I wonder if they have eliminated some of the classic details like the exposed screws that Balthy liked 

    It's mostly the exposed gaskets, but the screws didn't help. But calling them 'classic' is like calling WalMart uni-fit plastic hubcaps 'classic'.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    WAIT- this is the 2019 G??
    WTF happened to the concept G, the plasticy looking thing?
    Why doesn't Daimler ever produce any of their concepts?
    I guess the hideously low sales don't warrant a full redesign.

    Could had this:

    MBG19.png

    Instead you get a VW SUV from the '80s; you're welcome! :

    MB19o.png

    And I can see the exposed gaskets FROM HERE.
    Anybody still think there weren't corners cut?
    Daimler must have an 80% margin on this.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The concept was just cartoon nonsense.  The production one is retro modern, like the Wrangler.  Supposedly all-new. 

    19 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Max water fording depth is up to 27.5 inches on the new one, that is insane.  Anyone that buys a G-Wagen should take it off road at least once a year.  Even if you are a Real Housewives of Beverly Hills wannabe celeb driving this thing, it is a total waste of you don’t drive it up a mountain or over a sand dune or through a brick wall or something.

    The new model is said to be roomier on the inside it, and several hundred pounds lighter, same exterior size. 

    Yeah, I remember seeing quite a few of them in Phoenix & Scottsdale, always shiny and polished, shiny black tires and chrome wheels.  It would be nice to see people actually using them off-road, covered in dust and mud, scratches and rock chips, dents, etc... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Concept G from a few years ago was never meant to be a new G-Wagen, the G-class is what it is, they aren’t going to mess with the formula.  There has been talk that the Concept G will turn into a GLB boxy, off road looking crossover in the mid $30s price range.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's a shame; mercedes should build their concepts- they're far more intriguing than the white bread they do make.

    That concept would draw all sorts of attention & sales to the brand, even at exorbitant prices. Opportunity lost.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    That's a shame; mercedes should build their concepts- they're far more intriguing than the white bread they do make.

    That concept would draw all sorts of attention & sales to the brand, even at exorbitant prices. Opportunity lost.

    Agree TOTALLY! :metal: 

    The concept had me interested, this warmed over refresh is just Meh, I bet still tight back seating which means the Escalade beats this as a luxury SUV.

    Yes SMK, G-Wagon has better offroad capabilities that I think these sales only help them to reduce R&D for the military version as you never see the G-Wagon off road much if ever except for the extreme videos on YouTube.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Agree TOTALLY! :metal: 

    The concept had me interested, this warmed over refresh is just Meh, I bet still tight back seating which means the Escalade beats this as a luxury SUV.

    Yes SMK, G-Wagon has better offroad capabilities that I think these sales only help them to reduce R&D for the military version as you never see the G-Wagon off road much if ever except for the extreme videos on YouTube.

    First off, as I said, the Ener-G Concept was not meant to be the G-Wagen, that was a electric fuel cell concept which obviously isn’t commercially viable from a powertrain standpoint.

    They are building a GLB crossover in 2019 based on that concept, so the masses will line up to get a mini G-Wagen. 

    The current G-Wagen has more rear seat legroom than the Escalade, the new G-Wagen is getting 5.9 inches more so no problem there.  And keep in mind the G-Wagen is a mid-size SUV. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, balthazar said:

    "meant to be" is immaterial; it SHOULD HAVE BEEN.

    Lost opportunity.

    Not sure how it is a lost opportunity when they are building an SUV based on that concept.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Niches within niches...the GLB is rumored to be a butched-up GLA with G-class styling in a compact form, while a rumored GLG would be a GLE variation with G-class styling and room for 7. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GLBGLAGLCGLEGLG - utterly exhausting.

    Then again, if they badged a GGG, Guy Fieri could drive one on DDD.

    Not sure how it is a lost opportunity when they are building an SUV based on that concept.


    Here's how. Assumedly, if the concept comes out as a 'xxB', it's a bottom feeder cheap model, whereas the flagship G lingers on in 1979 guise. Top-down, not bottom up - don't want your $30K SUV to look & feel 50 years newer than your $110K SUV.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The G-class isn’t changing it’s look, just like the Wrangler has looked the same for 50 years.  And it now is on a 2018 so all of a sudden the G-Wagen has the most modern chassis in the industry. 

    And the GLB will feel nothing like a G-Wagen, plus the GLE is the same size as the G-Wagen, half the price and has been more modern than it the past 15 years and G-wagen sales went up every year.  

    What Mercedes is doing is similar to what Jeep has done, they can run 2 styling themes on SUVs, one boxy and off road like Wrangler and Renegade, one more smoother out like Compass and Cherokee and both can work.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's the problem- the G SHOULD change... into a modern equivalent.

    Also, the Wrangler is FAR more iconic and not the brand's flagship model; it can afford to remain truer to it's roots, esp for a brand like Jeep.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hahaha, the G-Wagen should never change.  That box on wheels is here to stay because that is what the G-class buyers want.  It set a global sales record in 2016, I imagine when the 2017 global numbers are out it will outdo 2016.  

    It is plenty modern, the chassis is brand new, the  4.0 V8 and 9-speed first came out in 2016, it has current Mercedes interior trim and electronics. 

    What Cadillac fans don’t get is the Escalade doesn’t compete with the G-Wagen and if Cadillac wants to then they need a product above the Escalade, but Cadillac/GM management thinks no SUV at GM can be above the Escalade, just like no sports car can be above the Corvette.  This kills Cadillac when trying to take on high end cars.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Think how many MORE Daimler could sell if it was something from this century! GM matched Daimler in profit in '16, Daimler needs to step up their game!

    G should have a 12-spd trans, it's behind the Escalade with it's 10 gears. Should also have a stretched WB version, and a convertible- that would be unique. But it really just needs modernization where it can be seen/felt. With no visual link with the rest of the line, as the flagship it instills no cache to the rest of the brand. A proverbial 'red-headed step-child'.

    Maybe MB should brand the G separately and radically expand it; bring it in-house and add more models.

    And they REALLY need an emergency re-do on the balloon knot air vents.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM sells 4 or 5 vehicles for every 1 Daimler sells, so them making equal profit would suggest Daimler does a better job.

    Mercedes ran something like a million simulations to see if there was any benefit in efficiency of a 10 speed to a 9 speed, and there was not, so that is why they made a 9-speed.  

    They already build a convertible Maybach G-Wagen.

    The G-class is also not the flagship Mercedes, the S-class is, always has been and is stated so on the Mercedes website.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow- that is some FWD profile! Since they went to nissan for a pick-up truck, perhaps they partnered with VPG for this (tho the MV-1 has less frontal overhang).

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Wow- that is some FWD profile! Since they went to nissan for a pick-up truck, perhaps they partnered with VPG for this (tho the MV-1 has less frontal overhang).

    It's just a rebodied variation of the FWD GLA, I think..  more filler.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/6/2018 at 10:41 AM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Niches within niches...the GLB is rumored to be a butched-up GLA with G-class styling in a compact form, while a rumored GLG would be a GLE variation with G-class styling and room for 7. 

    Mercedes should have kept Chrysler and bought Fiat.  They could have just rebadged the Renegade for the GLB. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/5/2018 at 5:41 PM, balthazar said:

    WAIT- this is the 2019 G??
    WTF happened to the concept G, the plasticy looking thing?
    Why doesn't Daimler ever produce any of their concepts?
    I guess the hideously low sales don't warrant a full redesign.

    Could had this:

    MBG19.png

    Instead you get a VW SUV from the '80s; you're welcome! :

    MB19o.png

    And I can see the exposed gaskets FROM HERE.
    Anybody still think there weren't corners cut?
    Daimler must have an 80% margin on this.

    Nothing about that bubbly concept is attractive. It also looks 2 lanes wide. 

    On 1/5/2018 at 7:17 PM, balthazar said:

    That's a shame; mercedes should build their concepts- they're far more intriguing than the white bread they do make.

    That concept would draw all sorts of attention & sales to the brand, even at exorbitant prices. Opportunity lost.

    I think their 6X6 and G500(squared) in neon yellow did the trick. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/6/2018 at 11:16 AM, balthazar said:

    That's the problem- the G SHOULD change... into a modern equivalent.

    Also, the Wrangler is FAR more iconic and not the brand's flagship model; it can afford to remain truer to it's roots, esp for a brand like Jeep.

    Why? What reason is there for it to change? Because it sells plenty at 120k starting price? 

    AMG GT is their flagship vehicle. 

    2 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    It looks like a kids ride-on toy...just cartoonish plastic nonsense...

    YES. 

    If they built that exact thing people would complain they build something with 10 inch windows and horrible blind spots with tires that stick out too far. Oh, and that it looks like sh!t. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Nothing about that bubbly concept is attractive. It also looks 2 lanes wide. 

    I think their 6X6 and G500(squared) in neon yellow did the trick. 

    That 2012 Bubbly Concept actually had me interested in a possible new SUV. But the re-warmed G-Wagon is a Failure!

    What they gave us was a Rewarmed worked over 40 year old product.

    2019 G Wagon

    2019-mercedes-classe-g-comparatif.jpg

    2012 when they showed the G Wagon Concept it was exciting to the crowds and this shows just how much better it was than the current G Wagon.

    Gforcegwagon.jpg

    They could have at least give us this concept version of the G Wagon that they did in 2015 or 2016.

    G-WagonConcept.jpg

    That is a 6 figure Modern 21st century G Wagon at least, not what they released this year.

    Makes me think MB is not as flush with cash and just trying to keep ripping people off with old product till they can make money to support their EV initiative. Makes me think they see a short life for the G Wagon before People will demand an EV long range version.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    You never had interest in a 100k Mercedes SUV. You're completely full of $h! once I read that. You dog that company so much. 

    LOL, I might dog that company but then I dog all companies and yes up till that concept they had nothing of interest. That concept and the Lovely Red one I posted have my interest, the rest of their product line sucks.

    People change their minds all the times depending on what a companies offers and you should know that ccap41.

    I loved the 2012 concept and have stated that in past posts if you are wanting to go look. The new concept I found in searching today just tells me that MB has yet to get it right and those of us that do spend money on expensive auto's will do so when the style / Design is right.

    2019 G Wagon - Failure in my Book

    That Red Concept above - Winner Winner Chicken Dinner! :metal: 

    Since you seem to have forgotten or never really paid attention, I do own a 100K SUV! Escalade ESV Platinum, fully loaded.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Of course that 'bloaty' SUV would be 'productionized', but it's 1000 steps in the right direction.

    That red G concept above- I've never seen that before. That's the PERFECT balance of heritage and 21st century. Can't for the LIFE of me figure out why Daimler couldn't pull the trigger on it.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Of course that 'bloaty' SUV would be 'productionized', but it's 1000 steps in the right direction.

    That red G concept above- I've never seen that before. That's the PERFECT balance of heritage and 21st century. Can't for the LIFE of me figure out why Daimler couldn't pull the trigger on it.

    I totally agree that they should have pulled the trigger and I think I now know why.

    15 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    That red concept looks like someones Photoshop effort of a Grand Cherokee with a Merc style front end and a few other tweaks...the side contours look very GCish...

    Nope not a photoshop at all, they showed this off in Frankfurt at their big show last year. 

    The Red G is to become their new 3 row GLG SUV for MB.

    That has my attention and looks yards way better than the G-Wagon.

    Mercedes-GLG-Illustration-1200x800-2.jpg

    Mercedes-GLG-Illustration-1200x800.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's clearly not a G Wagen replacement though. It looks like a GLS-sized vehicle. The G Wagen is relatively small. 

    15 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    You got a new Escalade?  Cool.   I thought you had a 2004 or so.  The new G-Class is all new from what I've read, not 'old product'. 

    You are correct, on both of those. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As far as I can tell, the 'GLG' is speculative fiction at this point...googling it turns up photos and a You Tube clip from Auto Bild and CarScoop and a couple other magazines with mention of 'renderings'....i.e. photoshop.

    Supposedly the next gen GLS coming soon will have a longer wheelbase Maybach version, though. 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    That's clearly not a G Wagen replacement though. It looks like a GLS-sized vehicle. The G Wagen is relatively small.

    But you get the sentiment being expressed here, yes? That the G desperately needs a redesign to bring it into the current century? Designs can be scaled easily- not a major hurdle.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    But you get the sentiment being expressed here, yes? That the G desperately needs a redesign to bring it into the current century? Designs can be scaled easily- not a major hurdle.

    Well, the G has been totally redesigned for the 2019 model year, as is the subject of this thread.  It should do well with it's retro styling...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Well, the G has been totally redesigned for the 2019 model year, as is the subject of this thread.  It should do well with it's retro styling...

    But that is the point Balthazar and I are trying to make, the underside might be modern according to MB, but the look is severely dated and while they sell them at an overflated price for what you get IMHO, they could probably increase sales greatly if they used the GLG style of body as the new G-Wagon scaled to be larger.

    MB is missing a bigger sales potential by sticking with already built stamping in building and selling the G-Wagon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search