Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,685

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    I know, but if a CT6 starts at $50k, it has to be less than that. And GM has some crazy pricing on some product, but even they are not foolish enough to price the CT5 on par with an E-class. And the CT6 is cheaper than an XT6. CT5 could cost less than XT5.
  2. smk4565
    Correct on all counts. And the New CLA45 and A45 have 406 hp I think now. So 400 hp is very likely as an option to the GLB in a class where about 240-250 hp is the norm. Cadillac not doing V-series on everything is sort of like GMC putting Denali on 2 models only, and saying we don't want extra money .
  3. smk4565
    So will a CT4 cost less than an XT4? SUV’s usually cost more than similar size sedans. I have to imagine CT5 starts around $40k.
  4. smk4565
    That looks hideous. Although I don’t think a luxury minivan is a bad idea considering how many 3 row luxury SUVs there are and a minivan would offer more passenger space than any of them and space and roominess does add to luxury and comfort.
  5. smk4565
    So it is not a C-class competitor, nor is it replacing both the ATS and CTS. Which this is a good size for a car, it isn’t as nice as an E-class or A6, but if they it like a C-class they should be fine. Or as fine as a sedan can be in a crossover market.
  6. smk4565
    Looks like a RAV4. A lot of Toyota in that design.
  7. smk4565
    The other articles I read state the CT5 is a 3-series and C-class competitor but it looks bigger than those cars. I am curious what the dimensions are. If it is priced like a C-class I think it should do fine. The interior looks on par with a A4 or C-class, a lot of plastic/rubber in that center console area but the doors look nice. Still not a fan of the shape or exterior styling.
  8. smk4565
    My complaint with XT4 and XT5 and XT6 is only 1 engine choice. If 224 hp isn’t enough a 300 hp will be available probably at launch or close to given that the work is done on the 35’s. And they might do a 400 hp GLB45, I would be surprised if they AMG everything.
  9. smk4565
    The Altima has awd but only on 4-cylinder models as with Subaru. If the Singer was good value, then awd and 2 extra doors should make it steal sales off Mustang and Camro all day long but that hasn’t happened. And people aren’t paying $10k more than an Optima because Stinger has all wheel drive. And the Stinger isn’t luxurious, the interior is below what you get in a Mazda 6. Thus it has low sales.
  10. smk4565
    No one offers 7 seats in this segment. A win for Mercedes. The GLB 35 won't be a $20k premium, the 45's are a $20k premium.
  11. smk4565
    My gripe is the Stinger is overpriced. The V6 Stinger costs more than a V8 Mustang or Camaro for example. And the Stinger isn't really any more luxurious or better equipped than a Mustang, it just has back doors. A Stinger is more than a Hemi Charger, too, and again the Stinger is maybe marginally better on interior, only because the Charger is ancient. I love the fact that Kia made a rear drive sports sedan, something different than all the FWD generic stuff that is out there. But they missed the mark on pricing. Kia has sold 3,227 Stinger in the first quarter, (which is down from 3,920) and they sold 22,668 Optimas which is up from last year. Same size car, I think similar interior quality/luxury in both. You can even get the same 2 liter turbo in both, but in the Stringer they change you $10-15k more than Optima because they turned the engine the correct way. Way too much of an up charge to send power to the back wheels instead of the front.
  12. smk4565
    I don't think it will be that cheap. I am thinking like $80k base model. Although that is also without me seeing the interior or knowing engine specs, but I predict price is going up.
  13. smk4565
    But nothing else is going to look like the G-wagen, that is why it is an icon. The biggest flaw I see in Mercedes design is with the SL. That should look like the 1955 version and be a retro style to be to the car side, what the G-wagen is to the SUV side. Compare the GLB to an XT4 or NX200 or 250 or whatever Lexus calls their small SUV which has almost the exact name a s Nissan commercial van. And we know 300 hp is right around the corner from launch of the base model, which is more than any of these other compact 4-cylinder SUVs have.
  14. smk4565
    That was never a future G-wagon, why would they ever change the styling? in 2040 the G-wagen will look the same as it does today.
  15. smk4565
    GLB looks a lot like that. That concept "invokes genes" of the G-class, that is like when Chevy puts out a Blazer that is inspired by a Camaro, that is all marketing speak that has nothing to do with anything. They never said Ener-G was a preview of the next G-wagen, the G-wagen wasn't going to change styling. GLB is for "tomorrow's off road adventures"
  16. smk4565
    What is it priced well compared to? The Stinger is no nicer than an Optima or Camry. A V6 Camry loaded up is $35k, the Stinger is that with rear drive and an extra 50 hp or so for $15,000 more. The Stinger isn't a luxury car.
  17. smk4565
    The Ener-G concept is the GLB. The Ener-g concept was not a G-Wagon concept. I thought it would have had more G-Wagen in it as well. This is the Ener-G concept comps to life. I do think this looks rather good, it might be their best looking SUV other than the G-wagen which is kind of love itnor hate it because of how obnoxious it is.
  18. smk4565
    Here is the Ener-G Force concept car put to production form, so Mercedes does build concept cars. I think this looks amazing inside and out and I don’t like crossovers. The “active lifestyle” millennials that will never go off road will buy these up in waves because they think they’ll go off road and haul kayaks, just like they think they’ll commit to going to the gym 4 times a week as a New Year’s resolution. 3rd row seat even if just for kids is a huge plus in this segment and Mercedes now has three 7 seat SUVs after having only 1 last year. Also important because people don’t buy the seats they need they buy the number of seats they Might need. The production interior probably won’t be that, but I hope they offer that Alcantara and stitching and leather in a designo package. Also the roof lights, gotta offer that too.
  19. smk4565
    The TLX is also a mid-size car, it is near E-class size.
  20. smk4565
    ILX is a CLA competitor. TLX competes with C-class.
  21. smk4565
    Stinger is wildly over priced. The Turbo V6 goes over $50k which is getting into 340i territory and the 340i is much faster, plus it a BMW not a Kia. Even the 4-cylinder Stinger is $33k base so most of those are probably listed for $40k. And the Stinger isn't any nicer inside than an Optima, and that new Sonata looks more luxurious than the Stinger. If Chevy added a 4-door Camaro that was $27k base and $45k for the 460 hp V6, they would add some sales to that 51k, rather than watch it just die off as coupes die.
  22. smk4565
    And how is the TLX selling? Especially since it is made in USA for USA and they don't have much global volume off it, if any. TLX was down 12.6% in 2018 and it is down 21.6% YTD. They sold 30,000 of them in 2018, they'll probably be lucky to get 25,000 sales this year. And that is pretty much their only sedan now.
  23. smk4565
    At GM, shiny chrome = luxury. At Mercedes it doesn't. The GLS has done well, and they have to consider Chinese and European tastes also, as the USA is Mercedes' 3rd biggest market. I think this will hit the mark.
  24. smk4565
    The Veloster has low sales, maybe that is a bad example, but the Camaro isn't an inexpensive sports car anymore, as the original mission was. Or maybe sports cars are just dying and it doesn't matter. They won't because sports car sales are so low. A 4-door Camaro that undercuts the Stinger by $5k (and VW Arteon by $8k) could have appeal. It would be easy to make a 4 door Camaro lift back off that platform, hell most of the work is done with the CT5. And they could price that where the current Impala is when that dies. Then at least Chevy would keep 3 sedans, whatever compact survives, Malibu and Camaro sedan. On a side note I think Ford is in trouble in the future, because Lincoln is weak, their SUVs like Escape, Ecosport, Edge are easily outsold by the Asian competition, and there is more Asian competition coming, they are basically hanging on by the F150. If Tesla or someone else disrupts that full size truck market, Ford doesn't have anyplace else to make money.
  25. smk4565
    If Chevy wants to make the Corvette challenge to McLaren, Ferrari and Lamborghini then they need mid-engine, high rev turbo engine, carbon fiber panels, etc which is all expensive and opposite of what the Corvette has always been. I think they should made this a Cadillac and kept the Corvette as a V6/V8 front engine car in the $50-100k range. As far as the Camaro goes it is too expensive too, sales of that car are bad, they should make it roomier and like the coupe alternative to a Veloster or Golf GTI in terms of price point. But you watch the Camaro move into $35-75k range to fill the void left when the Corvette goes up in price, then the Camaro will well like an ATS and GM will wonder why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search