Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Audi Gets Q2 and Q4 Trademarks From FCA

      Q2 and Q4 Are Now Under Audi's Control

    Audi can now use Q2 and Q4 for future models thanks a new deal with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

     

    Audi CEO Rupert Stadler tells Autoblog that the German automaker has done a trademark swap to get their hands on Q2 and Q4. It is unknown what FCA got out of the deal.

     

    "We tried to get it years ago and they said 'No, never,' but there is never 'never' in business. ... This year I went back to them with a proposal and we talked and there were some negotiations and then we agreed to it," said Stadler.

     

    Q2 was used by FCA to denote vehicles equipped with a limited-slip differential (mostly used on Alfa Romeo vehicles). Q4 denoted vehicles with all-wheel drive (used on Alfa Romeo and Maserati vehicles).

     

    Audi plans to use Q2 and Q4 on upcoming crossovers. The Q2 will be used for a crossover based on the MQB platform and Q4 will be on a coupe-like version of the Q3.

     

    Source: Autoblog

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    And the Confusion will continue and go from there for Audi CUV's and Cars. Their naming convention is so confusing that it is amazing anyone can figure it out. Q# for all the auto's and does not really help clarify car, CUV,SUV. I so hate this naming. Idiots in Marketing that cannot seem to come up with a proper way to differentiate between them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Article seemed clear enough..the Q1 will be a subcompact CUV, Q2 will be a compact sized CUV, the Q4 will be an X4 competitor.. CUVs for every budget and size niche...following the same patterns of BMW and M-B, fill every niche and niches between niches and within niches...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41

     

    I though Q# meant SUV/CUV and A/S/RS# meant cars? Does it not?

     

    You are correct. Q = SUV/CUV for Audi

     

    Okay, I thought so.

     

    I guess I was confused by dfelt's post saying it's confusing. I actually think Audi has one of the clearer naming systems of Q# being all SUV/CUVs and A# being all cars(okay I guess the R8 is an exception).

     

    Alright I just went to their site and the models that confuse things are the R8 and TT as they're kind of their own thing, not actually confusing if you ask me. Buuuuut the one lone bird is the A3 Sportback e-tron. That's listed under their SUVs/Crossovers/Wagons. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Drew Dowdell
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      In this latest war with Canada (we'd been bros since like 1813), this American is taking the Canadian's side.  That's all I've got to say on it.
    • Drew Dowdell
      Genesis News: Genesis debuts a Long Wheelbase G90 Black Edition

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      You're speaking of collision parts. I'm just talking about doing brakes and oil. The S-Class (like most high-end German luxury from any brand) has some pretty crazy service items.  Audi is definitely worse in this department for any V engine. The G90 doesn't run the 2.0 or 2.4. The 3.5 and 3.8 have been around a few years now and seem to be serving just fine.  While what you're saying is true for Hyundai, it seems to be significantly less true for Genesis.
    • smk4565
      Genesis News: Genesis debuts a Long Wheelbase G90 Black Edition

      By smk4565 · Posted

      Not sure the maintenance is so low on a Genesis.  Hyundai/Kia parts prices are insane.  An engine wire harness on an Elantra is over $5,000, it is $6,000 on an Elantra Hybrid on and S-class and it is $4,370.  A Tucson front door is $2300, on an S-class it is $2,100 on a Lexus LS is $838.    A Kia Sorrento quarter wheel opening molding is $808, for plastic.  1 headlight on a G90 is $3,649, more than an S-class but less than the BMW $5,000 laser headlight. On a Mercedes a front radar sensor is about $650.   On the current Hyundai Tucson front radar sensor is $2000, on the prior generation they are $2700  S-class parts are expensive for sure, but expected for the price of the car and basically on par with  Tucson/Elantra parts.  Lexus parts are cheaper than Hyundai/Kia or Mitsubishi parts. And it seems like the Hyundai 3.5 V6 doesn't have issues, but those 2.0 and 2.4 liter 4 cylinders for the 2010s burned oil and grenaded themselves like crazy.  Those are the engine equivalent to the Nissan CVT transmission, do not buy ever.  On top of the fact that you can steal those Hyuundais but putting a scrunched USB jack in the ignition.  I just can't trust anything Hyundai makes, it looks nice new and after 5 years they look like crap and fall apart.  
    • oldshurst442
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

      Trump did call our Prime Minister by his actual title.  Prime Minister and not governor. He did say it was a good call.  (But werent all calls from the US to Canada since all this tariff nonsense began were good calls?) PM Carney also said it was a good call. Trump did lie that other countries have apologized to him...  As if all other countries have taken advantage of the US.  Like he keeps on crying on about puffing his chest.  (Elbows up Canada!!! Right to his unprotected head)  Trump playing the victimhood card is a bad look in my opnion.  Makes the US look really really weak.   Like the US never had a backbone. And with Trump in charge a spineless backbone even worse...     Al, that though still doesnt change the fact the Canadians will NOT be buying anything American for a very looooooong time.   Damage is done.   Elbows up! 
    • oldshurst442
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

      https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/our-staff-made-a-mistake-toronto-blue-jays-fan-tossed-from-rogers-centre-for-sporting-canada-is-not-for-sale-hat/   https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/never-take-that-hat-off-doug-ford-calls-blue-jays-fan-who-was-removed-for-wearing-canada-is-not-for-sale-hat/      

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search