smk4565

The SLk/SLC is getting cancelled at the end of its life cycle. G6 coupe, Monte Carlo, Sebring/200, Solara, Altima coupe all dead. I forgot the Nissan 370 is 2 seater only. They have sold 3,265 YTD down 23.9%. Mazda is on pace to sell about 10,000 Miata's this year. But compare that to a Camaro or Mustang. If Honda is going to introduce a sports car, they are better off offering a back seat.

The 911 has a back seat. The Miata is the only 2 seater left under $40k, there is probably a reason for that. And look at Miata sales vs Mustang, Camaro, Challenger, 370Z, BRZ/GT86, etc. Coupes are dying as it is, 2 seaters even more so.

The article is speculating 0-60 times on a car that hasn't been tested yet. The E43 does it in 4.2 without the e-turbo and 35 less hp. The S450 is 5.1 seconds 4.9 or 5.0 makes sense for a CLS carrying less weight. I think the interesting bit is the 300 hp, 295 lb-ft inline 4, that would be a big boost to the C300, GLC300, E300.

The AMG version will be fast, even though it is only a 43 level. The GLC43 does 0-60 in 4.3 seconds as an SUV, the E43 does it in 4.2 and this car will have more power than those two. There is supposedly to be no V8 on the next CLS. Yep, half the sedans on the market took that CLS shape.

A new S2000 coupe and convertible could work but sadly I think it would need a back seat to compete with BRZ, Camaro, Mustang, etc. 2 seater only is really low volume.

I saw a Fiesta Titanium today which I didn't even know was a thing.

I am most interested in seeing what they do with the new inline six engine because it will bring along an update to the inline 4 also and 48 volt mild hybrid systems too. This is short term future to get power and mpg before the electrics take over. I don't think they even need the CLS with the E-class coupe now having a spacious back seat. I think the E-class sedan and coupe cover the market but it is nice that they provide the customers choice.

Which in 2005 was 425 hp and 14/20 mpg. To 14/23 mpg in 2014, and the SRT is out of production since 2014. 45 hp gain in 9 years with 3 mpg gain. The current Chrysler 300 V8 makes 363 hp.

But they went from 350 hp to 363 hp in the Chrysler 300. An 06 S500 4matic got 14/20 mpg out of its 302 hp V8, the 2018 S560 4Matic gets 17/27 mpg with 463 hp. Adding 160 hp and 7 mpg highway is pretty good. The S63 went from ab6.3 V8 with 518 hp, 11/17 mpg in 2008, to 5.5 liter V8 with 577 hp 15/23 mpg in 2013, to 4.0 liter V8 603 hp 17/26 mpg in 2018. 9 mpg highway improvement with adding 85 hp and 160 lb-ft of torque. So the point is you can raise power and fuel economy at the same time with engine downsizing, turbos, DI, etc. Use the technology, Chrysler doesn't do that.

But no gas mileage increase, and CAFE in 2005 was around 27 mpg, in 2025 it is 54 mpg. In 12 years they went no where, now they have to double the fuel economy in 8 years. 375 is definitely a lot of horsepower, but a six cylinder can make that. The Pentastar should replace the 5.7 Hemi with equal power but a 5 mpg advantage.

They still sell the 5.7 liter as the option in the 300C, which is why I compared an S500 then to an S560 today, same model. The Mercedes 6.3 is 10 years old and has been out of production for years, no point to compare it to a engine introduced in 2017. Mercedes can win any HP/liter argument too because they have a 700 hp 1.6 liter V6, but never mind that, not the point. The Demon and Hellcat make a ton of power, no doubt. Terrible fuel economy but nonetheless huge power. Problem is Chrysler's mainstream engines are bad. And they haven't seen increases in fuel economy and power as others have.

With displacement increases. Chrysler should have a 3 liter V6 making more power than the 2005 5.7 liter Hemi V8. Alfa does, so it is doable. The Pentastar should be turbo to 370 hp as the upgrade from the myster horsepower turbo 4. CAFE also goes up like 10% per year in the 2020-2025 time frame. They are paying fines now, they need massive gains. And all this stuff should be electrified in some way post 2020. AMG has 603 hp, 627 lb-ft from a 4.0 liter V8, 485 hp out of a 6.4 liter is a joke, even the 2007 Mercedes 6.3 had 510 hp. And they replaced that engine twice already.

Not a fan of this, I don't think it will gain any traction. The problem with this model is car utilization. Some pays $2,000 a month for a Porsche they drive 1 hour a day maybe 2. And the car sits in a garage for 22 hours. Once you have autonomous cars they can go to multiple people per day, offering rides to multiple users, and being used say 12 hours per day, then that $2,000 cost drops to $350 a month. And when happens people stop buying a cars.

The turbo 4 replaced the V6 in almost every sedan, from Sonata to Malibu to CTS to E-class. And the turbo V6 replaced the V8 in the F150, replaced it on the Audi RS4, E43, etc. The Wrangler has 285 hp and gets 17/21 mpg, a Turbo 4 can get near that power and beat that MPG. A turbo V6 can be the upgrade. GM has the same problem with their 3.6 V6 in a lot of vehicles, mainly Cadillacs. It doesn't offer much difference in acceleration or fuel economy of the 2.0T and it is way outgunned by German V6s. For fun: 2005 Chrysler 300C 340 hp, 390 lb-ft 17/25mpg (5-speed) 2017 Chrysler 300C Hemi 363 hp, 396 lb-ft 16/25 mpg (8-speed) That is what 12 yeas of advancement got? By comparison, progress being made in Stuttgart: 2005 Mercedes S500 4Matic 302 hp, 339 lb-ft, 16/22 mpg (5.0 liter V8) 2018 Mercedes S450 4Matic 362 hp, 369 lb-ft, 18/28 mpg (3.0 liter V6) 2018 Mercedes S560 4Matic 463 hp, 516 lb-ft, 17/27 mpg (4.0 liter V8)

The Alfa 2.9 liter V6 makes more horsepower than a 6.4 liter Hemi V8 also. Hemi is even more dated than the Pentastar with barely any power increase since 2005.

Alfa Romeo makes a smaller displacement V6 than the Pentastar with 213 more horsepower. Ford makes a two 3-liter or less V6's with more horsepower and torque than the Pentastar.

Once it comes out it will be the most desired SUV on the planet. Just watch. My guess is they will only make 500 a year, but they could get $400,000 easy for it.

Any car maker that isn't 100% turbo by 2020 is way behind the times. The Pentastar V6 should be turbo only. The one place the turbo 4 makes most sense is over seas where the Pentastar will get hit with displacement tax.

Agreed. Although if it makes 268 hp and 280 lb-ft, what is the point of the Pentastar that is like 290 hp, 260 lb-ft? Now you have 2 powertrains with the same power output.

They can drop the diesel and put the Wrangler's new 4 cylinder in the Ram. That will yield more horsepower and probably better gas mileage. Problem solved.

They will probably charge $450,00 for it, thus that will limit how many there are, and at the same time make a lot of profit. If you take Ferrari's total profit, dived buy number of cars they sell, it works out to like $97,000 per car. Someone skewed since they have some merchandise an licensing deals that bring revenue, but still, crazy profit per car.

Option 1 is build them in Mexico, at least until Trump tears up NAFTA, which I don't really think will ever happen. "all talk, no action" The other option is dumping stuff like XTS, LaCrosse, Impala, which will happen, and convert those plants to build crossovers. They can cut the Sonic too, and either import them from Mexico and South Korea or where ever else they make them, or just cut it from the US market all together. Ford is going is only going to have 3 cars in a few years and the Focus will be built in China, and Fusion in Mexico I think is the plan.

Fuel cell is going no where, waste of money to even bother with it. Developing better batteries is the break through. Toshiba says they will have a battery in 2022 that can get 300 miles of range in 5 minutes of charge. That is the stuff to work towards. Even most gasoline cars don't have 300 miles of range in 5 minutes of pumping gas.

It doesn't matter what kind of radio or streaming music is in it if the production line isn't running. This is the problem Tesla has to solve, they can design the car, they have to produce the car.

Well, really any engine FCA makes is going to be unreliable.