Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,685

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    Acura's whole line is less than mediocre. I'd say the RDX is actually less competitive in it's class than the MDX is in it's class, at least based on looks, roominess and interior. The RDX does still have a V6 in a world of 4 cylinder competition, but that just makes the RDX thirstier too. The MKX my be fantastic compared to a Acura or XT5, but compare the MKX to a Macan, Alfa Stelvio or a GLC43 or F-Pace. The over weight body and 6-speed on the MKX ecoboost holds 0-60 time at 6.0 seconds for AWD, 6.9 for FWD. A GLC43 does it in 4.5 seconds. Agree, Lincoln has nothing except an ever changing grille and design language and discounts. XT5 should have been built on the Alpha chassis too, likewise with XT4. That's what crazy, the thing Cadillac gets the most positive press for is their chassis work on Alpha and Omega, and it isn't on a crossover, the #1 selling body style and only growth segment in the auto industry right now. Wasted opportunity.
  2. smk4565
    It's a Ford Edge. The sad part is Cadillac losing in performance to anything Lincoln makes. But Lincoln recently has been increasing sales while Cadillac is losing sales.
  3. smk4565
    I agree with the full line idea and who cares what Buick or GMC have, Cadillac should be thought of as the profit machine and get anything they want. They should have the best crossovers, convertibles, sports cars, etc. I would hold off on the wagons though, I don't think they'd sell. And agreed that XT5 is more of a chic car (all the more reason to offer a man's crossover though) and a 390 hp turbo V6 would be plenty of power for that chassis, it beats what Lexus and Acura have and (I never thought I'd say this) it matches the Lincoln MKX ecoboost. Right now the MKX out muscles them, which is sort of sad.
  4. smk4565
    And yet Audi is adding 2 crossover coupes, Land Rover has that Range Rover coupe thing based on the F-pace. They are building what sells. I don't like crossovers in general, I would never buy one, but it is what the market wants, and they charge like $8k more for a GLE coupe than they do a regular GLE and it probably costs $1,000 extra to make it. Easy money.
  5. smk4565
    Who sold more FWD cars in the US last year, Mercedes or Cadillac?
  6. smk4565
    And yet M-B is #1 in US market luxury sales, #1 in European market luxury sales, #2 in China market luxury sales and 3 time defending champion in Formula 1. While posting record profits the past few years. On the Cadillac front, I agree a sub-ATS car is a waste of time, they need crossovers. That is what sells.
  7. smk4565
    The F-pace is a GLC, X3, Macan (soon to be Stelvio) competitor. F-Pace is based on the XE small sedan. And yes an E300 is slower than a V6 Camry, but they offer more powerful engines. M-B offers AMG engines on every model line, Cadillac can't do a V-series on their Utilities because their platforms couldn't handle the power. I can't see how Cadillac fans are happy that the CTS-V engine isn't on an XT5, when the Europeans all have big power.
  8. smk4565
    I see it this way, Group A has decided to build crossovers on FWD mass market platforms, this includes Cadillac, Acura, Lexus and Lincoln (and about half the Infiniti and Audi crossovers) Group B thinks performance matters and uses a more purpose built chassis, boosted engines, etc. This includes Alfa Romeo, BMW, Mercedes, Jaguar/Land Rover, Bentley, Porsche, Maserati. Would you want to be in group A or Group B?
  9. smk4565
    But Cadillac comes up with a product like Escalade, that defines their brand and is their most profitable product, and you don't really see a smaller version of it to capitalize on what Cadillac is. Not that I want them to make 6 versions of Escalade like there are 5 or 6 "Range Rovers" now, but I don't see a lot of Escalade influence in other Cadilacs, other than vertical lights, which every Cadillac has, and had since like 2003. Jeep does this well, Compass is a mini Grand Cherokee, Renegade is heavily influenced by Wrangler, because those are the iconic designs, and they get those designs to people at a lower price point. Cadillac is supposed to be performance luxury, but the performance is limited to 2 models, when they have 6 models. 6 model lines isn't enough as it is, 2 performance lines surely isn't enough. People want horsepower and performance, and people now want crossovers a lot more than they want sedans, yet Cadillac hasn't combined the 2 yet, when Porsche, Maserati, Alfa Romeo, BMW, Audi, Mercedes, Bentley, Jaguar, Land Rover all have, and probably soon Aston Martin and Lamborghini will join them. Huge missed opportunity by not having performance in the crossover space, just like the V-series sedans (and rwd sedans in general) arrived 15 years too late after the M3 and M5 already set the segment. In 10 years time we will look back on Cadillacs crossovers of the 2010-2020 era as lackluster product that let them fall behind, just as we now look back at the 90s FWD Seville and Deville that failed to get it done and let the Germans take over. 20 years later Cadillac makes the exact same mistake, but with a different body style.
  10. smk4565
    Alfa has a worse reputation than Cadillac, but a better product than Cadillac. So that gives them a chance. Something that can work in Alfa Romeo's favor is the majority of people under 30-35 don't really even know what Alfa Romeo is or much about their history. They haven't been here in 20 years, if you are 30 now, you were 10 the last time they sold a new car here. To younger buyers they don't have baggage like Cadillac or Lincoln might have. The other question though is can 30 year olds afford Alfa Romeo pricing? If Alfa has to rely on older buyers that remember what they were in the 80s, they have a big hill to climb. If VW were to buy Alfa they would want that Georgio platform. Every magazine ranks the Guilia over the M3 and C63, and you don't even see the A4 anywhere near those comparisons because it isn't competitive.
  11. smk4565
    But the XT5 is priced like an X3. If the XT5 was priced like the CT6 was $55-90k, it would have no sales. XT4 will probably cannibalize a lot of XT5 sales. Lexus RX crushes all these luxury crossovers in sales, but it is cheap, so that's why.
  12. smk4565
    Now Sergio says he has no interest in merger, haha. That guys is nuts.
  13. smk4565
    The Gergio platform would have value to them, they could use it to make a mid size Dodge Charger and perhaps a Dodge crossover, bring the Pacifica to Dodge and it pumps some life into that brand and gets them US market sales that VW brand doesn't get. VW loves luxury brands, maybe they can see Alfa and Audi co-existing, I don't think they have any use for Maserati, Porsche, Bentley Lambo etc are better than them.
  14. smk4565
    Should, but won't. That is why a CT6 is priced like a 5-series and the XT5 starts $15k lower than an X5. Cadillac doesn't want to go up there and get in a head to head battle with the Germans.
  15. smk4565
    I don't see how you let a test car out with something broken on it. You want the press cars in tip top shape. This is the battle they will have to fight, even if it drives great, people will wonder if it will break all the time and would they just be safer buying a German car. You can't afford to have customers feel like they are gambling when buying your product.
  16. smk4565
    Listening to, and actually considering a merger are 2 different things. Of course it is worth listening, but they may have zero interest in FCA. I think Jeep gives VW interest, they'd probably want that brand and some more of the US market.
  17. smk4565
    Lexus has confirmed they are putting the UX into production, that will sit below the $35,000 NX. So you know Cadillac will want a product below XT4, to get in that growing segment. Infiniti I think has a crossover coming below the one they have based on the GLA, Mercedes is making a GLB, they are all fighting over this low $30s crossover segment because they can get growth there. Fighting over mid-size sedans is a lost cause anymore.
  18. smk4565
    The MR2 isn't feasible because how are they going to make a mid-engine chassis used on one low volume model and sell it for an affordable price? Won't happen. I think Toyota is foolish for not having a Celica, which is a front drive car, it could be a mechanical twin to the Corolla in base trim, and offer a turbo engine for the Celica GT-S and you put a good stereo and flashy wheels on it, and you have a car the young people will gobble up. The Supra might be good, it has BMW underpinnings, it might be as good as a base Corvette, but cheaper.
  19. smk4565
    75 % of sales being truck and utility is a telling number, and that could grow too. If only 20% of their sales are passenger car by 2020, then a lot of passenger car lines are going to get dumped. Sonic, Impala, Regal, ATS would be easy cuts. Or merge Spark and Sonic into one vehicle some how. Even Lacrosse is in a rapidly shrinking segment, the next Gen Lacrosse maybe goes down in size to become their version of the Malibu if Buick is to have only 1 car, it probably has to be more middle sized.
  20. smk4565
    I do hate numbered schemes that box you in like A3-4-5-6-7-8, or XT4-5-6-7, etc. Because then if the market changes or you want to introduce a new product your naming scheme doesn't allow it. I wonder why they went with XT4, unless they want to make it not like BMW X3. But I think more likely they see the need for XT2 and XT3 later on, so they want more slots below it to use. Not as fast as a 505 hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio though.
  21. smk4565
    To be a true MR2 it would have to be mid engined and I don't see Toyota doing that. And as mentioned sales of 2 seat cars are drying up fast. And I don't see how you build it at a low price point given the cost of developing a mid engine hybrid and I don't think anyone would buy it. With Scion dead it would be easy as can be to take the Corolla and make a 2 door version with different front and rear fascias and call it the Celica. That gets the fwd Celica back on sale with virtually no development cost.
  22. smk4565
    Lots of things will go hybrid, and more and more as costs drop. Combined with increasing regulations on fuel economy and emissions. Really you could have a 2.0 liter turbo 4 hybrid making as much horsepower and torque as a Hemi V8. Hybrids are the performance cars of the future too, just look at the McLaren P1 and Porsche 918, that philosophy will trickle down, it will just take time.
  23. smk4565
    We don't know what Alfa Romeo reliability will be like. Ow since it just went on sale. The problem is neither do the potential buyers. People buying sport sedans and soon Alfa will be in sport crossover, trust the Germans, they know what they are getting. If you buy a Jaguar or Alfa Romeo it is a gamble, you aren't sure what you are getting.
  24. smk4565
    Alfa has the Stelvio too, that may sell. And the number of 500 hp small crossovers can be counted on one hand, and that is even after the F-Pace V8 and GLC63 go on sale.
  25. smk4565
    Because the because the CT6 interior is worse than the C-class or most Audis, unless you only judge by rear seat legroom. So unless the ATS gets a CT6 beating interior, they aren't being a game changer. The Alfa Quadrafiglio is like 20 seconds faster around the Nurburgring ring than a CTS-V. I don't see them making an ATS-v faster than a CTS-V so again no game changer. Mercedes is for some unknown reason building a C63 R that will drop weight and have 577ish hp, Cadillac isn't that ballsy because there is next to no market for cars like that. I don't think Mercedes should even bother with it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search