Jump to content
Create New...

trinacriabob

Members
  • Posts

    10,982
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    113

Everything posted by trinacriabob

  1. And so expensive.
  2. Colosseum
  3. Question 1: Then where do the First Reading, the Second Reading and the Gospel Reading, which is the focal point of our Mass, come from? Essentially the same Bible you use. Question 2: Then what are we? Did you read an earlier post of mine? My Catholic university had courses called "Roots of Catholic Christianity" and "Moral Teachings of the New Testament" - the latter out of the very book that should UNITE all Christians rather than splintering them. Incidentally, to address comments such as your last one, a parish in the foothill community of El Dorado Hills very clearly states in its mission statement something about a being community of "Catholic Christians." You can rag on Catholics all you want. I (and the other Catholics on here) have both a thick skin and we are brighter than the average dweeb walking around (Catholics and Jews have the highest educational attainment in the US), but saying we are excluded from the ranks of Christianity is a reactionary, a vestige of some church congregations who don't like us...probably because our "market share" is the highest.
  4. Another reason for the lacking of Bible integration at a young age is because it's tough. It wasn't even that integrated in religious classes in high school. However, at my Catholic univ., I finally got into the Bible. The lower div course was called "Roots of Catholic Christianity" (Look, in the same phrase ) and the upper div course was called "Moral Teachings of the New Testament." It was the latter course that really gave me an appreciation of what being a Christian is all about.
  5. NDL, I think I understand what you are saying. Catholics, Lutherans, Mennonites, Pentecostals and fundamentalists are ALL Christians. It's just that any of the people in these sects may or may not be able to call themselves Christians - that's a function of whether they believe in the message and act like one. Agreed? But even then, those who believe and act accordingly sometimes "fall off the wagon." They just happen to be a Christian who fell off the wagon and is dusting themselves off to get back on board. Turbo, I don't know how the Catholic church asks less of its members than a Lutheran, Baptist or A.O.G. church. That was a head scratcher for me. I will say this - there are parishes within our church that differ drastically. One that I was a member of in Atlanta made my skin crawl. Itc "culture" comes from the top. I thought the priests and the office personnel were uptight snobs and it filtered into the congregation - kind of dysfunctional, really. Then, I've been to some that are truly a community. Like I said in an earlier post, I will NEVER knock another Christian sect...only when they have the balls to think that their group can take "cuts in line" in front of another Christian sect at the end of our journey here on earth.
  6. Turbo, I hope that's a RARE occurrence. I know VERY FEW fire and brimstone Catholics and I like it that way. The more Catholics you know, the more you should run into the "it's up to you -- whatever" mindset regarding religious beliefs. Ignore this person on this issue.
  7. And THAT's the irritant. For some "born agains," Catholics ARE NOT Christians. How do they figure? Well, it's because we haven't "been born again and accepted Jesus as our personal savior" in the exact same manner and timeframe that they have.
  8. Oh, wow, this topic...and I have a bit to say about it. First, I was raised Catholic and still consider myself one. Sixteen years of Catholic school. I like the foundation they have given me. It's a church that has its problems, but then so do the others, so why switch? That's my thought. I don't accept 100% of it, but then I wouldn't accept 100% of other Christian religions either...let alone non-Christian religions. Now, for the "born again" part. First and foremost, I will NOT accept any difference between any New Testament based faith. Period. The only difference is the institution or flavor one chooses to surround themselves with. Through the invitations of people I know, I have gone to other Christian churches. They are not for me. I didn't feel comfortable. The New Testament message is and ought to be the same. Then, why this ardent recruitment of members content in one sect to another? I'm not buying. I find the overused line "Have you been born again and accepted Jesus as your personal savior?" annoying. I was baptized, took First Communion and was confirmed by the time I was a teenager. The way I choose to look at it is that, at the time, I was going through formalities programmed by my parents. Now, I affirm those "vows" by having matured in my Christianity. I think that if a person believes in and tries to live by the New Testament, they have nothing to worry about. (I still worry though, you've seen the bumper sticker "Jesus is coming...and boy is He pissed"). I was at Starbucks one night. I tried to avoid a co-worker (who I like very much) and his wife, but they saw me. They are very Christian. I wanted to avoid them because I had things to do. At any rate, the topic predictably went to religion. She had to talk about her negative and empty experiences in the Catholic church. Within no time, she had invited me to their church...almost pushing. And, of course, the question "Have you been born again and accepted Jesus as your personal savior?" It drives me nuts. I accept my faith through my actions. I can be an ass hole sometimes, but I make a concerted effort NOT to be one. Simply put, I try to do the following: 1) treat others the way I want to be treated, 2) know that every one is equal in the eyes of the Lord ($h!, I could have ended up in an embryo in Kenya instead of one in Los Angeles - how can anyone think they are more worthy than someone else?, 3) try not to be greedy...comfortable is fine, excessive is not...others have needs, too, and 4) remember that I am an inconsequential piece of crap on the face of the earth -- 9/11/2001 really drove that home...your Hamptons estate, Upper East Side apartment, Harvard MBA, money, accoutrements, connections and corner office weren't insurance for what transpired on that day....you can never take yourself too seriously. I plan on remaining a Catholic. I find it to be a user-friendly religion that, beyond a couple of hang-ups in certain areas of doctrine, is actually liberal, tolerant and egalitarian. So, maybe, I plan on remaining a "cafeteria Catholic" - pushes the tray down the food line "I'll take that and that, but not that." Either way, I'm just as much a Christian as the "born again" individual who talks about it ALL the time. I never talk about it...this has been the first time since Starbucks, about 5 months ago. I just try to let my actions speak for how Christian I am. Mustang, you're tough. I know you will stick to your convictions.
  9. my father's Oldsmobile
  10. Tacoma
  11. bordello
  12. In Bremerton WA.
  13. prostitute
  14. This is heavy but, at any rate, Vipes, glad to see you're back.
  15. Mud on the tires
  16. You've often heard that saying - they happen in 3s. Sad, though.
  17. Does Argentina count....it's close....and it has a lot of the same letters. :AH-HA_wink:
  18. I won't comment on the movies item, but this is an interesting term and I doubt I'm boxed in, having lived in:Southern California Northern California New Jersey surburbs of NYC Portland OR Seattle WA Atlanta GA Champaign IL PLUS Italy for 4 years Have a great day, buddy!
  19. baseball
  20. Wow. This is getting intense. First of all, I have to see ALL of the movies now, including "Crash" -- sounds like "Bonfire of the Vanities" brought to a much more realistic level, am I wrong? Plus, I'd love to see what parts of LA it was filmed in. As for "Brokeback", which I saw in a matinee in Chico CA of all places, well, it does and it doesn't break new ground. I think that the attachment some people feel is that it, in some ways, shattered the preconceptions. The 2 actors were not "packaged" and in no way did they fit any stereotypes. In fact, they were simple people. The goings-on in the movie, however, are not new: infidelity, lack of communication, keeping up a front, lust, and longing. It's just that they were played out in a context or situation previously not entertained. As for the acting, it was good. It was B+/A-. But then, it's the A that fetches the Oscar. I earlier posted how I would have been disappointed if Clooney won. I said that he plays himself. I have only seen him in two movies and I thought he was mediocre. I made this comment to a co-worker, a New Yorker, and he said that it could have been the roles. I thought about this. Look at Travolta. Growing up, I thought he was a buffoon. Then he matured into better, more dynamic roles. I would now consider him a fairly good actor. Maybe Clooney is getting there. Hollywood comments? EXTREMELY liberal, for the most part. In fact, it's almost too liberal for most of the people I know in LA - especially those who are in no way connected to "the industry." Ocn, stop going to Maryland/Delaware shore and try vacationing in California some time. You will see that there are no limits to anything in the Golden State and as my friend from Philly said, "California is very free-wheeling." She is in the tech industry in Princeton NJ but is originally from a Philly suburb. I didn't see the Oscars. I was working on a presentation I had to do today. I also wanted to comment on what Moltar said -- a very good comment. He said that the films of the past year are more geared to the thinking man and woman. That means that they do not cater to the popcorn matinee crowd. There are some years in which there are bumper crops of intellectual films. There is nothing wrong with that. While I can watch a 007 flick or an "Office Space" several times, nothing is better than a film that taxes the mind.
  21. I like virtually all the French names for cars and Pontiac seems to have that market cornered: Grand Prix Le Mans Bonneville Parisienne (no longer) Grand Ville (no longer) Esprit (some Firebird models)(no longer) And then others have them too: Oldsmobile Intrigue Buick Allure Ooh la la
  22. This always comes up and I take issue with it. Does it really mean that? I was driving out of Messina Sicily about 4 years ago with my cousin and, lo and behold, there is a placard that you were entering the community of Camaro. It could be what you say but it's also a town in Sicily or a division of Messina. I'll take a picture next time I'm there. Now, "camaron" in Spanish means shrimp, like the seafood you eat.
  23. You said everything you needed to say. You, "The Ocn" (as in "The Donald") and a few others on the board have been very emotionally invested in the film and thus champion it. But that isn't the case with all moviegoers who saw it...and the other films. While a good flick, I didn't see all of the movies to comment on who should have won. Last year, one of the few contending movies I saw was "Sideways." I loved it...probably because of the setting but also because, in a So Cal context, every one of the characters exists... as shown. Again, I didn't see most of the others. I don't think it walked away with much and my feeling was "oh well." Cheer up, guys.
  24. alien
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search