Drew Dowdell

I got your DT7 right here. Anyone wanna throw some Art & Science on this?

Since that's the case, just leave the DTS on the G-body and update the power train. No, it's not a 7 series, but at least it's not a Towncar.

I have one really huge angel fish that I've raised from a baby.

Considering that most of south florida is supposed to be glades right now...... My parents live there. Their boat repair business would be booming.

During the last ice age, but not seeing your point. My point is that he can't call on something that can be empirically proven.

Care to back that up? How can "A glacier use to be here and now it's not" have a 250% margin of error? You are turning into the SMK of the environmental discussions.

Dogbert the bank CEO

If anyone would have a 7 Cylinder it'd be Volvo. I think there were some 7 cylinder diesels out there.

its newer in the msm

F.O.G, I like you and we agree on a lot of things, but you're still wrong on this one. They changed the terminology because of statements like yours. It may sound strange, but yes global warming could cause snow in London. Here's the explanation: London is kept warm by the gulf stream. As warming melts arctic ice, that cold water and ice burgs flow south and interact with the gulf stream as it heads toward the English coast. This has a cooling effect on the gulf stream and lowers the air temperature reaching England. Keep in mind that nearly all of England is at a higher latitude than any of the lower 48 states.

What recovery? The fundamentals of the economy are strong.

Yo! Idiots! Over here! This is the enemy! Stop fighting each other and focus on the task at hand.

You do point out one of the unintended benefits of global warming.... the most populated places in CA will be under water. it's a joke people.... laugh.

You expecting a $7,000 rebate and 0.9% financing?

The towers would have likely stood had it not been for the intense fire. There is a reason transcontinental flights were chosen from Boston. Fuel.

What's your idea of what has caused a glacier to shrink by 90% over 100 years? I mean seriously... we know for a fact that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. We know we are dumping a lot of it into the air every year. Don't let your hatred of Gore cloud your ability to reason.

but yeah, just a theory......

Glaciers in Spain's Pyrenees have lost 90% of their ice in the last 100 years. Continuing global warming insures that they will completely disappear in a few decades. Most of Europe's glaciers are shrinking and overall have lost a quarter of their mass in less than 10 years.

I thought GM filled everything from Ecotecs to HF3.6s to LS-whatevers with Mobile one these days.

The facts of the past are not in question. We do know for a fact that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. We know how much of it we are putting into the air each year. We can observe the climate data from the last 100 years, we can observe animal behavior, we can observe plant growth patterns, and we can form a hypothesis. Basic scientific method.

Courtesy of Failblog.org

and that's how we got you.....

Fine. Both of you are unqualified. I don't know what the true answer is, but I choose to err on the side of caution... ya know, just in case the facts that are not in dispute turn out to point to a bigger problem. I personally don't care if my car is powered by genetically modified hamsters as long as it's cheap to fuel, has great acceleration, is smooth, quiet and causes minimal environmental impact.

There seems to be confusion about the Politics rule in non-politics threads. Discussion of policy is fine. Discussion of execution of policy is fine. Random partisan hackery irrelevant to GM or the discussion at hand is not fine.